燃煤机组不同灵活性调节方案参与一次调频过程的经济性分析

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201903017

中国电力 ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (8): 164-172.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201903017

燃煤机组不同灵活性调节方案参与一次调频过程的经济性分析

伦涛¹, 鄂志君², 张利³, 王鑫², 赵永亮⁴, 严俊杰⁴

1. 国家电网公司电力调度控制中心, 北京 100031;
2. 国网天津市电力公司电力调度控制中心, 天津 300010;
3. 国网天津市电力公司电力科学研究院, 天津 300384;
4. 西安交通大学动力工程多相流国家重点实验室, 陕西西安 710049

收稿日期:2019-03-18 修回日期:2019-05-13 发布日期:2019-08-14
通讯作者: 严俊杰(1967-),男,通信作者,教授,从事燃煤机组瞬态过程能耗特性与污染物协同控制研究,E-mail:yanjj@mail.xjtu.edu.cn
作者简介:伦涛(1977-),男,硕士,高级工程师,从事特高压互联电网调度运行与控制研究,E-mail:garno@sina.com
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究计划资助项目（2015CB251504）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（51436006）。

Thermo-economic Analysis on Four Regulation Schemes with Different Flexibilities for Primary Frequency Regulation Control in a Coal-Fired Power Plant

LUN Tao¹, E Zhijun², ZHANG Li³, WANG Xin², ZHAO Yongliang⁴, YAN Junjie⁴

1. Electric Power Dispatching and Control Center, State Grid Corporation of China, Beijing 100031, China;
2. Electric Power Dispatching and Control Center, State Grid Tianjin Electric Power Company, Tianjin 300010, China;
3. Electrical Power Research Institute, State Grid Tianjin Electric Power Company, Tianjin 300384, China;
4. State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China

Received:2019-03-18 Revised:2019-05-13 Published:2019-08-14
Supported by:
This work is supported by National Basic Research Program of China (No.2015CB251504) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51436006).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 提高燃煤发电机组运行高效灵活性是提高电网运行安全性的有效手段。采用GSE软件搭建了660 MW超临界燃煤机组动态仿真模型，研究了一次调频过程中4种热力系统调节方案下的主要热经济性参数和蓄热量的动态特性，定义了一次调频过程的热经济性指标，最终分析了一次调频作用时间和调节方案对平均标准煤耗率差值的影响规律。研究表明：一次调频升负荷过程，4种不同调节方案中的汽轮机输出功率和发电厂总效率均迅速升高，而发电标准煤耗率规律正好相反；锅炉和汽轮机系统蓄热量降低是4种方案可以参与一次调频的本质原因；平均标准煤耗率差值的最小值为-22.15 g/（kW·h），出现在高加抽汽节流方案下且一次调频作用时间为90 s。

关键词: 燃煤发电机组, 一次调频, 运行灵活性, 动态仿真, 发电标准煤耗率

Abstract: Achieving high operational efficiency and flexibility of coal-fired power plants is an effective way to improve the security of power grids. In this study, the dynamic model of a 660 MW supercritical coal-fired power plant is developed via the GSE software, and then the dynamic characteristics of the main thermo-economic parameters and heat storage using four regulation schemes during the primary frequency regulation process are explored. After the thermo-economic index is defined for the primary frequency regulation, the deviations from average standard coal consumption rate with respect to different time durations of the four regulation schemes are analyzed. It turns out that during the primary frequency regulation load ramping up process, the output power of steam turbine and the total efficiency of power plant get boosted sharply with all the four regulation schemes, whereas the standard power generation coal consumption rate goes down in an opposite way. The basic reason for those four schemes eligible to participate in primary frequency regulation is explained as the heat storage reduction of both the boiler and steam turbine systems. The deviation from the average standard coal consumption rate hit the minimum value of -22.15 g/(kW·h), when the scheme of throttling extraction steam from high-pressure heaters is applied with the primary frequency regulation time duration set as 90 s.

Key words: coal-fired power generation unit, primary frequency regulation, operational flexibility, dynamic simulation, power generation standard coal consumption rate

中图分类号:

TM611.1

伦涛, 鄂志君, 张利, 王鑫, 赵永亮, 严俊杰. 燃煤机组不同灵活性调节方案参与一次调频过程的经济性分析[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(8): 164-172.

LUN Tao, E Zhijun, ZHANG Li, WANG Xin, ZHAO Yongliang, YAN Junjie. Thermo-economic Analysis on Four Regulation Schemes with Different Flexibilities for Primary Frequency Regulation Control in a Coal-Fired Power Plant[J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(8): 164-172.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201903017

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2019/V52/I8/164

参考文献

[1] LU X, MCELROY M B, PENG W, et al. Challenges faced by China compared with the US in developing wind power[J]. Nature Energy, 2016, 1:1-6.
[2] VITHAYASRICHAREON P, RIESZ J, MACGILL I. Operational flexibility of future generation portfolios with high renewables[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 206:32-41.
[3] GONZALEZ-SALAZAR M A, KIRSTEN T, PRCHLIK L. Review of the operational flexibility and emissions of gas-and coal-fired power plants in a future with growing renewables[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 82:1497-1513.
[4] GARDARSDÓTTIR SÓ, GÖRANSSON L, NORMANN F, et al. Improving the flexibility of coal-fired power generators:Impact on the composition of a cost-optimal electricity system[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 209:277-289.
[5] WANG D, ZHOU Y L, ZHOU H C. A mathematical model suitable for simulation of fast cut back of coal-fired boiler-turbine plant[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 108:546-554.
[6] 李福尚, 王旭荣, 戴义平, 等. 超临界机组一次调频对汽轮机动态热力特性的影响[J]. 热能动力工程, 2014, 29(5):470-476 LI Fushang, WANG Xurong, DAI Yiping, et al. Influence of the primary frequency modulation of a supercritical unit on the dynamic thermal characteristics of its steam turbine[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2014, 29(5):470-476
[7] 盛锴, 江效龙, 周年光, 等. 基于系统仿真的火电机组一次调频性能优化[J]. 热能动力工程, 2016, 31(10):109-114 SHENG Kai, JIANG Xiaolong, ZHOU Nianguang, et al. Performance optimization of primary frequency regulation based on modeling of turbine and its governing system[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2016, 31(10):109-114
[8] 王永庆, 赵嘉, 曹越, 等. 超临界机组及其一次调频控制系统的辨识与仿真[J]. 热能动力工程, 2018, 33(2):111-116 WANG Yongqing, ZHAO Jia, CAO Yue, et al. Identification and simulation of a supercritical unit and its primary frequency modulation and control system[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2018, 33(2):111-116
[9] 黄卫剑, 张曦, 陈世和, 等. 提高火电机组一次调频响应速度[J]. 中国电力, 2011, 44(1):73-77 HUANG Weijian, ZHANG Xi, CHEN Shihe, et al. Enhancing response speed of primary frequency regulation in thermal power unit[J]. Electric Power, 2011, 44(1):73-77
[10] LONG D T, WANG W, YAO C, et al. An experiment-based model of condensate throttling and its utilization in load control of 1000 MW power units[J]. Energy, 2017, 133:941-954.
[11] 刘吉臻, 刘彧昕, 王玮. 基于汽水分布方程的热力发电机组凝结水节流静态负荷响应特性[J]. 动力工程学报, 2015, 35(4):318-324 LIU Jizhen, LIU Yuxin, WANG Wei. Study on static load response of thermal power units caused by condensate throttling based on steam-water distribution equation[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2015, 35(4):318-324
[12] WANG W, LIU J Z, ZENG D L, et al. Modeling for condensate throttling and its application on the flexible load control of power plants[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 95:303-310.
[13] 祝建飞, 沈丛奇, 姚峻, 等. 汽轮机组经济运行方式下新型一次调频技术[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(5):144-150 ZHU Jianfei, SHEN Congqi, YAO Jun, et al. New primary frequency regulation technologies for steam turbines under economical operation mode[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(5):144-150
[14] 陈波, 周慎学, 丁宁, 等. 超(超)临界机组高加给水旁路调节方式的一次调频控制技术研究与试验[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(8):32-36 CHEN Bo, ZHOU Shenxue, DING Ning, et al. Research and test of the primary frequency control in ultra-supercritical units under feed water bypass control of HP heater[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(8):32-36
[15] ZHAO Y L, WANG C Y, LIU M, et al. Improving operational flexibility by regulating extraction steam of high-pressure heaters on a 660 MW supercritical coal-fired power plant:A dynamic simulation[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 212:1295-1309.
[16] ZHAO Y L, LIU M, WANG C Y, et al. Increasing operational flexibility of supercritical coal-fired power plants by regulating thermal system configuration during transient processes[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 228:2375-2386.
[17] 汤可怡, 杨建明, 蔡喜冬. 大型机组一次调频性能优化方法[J]. 发电设备, 2016, 30(6):374-377 TANG Keyi, YANG Jianming, CAI Xidong. Optimization on primary frequency regulation of large power units[J]. Power Equipment, 2016, 30(6):374-377
[18] 徐星, 谭锐, 李永生, 等. 1000 MW超超临界二次再热机组一次调频方式分析[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(2):169-175 XU Xing, TAN Rui, LI Yongsheng, et al. Analysis on primary frequency regulation of 1000 MW double-reheat ultra-supercritical units[J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(2):169-175
[19] 王建强, 郑渭建, 童小忠, 等. 基于热网蓄热提升机组AGC、一次调频品质的试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2014, 47(9):1-5 WANG Jianqiang, ZHENG Weijian, TONG Xiaozhong, et al. Experimental study on enhancing the quality of AGC and primary frequency regulation based on heat system accumulation[J]. Electric Power, 2014, 47(9):1-5
[20] 归一数, 沈丛奇, 陈欢乐, 等. 火电燃煤机组大频差一次调频性能研究与优化实施[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(4):1-5 GUI Yishu, SHEN Congqi, CHEN Huanle, et al. Research and optimization on primary frequency regulation characteristics with large frequency deviation for coal-fired power plants[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(4):1-5
[21] 樊印龙, 张宝, 顾正皓, 等. 节流配汽汽轮机组一次调频经济代价分析[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(7):86-89 FAN Yinlong, ZHANG Bao, GU Zhenghao, et al. Analysis on economic cost of primary frequency regulation of throttling steam turbine units[J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(7):86-89

燃煤机组不同灵活性调节方案参与一次调频过程的经济性分析

Thermo-economic Analysis on Four Regulation Schemes with Different Flexibilities for Primary Frequency Regulation Control in a Coal-Fired Power Plant

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张玉敏, 尹延宾, 吉兴全, 叶平峰, 孙东磊, 宋爱全. 计及热网不同运行状态下灵活性供给能力的综合能源系统优化调度[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(2): 88-102.
[2]	孙东磊, 王宪, 孙毅, 孟祥飞, 张涌琛, 张玉敏. 基于多面体不确定集合的电力系统灵活性量化评估方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(9): 146-155.
[3]	田刚领, 武鸿鑫, 李娟, 张柳丽, 谢佳, 李爱魁. 风电场多功能储能电站功率分配策略[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(9): 247-256.
[4]	李鲁阳, 陈龙翔, 陈磊, 孙大卫, 吴林林, 闵勇. 用于新能源一次调频的储能经济配置研究[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(7): 54-65.
[5]	徐峰亮, 王克谦, 王文豪, 王鹏, 王焕昌, 张帅, 赵凤展. 计及运行灵活性的中压配电系统源-网-储协同扩展规划[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(7): 98-108.
[6]	万明元, 任鑫, 王渡, 金亚飞, 王志刚, 王廷举, 杨昌宏, 刘昊坤. 100 MW级联式S-CO₂循环动态特性研究[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(12): 169-177.
[7]	胡英杰, 李强, 李群. 考虑容量限制的构网型光储系统惯量与一次调频参数优化配置方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(10): 115-122.
[8]	曹斌, 苏珂, 原帅, 肖谭南, 陈颖. 基于微分代数神经网络的含新能源区域电网端口动态特性学习方法[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(2): 23-31.
[9]	李建华, 曹路, 杨仁炘, 邓桢彦, 李征, 蔡旭. 华东沿海风电场群电网主动频率支撑策略[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(11): 49-58, 112.
[10]	张嘉诚, 夏向阳, 邓子豪, 陈贵全. 储能电站安全参与电网一次调频的优化控制策略[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(2): 19-27.
[11]	方日升, 林耀东, 江伟, 黄霆, 徐振华, 吴丹岳, 陈志, 苏毅, 林济铿. 调速侧电力系统稳定器优化设计方法[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(9): 74-82.
[12]	盛锴, 邹鑫, 邱靖, 朱晓星. 火电机组一次调频功率响应特性精细化建模[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(6): 111-118,152.
[13]	陈欢乐, 归一数, 陈伟, 王阳, 卢宏林, 明磊. 基于加热器切除的深度调频控制技术研究与实施[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(3): 168-176.
[14]	王天翔, 程雪坤, 李伟超, 郑金鑫. 基于变参数减载控制的风电场一次调频策略[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(12): 94-101.
[15]	于国强, 崔晓波, 史毅越, 汤可怡, 张天海. 基于改进群优化算法的深度调峰机组一次调频建模[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(6): 147-152.

模态框（Modal）标题

燃煤机组不同灵活性调节方案参与一次调频过程的经济性分析

Thermo-economic Analysis on Four Regulation Schemes with Different Flexibilities for Primary Frequency Regulation Control in a Coal-Fired Power Plant

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics