燃煤电厂SCR脱硝氨逃逸迁移规律试验研究

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202006114

中国电力 ›› 2021, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 196-202.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202006114

• 节能与环保 • 上一篇

燃煤电厂SCR脱硝氨逃逸迁移规律试验研究

赵宏¹, 张发捷², 马云龙², 马宝林¹, 唐潇³, 徐仁博¹, 罗通达¹, 李成宝¹, 任传明¹, 于洁³, 孙路石³

1. 华能大连电厂，辽宁大连 116033;
2. 西安热工研究院有限公司苏州分公司，江苏苏州 215153;
3. 华中科技大学煤燃烧国家重点实验室，湖北武汉 430074

收稿日期:2020-06-08 修回日期:2020-08-05 出版日期:2021-01-05 发布日期:2021-01-11
作者简介:赵宏(1970—)，男，高级工程师，从事火电厂污染治理技术研究与应用，zhc120689@sina.com;于洁(1985—)，男，通信作者，博士，副教授，从事电站锅炉氮氧化物控制技术研究，yujie@hust.edu.cn
基金资助:
中国华能集团有限公司科技项目(燃煤电厂SCR机组氨逃逸迁移、危害及防治技术研究，HNKJ19-G43)。

Test Study on the Migration Characteristics of Slip Ammonia from the SCR System in the Coal-Fired Power Plant

ZHAO Hong¹, ZHANG Fajie², MA Yunlong², MA Baolin¹, TANG Xiao³, XU Renbo¹, LUO Tongda¹, LI Chengbao¹, REN Chuanming¹, YU Jie³, SUN Lushi³

1. Huaneng Dalian Power Plant, Dalian 116033, China;
2. Suzhou Branch, Xi'an Thermal Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215153, China;
3. State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2020-06-08 Revised:2020-08-05 Online:2021-01-05 Published:2021-01-11
Supported by:
This work is supported by the Science and Technology Project of China Huaneng Group Co., Ltd. (Migration and Prevention of Escaped NH₃ from SCR Equipment of Coal Fired Power Plant, No.HNKJ19-G43).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了某燃煤电厂350 MW机组SCR系统氨逃逸在下游设备的迁移规律。现场试验发现，SCR系统下游设备中空气预热器、低低温省煤器、电除尘器氨逃逸捕获率分别为总氨逃逸量的23%~26%、9%~17%和56%~62%，进入脱硫系统的氨逃逸不足总氨逃逸的3%；提高低低温省煤器出口烟温会导致氨捕获率降低，但下游电除尘器飞灰氨含量增多，表明其对氨的捕获性能提高，最终总的捕获比例基本保持不变。通过现场试验及数据分析，建立了电除尘器所捕捉飞灰中氨含量与SCR出口氨逃逸的对应关系，当机组燃煤煤质大幅变化或对设备进行大幅改造等情况时，需要根据实际情况重新修正对应关系。

关键词: 燃煤电厂, SCR脱硝, 氨逃逸, 飞灰, 电除尘器

Abstract: In this paper, the migration characteristics of slip ammonia were studied which passed through the various downstream equipments of the SCR system of a 350 MW coal-fired power plant. The field test concludes that the slip ammonia intercepted by the air pre-heater, low temperature economizer, and electrostatic precipitator accounts for 23%~26%, 9%~17%, and 56%~62% of the total slip ammonia, respectively, while that entering the desulfurization system accounts for less than 3% of the total slip ammonia. Raising the temperature of the low temperature economizer outlet flue gas will reduce its capture ratio of ammonia. However, the increase of the ammonia content in the fly ash from the electrostatic precipitator indicates the performance improvement of the electrostatic precipitator for the ammonia capture capability. Therefore, the overall capture ratio remains basically unchanged. Through the field test and data analysis, the relationship between the ammonia content in the fly ash from the electrostatic precipitation and the ammonia escape from the SCR outlet was also established. Nevertheless, whenever there are any significant coal quality changes or equipment modifications, etc., such relationship needs to be revised according to the actual situations.

Key words: coal-fired power plant, SCR denitrification, ammonia escape, fly ash, electrostatic precipitator

赵宏, 张发捷, 马云龙, 马宝林, 唐潇, 徐仁博, 罗通达, 李成宝, 任传明, 于洁, 孙路石. 燃煤电厂SCR脱硝氨逃逸迁移规律试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(1): 196-202.

ZHAO Hong, ZHANG Fajie, MA Yunlong, MA Baolin, TANG Xiao, XU Renbo, LUO Tongda, LI Chengbao, REN Chuanming, YU Jie, SUN Lushi. Test Study on the Migration Characteristics of Slip Ammonia from the SCR System in the Coal-Fired Power Plant[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(1): 196-202.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202006114

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2021/V54/I1/196

参考文献

[1] 王禹苏, 张蕾, 陈吉浩, 等. 大气中氮氧化物的危害及治理[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2019(7): 137-138
[2] 中国电力企业联合会. 中国电力行业年度发展报告2019[M]. 北京: 中国建材工业出版社, 2019: 85–94.
[3] 张立男. SCR脱硝过程中ABS挥发动力学及控制方法研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2017.
ZHANG Linan. Volatilization kinetics and control method of ammonium bisulfate in the process of SCR denitrification[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2017.
[4] 袁细宁. 脱硝市场现状及发展建议[J]. 科技资讯, 2010(19): 222
[5] 祝社民, 李伟峰, 陈英文, 等. 烟气脱硝技术研究新进展[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2005(9): 699-703
ZHU Shemin, LI Weifeng, CHEN Yingwen, et al. New development of controlling NO_x pollution from plue gas[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2005(9): 699-703
[6] 王乐乐, 孔凡海, 何金亮, 等. 超低排放形势下SCR脱硝系统运行存在问题与对策[J]. 热力发电, 2016, 45(12): 19-24
WANG Lele, KONG Fanhai, HE Jinliang, et al. Difficulties and countermeasures of SCR denitration system operation in ultra low emission situation[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2016, 45(12): 19-24
[7] BRENDEL G F, BONETTI J E, RATHBONE R F, et al. Investigation of ammonia adsorption on fly ash due to installation of selective catalytic reduction systems[R]. Washington: US Department of Energy, 2000.
[8] GĄSIOROWSKI S A, HRACH F J. Method for removing ammonia from ammonia contaminated fly ash, US: 6077494[P]. 2000.
[9] 马双忱, 郭蒙, 宋卉卉, 等. 选择性催化还原工艺中硫酸氢铵形成机理及影响因素[J]. 热力发电, 2014, 43(2): 75-78, 86
MA Shuangchen, GUO Meng, SONG Huihui, et al. Formation mechanism and influencing factors of ammonium bisulfate during the selective catalytic reduction process[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2014, 43(2): 75-78, 86
[10] 莫卫民, 田林. 脱硝粉煤灰对水泥性能的影响研究[J]. 中国建材科技, 2019, 28(3): 49-50, 52
MO Weimin, TIAN Lin. Research on effect of denitration fly ash on properties of cement[J]. China Building Materials Science & Technology, 2019, 28(3): 49-50, 52
[11] GAO Y M, CHEN X, FUJISAKI G, et al. Dry and semi-dry methods for removal of ammonia from pulverized fuel combustion fly ash[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2002, 16(6): 1398-1404.
[12] 戴会生, 谷卫东, 朱战岭. 粉煤灰致使混凝土发泡的质量问题分析及预防[J]. 中国包装科技博览: 混凝土技术, 2011(1): 6-10
DAI Huisheng, GU Weidong, ZHU Zhanling. Analysis and protective measure of fly ash expands the ready-mixed concrete[J]. China Science and Technology Review: Concrete Technology, 2011(1): 6-10
[13] BITTNER J, GASIOROWSKI S, HRACH F. Removing ammonia from fly ash[C]//2001 International Ash Utilization Symposium, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA, 2001.
[14] O'CONNOR D, LARRIMORE L, DODGEN D, et al. The effects of ammonia-based NO_x reduction on fly ash: ammonia adsorption on ash[C]//EPRI-DOE-EPA Combined Utility Air Pollution Control Symposium: The MEGA Symposium, Atlanta, USA, 1999: 16.
[15] SARUNAC N. Power 101: Improving the performance of boiler auxiliaries, part Ⅱ[J/OL]. (2011-02-01) [2020-03-20]. https://www.powermag.com/power-101-improving-the-performance-of-boiler-auxiliaries-part-ii/.
[16] 马双忱, 金鑫, 孙云雪, 等. SCR烟气脱硝过程硫酸氢铵的生成机理与控制[J]. 热力发电, 2010, 39(8): 12-17
MA Shuangchen, JIN Xin, SUN Yunxue, et al. The formation mechanism of ammonium bisulfate in SCR flue gas denitrification process and control thereof[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2010, 39(8): 12-17
[17] STEWART B R. Unintended effects of EPA's recent ozone transport rule[C]//1999 Conference on Selective Catalytic and Non-Catalytic Reduction for NO_x control, Chicago, United State, 1999: 9–10.
[18] 钟智坤, 路璐, 吴华成, 等. 电极法检测灰中氨的样品处理研究[J]. 华北电力技术, 2014(12): 52-54
ZHONG Zhikun, LU Lu, WU Huacheng, et al. Test of ammonia content in fly ash by electrode method[J]. North China Electric Power, 2014(12): 52-54
[19] 刘政修. 燃煤机组锅炉烟气脱硝灰中氨含量测定[J]. 全面腐蚀控制, 2015, 29(4): 14-19
LIU Zhengxiu. Determination of content of nitrate removal of ammonia in ash of boiler flue gas of coal-fired units[J]. Total Corrosion Control, 2015, 29(4): 14-19
[20] 石磊, 牛国平, 马强, 等. 燃煤电厂烟气飞灰吸附氨变化规律[J]. 热力发电, 2019, 48(6): 53-57
SHI Lei, NIU Guoping, MA Qiang, et al. Ammonia adsorption by fly ash in flue gas of a coal-fired power plant[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2019, 48(6): 53-57
[21] 张宇. 选择性催化还原脱硝(SCR)对粉煤灰性能的影响研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2016.
ZHANG Yu. Study on the effect of selective catalytic reduction denitration (SCR) on the properties of fly ash[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2016.
[22] MAJ I, KALISZ S, GĄDEK W. Ammonia desorption from fly ash[J]. E3S Web of Conferences, 2019(82): 01012.
[23] 张宇, 王智, 孙化强, 等. 脱硝后粉煤灰中氨氮物质的性质探讨[J]. 粉煤灰, 2015, 27(5): 5-6, 10
ZHANG Yu, WANG Zhi, SUN Huaqiang, et al. Probe into properties of ammonia nitrogen substance in denitrated fly ash[J]. Coal Ash, 2015, 27(5): 5-6, 10

燃煤电厂SCR脱硝氨逃逸迁移规律试验研究

Test Study on the Migration Characteristics of Slip Ammonia from the SCR System in the Coal-Fired Power Plant

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘毅. 燃煤电厂烟气中SO₃排放控制中试研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(7): 201-208.
[2]	刘含笑, 吴黎明, 赵琳, 于立元, 郦建国, 崔盈. 燃煤电厂湿式电除尘器减排及能效特性研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 196-203.
[3]	孙尊强, 郑成航, 周灿, 王圣, 马修元, 叶毅科. 燃煤电厂典型除尘器运行现状分析及优化[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 194-201.
[4]	晏敏, 张杨, 郭博闻, 朱跃. 基于全寿命周期成本的SCR脱硝系统优化分析[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(3): 191-196.
[5]	吴家玉, 莫华, 胡耘, 朱杰, 帅伟, 张晴, 姜岸. 京津冀及周边地区燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物不同控制情景下时空变化特征[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 182-189.
[6]	华晨飞, 朱林, 姚杰, 庄柯. 废烟气脱硝催化剂资源回用载体的品质及特性研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 197-204.
[7]	刘玺璞, 李东阳, 张超. 多种负荷工况下湿式电除尘器的PM_2.5脱除效率及排放特征[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(1): 182-187.
[8]	赵柄, 王海刚, 胡冬, 陈坤洋, 金绪良, 殷爱鸣. 燃煤电厂碱性吸附剂脱汞性能研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(9): 208-213.
[9]	姚燕, 马云龙, 杨晓宁, 张华东, 王丽朋. 高砷煤SCR脱硝催化剂中毒失活研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(6): 191-196.
[10]	马学礼, 孙希进, 苏燊燊, 张仁锋, 党立晨, 黄显昌, 谢永平. 基于超低排放的燃煤电厂烟囱高度优化研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(5): 179-184.
[11]	徐静馨, 朱法华, 王圣, 张明, 赵秀勇, 孙雪丽, 胡耘, 田文鑫. 超低排放燃煤电厂和燃气电厂综合对比[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(2): 164-172,179.
[12]	许剑, 罗志, 周鑫, 李文杰, 黄少波, 常磊, 王晓冰, 牛国平, 张广才. W火焰锅炉SCR分区混合动态调平技术及应用[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(11): 234-242.
[13]	李滨, 杨阳. 烟气SO₃监测控制冷凝法采样方法[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(1): 140-146.
[14]	王文欣, 高毅, 刘春红, 童小忠, 陈彪, 祁志福, 张勤. 燃煤电厂旁路烟气干燥塔控制技术开发[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(1): 147-154.
[15]	雷嗣远, 李海浩, 李乐田, 倪贵东, 孔凡海, 吴国勋, 卞子君. SCR脱硝低负荷投运烟气调温旁路改造设计[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(9): 179-184.

模态框（Modal）标题

燃煤电厂SCR脱硝氨逃逸迁移规律试验研究

Test Study on the Migration Characteristics of Slip Ammonia from the SCR System in the Coal-Fired Power Plant

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics