双塔双循环脱硫系统优化与经济性运行研究

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201609047

中国电力 ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (4): 136-142,179.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201609047

双塔双循环脱硫系统优化与经济性运行研究

杨用龙¹, 苏秋凤², 张杨¹, 王建峰¹, 王仁雷¹, 胡妲¹, 朱跃¹

1. 华电电力科学研究院, 浙江杭州 310030;
2. 浙江大学能源清洁利用国家重点实验室, 浙江杭州 310027

收稿日期:2016-09-11 修回日期:2017-12-10 出版日期:2018-04-05 发布日期:2018-04-12
作者简介:杨用龙(1985-),男,湖北荆州人,硕士,工程师,从事火电厂烟气环保工程技术及研究工作,E-mail:yangyonglonghao@163.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0203701-5）；国家科技支撑计划课题（2015BAA05B02-2）。

System Optimization and Economical Operation of the Series Absorption Tower

YANG Yonglong¹, SU Qiufeng², ZHANG Yang¹, WANG Jianfeng¹, WANG Renlei¹, HU Da¹, ZHU Yue¹

1. Huadian Electric Power Research Institute, Hangzhou 310030, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China

Received:2016-09-11 Revised:2017-12-10 Online:2018-04-05 Published:2018-04-12
Supported by:
This work is supported by National Key Research Program of China (No.2016YFC0203701-5), National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China (No.2015BAA05B02-2).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 介绍了双塔双循环脱硫系统优化试验情况，结合优化试验结果分析了不同运行参数对双塔双循环脱硫系统的影响，并优选出了最佳运行工况。结果表明：双塔双循环脱硫系统的脱硫效率可以达到99.2%以上；不同负荷条件下应选择合适的运行工况；按照优选的运行参数运行可以大大节约运行成本；双塔双循环工艺的脱硫效果完全满足超低排放要求。

关键词: 火力发电, 燃煤机组, 双塔脱硫系统, 脱硫效率, 系统优化

Abstract: Optimization tests of the series absorption tower are conducted in the work. The effect of the series absorption tower on different operating conditions is analyzed based on the optimization test results, and the best operation condition is selected. The results show that the desulfurization efficiency can reach over 99.2% using the series absorption tower. The suitable operation condition should be chosen in different load conditions accordingly to save the operation cost greatly, and the desulfurization effect of the series absorption tower fully meets the requirement of ultra-low emission.

Key words: thermal power plant, coal-fired units, series absorption tower, desulfurization efficiency, system optimization

中图分类号:

TM621
X51

杨用龙, 苏秋凤, 张杨, 王建峰, 王仁雷, 胡妲, 朱跃. 双塔双循环脱硫系统优化与经济性运行研究[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(4): 136-142,179.

YANG Yonglong, SU Qiufeng, ZHANG Yang, WANG Jianfeng, WANG Renlei, HU Da, ZHU Yue. System Optimization and Economical Operation of the Series Absorption Tower[J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(4): 136-142,179.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201609047

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2018/V51/I4/136

参考文献

[1] 火电厂大气污染物控制排放标准: GB/T13223—2011[S].Emission standard of air pollutants for thermal power plants: GB/T13223—2011[S].
[2] 李兴华, 赵彩虹, 牛拥军, 等. 燃煤火电机组无烟气旁路脱硫系统运行及改造方案研究[J]. 中国电力, 2014, 47(10): 134-136.LI Xinghua, ZHAO Caihong, NIU Yongjun, et al. Study on operation optimization and retrofit of non-bypass FGD system of fossil fuel power plants[J]. Electric Power, 2014, 47(10): 134-136.
[3] 王运军, 王宏伟, 魏继平, 等. 600MW超临界发电机组污染物脱除及排放[J]. 中国电力, 2013, 46(12): 113-117.WANG Yunjun, WANG Hongwei, WEI Jiping, et al. Removal and emission of pollutants from 600MW supercritical units[J]. Electric Power, 2013, 46(12): 113-117.
[4] 许月阳, 薛建明, 管一明, 等. 燃煤电厂应对新标准二氧化硫控制对策研究[J]. 中国电力, 2012, 45(4): 73-77.XU Yueyang, XUE Jianming, GUAN Yiming, et al. Control strategy for sulfur dioxide under new standard in coal-fired power plant[J]. Electric Power, 2012, 45(4): 73-77.
[5] 张军梅. 提高电站湿法脱硫系统效率及可靠性的几点措施[J]. 中国电力, 2013, 46(5): 13: 17.ZHANG Junmei. Several measures of improving the efficiency and reliability of FGD system in power plant[J]. Electric Power, 2013, 46(5): 13: 17.
[6] 发改能源【2014】2093号: 关于印发《煤电节能减排升级与改造行动计划(2014-2020)》的通知[S].
[7] 帅伟, 李立, 崔志敏, 等. 基于实测的超低排放燃煤电厂主要大气污染物排放与减排效益分析[J]. 中国电力, 2015, 48(11): 131-137.SHUAI Wei, LI Li, CUI Zhimin, et al. Analysis of primary air pollutant emission characteristics and reduction efficiency for ultra-low emission coal-fired power plants based on actual measurement[J]. Electric Power, 2015, 48(11): 131-137.
[8] 孟炜, 李清毅, 胡达清, 等. 百万千瓦燃煤机组烟气超低排放设计及应用[J]. 热能动力工程, 2016, 31(1): 111-116.Meng Wei, LI Qingyi, HU Daqing, et al. Design and applications of the ultra low emissions of flue gases from a 1000 MW coal-fired boiler unit[J]. Engineering for Thermal Energy & Power, 2016, 31(1): 111-116.
[9] 姚明宇, 聂剑平, 张立欣, 等. 燃煤电站锅炉烟气污染物一体化协同治理技术[J]. 热力发电, 2016, 45(3): 8-12.YAO Mingyu, NIE Jianping, ZHANG Lixin, et al. Integrative flue-gas pollutants removal technology for coal-fired utility boilers[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2016, 45(3): 8-12.
[10] 史文峥, 杨萌萌, 张绪辉, 等. 燃煤电厂超低排放技术路线与协同脱除[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(16): 4308-4318.SHI Wenzheng, YANG Mengmeng, ZHANG Xuhui, et al. Ultra-low emission technical route of coal-fired power plants and the cooperative removal[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(16): 4308-4318.
[11] 李兴华, 何育东. 燃煤火电机组SO₂超低排放改造方案研究[J]. 中国电力, 2015, 48(10): 148-151.LI Xinghua, HE Yudong. Study on modification of ultra-low SO₂ emission in coal-fired power plants[J]. Electric Power, 2015, 48(10): 148-151.
[12] 赵磊, 周洪光. 超低排放燃煤火电机组湿式电除尘器细颗粒物脱除分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(2): 468-473.ZHAO Lei, ZHOU Hongguang. Particle removal efficiency analysis of WESP in an ultra low emission coal-fired power plant[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(2): 468-473.
[13] 莫华, 朱杰, 黄志杰, 等. 超低排放下不同湿法脱硫技术脱除SO₃效果测试与分析[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(3): 46-50.MO Hua, ZHU Jie, HUANG Zhijie, et al. Test and study on SO₃ removal performance of different wet flue gas desulfurization technologies at ultra low pollutants emission[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(3): 46-50.
[14] 张军, 郑成航, 张涌新, 等. 某1000 MW燃煤机组超低排放电厂烟气污染物排放测试及其特性分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(5): 1310-1314.ZHANG Jun, ZHENG Chenghang, ZHANG Yongxin, et al. Experimental investigation of ultra-low pollutants emission characteristics from a 1000 MW coal-fired power plant[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(5): 1310-1314.
[15] 朱法华. 燃煤电厂烟气污染物超低排放技术路线的选择[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(3): 11-16.ZHU Fahua. Methodologies on choosing appropriate technical route for ultra low emission of flue gas pollutants from caol-fired power plants[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(3): 11-16.
[16] 林朝扶, 兰建辉, 梁国柱, 等. 串联吸收塔脱硫技术在燃超高硫煤火电厂的应用[J]. 广西电力, 2013, 36(5): 11-15.LIN Chaofu, LAN Jianhui, LIANG Guozhu, et al. Application of flue gas desulphurization technology of series- connected absorption tower in the supper high sulfur coal-fired power plant[J]. Guangxi Electric Power, 2013, 36(5): 11-15.
[17] 李元, 杨志忠. 湿法烟气脱硫关键影响因素及新型单塔双循环技术[J]. 环境工程, 2016(1): 69-73.LI Yuan, YANG Zhizhong. Influence of key factors on lime-gypsum wet flue gas desulfurization and two circulations per tower technology[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2016(1): 69-73.
[18] 李娜. 石灰石-石膏法单塔双循环烟气脱硫工艺介绍[J]. 硫酸工业, 2014(6): 45-48.LI Na. Technology of flue gas desulphurization utilizing single desulphurization tower and double cycling of desulphurizing solution by limestone-gypsum method[J]. Sulphuric Acid Industry, 2014(6): 45-48.
[19] 魏宏鸽, 徐明华, 柴磊, 等. 双塔双循环脱硫系统的运行现状分析与优化措施探讨[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(10): 132-135.WEI Hongge, XU Minghua, CHAI Lei, et al. Current operation state analysis and optimization method exploration on double-tower double-cycle wet-FGD systems[J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(10): 132-135.
[20] 李晓金, 梁培婷, 刘纯杰, 等. 双循环石灰石-石膏湿法脱硫技术反应机理分析[J]. 环境工程, 2017, (35增刊): 414-417, 517.LI Xiaojin, LIANG Peiting, LIU Chunjie, et al. Analysis on reaction mechanism of double loop process for wet flue gas desulphurization with limestone[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2017, (35supplement issue): 414-417, 517.
[21] 周勇. 双塔串联石灰石-石膏湿法脱硫的研究与应用[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2014.ZHOU Yong. Study on limestone-plasterboard wet desulphurization based on two series[D].Jinan: Shandong University, 2014.
[22] 王仁雷, 蔡传钰, 张杨, 等. 不同浆液循环泵运行方式下串联吸收塔脱硫效果评价及优化[J]. 电站系统工程, 2016, 32(2): 19-21.WANG Renlei, CAI Chuanyu, ZHANG Yang, et al. Study and optimization of operation methods of slurry circulating pump based on desulfurization effect of FGD with series absorption tower[J]. Power System Engineering, 2016, 32(2): 19-21.

