碳交易试点政策与电力行业碳减排

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202110046

中国电力 ›› 2021, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (12): 156-161.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202110046

碳交易试点政策与电力行业碳减排

陈景东, 赵沛

国家能源集团资本控股有限公司, 北京 100034

收稿日期:2021-10-18 修回日期:2021-11-10 出版日期:2021-12-05 发布日期:2021-12-16
作者简介:陈景东(1964-),男,硕士,高级工程师,从事电力经济研究,E-mail:jingdong.chen.c@chnenergy.com.cn;赵沛(1989-),男,博士,通信作者,从事电力经济、金融风险研究,E-mail:zhaopeinku@163.com
基金资助:
天津市金融学会2021年度重点研究项目（中国与欧盟碳排放权交易市场溢出关系及定价权归属研究，TJX202108）

Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot Policy and Power Industry Emissions Reductions

CHEN Jingdong, ZHAO Pei

China Energy Capital Holdings Co., Ltd., Beijing 100034, China

Received:2021-10-18 Revised:2021-11-10 Online:2021-12-05 Published:2021-12-16
Supported by:
This work is supported by Key Research Items of Tianjin Society for Finance and Banking (The Spillover Effect between China-EU Carbon Emission Market and Pricing Power Attribution, No.TJX202108)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 低碳战略下，碳交易制度对于电力行业的碳排放量具有重要影响。以碳交易地方试点政策作为准自然实验，利用中国2006—2018年30个省际面板数据，采用双重差分模型检验了碳交易政策的实际影响效果。发现：（1）相对非试点地区，试点地区电力行业碳排放量具有更为迅速的下降趋势；（2）试点地区碳交易总量越高，交易额越大，则该地区电力行业碳排放量越低。结论表明：中国的碳交易试点制度对于地区电力行业碳排放具有控制作用。

关键词: 碳交易试点政策, 碳排放, 双重差分, 碳金融

Abstract: In the context of the low carbon strategy, carbon trading system plays an important role in reducing carbon emissions of the power industry. Using a sample of 30 provinces in China and local carbon trading pilot policies as a quasi-natural experiment, this paper examines the real effect of carbon emissions trading policies by difference in differences (DID) estimations. The study finds that, first, carbon emissions of power industry in pilot provinces decline more rapidly than that in non-pilot provinces. Second, the carbon emissions of the power industry in a province are negatively related to the total volume and amount of local carbon trading. These findings imply that China's carbon trading pilot system has a positive effect on carbon emissions reduction of local power industry.

Key words: carbon emissions trading pilot policy, carbon emissions, difference in difference, carbon finance

陈景东, 赵沛. 碳交易试点政策与电力行业碳减排[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(12): 156-161.

CHEN Jingdong, ZHAO Pei. Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot Policy and Power Industry Emissions Reductions[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(12): 156-161.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202110046

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2021/V54/I12/156

参考文献

[1] COASE R H. The problem of social cost[M]//Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1960: 87–137.
[2] 陈向国. “电”“碳”市场耦合共推电力行业低碳发展[J]. 节能与环保, 2019(5): 16–17
[3] BURNIAUX J M. Green : a multi-sector, multi-region dynamic general equilibrium model for quantifying the costs of curbing CO 2 emissions : a technical manual[J]. 1992.
[4] BÖHRINGER C, WELSCH H. Contraction and Convergence of carbon emissions: an intertemporal multi-region CGE analysis[J]. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2004, 26(1): 21–39.
[5] TANG L, WU J Q, YU L A, et al. Carbon emissions trading scheme exploration in China: a multi-agent-based model[J]. Energy Policy, 2015, 81: 152–169.
[6] ZHANG C, YUN P, WAGAN Z A. Study on the wandering weekday effect of the international carbon market based on trend moderation effect[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2019, 28: 319–327.
[7] FAN X H, LV X X, YIN J L, et al. Multifractality and market efficiency of carbon emission trading market: analysis using the multifractal detrended fluctuation technique[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 251: 113333.
[8] DASKALAKIS G, PSYCHOYIOS D, MARKELLOS R N. Modeling CO₂ emission allowance prices and derivatives: evidence from the European trading scheme[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2009, 33(7): 1230–1241.
[9] 周迪, 刘奕淳. 中国碳交易试点政策对城市碳排放绩效的影响及机制[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020, 40(1): 453–464
ZHOU Di, LIU Yichun. Impact of China's carbon emission trading policy on the performance of urban carbon emission and its mechanism[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020, 40(1): 453–464
[10] 任亚运, 傅京燕. 碳交易的减排及绿色发展效应研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(5): 11–20
REN Yayun, FU Jingyan. Research on the effect of carbon emissions trading on emission reduction and green development[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(5): 11–20
[11] 宋德勇, 夏天翔. 中国碳交易试点政策绩效评估[J]. 统计与决策, 2019, 35(11): 157–160
[12] 路正南, 罗雨森. 中国碳交易政策的减排有效性分析: 双重差分法的应用与检验[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(4): 1–7
LU Zhengnan, LUO Yusen. Analysis of China's carbon trading policy in mitigation effectiveness[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020, 34(4): 1–7
[13] 张彩江, 李章雯, 周雨. 碳排放权交易试点政策能否实现区域减排?[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(10): 93–99
ZHANG Caijiang, LI Zhangwen, ZHOU Yu. Can carbon emissions trading pilot policy promote regional emissions reductions?[J]. Soft Science, 2021, 35(10): 93–99
[14] 曾诗鸿, 李璠, 翁智雄, 钟震. 碳市场的减排效应研究——来自中国碳交易试点地区的经验证据[J/OL]. 中国环境科学. https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.20211022.007.
ZENG Shihong, LI Fan1, WENG Zhixiong, ZHONG Zhen. A Study of the Emission Reduction Effects of Carbon Markets: Empirical Evidence from Pilot Carbon Trading Regions in China[J/OL]. China Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.20211022.007.
[15] 王文军, 谢鹏程, 李崇梅, 等. 中国碳排放权交易试点机制的减排有效性评估及影响要素分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018, 28(4): 26–34
WANG Wenjun, XIE Pengcheng, LI Chongmei, et al. The key elements analysis from the mitigation effectiveness assessment of Chinese pilots carbon emission trading system[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018, 28(4): 26–34
[16] 任松彦, 汪鹏, 赵黛青, 等. 基于CGE模型的广东省重点行业碳排放上限及减排路径研究[J]. 生态经济, 2016, 32(7): 69–73
REN Songyan, WANG Peng, ZHAO Daiqing, et al. Research on carbon emissions cap and emission reduction path of key industries in Guangdong Province based on CGE model[J]. Ecological Economy, 2016, 32(7): 69–73
[17] 李广明, 张维洁. 中国碳交易下的工业碳排放与减排机制研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(10): 141–148
LI Guangming, ZHANG Weijie. Research on industrial carbon emissions and emissions reduction mechanism in China's ETS[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(10): 141–148
[18] 胡珺, 黄楠, 沈洪涛. 市场激励型环境规制可以推动企业技术创新吗?—基于中国碳排放权交易机制的自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2020(1): 171–189
HU Jun, HUANG Nan, SHEN Hongtao. Can market-incentive environmental regulation promote corporate innovation? A natural experiment based on China's carbon emissions trading mechanism[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2020(1): 171–189
[19] 原毅军, 谢荣辉. 环境规制的产业结构调整效应研究—基于中国省际面板数据的实证检验[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014(8): 57–69
YUAN Yijun, XIE Ronghui. Research on the effect of environmental regulation to industrial restructuring—empirical test based on provincial panel data of China[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2014(8): 57–69
[20] 王杰, 刘斌. 环境规制与企业全要素生产率: 基于中国工业企业数据的经验分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014(3): 44–56
WANG Jie, LIU Bin. Environmental regulation and enterprises' TFP—an empirical analysis based on China's industrial enterprises data[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2014(3): 44–56
[21] 任胜钢, 郑晶晶, 刘东华, 等. 排污权交易机制是否提高了企业全要素生产率: 来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(5): 5–23
REN Shenggang, ZHENG Jingjing, LIU Donghua, et al. Does emissions trading system improve firm's total factor productivity—evidence from Chinese listed companies[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2019(5): 5–23
[22] 李树, 陈刚. 环境管制与生产率增长: 以APPCL2000的修订为例[J]. 经济研究, 2013, 48(1): 17–31
LI Shu, CHEN Gang. Environmental regulation and the growth of productivity in China—evidence from the revision of air pollution prevention and control law in 2000[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2013, 48(1): 17–31
[23] 陆敏, 苍玉权, 李岩岩. 碳交易机制对上海市工业碳排放强度和竞争力的影响[J]. 技术经济, 2018, 37(7): 114–120
LU Min, CANG Yuquan, LI Yanyan. Impact of carbon emission trading mechanism on industrial carbon emission intensity and competitiveness in Shanghai[J]. Technology Economics, 2018, 37(7): 114–120
[24] 胡玉凤, 丁友强. 碳排放权交易机制能否兼顾企业效益与绿色效率?[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(3): 56–64
HU Yufeng, DING Youqiang. Can carbon emission permit trade mechanism bring both business benefits and green efficiency?[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020, 30(3): 56–64
[25] 文洁, 覃云. 碳排放交易制度对中国电力企业经营效率的影响: 基于双重差分模型的实证研究[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 35(5): 185–195
WEN Jie, QIN Yun. The impact of the carbon trading system on the operating efficiency of China's power companies-empirical research based on the double differential model[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Natural Science), 2021, 35(5): 185–195

碳交易试点政策与电力行业碳减排

Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot Policy and Power Industry Emissions Reductions

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	徐祥海, 商佳宜, 赵天煜, 龚莺飞, 何卫斌, 汤亚宸. 考虑碳排放限制与市场参与的储能利润优化[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(3): 204-212.
[2]	李江, 范袁铮, 刘博. 计及水泥厂直接碳排放碳责任的源-荷低碳优化运行方法[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(1): 141-152.
[3]	王栋, 冯景丽, 李达, 牛静伟, 李军. 基于区块链的园区碳排放可信监测模型[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(7): 182-187.
[4]	刘含笑, 单思珂, 魏书洲, 于立元, 王帅, 刘美玲, 崔盈. 基于生命周期法的煤电碳足迹评估[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(7): 227-237.
[5]	吴静, 刘轩宇, 李响, 齐笑言, 李成俊, 张忠. 考虑网损的电力系统节点边际碳势理论研究与建模[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(6): 215-224.
[6]	王一蓉, 陈浩林, 林立身, 唐进. 考虑电力行业碳排放的全国碳价预测[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(5): 79-87.
[7]	李汶龙, 周云, 罗祾, 陈甜甜, 冯冬涵. 计及现货交易的电能量交易全环节用电碳责任分摊[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(5): 99-112.
[8]	李祥光, 谭青博, 李帆琪, 李旭东, 谭忠富. 电碳耦合对煤电机组现货市场结算电价影响分析模型[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(5): 113-125.
[9]	谭玲玲, 汤伟, 楚冬青, 于子涵, 吉兴全, 张玉敏. 考虑电-氢一体化的微电网低碳-经济协同优化调度[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(5): 137-148.
[10]	李虎军, 张栋, 吕梦璇, 邓方钊, 杨萌, 元博. 考虑碳排放约束的新能源与调峰资源优化配置方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(4): 42-51.
[11]	李骏龙, 尤培培, 张超, 方鲁睿, 张文哲. 基于双重差分模型的分时电价机制对用电成本的影响分析[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(11): 173-182.
[12]	张娜, 赵琳, 商文颖, 吉星, 李佳, 黄玉辉. 基于STIRPAT模型的大连市全流程碳足迹溯源[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(1): 133-139.
[13]	张丽, 刘青雷, 张宏伟. 基于改进二进制粒子群算法的家庭负荷优化调度策略[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(5): 118-128.
[14]	任鑫, 王渡, 金亚飞, 王志刚. 基于能耗、经济性及碳排放的热电联产机组运行优化[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(4): 201-210.
[15]	陈家兴, 王春玲, 刘春明. 基于改进碳排放流理论的电力系统动态低碳调度方法[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(3): 162-172.

模态框（Modal）标题

碳交易试点政策与电力行业碳减排

Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot Policy and Power Industry Emissions Reductions

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics