中国电力 ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (5): 142-149.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202510014
收稿日期:2025-10-10
修回日期:2026-04-17
发布日期:2026-05-15
出版日期:2026-05-28
作者简介:基金资助:
YANG Chaoying(
), LI Huipeng(
), ZHAO Jun(
)
Received:2025-10-10
Revised:2026-04-17
Online:2026-05-15
Published:2026-05-28
Supported by:摘要:
在“双碳”目标下,集中式光伏电站已成为新能源电力系统的重要支撑,但光伏发电功率受季节、天气等因素影响具有强间歇性与波动性。针对实际应用中输入数据动态演变导致模型性能衰减,且传统更新方式易引发灾难性遗忘的问题,提出一种基于深度学习的在线增量功率预测模型。该模型引入深度经验回放++(deep experience replay,DER++)增量学习机制,构建“分块特征提取-在线知识保留”双核心框架,通过补丁令牌策略捕捉多尺度周期性特征,利用自注意力机制挖掘多变量依赖关系,结合经验回放技术缓解灾难性遗忘。基于某光伏电站实测数据表明,所提模型的累计精度衰减率远低于传统模型,展现出更强的适应性与泛化能力,为集中式光伏功率在线动态预测提供了有效解决方案。
杨超颖, 李慧蓬, 赵军. 基于深度学习的集中式光伏电站在线增量功率预测方法[J]. 中国电力, 2026, 59(5): 142-149.
YANG Chaoying, LI Huipeng, ZHAO Jun. Online incremental power forecasting method for centralized photovoltaic power plants based on deep learning[J]. Electric Power, 2026, 59(5): 142-149.
| 超参数 | 取值 |
| 块长度 | 8, 16 |
| 步长 | 8 |
| 注意力头数 | 4 |
| 编码器层数 | 3 |
| 训练轮次 | 30 |
| 批大小 | 16 |
| 早停耐心值 | 3 |
| 学习率 | |
| 输入序列长度 | 120 |
| 经验回放缓冲区大小 | |
| 训练数据子集数 | 3 |
表 1 PTER 模型超参数配置
Table 1 PTER Model Hyperparameter Configuration
| 超参数 | 取值 |
| 块长度 | 8, 16 |
| 步长 | 8 |
| 注意力头数 | 4 |
| 编码器层数 | 3 |
| 训练轮次 | 30 |
| 批大小 | 16 |
| 早停耐心值 | 3 |
| 学习率 | |
| 输入序列长度 | 120 |
| 经验回放缓冲区大小 | |
| 训练数据子集数 | 3 |
| 模型 | 学习率 | 编码器层数 |
| Transformer | 3 | |
| Informer | 2 | |
| Autoformer | 2 | |
| PatchTST | 3 | |
| PTER | 3 |
表 2 各对比模型核心最优超参数配置
Table 2 Core optimal hyperparameter configurations of each comparative model
| 模型 | 学习率 | 编码器层数 |
| Transformer | 3 | |
| Informer | 2 | |
| Autoformer | 2 | |
| PatchTST | 3 | |
| PTER | 3 |
| 模型 | EMA | ERMS | R2 | Cor |
| Transformer | 0.118 | 0.156 | 0.823 | 0.907 |
| Informer | 0.105 | 0.138 | 0.857 | 0.925 |
| Autoformer | 0.098 | 0.129 | 0.872 | 0.934 |
| PatchTST | 0.092 | 0.121 | 0.885 | 0.941 |
| PTER | 0.082 | 0.105 | 0.913 | 0.956 |
表 3 不同模型在测试集上的预测性能对比
Table 3 Comparison of predictive performance of different models on the test set
| 模型 | EMA | ERMS | R2 | Cor |
| Transformer | 0.118 | 0.156 | 0.823 | 0.907 |
| Informer | 0.105 | 0.138 | 0.857 | 0.925 |
| Autoformer | 0.098 | 0.129 | 0.872 | 0.934 |
| PatchTST | 0.092 | 0.121 | 0.885 | 0.941 |
| PTER | 0.082 | 0.105 | 0.913 | 0.956 |
| 模型 | 子集1— 2衰减率 | 子集2— 3衰减率 | 累计衰减率 |
| Transformer全量更新 | 78.3 | 62.5 | 48.9 |
| PatchTST全量更新 | 82.1 | 68.7 | 56.4 |
| PatchTSTER | 85.6 | 75.2 | 64.3 |
| PTERDER++ | 92.4 | 88.6 | 81.9 |
表 4 不同模型在增量更新过程中的精度衰减率
Table 4 Accuracy degradation rate of different models during incremental update process 单位:%
| 模型 | 子集1— 2衰减率 | 子集2— 3衰减率 | 累计衰减率 |
| Transformer全量更新 | 78.3 | 62.5 | 48.9 |
| PatchTST全量更新 | 82.1 | 68.7 | 56.4 |
| PatchTSTER | 85.6 | 75.2 | 64.3 |
| PTERDER++ | 92.4 | 88.6 | 81.9 |
| 1 | 王帅, 贾东梨, 刘科研, 等. 适应高比例光伏接入的有源配电网改进型故障保护策略[J]. 中国电力, 2026, 59 (1): 105- 114. |
| WANG Shuai, JIA Dongli, LIU Keyan, et al. Improved fault protection strategy for active distribution networks adapting to high proportion photovoltaic access[J]. Electric Power, 2026, 59 (1): 105- 114. | |
| 2 |
贾东梨, 任昭颖, 刘科研, 等. 计及多种分布式能源的多端直流配电网故障电流计算方法[J]. 中国电力, 2026, 59 (1): 84- 96.
|
|
JIA Dongli, REN Zhaoying, LIU Keyan, et al. Fault current calculation method for multi-terminal DC distribution networks considering multiple distributed generation[J]. Electric Power, 2026, 59 (1): 84- 96.
|
|
| 3 | 孙怡文, 邢海军, 梅丘梅, 等. 计及风电-光伏出力相关性的新型电力系统可靠性评估[J]. 浙江电力, 2025, 44 (9): 13- 20. |
| SUN Yiwen, XING Haijun, MEI Qiumei, et al. Reliability assessment of modern power systems accounting for the correlation of wind-PV output correlation[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2025, 44 (9): 13- 20. | |
| 4 |
王芊瑞, 阮景昕, 王跃社. 考虑风、光出力时空相关性的电-氢协同储能系统经济性优化调度研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2025, 47 (12): 34- 45.
|
|
WANG Qianrui, RUAN Jingxin, WANG Yueshe. Economic optimal scheduling of electricity-hydrogen coordinated energy storage system considering spatiotemporal correlation of wind and photovoltaic power outputs[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2025, 47 (12): 34- 45.
|
|
| 5 | 郎益涛, 黄美珑, 吴沂林, 等. 光伏配储系统多场景优化调度策略研究[J]. 湖南电力, 2025, 45 (2): 30- 35. |
| LANG Yitao, HUANG Meilong, WU Yilin, et al. Research on multi-scenario optimal scheduling strategy of photovoltaic distribution and storage system[J]. Hunan Electric Power, 2025, 45 (2): 30- 35. | |
| 6 | 李旭涛, 周洋, 常启诚, 等. 考虑电制氢辅助的配电网两阶段电压优化控制方法[J]. 中国电力, 2026, 59 (2): 81- 89. |
| LI Xutao, ZHOU Yang, CHANG Qicheng, et al. Two-stage voltage optimization control method for hydrogen-production-assisted distribution networks[J]. Electric Power, 2026, 59 (2): 81- 89. | |
| 7 |
余笑东, 凌煦, 王源, 等. 基于改进全纯嵌入法的含光伏电站主动调节无功补偿策略[J]. 湖南电力, 2025, 45 (6): 84- 90.
|
|
YU Xiaodong, LING Xu, WANG Yuan, et al. A reactive power compensation strategy with active regulation for photovoltaic power plants based on the improved holomorphic embedding method[J]. Hunan Electric Power, 2025, 45 (6): 84- 90.
|
|
| 8 | 杨胡萍, 龚家宁, 程明, 等. 计及多重不确定性的综合能源系统两阶段鲁棒低碳优化调度[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58 (11): 101- 110, 121. |
| YANG Huping, GONG Jianing, CHENG Ming, et al. Two-stage robust low-carbon optimal scheduling for integrated energy systems considering for multiple uncertainties[J]. Electric Power, 2025, 58 (11): 101- 110, 121. | |
| 9 | 陈水耀, 徐峰, 潘武略, 等. 适应高比例光伏接入的有源配电网自适应电流差动保护[J]. 浙江电力, 2025, 44 (1): 34- 43. |
| CHEN Shuiyao, XU Feng, PAN Wulue, et al. Adaptive current differential protection for active distribution networks accommodating high levels of PV integration[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2025, 44 (1): 34- 43. | |
| 10 | 殷林飞, 张依玲. 基于多重卷积组合大模型的光伏出力预测[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2025, 47 (4): 63- 72. |
| YIN Linfei, ZHANG Yiling. Photovoltaic output prediction based on multi-convolutional combined large model[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2025, 47 (4): 63- 72. | |
| 11 |
吴晓刚, 阎洁, 葛畅, 等. 基于改进GRU-CNN的风光水一体化超短期功率预测方法[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56 (9): 178- 186, 205.
|
|
WU Xiaogang, YAN Jie, GE Chang, et al. Ultra-short-term power forecasting method for wind-solar-hydro integration based on improved GRU-CNN[J]. Electric Power, 2023, 56 (9): 178- 186, 205.
|
|
| 12 | 谭洪, 张雅丽, 关苏敏, 等. 含光伏光热制氢设备的园区综合能源系统低碳经济调度[J]. 浙江电力, 2025, 44 (7): 44- 54. |
| TAN Hong, ZHANG Yali, GUAN Sumin, et al. Low-carbon economic dispatch of a park integrated energy system with PV/T-driven hydrogen production equipment[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2025, 44 (7): 44- 54. | |
| 13 | 周洋, 黄德志, 李培栋, 等. 考虑平衡端点相位不对称及光伏接入的低压配电网三相潮流模型[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57 (10): 190- 198. |
| ZHOU Yang, HUANG Dezhi, LI Peidong, et al. A three-phase power flow model for low-voltage distribution networks considering balanced bus phase asymmetry and photovoltaic access[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57 (10): 190- 198. | |
| 14 |
梁宏涛, 王莹, 刘国柱, 等. 光伏出力预测理论与方法综述[J]. 青岛科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 45 (2): 147- 158.
|
|
LIANG Hongtao, WANG Ying, LIU Guozhu, et al. Review on the theory and methods of photovoltaic output forecasting[J]. Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 45 (2): 147- 158.
|
|
| 15 | 战文华, 车建峰, 王勃, 等. 基于网格化数值天气预报的区域光伏发电多输出功率预测方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57 (3): 144- 151. |
| ZHAN Wenhua, CHE Jianfeng, WANG Bo, et al. A grid-based numerical weather prediction method for multi-output prediction of regional photovoltaic power[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57 (3): 144- 151. | |
| 16 | 张俊蔚. 基于物理模型的光伏电站输出功率预测[J]. 甘肃水利水电技术, 2015, 51 (1): 46- 49. |
| 17 | 岳建通, 吴迪, 钱金跃. 基于ARIMA模型的分布式光伏出力预测方法应用[J]. 农村电工, 2024, 32 (2): 31- 32. |
| 18 |
杨海亭, 白伟, 胡运冲. 分布式光伏发电接入智能电网功率预测模型优化研究[J]. 电工电气, 2024 (4): 1- 9.
|
|
YANG Haiting, BAI Wei, HU Yunchong. Research on the optimization of power prediction model for distributed photovoltaic power generation connected to smart grid[J]. Electrotechnics Electric, 2024 (4): 1- 9.
|
|
| 19 |
付小标, 侯嘉琪, 李宝聚, 等. 一种二模态天气分型方法及其在光伏功率概率预测的应用[J]. 发电技术, 2024, 45 (2): 299- 311.
|
|
FU Xiaobiao, HOU Jiaqi, LI Baoju, et al. A two-modal weather classification method and its application in photovoltaic power probability prediction[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45 (2): 299- 311.
|
|
| 20 | 王旭光, 李云, 王聪, 等. 基于超图像的短期光伏功率预测[J]. 广东电力, 2025, 38 (10): 14- 29. |
| WANG Xuguang, LI Yun, WANG Cong, et al. Short-term photovoltaic power prediction based on hyperimage[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2025, 38 (10): 14- 29. | |
| 21 |
高海淑, 孙开宁, 黄钢, 等. 计及线路电热耦合特性的配电网鲁棒强化学习动态重构方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2026, 50 (1): 39- 50.
|
|
GAO Haishu, SUN Kaining, HUANG Gang, et al. Robust reinforcement learning-based dynamic reconfiguration method for distribution networks considering line electro-thermal coupling characteristics[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2026, 50 (1): 39- 50.
|
|
| 22 | 殷豪, 李奕甸, 谢智锋, 等. 混合图神经网络和门控循环网络的短期光伏功率预测[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45 (3): 523- 532. |
| YIN Hao, LI Yidian, XIE Zhifeng, et al. Short-term photovoltaic power prediction method based on mixed graph neural network and gated recurrent unit network[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2024, 45 (3): 523- 532. | |
| 23 | 王育飞, 郝德扬, 薛花, 等. 计及云图和混沌特性的光伏功率组合预测方法[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44 (12): 74- 81. |
| WANG Yufei, HAO Deyang, XUE Hua, et al. Combined forecasting approach of photovoltaic power based on cloud images and chaotic characteristics[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2023, 44 (12): 74- 81. | |
| 24 |
邓韦斯, 戴仲覆, 王皓怀, 等. 基于WNN的光伏功率超短期预测研究[J]. 机械与电子, 2023, 41 (12): 15- 19.
|
|
DENG Weisi, DAI Zhongfu, WANG Haohuai, et al. Ultra-short-term forecasting research research of photovoltaic power based on WNN[J]. Machinery & Electronics, 2023, 41 (12): 15- 19.
|
|
| 25 |
范国庆, 李康辉, 高捷, 等. 基于核密度估计和CatBoost算法的光伏功率预测方法[J]. 上海电力大学学报, 2023, 39 (6): 529- 535.
|
|
FAN Guoqing, LI Kanghui, GAO Jie, et al. A photovoltaic power prediction method based on kernel density estimation and CatBoost method[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Electric Power, 2023, 39 (6): 529- 535.
|
|
| 26 | 沙伟燕, 胡伟, 何宁辉, 等. 大规模虚拟储能平抑新能源功率预测误差优化调度方法[J]. 电力科学与技术学报, 2023, 38 (6): 167- 174. |
| SHA Weiyan, HU Wei, HE Ninghui, et al. Optimal scheduling method for stabilizing power prediction error of new energy by large-scale virtual energy storage[J]. Journal of Electric Power Science and Technology, 2023, 38 (6): 167- 174. | |
| 27 | 卫志农, 徐昊, 陈胜, 等. 基于深度学习的直流配电网分布鲁棒优化调度方法[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2023, 43 (10): 87- 94. |
| WEI Zhinong, XU Hao, CHEN Sheng, et al. Distributionally robust optimal dispatching method of DC distribution network based on deep learning[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2023, 43 (10): 87- 94. | |
| 28 | 杨锡运, 马文兵, 彭琰, 等. 基于组合神经网络的分布式光伏超短期功率预测方法[J]. 热力发电, 2023, 52 (8): 162- 171. |
| YANG Xiyun, MA Wenbing, PENG Yan, et al. Distributed photovoltaic ultra-short-term power prediction method based on combined neural network[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2023, 52 (8): 162- 171. | |
| 29 |
许伟欣, 杨明, 骆海琦, 等. 基于深度学习模型的光伏发电负荷预测[J]. 电气传动自动化, 2023, 45 (4): 62- 64, 49.
|
|
XU Weixin, YANG Ming, LUO Haiqi, et al. Photovoltaic load forecasting based on deep learning model[J]. Electrical Drive Automation, 2023, 45 (4): 62- 64, 49.
|
|
| 30 |
朱明. 基于数据处理和深度学习的光伏发电预测模型[J]. 河南科学, 2023, 41 (7): 970- 977.
|
|
ZHU Ming. Photovoltaic power generation prediction model based on data processing and deep learning[J]. Henan Science, 2023, 41 (7): 970- 977.
|
|
| 31 | 王海军, 居蓉蓉, 董颖华. 基于时空关联特征与B-LSTM模型的分布式光伏功率区间预测[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57 (7): 74- 80. |
| WANG Haijun, JU Rongrong, DONG Yinghua. Distributed photovoltaic power interval prediction based on spatio-temporal correlation feature and B-LSTM model[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57 (7): 74- 80. | |
| 32 | 戚成飞, 王亚超, 李文文, 等. 基于数据驱动的高渗透率电动汽车充电规划与优化[J]. 中国电力, 2026, 59 (2): 104- 113. |
| QI Chengfei, WANG Yachao, LI Wenwen, et al. Data driven planning and optimization of high penetration electric vehicle charging[J]. Electric Power, 2026, 59 (2): 104- 113. | |
| 33 |
高岩, 吴汉斌, 张纪欣, 等. 基于组合深度学习的光伏功率日前概率预测模型[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57 (4): 100- 110.
|
|
GAO Yan, WU Hanbin, ZHANG Jixin, et al. Day-ahead probabilistic prediction model for photovoltaic power based on combined deep learning[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57 (4): 100- 110.
|
|
| 34 |
贺庆辰, 秦斌. 基于改进SAC算法的城轨列车混合储能系统动态功率分配策略[J]. 湖南电力, 2024, 44 (4): 11- 19.
|
|
HE Qingchen, QIN Bin. Dynamic power allocation strategy for hybrid energy storage system of urban rail trains based on improved SAC algorithm[J]. Hunan Electric Power, 2024, 44 (4): 11- 19.
|
|
| 35 |
王斌, 明廷谦, 李志强, 等. 人工智能技术在配电网运行智能决策支持系统中的应用研究[J]. 电气技术与经济, 2024 (6): 116- 118, 122.
|
| [1] | 赵军, 张世锋, 宋金鸽. 物理数据融合的风电场功率预测[J]. 中国电力, 2026, 59(5): 176-182. |
| [2] | 孙璇, 乔梦妍, 李军, 申立艳, 代海英, 郝楠, 常启诚, 周昊. 基于扩散模型的电网数字化系统背景流量生成[J]. 中国电力, 2026, 59(1): 66-75. |
| [3] | 李科, 潘庭龙, 许德智. 基于MSCNN-BiGRU-Attention的短期电力负荷预测[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(6): 10-18. |
| [4] | 魏伟, 余鹤, 叶利, 汪应春. 基于FCM-SENet-TCN的低压台区光伏超短期功率预测方法[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(6): 172-179. |
| [5] | 姜通海, 王峰, 刘子琪, 单帅杰. 基于改进生成对抗网络的风光气象资源联合场景生成方法[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(3): 183-192. |
| [6] | 孟浩, 徐飞, 符帅, 孙鹏, 郝玲, 刘博宇, 刘芷维. 考虑温控型负荷特性影响的集群用户超短期负荷预测方法[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(12): 63-72, 85. |
| [7] | 武同心, 纪鑫, 杨成月, 陈屹婷, 杨智伟. 基于双层注意力机制的电力文本分类模型[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(11): 156-163. |
| [8] | 战文华, 车建峰, 王勃, 丁禹. 基于网格化数值天气预报的区域光伏发电多输出功率预测方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(3): 144-151. |
| [9] | 杨国华, 祁鑫, 贾睿, 刘一峰, 蒙飞, 马鑫, 邢潇文. 基于CEEMD-SE的CNN&LSTM-GRU短期风电功率预测[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(2): 55-61. |
| [10] | 李翰章, 冯江涛, 王鹏程, 荣澔洁, 柴宇唤. 基于TDE-SO-AWM-GRU的光伏发电功率预测模型[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(12): 41-49. |
| [11] | 杨鹏伟, 赵丽萍, 陈军法, 甄钊, 王飞, 李利明. 基于相似时段匹配与Transformer网络建模的分布式光伏超短期功率预测方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(12): 60-70. |
| [12] | 吴晓刚, 阎洁, 葛畅, 唐雅洁, 倪筹帷, 季青锋. 基于改进GRU-CNN的风光水一体化超短期功率预测方法[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(9): 178-186,205. |
| [13] | 刘东, 张越, 皮俊波, 单连飞, 刘赫, 宋鹏程, 姜涛. 面向电网调控信息智能检索的知识图谱构建及应用[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(7): 78-84. |
| [14] | 张鑫, 叶俊杰, 崔瑶, 黄鑫, 仲林林. 基于语义信息距离解耦的变电运维多类别缺陷图像检测[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(6): 209-218. |
| [15] | 周震震, 宋云海, 何宇浩, 王黎伟, 黄和燕, 何珏, 朱志航, 闫云凤. 基于分组查询注意力的可扩展电力人员行为分类方法[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(11): 77-85. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||


AI小编