碱性吸收剂喷射脱除电厂烟气SO3技术及理论模型

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201704102

中国电力 ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (4): 130-135.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201704102

碱性吸收剂喷射脱除电厂烟气SO₃技术及理论模型

姚宣, 杨建辉, 王洪亮, 段威, 松鹏, 张军, 路光杰, 郑鹏

北京国电龙源环保工程有限公司, 北京 100039

收稿日期:2017-04-24 修回日期:2017-12-12 出版日期:2018-04-05 发布日期:2018-04-12
作者简介:姚宣(1987-),男,山东曲阜人,硕士,工程师,从事燃煤烟气脱硫脱硝工程设计及技术研究,E-mail:yaox@lyhb.cn;杨建辉(1984-),男,山东郓城人,博士,高级工程师,从事燃煤电厂环保技术及脱硝催化剂制备技术研究,E-mail:yangjh@lyhb.cn。
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划资助项目（2015BAA05B01）。

Theoretical Model for SO₃ Removal from Flue Gas Using Alkali Sorbent Injection Technology in Power Plant

YAO Xuan, YANG Jianhui, WANG Hongliang, DUAN Wei, SONG Peng, ZHANG Jun, LU Guangjie, ZHENG Peng

Beijing Guodian Longyuan Environmental Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 100039, China

Received:2017-04-24 Revised:2017-12-12 Online:2018-04-05 Published:2018-04-12
Supported by:
This work is supported by the National Science and technology support program (No.2015BAA05B01).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 碱性吸收剂喷射技术是一种高效脱除电厂烟气中SO₃的新型技术。为推动国内燃煤电厂烟气SO₃脱除技术的发展，介绍了该技术的特点、系统运行特征和原理，建立了SO₃脱除反应理论模型，并对理论模型进行了实践验证。此外，对加入的碱性吸收剂是否会影响脱硝催化剂的活性进行了论证。研究结果表明：（1）碱性吸收剂颗粒终端沉降速度在0.01~0.10m/s之间，远远小于烟气速度；（2）通过简化气固反应模型得到的理论SO₃脱除效率解析解，与工程实测值偏差在 ±5%以内；（3）SO₃脱除效率与烟气速度、烟气温度，吸收剂颗粒粒径、吸收剂与SO₃摩尔比等因素相关；（4）在工程设计过程中，将吸收剂与SO₃摩尔比设置在1.5以上，吸收剂粒径选择在30μm以下，吸收剂颗粒停留时间不小于4s，可保证SO₃脱除效率在80%以上；（5）碱基吸收剂亚硫酸钠对脱硝催化剂的负面影响可忽略不计。

关键词: 燃煤电厂, 烟气, 三氧化硫, 硫酸雾, 碱性吸收剂, 亚硫酸钠

Abstract: Alkaline sorbent injection is a new technology to remove SO₃ from flue gas in power plant. In this paper, the technical features, system operation characteristics and principles of SO₃ removal using alkaline absorbent are introduced. Meanwhile, the theoretical model of SO₃ removal reaction is established and verified through practice. Moreover, the impact of alkaline sorbent on the activity of catalyst is examined. The results show that the terminal settling velocity of absorbent is 0.01~0.1m/s, which is far less than that of flue gas. By simplifying the gas-solid reaction model, the deviation of theoretical SO₃ removal efficiency from engineering measurement value is less than ±5%, and the SO₃ removal efficiency is related to the flue gas velocity, flue gas temperature, particle size, chemical equivalence ratio and so on. In the process of engineering design, in order to ensure the SO₃ removal efficiency above 80%, the stoichiometric ratio must be set higher than 1.5, and the particle size of absorbent must be smaller than 30 μm, while the retention time of absorbent particles should not be less than 4s. The side effects of sorbent sodium sulfite on denitration catalysts is negligible.

Key words: coal-fired power plant, flue gas, SO₃, sulphur acid, alkali sorbent, Na₂SO₃

中图分类号:

TM621
X51

姚宣, 杨建辉, 王洪亮, 段威, 松鹏, 张军, 路光杰, 郑鹏. 碱性吸收剂喷射脱除电厂烟气SO₃技术及理论模型[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(4): 130-135.

YAO Xuan, YANG Jianhui, WANG Hongliang, DUAN Wei, SONG Peng, ZHANG Jun, LU Guangjie, ZHENG Peng. Theoretical Model for SO₃ Removal from Flue Gas Using Alkali Sorbent Injection Technology in Power Plant[J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(4): 130-135.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201704102

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2018/V51/I4/130

参考文献

[1] 姚宣, 郑鹏, 郑伟. SCR脱硝系统最低连续喷氨温度的研究[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(1): 146-150.YAO Xuan, ZHENG Peng, ZHENG Wei. Study on minimum continuous -operation temperature of SCR system[J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(1): 154-158.
[2] 郝江涛, 于伟, 卢平, 等. 烟气组分和添加剂对选择性非催化还原脱硝特性的影响[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2015, 35(12): 3054-3060.HAO Jiangtao, YU Wei, LU Ping, et al. Influences of flue gas components and additives on NO reduction in the selective non-catalytic reduction process[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2015, 35(12): 3054-3060.
[3] 高智溥, 胡冬, 张志刚, 等. 碱性吸附剂脱除SO₃技术在大型燃煤机组中的应用[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(7): 102-108.GAO Zhipu, HU Dong, ZHANG Zhigang, et al. Application of SO₃ removal with alkaline sorbent injection in large capacity coal-fired power plants[J]. 2017, 50(7): 102-108.
[4] 郭彦鹏, 狄华娟, 潘丹萍, 等.燃煤烟气中SO₃的形成及其控制措施[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(8): 154-156.GUO Yanpeng, DI Huajuan, PAN Danping, et al. The formation and control of SO₃ in coal-fired flue gas[J]. 2016, 49(8): 154-156.
[5] 梁占刚, 何榕, 陈群, 等. CaO高温脱硫过程数值计算[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2005, 25(19): 71-74.LIANG Zhangang, HE Rong, CHEN Qun, et al. Numerical simulation of desulfurization process with CaO at high temperature[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2005, 25(19): 71-74.
[6] PETERSON J., JONES A F. SO₃ mitigation guide[R]. EPRI Report, Number: TR-104424, 1994.
[7] KONG Yougen, WOOD Michael. Sodium injection for MATS and boiler MACT[J]. Pollution Engineering, 2012, 44(6): 34-39.
[8] WANG Zhiqiang, HUAN Qingchao, QI Chenlu, et al. Study on the removal of coal smoke SO₃ with CaO[J]. Energy Procedia, 2012(14): 1911-1917.
[9] KONG Yougen, DAVIDSON Heidi. Dry sorbent injection of sodium sorbents for SO₂, HCl and mercury mitigation[C]// North American Waste-to-energy Conference. Florida, 2010: 317–320.
[10] 陈朋. 钙基吸收剂脱除燃煤烟气中SO₃的研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2011.
[11] OFFEN G. Modeling of SO₃ formation process in coal-fired boilers[R]. EPRI Report Number: 1018501, 2007.
[12] HIMES R. SO₃ mitigation: current utility operating experience[R]. Palo Alto: EPRI Report, Number: 1010754, 2006.
[13] HIMES R. Continuous measurement of SO₃ in a coal-fired power plant[R]. EPRI Report Number: 1010375, 2006.
[14] STERLING Gray, MICK Harpenau, PHILIP Copsey. Ultra-high SO₃ removal: SBS injection as an alternative to WESP[C]// Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Mega Symposium. Washington D. C., 2008.
[15] 金涌, 祝京旭, 汪展文, 等. 流态化工程原理[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2001: 24–25.
[16] 许贺卿. 气固反应工程[M]. 北京: 原子能出版社, 1993: 170-180.
[17] STERLING Gray, JIM Wilhelm. SBS injection technology for SO₃ control: a summary of utility operating experience[C]//Combined Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Mega Symposium. Washington D. C., 2004.
[18] STERLING Gray, SCOTT Miller, FRANK Meserole, et al. In-situ SBS injection technology for SO₃ control: summary of operating performance and economics[C]// Air Quality V conference. Arlington, VA, 2005.

碱性吸收剂喷射脱除电厂烟气SO₃技术及理论模型

Theoretical Model for SO₃ Removal from Flue Gas Using Alkali Sorbent Injection Technology in Power Plant

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	姜龙, 程亮, 李金晶, 李庆. 燃煤电厂湿法脱硫浆液品质及喷淋层运行状况定量评价[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(11): 217-225, 235.
[2]	伊超, 滕达, 宋绍伟, 陈鸥. 喷淋法燃煤电站烟气冷凝水回收系统应用分析[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(11): 226-235.
[3]	刘含笑, 吴黎明, 赵琳, 于立元, 郦建国, 崔盈. 燃煤电厂湿式电除尘器减排及能效特性研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 196-203.
[4]	刘广建, 岳凤站, 周硕, 王琳, 干雪. 燃煤电厂水平衡模型与节水分析[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(4): 221-228.
[5]	黄婧杰, 刘镂志, 殷旭锋, 李雪芹, 潘轩, 周任军. 碳循环利用的垃圾焚烧电厂-烟气处理-P2G协调优化运行[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(3): 152-158.
[6]	孙尊强, 郑成航, 周灿, 王圣, 马修元, 叶毅科. 燃煤电厂典型除尘器运行现状分析及优化[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 194-201.
[7]	刘志坦, 姚杰, 庄柯, 喻乐蒙, 周凯. 燃气轮机与燃煤机组SCR脱硝催化剂特性比较[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(6): 145-152.
[8]	杜振, 王志东, 江建平, 朱跃. 湿法脱硫系统PM_2.5排放特性分析[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(6): 153-158.
[9]	米大斌, 郭江龙, 张衡. 陶瓷膜法的烟气水分及余热回收中试研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(4): 199-206.
[10]	李飞. 旋转雾化蒸发技术对脱硫废水和烟气的适应性研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(4): 213-220.
[11]	徐遵义, 刘文慧, 张旭冉, 张海燕. 基于数据驱动的浆液循环泵运行优化研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(3): 197-204.
[12]	吴家玉, 莫华, 胡耘, 朱杰, 帅伟, 张晴, 姜岸. 京津冀及周边地区燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物不同控制情景下时空变化特征[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 182-189.
[13]	赵宏, 张发捷, 马云龙, 马宝林, 唐潇, 徐仁博, 罗通达, 李成宝, 任传明, 于洁, 孙路石. 燃煤电厂SCR脱硝氨逃逸迁移规律试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(1): 196-202.
[14]	张志强, 朱法华, 邹斯诣, 史鹏飞, 王晓玲, 游秦, 姚力, 闫绍帅, 王兴. 基于实测的烟气“消白”工程环境效益研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(9): 202-207.
[15]	赵柄, 王海刚, 胡冬, 陈坤洋, 金绪良, 殷爱鸣. 燃煤电厂碱性吸附剂脱汞性能研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(9): 208-213.

模态框（Modal）标题