京津冀及周边地区燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物不同控制情景下时空变化特征

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202009115

中国电力 ›› 2021, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 182-189.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202009115

京津冀及周边地区燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物不同控制情景下时空变化特征

吴家玉¹, 莫华¹, 胡耘², 朱杰³, 帅伟¹, 张晴¹, 姜岸¹

1. 生态环境部环境工程评估中心，北京 100012;
2. 国电环境保护研究院有限公司，江苏南京 210031;
3. 中国电力工程顾问集团中南电力设计院有限公司，湖北武汉 430071

收稿日期:2020-09-27 修回日期:2020-11-23 发布日期:2021-02-06
作者简介:吴家玉(1983-),男,高级工程师,从事电力环境保护政策与管理研究,E-mail:wujy@acee.org.cn;朱杰(1982-),男,通信作者,高级工程师,从事电力环境影响评价、环境保护政策研究,E-mail:zj5915@csepdi.com
基金资助:
生态环境部资助项目（环境影响评估，144024000000150001）；生态环境部环境工程评估中心资助项目（基于环境管理需求的燃煤电厂颗粒物无组织源强核算技术方法及案例研究，2019-09）

Spatio-Temporal Variation Characteristics of Fugitive Particulate Matter Emissions from the Coal Storage Yard of Coal-Fired Power Plants in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and Surrounding Areas under Different Regulatory Scenarios

WU Jiayu¹, MO Hua¹, HU Yun², ZHU Jie³, SHUAI Wei¹, ZHANG Qing¹, JIANG An¹

1. Appraisal Center for Environment & Engineering, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of P.R.C., Beijing 100012, China;
2. State Power Environmental Protection Research Institute Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210031, China;
3. Central South Electric Power Design Institute of CPECC, Wuhan 430071, China

Received:2020-09-27 Revised:2020-11-23 Published:2021-02-06
Supported by:
This work is supported by Ministry of Ecology and Environment (Environmental Impact Assessment, No.144024000000150001) and the Appraisal Center for Environment & Engineering of Ministry of Ecology and Environment (A Case Study of Pollution Source Intensity Accounting Method of Fugitive Particulate Matter in Coal-Fired Power Plant Coal Yard Based on Environmental Management Demand, No.2019-09)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为支撑京津冀及周边地区燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物深度治理工作，以2017年为基准年、以总悬浮颗粒物（TSP）为指标分析了燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物时空变化特征，基于相关政策设计了防风抑尘网改造和全封闭改造两个控制情景并分别分析了其控制效果。结果表明：2017年京津冀及周边地区城市燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物排放量为3 044.41 t，冬春季（1—5月）是开展煤场无组织颗粒物排放治理的关键期。煤场全封闭改造可减排98.33%的煤场无组织颗粒物。从局地环境质量改善角度考虑，燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物治理较有色烟羽改造更具性价比。建议重视区域内燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物排放控制工作，抓住治理关键期，有序、分步开展煤场全封闭改造。

关键词: 京津冀及周边地区, 燃煤电厂, 煤场, 无组织颗粒物, 防风抑尘网改造, 全封闭改造

Abstract: In order to support the in-depth control of fugitive particulate matter emissions in the coal yard of coal-fired power plants in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and surrounding areas, by taking the data collected from the year of 2017 as the baseline and the total suspended particulate (TSP) as the research objective, the temporal and spatial variation characteristics of fugitive particulate matter emissions from the coal yard of coal-fired power plants are explored. Based on relevant policies, two scenarios with different approaches are designed and their control effects are analyzed respectively, i.e., porous fences reconstruction and fully enclosed reconstruction. The results show that in 2017, there were 3 044.41 tons of fugitive particulate matter emitted from the coal yards in the above areas. Winter and spring seasons (from January to May) are the critical time period for the control of fugitive particulate matter emissions. With the approach of total enclosure reconstruction, the fugitive particulate matter emissions can be reduced by 98.33% from coal yards. From the perspective of improving the local environmental quality, emission control of the fugitive particulate matter in coal yards is more cost-effective than that of “colored plume” reduction. At last, it is suggested to attach significance to the control of fugitive particulate matter emission in the coal yard of regional coal-fired power plants. Also by seizing the critical period of environmental management, the fully enclosed reconstruction of coal yard should be carried out in an orderly and step-by-step manner.

Key words: Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and surrounding areas, coal-fired power plant, coal yard, fugitive particulate matter, porous fences reconstruction, fully enclosed reconstruction

吴家玉, 莫华, 胡耘, 朱杰, 帅伟, 张晴, 姜岸. 京津冀及周边地区燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物不同控制情景下时空变化特征[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 182-189.

WU Jiayu, MO Hua, HU Yun, ZHU Jie, SHUAI Wei, ZHANG Qing, JIANG An. Spatio-Temporal Variation Characteristics of Fugitive Particulate Matter Emissions from the Coal Storage Yard of Coal-Fired Power Plants in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and Surrounding Areas under Different Regulatory Scenarios[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(2): 182-189.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202009115

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2021/V54/I2/182

参考文献

[1] 国家发展改革委, 环境保护部, 国家能源局. 关于印发《煤电节能减排升级与改造行动计划(2014—2020年)》的通知(发改能源〔2014〕2093号)[EB/OL]. (2014-09-12)[2020-09-24]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/gwy/201409/t20140925_289556.htm.
[2] 中国电力企业联合会. 中国电力行业年度发展报告(2019)[M]. 1版. 北京: 中国建材工业出版社, 2019.
[3] TANG L, QU J B, MI Z F, et al. Substantial emission reductions from Chinese power plants after the introduction of ultra-low emissions standards[J]. Nature Energy, 2019, 4(11): 929-938.
[4] 中华人民共和国国务院. 国务院关于印发打赢蓝天保卫战三年行动计划的通知(国发〔2018〕22号)[EB/OL]. (2018-06-27)[2020-09-24]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-07/03/content_5303158.htm.
[5] 山东省生态环境厅. 山东省生态环境厅关于印发山东省工业企业无组织排放分行业管控指导意见的通知(鲁环发〔2020〕30号)[EB/OL]. (2020-06-30)[2020-09-24]. http://xxgk.sdein.gov.cn/zfwj/lhf/202007/t20200701_3151585.html.
[6] 王文兴, 柴发合, 任阵海, 等. 新中国成立70年来我国大气污染防治历程、成就与经验[J]. 环境科学研究, 2019, 32(10): 1621-1635
WANG Wenxing, CHAI Fahe, REN Zhenhai, et al. Process, achievements and experience of air pollution control in China since the founding of the People's Republic of China 70 years ago[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 32(10): 1621-1635
[7] 何伟, 张文杰, 王淑兰, 等. 京津冀地区大气污染联防联控机制实施效果及完善建议[J]. 环境科学研究, 2019, 32(10): 1696-1703
HE Wei, ZHANG Wenjie, WANG Shulan, et al. Effects and improvement suggestions on air pollution joint prevention and control mechanism in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 32(10): 1696-1703
[8] 环境保护部, 国家发展和改革委员会, 公安部, 等. 关于印发《京津冀及周边地区2017—2018年秋冬季大气污染综合治理攻坚行动方案》的通知(环环监〔2017〕110号)[EB/OL]. (2017-08-21)[2020-09-24]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bwj/201708/t20170824_420330.htm.
[9] 生态环境部, 国家发展和改革委员会, 工业和信息化部, 等. 关于印发《京津冀及周边地区2018—2019年秋冬季大气污染综合治理攻坚行动方案》的通知(环大气〔2018〕100号)[EB/OL]. (2018-09-21)[2020-09-24]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/sthjbgw/sthjbwj/201809/t20180927_630570.htm.
[10] 生态环境部, 国家发展和改革委员会, 工业和信息化部, 等. 关于印发《京津冀及周边地区2019—2020年秋冬季大气污染综合治理攻坚行动方案》的通知(环大气〔2019〕88号)[EB/OL]. (2019-09-25)[2020-09-24]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk03/201910/t20191016_737803.html.
[11] 生态环境部. 全国排污许可证管理信息平台[EB/OL]. [2020-09-24]. http://permit.mee.gov.cn/permitExt/defaults/default-index!getInformation.action.
[12] USEPA. Compilation of air emissions factors (AP - 42) [EB/OL]. [2020-09-24]. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-factors-and-quantification/ap-42-compilation-air-emissions-factors.
[13] 王宝章, 齐鸣, 徐铀, 等. 煤炭装卸堆放起尘规律及煤尘扩散规律的研究[J]. 武汉水运工程学院学报, 1985(4): 41-50
WANG Baozhang, QI Ming, XU You, et al. A study of release and dispersion of coal dust caused by handling coal[J]. Journal of Wuhan Institute of Water Transportation Engineering, 1985(4): 41-50
[14] 刘迪. 贮煤场煤尘源强估算及防护距离确定[J]. 环境保护与循环经济, 2011, 31(5): 55-56, 62
[15] 环境保护部. 关于发布《大气可吸入颗粒物一次源排放清单编制技术指南(试行)》等5项技术指南的公告(环境保护公告 2014年第92号)[EB/OL]. (2014-12-31)[2020-09-24]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201501/t20150107_293955.htm.
[16] 生态环境部. 污染源源强核算技术指南火电: HJ 888—2018[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2018.
[17] 黄晨, 李世健. 煤炭堆场风蚀起尘源强两种计算方法的对比[J]. 中国港湾建设, 2015, 35(10): 48-52
HUANG Chen, LI Shijian. Contrast of two calculation methods of wind erosion dust sources in coal storage yard[J]. China Harbour Engineering, 2015, 35(10): 48-52
[18] 张晴原, 杨洪兴. 建筑用标准气象数据手册[M]. 1版. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.
[19] 太原市环境保护局. 关于重点工业源及集中式污染治理设施污染物排放量核算方法有关问题的通知(市污普办〔2008〕8 号)[A]. 2008.
[20] 彭兴文, 柳建龙, 郑祥云, 等. 华能汕头电厂煤场自动喷雾防尘系统的研制[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2005, 31(5): 19-20
PENG Xingwen, LIU Jianlong, ZHENG Xiangyun, et al. Development of automatic spray dust control system for coal yard of Huaneng Shantou Power Plant[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2005, 31(5): 19-20
[21] 国家环境保护总局. 排污申报登记实用手册[M]. 1版. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2003.
[22] 中国环境监测总站. 2017年74城市空气质量状况报告[EB/OL]. [2020-09-24]. http://www.cnemc.cn/jcbg/kqzlzkbg/index_1.shtml.
[23] 苟银寅, 张凯, 李金娟, 等. 保定市大气污染变化趋势及特征[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(10): 4413-4425
GOU Yinyin, ZHANG Kai, LI Jinjuan, et al. Variational trend and characteristics of air pollution in Baoding City[J]. Environmental Science, 2020, 41(10): 4413-4425
[24] 李青春, 王耀庭, 李伟, 等. 基于垂直加密观测的北京地区霾和沙尘复合污染形成条件分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2020, 40(3): 803-818
LI Qingchun, WANG Yaoting, LI Wei, et al. Analysis of formation conditions about haze and sand-dust combined pollution in the Beijing region based on intensive vertical observations[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2020, 40(3): 803-818
[25] 林宇, 杨莹, 李美玲, 等. 港口煤炭作业细颗粒物(PM_2.5)排放特征研究[J]. 水道港口, 2015, 36(6): 578-582
LIN Yu, YANG Ying, LI Meiling, et al. Study on emission characteristics of fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) in coal port[J]. Journal of Waterway and Harbor, 2015, 36(6): 578-582
[26] 陈俊博, 张丽, 胡树超. 露天堆煤场防风抑尘网项目环境影响经济评价研究[J]. 环境工程, 2018, 36(增刊1): 854-856
CHEN Junbo, ZHANG Li, HU Shuchao. Study on economic evaluation of environmental impact of windbreak and dust suppression network project in open coal yard[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2018, 36(S1): 854-856
[27] 刘文斌, 李雪梅. 大型煤场全封闭改造选型分析[J]. 东北电力技术, 2019, 40(10): 54-57
LIU Wenbin, LI Xuemei. Analysis of large coal yard fully closed renovation selection[J]. Northeast Electric Power Technology, 2019, 40(10): 54-57
[28] 司小飞, 李元昊, 王灵. 火电厂大跨度煤棚封闭设计[J]. 工业建筑, 2017, 47(增刊2): 281-285
SI Xiaofei, LI Yuanhao, WANG Ling. Full closure design for long span coal fired power plant[J]. Industrial Architecture, 2017, 47(S2): 281-285
[29] 莫华, 朱杰. 燃煤电厂有色烟羽治理要点分析与环境管理[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(3): 10-15, 35
MO Hua, ZHU Jie. Analysis of key points on curbing colored plume in coal-fired power plants and environmental management[J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(3): 10-15, 35
[30] 杨爱勇, 舒喜, 申智勇, 等. 湿烟羽综合治理政策分析及建议[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(1): 130-139
YANG Aiyong, SHU Xi, SHEN Zhiyong, et al. Policy studies and advice on comprehensive control of wet plume[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(1): 130-139
[31] 朱法华, 孙尊强, 申智勇. 超低排放燃煤电厂有色烟羽成因及治理技术的经济与环境效益研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(8): 1-7, 25
ZHU Fahua, SUN Zunqiang, SHEN Zhiyong. Cause analysis of colored smoke plume and related studies on economic and environmental benefits of its treatment technologies for ultra-low emission coal-fired power plants[J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(8): 1-7, 25
[32] 王志轩. 超低排放后, 对火电厂“消白”是舍本逐末[J]. 环境经济, 2020(5): 50-55
[33] 帅伟, 李立, 崔志敏, 等. 基于实测的超低排放燃煤电厂主要大气污染物排放特征与减排效益分析[J]. 中国电力, 2015, 48(11): 131-137
SHUAI Wei, LI li, CUI Zhimin, et al. Analysis of primary air pollutant emission characteristics and reduction efficiency for ultra-low emission coal-fired power plants based on actual measurement[J]. Electric Power, 2015, 48(11): 131-137
[34] 吴家玉, 朱杰, 莫华, 等. 典型燃煤电厂浆液冷却烟气消白设施SO₃治理效果测试研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(8): 145-150, 172
WU Jiayu, ZHU Jie, MO Hua, et al. Test study on SO₃ control effect of slurry cooling wet plume treatment project in a typical coal-fired power plant[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(8): 145-150, 172
[35] 张志强, 朱法华, 邹斯诣, 等. 基于实测的烟气“消白”工程环境效益研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(9): 202-207
ZHANG Zhiqiang, ZHU Fahua, ZOU Siyi, et al. Study on environmental benefits of wet plume treatment project based on actual measurements[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(9): 202-207

京津冀及周边地区燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物不同控制情景下时空变化特征

Spatio-Temporal Variation Characteristics of Fugitive Particulate Matter Emissions from the Coal Storage Yard of Coal-Fired Power Plants in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and Surrounding Areas under Different Regulatory Scenarios

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘含笑, 吴黎明, 赵琳, 于立元, 郦建国, 崔盈. 燃煤电厂湿式电除尘器减排及能效特性研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 196-203.
[2]	孙尊强, 郑成航, 周灿, 王圣, 马修元, 叶毅科. 燃煤电厂典型除尘器运行现状分析及优化[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 194-201.
[3]	赵宏, 张发捷, 马云龙, 马宝林, 唐潇, 徐仁博, 罗通达, 李成宝, 任传明, 于洁, 孙路石. 燃煤电厂SCR脱硝氨逃逸迁移规律试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(1): 196-202.
[4]	赵柄, 王海刚, 胡冬, 陈坤洋, 金绪良, 殷爱鸣. 燃煤电厂碱性吸附剂脱汞性能研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(9): 208-213.
[5]	姚燕, 马云龙, 杨晓宁, 张华东, 王丽朋. 高砷煤SCR脱硝催化剂中毒失活研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(6): 191-196.
[6]	马学礼, 孙希进, 苏燊燊, 张仁锋, 党立晨, 黄显昌, 谢永平. 基于超低排放的燃煤电厂烟囱高度优化研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(5): 179-184.
[7]	徐静馨, 朱法华, 王圣, 张明, 赵秀勇, 孙雪丽, 胡耘, 田文鑫. 超低排放燃煤电厂和燃气电厂综合对比[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(2): 164-172,179.
[8]	李滨, 杨阳. 烟气SO₃监测控制冷凝法采样方法[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(1): 140-146.
[9]	王文欣, 高毅, 刘春红, 童小忠, 陈彪, 祁志福, 张勤. 燃煤电厂旁路烟气干燥塔控制技术开发[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(1): 147-154.
[10]	雷嗣远, 李海浩, 李乐田, 倪贵东, 孔凡海, 吴国勋, 卞子君. SCR脱硝低负荷投运烟气调温旁路改造设计[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(9): 179-184.
[11]	许剑, 夏小飞, 李凯伦, 郑金, 王星, 马翔. 电站轴流引风机叶片通过频率振动超标问题机理分析及治理[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 117-122.
[12]	陈海杰, 马务, 刘贡祎, 高攀. W火焰锅炉SNCR脱硝及其对SCR入口流场的影响[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 146-153.
[13]	晋银佳, 刘泽宇, 尤良洲, 夏守庆, 唐国瑞. RESALT技术在燃煤电厂脱硫废水浓缩处理中的应用[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 154-160.
[14]	王锡辉, 陈厚涛, 朱晓星, 王志杰, 盛锴. W火焰直流炉协调控制策略及工程应用优化[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(6): 154-159,165.
[15]	薛翔, 邱勇, 马翔, 郑金, 李凯伦, 张振民. 300 MW机组引、增压风机二合一改造后动调风机振动原因分析及解决方案[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(6): 172-178.

模态框（Modal）标题

京津冀及周边地区燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物不同控制情景下时空变化特征

Spatio-Temporal Variation Characteristics of Fugitive Particulate Matter Emissions from the Coal Storage Yard of Coal-Fired Power Plants in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and Surrounding Areas under Different Regulatory Scenarios

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics