Economic Operation Method of Active Distribution Network Based on Blockchain and Endowment Effect

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202305036

Abstract

Abstract:

With the large-scale integration of renewable energy, the number of participants involved in electricity transactions is increasing. The traditional centralized trading model, which is matched by the dispatching center, fails to cope with the surge of transaction data and achieve the optimal economic operation of the active distribution network. Therefore, an economic operation method of an active distribution network based on blockchain and endowment effect is proposed, which uses the decentralized, autonomous, and anonymous characteristics of blockchain to construct an electricity transaction mechanism. On this basis, users participating in demand response are regarded as "behavioral agents", and an endowment effect-based demand response model is constructed, which is more in line with users' psychological needs. The calculation results show that the proposed electricity transaction mechanism based on blockchain technology can effectively improve the efficiency of electricity transactions, and the established endowment effect-based demand response model can effectively improve the economic operation and source-load matching of the active distribution network.

Key words: active distribution network, economic operation, blockchain technology, endowment effect

Li ZHOU, Chuanyu XIONG, Fangchao KE, Zhiwei LI, Hong ZHANG, Ran CHEN, Wanfang LIU, Yazhou YU, Liqin REN. Economic Operation Method of Active Distribution Network Based on Blockchain and Endowment Effect[J]. Electric Power, 2023, 56(12): 58-68.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202305036

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/Y2023/V56/I12/58

Figures/Tables 13

References 25

1	张运洲, 张宁, 代红才, 等. 中国电力系统低碳发展分析模型构建与转型路径比较[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54 (3): 1- 11.
	ZHANG Yunzhou, ZHANG Ning, DAI Hongcai, et al. Model construction and pathways of low-carbon transition of China’s power system[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54 (3): 1- 11.
2	茹秋实, 米雪峰, 宋志刚, 等. 考虑储能-智能软开关的主动配电网混合时间尺度鲁棒优化[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55 (9): 129- 139.
	RU Qiushi, MI Xuefeng, SONG Zhigang, et al. Hybrid-timescale robust optimization in active distribution network with energy storage system-soft open point[J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55 (9): 129- 139.
3	田宇, 黄婧, 谢枭, 等. 主动配电网无功补偿和OLTC鲁棒多目标优化配置[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56 (3): 94- 99.
	TIAN Yu, HUANG Jing, XIE Xiao, et al. Multi-objective optimal allocation of reactive compensation and OLTC in active distribution network[J]. Electric Power, 2023, 56 (3): 94- 99.
4	黄河, 高松, 朱磊, 等. 考虑多能互补的主动配电网规划与高效Benders求解方法[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52 (6): 11- 18.
	HUANG He, GAO Song, ZHU Lei, et al. Active distribution network planning model and benders solution strategy considering multi-energy complementation[J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52 (6): 11- 18.
5	邢海军, 谢宝江, 秦建, 等. 考虑CVR的主动配电网优化运行方法[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54 (11): 76- 81.
	XING Haijun, XIE Baojiang, QIN Jian, et al. Active distribution network optimal operation considering conservation voltage reduction[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54 (11): 76- 81.
6	庞凯元, 王崇宇, 文福拴, 等. 主动配电网灵活孤岛划分与实时调度策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2022, 46 (22): 13- 24.
	PANG Kaiyuan, WANG Chongyu, WEN Fushuan, et al. Flexible islanding participation and real-time scheduling strategy for active distribution network[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2022, 46 (22): 13- 24.
7	叶畅, 苗世洪, 刘昊, 等. 联盟链框架下主动配电网电力交易主体合作演化策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35 (8): 1739- 1753.
	YE Chang, MIAO Shihong, LIU Hao, et al. Cooperative evolutionary game strategy for electricity trading stakeholders in active distribution network under consortium blockchain framework[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35 (8): 1739- 1753.
8	陈涛, 刘洋, 李文峰, 等. 基于区块链技术的微网自适应定价策略及经济调度方法[J]. 电力建设, 2021, 42 (6): 17- 28.
	CHEN Tao, LIU Yang, LI Wenfeng, et al. Adaptive microgrid price-making strategy and economic dispatching method based on blockchain technology[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2021, 42 (6): 17- 28.
9	穆程刚, 丁涛, 曲明, 等. 基于区块链的表后微网系统及其点对点能量块交易模型设计[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41 (20): 6927- 6941.
	MU Chenggang, DING Tao, QU Ming, et al. Blockchain-oriented behind-the-meter microgrid and its peer-to-peer distributed transaction model with energy blocks[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41 (20): 6927- 6941.
10	沈泽宇, 陈思捷, 严正, 等. 基于区块链的分布式能源交易技术[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41 (11): 3841- 3851.
	SHEN Zeyu, CHEN Sijie, YAN Zheng, et al. Distributed energy trading technology based on blockchain[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41 (11): 3841- 3851.
11	张利华, 胡方舟, 黄阳, 等. 基于联盟链的微电网身份认证协议[J]. 应用科学学报, 2020, 38 (1): 173- 183.
	ZHANG Lihua, HU Fangzhou, HUANG Yang, et al. Identity authentication protocol of micro-grid power based on consortium blockchain[J]. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2020, 38 (1): 173- 183.
12	祝垒, 陈中, 颜云松, 等. 基于权威证明的微电网分层交易策略[J]. 电网技术, 2021, 45 (11): 4356- 4365.
	ZHU Lei, CHEN Zhong, YAN Yunsong, et al. Hierarchical transaction strategy of microgrid based on proof of authority[J]. Power System Technology, 2021, 45 (11): 4356- 4365.
13	杨晓东, 张有兵, 卢俊杰, 等. 基于区块链技术的能源局域网储能系统自动需求响应[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2017, 37 (13): 3703- 3716.
	YANG Xiaodong, ZHANG Youbing, LU Junjie, et al. Blockchain-based automated demand response method for energy storage system in an energy local network[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2017, 37 (13): 3703- 3716.
14	尤宏亮, 赵哲源, 刘建戈, 等. 基于区块链的电力需求响应交易机制研究与实现[J]. 电力需求侧管理, 2022, 24 (1): 28- 33.
	YOU Hongliang, ZHAO Zheyuan, LIU Jiange, et al. Research and implementation of blockchain-based electrical power demand response transaction system[J]. Power Demand Side Management, 2022, 24 (1): 28- 33.
15	陈冠廷, 张利, 刘宁宁, 等. 基于区块链的面向居民用户需求响应交易机制[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2020, 40 (8): 9- 17.
	CHEN Guanting, ZHANG Li, LIU Ningning, et al. Blockchain-based transaction mechanism for residential users demand response[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2020, 40 (8): 9- 17.
16	王蓓蓓, 王骐鑫, 李雅超, 等. 区块链环境下考虑信用的需求响应资源交易机制[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45 (5): 30- 38.
	WANG Beibei, WANG Qixin, LI Yachao, et al. Transaction mechanism of demand response resource considering credit in blockchain environment[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45 (5): 30- 38.
17	KAHNEMAN D, KNETSCH J L, THALER R H. Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98 (6): 1325- 1348.
18	LIU J Q, WANG W, LI D, et al. Role of gifts in decision making: an endowment effect incentive mechanism for offloading in the IoV[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2019, 6 (4): 6933- 6951.
19	王雨格, 孟全省, 陈秉谱. 产权强度对公益林区林地流转的影响: 基于禀赋效应与安全感知视角[J]. 资源科学, 2021, 43 (1): 161- 170.
	WANG Yuge, MENG Quanxing, CHEN Bingpu. Impact of forest land tenure security on the circulation of ecological forest land: from the perspective of endowment effect and security perception[J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43 (1): 161- 170.
20	李力行, 苗世洪, 孙丹丹, 等. 多利益主体参与下主动配电网完全信息动态博弈行为[J]. 电工技术学报, 2018, 33 (15): 3499- 3509.
	LI Lixing, MIAO Shihong, SUN Dandan, et al. Dynamic games of complete information in active distribution network with multi-stakeholder participation[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2018, 33 (15): 3499- 3509.
21	龚钢军, 杨晟, 王慧娟, 等. 综合能源服务区块链的网络架构、交互模型与信用评价[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40 (18): 5897- 5911.
	GONG Gangjun, YANG Sheng, WANG Huijuan, et al. Network architecture, interaction model and credit evaluation of integrated energy service blockchain[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020, 40 (18): 5897- 5911.
22	龚诚嘉锐, 林顺富, 边晓燕, 等. 基于多主体主从博弈的负荷聚合商经济优化模型[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50 (2): 30- 40.
	GONG Chengjiarui, LIN Shunfu, BIAN Xiaoyan, et al. Economic optimization model of a load aggregator based on the multi-agent Stackelberg game[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50 (2): 30- 40.
23	张靖琛, 于鹤洋, 周自强, 等. 面向负荷聚合商的智能合约微服务架构设计及实现[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2022, 46 (21): 125- 133.
	ZHANG Jingchen, YU Heyang, ZHOU Ziqiang, et al. Design and implementation of smart contract micro-service architecture for load aggregator[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2022, 46 (21): 125- 133.
24	靳开元, 杨建华, 陈正, 等. 基于区块链的分布式光伏就地消纳交易模式研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54 (5): 8- 16.
	JIN Kaiyun, YANG Jianhua, CHEN Zheng, et al. Blockchain-based transaction model of distributed photovoltaic generation for local power consumption[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54 (5): 8- 16.
25	沈泽宇, 陈思捷, 严正, 等. 基于区块链的多能协同运行(二): 仿真平台与算例[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42 (10): 3527- 3538.
	SHEN Zeyu, CHEN Sijie, YAN Zheng, et al. Multi-energy synergy and co-optimization based on blockchain(part Ⅱ): platform and case[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42 (10): 3527- 3538.

参与主体	信誉值
参与主体	＜200 kW	200~400 kW	400~600 kW	＞600 kW
电力用户	0.75	0.80	0.85	0.90
分布式电源	0.80	0.85	0.90	0.95
储能设备	0.70	0.75	0.80	0.85
外部电网				0.60

参与主体	信誉值
参与主体	＜200 kW	200~400 kW	400~600 kW	＞600 kW
电力用户	0.75	0.80	0.85	0.90
分布式电源	0.80	0.85	0.90	0.95
储能设备	0.70	0.75	0.80	0.85
外部电网				0.60

参与主体	功率/kW	运行维护系数/(kW·元^–1)	数量/个	初始信誉值
电力用户1	200		1	0.75
电力用户2	450		1	0.85
电力用户3	300		2	0.80
光伏机组	300	0.63	1	0.85
风电机组	300	0.85	1	0.85
储能设备1	400	0.38	2	0.75
储能设备2	600	0.38	2	0.80
外部电网				0.60

参与主体	功率/kW	运行维护系数/(kW·元^–1)	数量/个	初始信誉值
电力用户1	200		1	0.75
电力用户2	450		1	0.85
电力用户3	300		2	0.80
光伏机组	300	0.63	1	0.85
风电机组	300	0.85	1	0.85
储能设备1	400	0.38	2	0.75
储能设备2	600	0.38	2	0.80
外部电网				0.60

方案	用户用电成本	分布式电源效益	储能设备效益	系统总体效益
1	15001.2	1726.7	598.6	6796.3
2	14355.7	1920.1	726.8	7509.4
3	13735.5	2012.6	769.3	8337.6