基于双端行波法的电缆线路短路故障定位改进

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201901111

中国电力 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (11): 168-174.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201901111

基于双端行波法的电缆线路短路故障定位改进

柴鹏¹, 周灏², 张煜¹, 赵文杰¹, 杨潇¹, 周苗¹, 李明贞³

1. 国网湖北省电力有限公司黄石供电分公司，湖北黄石 435000;
2. 武汉易摩特科技有限公司，湖北武汉 430000;
3. 武汉大学电气与自动化学院，湖北武汉 430072

收稿日期:2019-01-30 修回日期:2019-05-07 出版日期:2020-11-05 发布日期:2020-11-05
作者简介:柴鹏(1987—)，男，工学硕士，从事配电网设计，规划，检修等方面工作，E-mail：691094531@qq.com;李明贞(1991—)，男，通信作者，博士研究生，从事电力电缆状态评估、运维管理等方面技术研究，E-mail：li-mingzhen@qq.com

Short-Circuit Fault Location for Power Cables Based on Improved Two-Terminal Traveling Wave Method

CHAI Peng¹, ZHOU Hao², ZHANG Yu¹, ZHAO Wenjie¹, YANG Xiao¹, ZHOU Miao¹, LI Mingzhen³

1. Huangshi Power Supply Company, State Grid Hubei Electric Power Co. Ltd., Huangshi 435000, China;
2. Wuhan Intelligent Monitoring Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430000, China;
3. School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

Received:2019-01-30 Revised:2019-05-07 Online:2020-11-05 Published:2020-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为实现电力电缆线路上的短路故障精确定位，对双端行波法故障定位原理进行了改进。使用仅需要本地时钟同步的方式替代传统的远距离双端同步方式，从原理层面解决了双端行波法的同步问题，改进后的故障定位方法只与故障行波到达电缆线路两端监测点的时间差有关。并且用归一化的故障点判据代替具体的数值判据，从而降低了对线路电气参数精准性的依赖。因此，改进后的方法有更高的故障定位精度。用PSCAD软件对双端结构的电缆线路进行了仿真，结果表明改进后的方法具有更高的定位精度，且在任意故障点位置条件下的故障定位精度优于传统的双端行波法。

关键词: 电力电缆, 短路故障, 故障定位, 双端行波法, 同步

Abstract: In order to accurately locate the short-circuit fault on the power cable line, the principle of fault location of the two-terminal traveling wave method has been improved. The traditional long-distance two-terminal synchronization method is replaced by the local clock synchronization method. Thus, the synchronization problem of the two-terminal traveling wave method has been solved from the principle level. The improved fault location method is only related to the time difference between the fault traveling wave arriving at the monitoring points at both ends of the power cable. And the normalized fault point criterion is used instead of the specific numerical criterion to reduce the dependence on the accuracy of the line electrical parameters. Therefore, the improved method has higher fault location accuracy. The double-ended structure of the power cable is simulated by PSCAD. The results show that the improved method has higher location accuracy, and the fault location accuracy is better than the traditional two-terminal traveling wave method under any fault positions.

Key words: power cables, short-circuit fault, fault location, two-terminal traveling wave method, synchronization

柴鹏, 周灏, 张煜, 赵文杰, 杨潇, 周苗, 李明贞. 基于双端行波法的电缆线路短路故障定位改进[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(11): 168-174.

CHAI Peng, ZHOU Hao, ZHANG Yu, ZHAO Wenjie, YANG Xiao, ZHOU Miao, LI Mingzhen. Short-Circuit Fault Location for Power Cables Based on Improved Two-Terminal Traveling Wave Method[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(11): 168-174.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201901111

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2020/V53/I11/168

参考文献

[1] LI M Z, ZHOU C K, ZHOU W J, et al. A Novel fault location method for a cross-bonded hv cable system based on sheath current monitoring[J]. Sensors, 2018, 18(10): 3356.
[2] 季涛, 孙同景, 徐丙垠, 等. 配电混合线路双端行波故障测距技术[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2006, 26(12): 89-94
JI Tao, SUN Tongjing, XU Bingyin, et al. Study on fault location of distribution mixed feeders based on double terminal method of traveling waves[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2006, 26(12): 89-94
[3] ZHENG X X, SHANG Y D, PENG X M. Orbital stability of periodic traveling wave solutions to the generalized zakharov equations[J]. Acta Mathematica Scientia (English Series), 2017(4): 998-1018.
[4] GILANY M, IBRAHIM D K, TAG ECDIAC E S. Traveling-wave-based fault-location scheme for multiend-aged underground cable system[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2007, 22(1): 82-89.
[5] LOPES F V, SILVA K M, COSTA F B, et al. Real-time traveling-wave-based fault location using two-terminal unsynchronized data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2015, 30(3): 1067-1076.
[6] 李明贞, 刘建明, 王航, 等. 通信系统时延抖动对基于行波法的电力线路故障定位影响分析[J]. 电信科学, 2018, 34(3): 170-176
LI Mingzhen, LIU Jianming, WANG Hang, et al. Analysis of time delay jitter of communication system on fault location of power line based on traveling wave method[J]. Telecommunications Science, 2018, 34(3): 170-176
[7] LEE H, MOUSA A M. GPS travelling wave fault locator systems: investigation into the anomalous measurements related to lightning strikes[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 1996, 11(3): 1214-1223.
[8] LOPES F V. Settings-Free traveling wave-based earth fault location using unsynchronized two-terminal data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2016, 31(5): 2296-2298.
[9] SCHWEITZER E O, GUZMAN A, MYNAM M V et al. Protective relays with traveling wave technology revolutionize fault locating[J]. IEEE Power & Energy Magazine, 2016, 14(2): 114-120.
[10] 张媛媛, 朱永利, 张宁, 等. 基于相位比较的多端输电线路故障定位研究[J]. 高压电器, 2018, 54(1): 57-63
ZHANG Yuanyuan, ZHU Yongli, ZHANG Ning, et al. Research of fault location for multi-terminal transmission lines based on phase comparison[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 2018, 54(1): 57-63
[11] WANG Y H, WANG H, ZHANG H S, et al. Exact interaction solutions of an extended (2+1)-dimensional shallow water wave equation[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2017, 68(8): 165-169.
[12] 李振兴, 吴李群, 谭洪, 等. 基于简单通信的双端行波测距新方法[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(3): 74-79
LI Zhenxing, WU Liqun, TAN Hong, et al. A novel method for double terminal traveling wave fault location based on simple communication[J]. Electric power, 2018, 51(3): 74-79
[13] 索南加乐, 王增超, 钟应, 等. 基于参数识别的长输电线路接地距离保护算法[J]. 高电压技术, 2013, 39(11): 2814-2821
SUONAN Jiale, WANG Zengchao, ZHONG Ying, et al. Grounding distance protection algorithm for long transmission line based on parameter identification[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2013, 39(11): 2814-2821
[14] 张磐, 张愉, 丁一, 等. 基于微扰法的低压有源配电网故障定位方法[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(12): 63-71
ZHANG Pan, ZHANG Yu, DING Yi, et al. Fault location for low voltage active distribution network based on perturbation method[J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(12): 63-71
[15] 琚永安, 刘聪, 单汝涛, 等. 消弧线圈接地系统单相断线故障的辨识与定位[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(8): 113-117
JU Yong’an, LIU Cong, SHAN Rutao, et al. Identification and location of single-phase line-broken fault of arc-suppression coil grounding system[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(8): 113-117
[16] 周军珲, 杨毅, 孙辉军, 等. 无需波速和线路长度整定的故障行波定位方法[J]. 电测与仪表, 2015, 52(19): 117-122
ZHOU Junhui, YANG Yi, SUN Huijun, et al. A method of traveling wave fault location without setting wave velocity and line length[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2015, 52(19): 117-122
[17] RAZZAGHI R, LUGRIN G, MANESH H, et al. An efficient method based on the electromagnetic time reversal to locate faults in power networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2013, 28(3): 1663-1673.
[18] 方子希, 高会生. 抗时延抖动的线路纵差保护分组传输通道配置参数影响分析[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2017, 45(12): 82-87
FANG Zixi, GAO Huisheng. An impact analysis of the configuration parameters against delay jitter of line comparison pilot protection in packet transport channel[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2017, 45(12): 82-87
[19] DAHMOUNI H, GIRARD A, SANSÒ B. An analytical model for jitter in IP networks[J]. Journal of Annals of Telecommunications, 2012, 67(1-2): 81-90.
[20] 吴骏, 王震, 袁海星, 等. 基于物联网技术的配电网故障定位研究[J]. 高压电器, 2015, 51(12): 72-78
WU Jun, WANG Zhen, YUAN Haixing, et al. Study on the Fault location of the distribution system based on internet of things[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 2015, 51(12): 72-78
[21] 邓丰, 曾祥君, 马士聪, 等. 基于分布式行波检测的广域网络故障定位方法[J]. 电网技术, 2017, 41(4): 1300-1307
DENG Feng, ZENG Xiangjun, MA Shicong, et al. Research on wide area traveling wave fault location method based on distributed traveling wave detection[J]. Power System Technology, 2017, 41(4): 1300-1307

基于双端行波法的电缆线路短路故障定位改进

Short-Circuit Fault Location for Power Cables Based on Improved Two-Terminal Traveling Wave Method

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	赵欣洋, 邹洪森, 杨晨, 李玉琦, 李博通, 刘思源. 基于模量反向行波的接地极线路故障类型识别与定位方法[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(2): 33-42.
[2]	陈仕龙, 吴涛, 郭成, 毕贵红, 钱永亮. 基于相关性分析的电网非同步监测数据场景谐波责任划分[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(1): 15-25.
[3]	戴朝波, 赵国亮, 杨志昌, 崔镜心. 基于二阶广义积分器单相锁频环的改进和比较[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(1): 61-69.
[4]	王泽嘉, 韩民晓, 范溢文. 基于SVG附加电流反馈阻抗重塑的双馈风电场次/超同步振荡抑制策略[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(8): 55-66.
[5]	王雪, 刘林, 刘文迪, 翟延鹏, 杨苓, 许方园, 高岩, 张纪欣. 基于纵横交叉算法的新型电力系统惯量延迟优化控制策略[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(7): 12-20.
[6]	柳丹, 江克证, 康逸群, 冀肖彤, 徐韫钰, 刘芳. 弱电网下新能源逆变器自同步电压源低电压穿越控制方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(7): 21-29.
[7]	赵牧驰, 汪海蛟, 刘纯, 何国庆, 孙艳霞, 王盼盼. 汽轮机发电机组宽频带阻抗建模及次/超同步振荡分析[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(7): 238-246.
[8]	曹宇, 胡鹏飞, 蔡婉琪, 王曦, 江道灼, 梁一桥. 基于MMC的超级电容与蓄电池混合储能系统及其混合同步控制策略[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(6): 78-89.
[9]	黄莉, 梁云, 黄辉, 孙晓艳, 王珊, 杨玉强. 基于代理模型的电力电缆温度场快速计算方法及其应用[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(5): 178-187.
[10]	朱子民, 张锦芳, 常清, 周专, 张晓林. 大规模新能源接入弱同步支撑柔直系统的送端自适应VSG控制策略[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(5): 211-221.
[11]	周于清, 李大虎, 姚伟, 宗启航, 周泓宇, 文劲宇. 受端近区光伏电站对LCC-HVDC系统稳定性影响分析[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(3): 170-182.
[12]	田宝江, 李岩, 廖晓玉, 杜兴伟, 段文岩. 基于小波变换检测信号奇异性的多厂站信息同步方案[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(12): 188-197.
[13]	夏向阳, 蒋戴宇, 曾小勇, 龚芬, 吴小忠, 华夏, 罗彦鹏, 石超. 基于虚拟振荡器控制的储能变流器控制策略研究[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(11): 70-77.
[14]	张江丰, 柯松, 陈文进, 王天宇, 郑可轲, 杨军. 光伏电站自备用可调的虚拟同步控制调频策略[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(11): 108-118.
[15]	吴赞红. 面向强干扰电力物联网的低功耗数据回传方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(11): 191-198.

模态框（Modal）标题

基于双端行波法的电缆线路短路故障定位改进

Short-Circuit Fault Location for Power Cables Based on Improved Two-Terminal Traveling Wave Method

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics