烟气SO3监测控制冷凝法采样方法

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201903047

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 烟气SO₃采样多采用控制冷凝法，因SO₃易凝结，捕集率仅有80%左右。参照GB/T 21508-2008所规定的控制冷凝法，对影响SO₃捕集率的主要因素，如蛇形盘管内径及总长、抽气流量、采样枪温度等进行实验研究，得到最佳盘管型式及控制参数。研究结果表明：采样枪的加热温度应≥280 ℃；对于内径4 mm的蛇形盘管，最佳抽气流量为20 L/min，蛇形盘管总长应为240 mm。在最佳条件下，控制冷凝法SO₃捕集效率可达97%以上，能够满足现场SO₃测试需要。将研究成果应用于某600 MW超低排放机组的监测，得到了烟气排放不同阶段SO₃排放浓度及各大气污染物治理设施对SO₃的脱除效率。

关键词: 燃煤电厂, SO₃监测, SO₃采样, 控制冷凝法, 采样枪, 蛇形盘管, 抽气流量

Abstract: Controlled condensation method was adopted mostly for SO₃ sampling in the flue gas, because SO₃ is prone to condense and its capture rate is only about 80%. Based on the specifications of controlled condensation method in GB/T 21508-2008, the experiment of SO₃ capture was carried out. Through the experimental studies on the main factors affecting the capture rate of SO₃, such as the size and total length of serpentine coil, the extract flow as well as temperature of sampling, the best coil type and control parameters were obtained. The results show that, the heating temperature of the sampling gun should be at least 280℃. For serpentine coil with the inner diameter of 4 mm, 20 L/min is the optimal pumping flow rate, and the length of serpentine coil should be 240 mm. Under the optimal conditions, the SO₃ capture efficiency can reach 97% or higher, which will meet the needs of SO₃ field test. Finally by taking advantage of this sampling method, the SO₃ concentration in flue gas at each stage was measured and the SO₃ removal efficiency of various air pollutant control equipment from a 600 MW ultra low emission unit was calculated based on the measurement data.

Key words: coal-fired power plant, SO₃ testing, SO₃ sampling, controlled condensation method, sampling gun, coil, suction flow rate

李滨, 杨阳. 烟气SO₃监测控制冷凝法采样方法[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(1): 140-146.

LI Bin, YANG Yang. The Controlled Condensation Method for the Sampling of SO₃ in the Flue Gas[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(1): 140-146.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201903047

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2020/V53/I1/140

参考文献

[1] 全国电力工业统计快报(2017年)[R]. 北京:中国电力企业联合会, 2018.
[2] 王树民, 张翼, 刘吉臻. 燃煤电厂细颗粒物控制技术集成应用及"近零排放"特性[J]. 环境科学研究, 2016, 29(9):1256-1263
WANG Shumin, ZHANG Yi, LIU Jizhen. Integrated application of fine particulate matter control technologies and their"near-zero emission"characteristics in coal-fired power plants[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2016, 29(9):1256-1263
[3] 闫克平, 李树然, 郑钦臻, 等. 电除尘技术发展与应用[J]. 高电压技术, 2017, 43(2):476-486
YAN Keping, LI Shuran, ZHENG Qinzhen, et al. Development and application of electrostatic precipitation technology[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2017, 43(2):476-486
[4] 张军, 郑成航, 张涌新, 等. 某1 000 MW燃煤机组超低排放电厂烟气污染物排放测试及其特性分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(5):1310-1314
ZHANG Jun, ZHENG Chenghang, ZHANG Yongxin, et al. Experimental investigation of ultra-low pollutants emission characteristics from a 1 000 MW coal-fired power plant[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(5):1310-1314
[5] 莫华, 朱杰, 黄志杰, 等. 超低排放下不同湿法脱硫技术脱除SO₃效果测试与分析[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(3):46-50
MO Hua, ZHU Jie, HUANG Zhijie, et al. Test and study on SO₃ removal performance of different wet flue gas desulfurization technologies at ultra-low pollutants emission[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(3):46-50
[6] 郭阳, 李媛, 汪永威, 等. SCR脱硝系统烟气中SO₃测试采样方法对比研究[J]. 电力建设, 2013, 34(6):69-72
GUO Yang, LI Yuan, WANG Yongwei, et al. Comparison of SO₃ testing and sampling methods in flue gas for SCR denitration system[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2013, 34(6):69-72
[7] 杜振, 杨立强, 魏宏鸽, 等. 低低温电除尘器对粉尘特性和SO₃脱除效果影响分析[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(9):125-128
DU Zhen, YANG Liqiang, WEI Hongge, et al. Analysis on the impacts of low-low temperature eletrostatic precipitator on dust characteristics and SO₃ removal effect[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(9):125-128
[8] 陈鹏芳, 朱庚富, 张俊翔. 基于实测的燃煤电厂烟气协同控制技术对SO₃去除效果的研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2017, 39(3):232-235
CHEN Pengfang, ZHU Gengfu, ZHANG Junxiang. Research on SO₃ removal efficiency by flue gas co-benefit control technique of coal-fired power plants based on field tests[J]. Environmental Pollution and Prevention, 2017, 39(3):232-235
[9] 刘含笑, 姚宇平, 郦建国, 等. 燃煤电厂烟气中SO₃生成、治理及测试技术研究[J]. 中国电力, 2015, 48(9):152-156
LIU Hanxiao, YAO Yuping, LI Jianguo, et al. Study on SO₃ generation, control and testing technology for coal-fired power plants[J]. Electric Power, 2015, 48(9):152-156
[10] FLEIG D, ANDERSSON K, NORMANN F, et al. SO₃ formation under oxyfuel combustion conditions[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2011, 50(14):8505-8514.
[11] YANG Zhengda, ZHENG Chenghang, ZHANG Xuefeng, et al. Sulfuric acid aerosol formation and collection by corona discharge in wet electrostatic precipitator[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(8):8400-8406.
[12] 张悠. 烟气中SO₃测试技术及其应用研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2013.
ZHANG You. Research and application of SO₃ measurement in flue gas[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2013.
[13] ZHENG Chenghang, WANG Yifan, LIU Yong, et al. Formation, transformation, measurement, and control of SO₃ in coal-fired power plants[J]. Fuel, 2019, 241:327-346.
[14] 杨丁, 陈永强, 陈威祥, 等. SO₃采样技术改进及烟气处理设备SO₃脱除能力测试[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(7):157-161
YANG Ding, CHEN Yongqiang, CHEN Weixiang, et al. Improvement of SO₃ sampling technology and SO₃ removal capability testing of flue gas treatment equipment[J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(7):157-161
[15] 刘小龙, 段玖祥, 李军状, 等. 燃煤电厂烟气中SO₃控制技术及测试方法探讨[J]. 环境工程, 2017, 35(5):98-102
LIU Xiaolong, DUAN Jiuxiang, LI Junzhuang, et al. Contol technology and determination methods of SO₃ in flue gas from coal-fired power plants[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2017, 35(5):98-102
[16] 陈威祥, 郭俊, 叶兴联, 等. 燃煤烟气SO₃测试捕集效率试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(3):43-48
CHEN Weixiang, GUO Jun, YE Xinglian, et al. Experimental study of the SO₃ detection and collection efficiency in coal-fired flue gas[J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(3):43-48
[17] YANG Zhengda, ZHENG Chenghang, ZHANG Xuefeng, et al. Highly efficient removal of sulfuric acid aerosol by a combined wet electrostatic precipitator[J]. RSC Advances, 2018, 8(1):59-66.
[18] BREWER L. Thermodynamic data for flue-gas desulfurization processes[R]. California:Lawrence Berkeley Lab, 1981.
[19] 潘丹萍, 吴昊, 黄荣廷, 等. 石灰石-石膏法烟气脱硫过程中SO₃酸雾脱除特性[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 46(2):311-316
PAN Danping, WU Hao, HUANG Rongting, et al. Removal properties of sulfuric acid mist during limestone-gypsum flue gas desulfurization process[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science), 2016, 46(2):311-316
[20] 王定帮, 雷鸣, 余福胜, 等. 燃煤机组SO₃ 迁移规律及排放特性试验[J]. 热力发电, 2018, 47(11):96-101
WANG Dingbang, LEI Ming, YU Fusheng, et al. SO₃ migration and emission characteristics of coal-fired power units[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2018, 47(11):96-101
[21] 杨玮, 孙彬彬, 王雪, 等. 山西某电厂燃煤烟气SO₃与颗粒物排放特征[J]. 环境工程, 2018, 36(1):83-87
YANG Wei, SUN Binbin, WANG Xue, et al. Emissions in coal-fired flue gas characteristics of SO₃ and particulate from Shanxi power plant[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2018, 36(1):83-87
[22] 纪培栋. SCR催化剂SO₂氧化机理及调控机制研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2016.
JI Peidong. Research of SO₂ oxidation over SCR catalyst and regulatory mechanism[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2016.
[23] 名嶋慎司. 石炭火力用低低温電気集塵装置[J]. 住友重機械技報, 2001, 146:35-38

烟气SO₃监测控制冷凝法采样方法

The Controlled Condensation Method for the Sampling of SO₃ in the Flue Gas

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘含笑, 吴黎明, 赵琳, 于立元, 郦建国, 崔盈. 燃煤电厂湿式电除尘器减排及能效特性研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 196-203.
[2]	孙尊强, 郑成航, 周灿, 王圣, 马修元, 叶毅科. 燃煤电厂典型除尘器运行现状分析及优化[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 194-201.
[3]	吴家玉, 莫华, 胡耘, 朱杰, 帅伟, 张晴, 姜岸. 京津冀及周边地区燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物不同控制情景下时空变化特征[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 182-189.
[4]	赵宏, 张发捷, 马云龙, 马宝林, 唐潇, 徐仁博, 罗通达, 李成宝, 任传明, 于洁, 孙路石. 燃煤电厂SCR脱硝氨逃逸迁移规律试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(1): 196-202.
[5]	赵柄, 王海刚, 胡冬, 陈坤洋, 金绪良, 殷爱鸣. 燃煤电厂碱性吸附剂脱汞性能研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(9): 208-213.
[6]	吴家玉, 朱杰, 莫华, 张峰, 帅伟, 张晴, 那钦. 典型燃煤电厂浆液冷却烟气消白设施SO₃治理效果测试研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(8): 145-150,172.
[7]	姚燕, 马云龙, 杨晓宁, 张华东, 王丽朋. 高砷煤SCR脱硝催化剂中毒失活研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(6): 191-196.
[8]	马学礼, 孙希进, 苏燊燊, 张仁锋, 党立晨, 黄显昌, 谢永平. 基于超低排放的燃煤电厂烟囱高度优化研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(5): 179-184.
[9]	徐静馨, 朱法华, 王圣, 张明, 赵秀勇, 孙雪丽, 胡耘, 田文鑫. 超低排放燃煤电厂和燃气电厂综合对比[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(2): 164-172,179.
[10]	王文欣, 高毅, 刘春红, 童小忠, 陈彪, 祁志福, 张勤. 燃煤电厂旁路烟气干燥塔控制技术开发[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(1): 147-154.
[11]	雷嗣远, 李海浩, 李乐田, 倪贵东, 孔凡海, 吴国勋, 卞子君. SCR脱硝低负荷投运烟气调温旁路改造设计[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(9): 179-184.
[12]	许剑, 夏小飞, 李凯伦, 郑金, 王星, 马翔. 电站轴流引风机叶片通过频率振动超标问题机理分析及治理[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 117-122.
[13]	陈海杰, 马务, 刘贡祎, 高攀. W火焰锅炉SNCR脱硝及其对SCR入口流场的影响[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 146-153.
[14]	晋银佳, 刘泽宇, 尤良洲, 夏守庆, 唐国瑞. RESALT技术在燃煤电厂脱硫废水浓缩处理中的应用[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 154-160.
[15]	王锡辉, 陈厚涛, 朱晓星, 王志杰, 盛锴. W火焰直流炉协调控制策略及工程应用优化[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(6): 154-159,165.

模态框（Modal）标题