双塔双循环脱硫系统优化与经济性运行研究

System Optimization and Economical Operation of the Series Absorption Tower

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张兴平, 王腾, 张馨月, 张浩楠. 基于多智能体深度确定策略梯度算法的火力发电商竞价策略[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(11): 161-172.
[2]	张国柱, 张钧泰, 文钰, 杨凯旋, 刘明, 刘继平. 燃煤机组烟气余热及水回收系统变工况特性和调控策略[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(4): 214-220.
[3]	张宁, 代红才, 王轶楠, 刘林, 汤芳, 徐楠. P2X技术进展及其参与电力系统运行优化模拟研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(6): 119-127,135.
[4]	刘志坦, 姚杰, 庄柯, 喻乐蒙, 周凯. 燃气轮机与燃煤机组SCR脱硝催化剂特性比较[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(6): 145-152.
[5]	贾西部. 石灰石-石膏湿法脱硫废水排放量深度解析[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(8): 139-144,163.
[6]	张顺, 闫培飞, 姚洪宇, 李生鹏, 曹士保, 高亚洲. 亚临界汽包炉深度调峰安全性评估及控制优化技术[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(7): 203-210.
[7]	王宏亮, 许月阳, 薛建明, 刘涛, 管一明. 燃煤发电机组超低排放改造前后汞排放规律对比研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(11): 243-251.
[8]	仝声, 刘乐, 王鹏飞. 基于多变量广义预测控制算法的两级过热汽温协调联动控制[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(10): 215-223.
[9]	杨明花, 张克涵. 基于高光谱图像和卷积神经网络的燃煤热值估计算法[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(9): 148-153.
[10]	曲立涛, 李超, 王德鑫, 于洪海, 杜佳, 齐晓辉. SCR脱硝超低排放NO_x均匀性优化及安全策略分析[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 161-167.
[11]	赵永亮, 刁保圣, 韩翔, 刘明, 王珠, 种道彤, 严俊杰. 660 MW超临界燃煤机组变负荷过程动态特性的仿真研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(5): 13-20.
[12]	刘玺璞, 李启永, 李东阳, 郭明, 李建光. 330 MW燃煤发电机组除尘系统节能优化[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(5): 164-169,175.
[13]	刘福国, 张绪辉, 吴举, 崔福兴. 基于数据校正的电厂日常供电煤耗诊断分析[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(11): 118-124.
[14]	张晓东, 王鹏飞, 刘乐. 基于多变量广义预测控制算法的脱硝优化研究及应用[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(10): 178-184.
[15]	赵海宝, 何毓忠, 沈志昂, 蒋华, 姚宇平. 1 350 MW机组电除尘器选型及其钢支架热膨胀影响控制[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(1): 124-128,136.

模态框（Modal）标题

双塔双循环脱硫系统优化与经济性运行研究

System Optimization and Economical Operation of the Series Absorption Tower

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics