燃煤发电机组超低排放改造前后汞排放规律对比研究

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202006328

中国电力 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (11): 243-251.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202006328

燃煤发电机组超低排放改造前后汞排放规律对比研究

王宏亮^1,2, 许月阳^1,2, 薛建明^1,2, 刘涛¹, 管一明^1,2

1. 国电科学技术研究院有限公司，江苏南京 210023;
2. 清洁高效燃煤发电与污染控制国家重点实验室，江苏南京 210023

收稿日期:2020-07-08 修回日期:2020-07-31 出版日期:2020-11-05 发布日期:2020-11-05
通讯作者: 国家能源投资集团科技创新基金资助项目(燃煤烟气重金属污染物磁响应高效捕集技术研究，GJNY-20-109)
作者简介:王宏亮(1983—)，男，硕士，高级工程师，从事火电厂污染物控制及资源化技术开发、工程应用研究，E-mail：hl_wang0128@163.com;许月阳(1979—)，男，通信作者，硕士，高级工程师(教授级)，从事火电厂污染物控制及资源化技术开发、工程应用及政策标准的研究，E-mail：xyy_gdhb@126.com
基金资助:
This work is supported by China Energy Investment Corporation Science Technology and Innovation Funding (Study on High-Efficiency Magnetic Capturing of Heavy Metal Pollutants in Coal-Fired Flue Gas, No.GJNY-20-109)

Comparative Study on the Characteristics of Mercury Emission from Coal-Fired Plants before and after Ultra-Low Emission Retrofitting

WANG Hongliang^1,2, XU Yueyang^1,2, XUE Jianming^1,2, LIU Tao¹, GUAN Yiming^1,2

1. GuoDian Science and Technology Research Institute, Nanjing 210023, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Clean and Efficient Coal-Fired Power Generation and Pollution Control, Nanjing 210023, China

Received:2020-07-08 Revised:2020-07-31 Online:2020-11-05 Published:2020-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用安大略法（Ontario hydro method，OHM）对2台超低排放改造机组排放的烟气汞进行了采样检测，并将测试数据与改造前的测试数据进行了对比分析。试验结果表明：2台机组排口总汞浓度分别为2.31、4.22 μg/m³，远低于国内现行标准。汞排放因子由改造前的1.76和3.13 g/TJ下降为0.83和2.17 g/TJ，降幅分别为52.84%和30.67%。改造后SCR+DESP+WFGD+WESP组合环保设施的总汞脱除效率分别为87.91%、82.27%，相较于改造前SCR+DESP+WFGD的组合效率69.57%、65.61%，效率绝对值分别提升了18.34、16.66个百分点。研究表明：改造提高了SCR对单质汞的氧化率，强化了WFGD对氧化汞和颗粒汞的捕集能力，新增设的WESP表现出对氧化汞和单质汞的协同脱除能力。另外，提高SCR流场均匀性、加强催化剂维护、抑制WFGD中氧化汞的再还原等能有效保障现有环保设施协同脱汞能力。

关键词: 燃煤机组, 超低排放改造, 烟气环保设施, 汞协同脱除, 汞排放因子

Abstract: In this paper, with the aid of Ontario Hydro Method (OHM), the mercury emissions from the two units with ultra-low emission retrofit are sampled and tested, then the testing data are compared and analyzed with those before the retrofitting. The testing results show that the mercury emission concentrations from the two units are 2.31 and 4.22 μg/m³ respectively, far below the limit value in the current domestic national standard. The mercury emission factors are reduced from 1.76 and 3.13 g/TJ to 0.83 and 2.17 g/TJ correspondingly, 52.84% and 30.67% of decrease. And the total mercury removal efficiencies of the retrofitted air pollution control devices with the combination of SCR+DESP+WFGD+WESP are 87.91% and 82.27%, respectively, 18.34% and 16.66% of increase compared with the efficiency of 69.57% and 65.61% of the combination of SCR+DESP+WFGD before the retrofit. These data indicate that the ultra-low emission retrofit has improved the oxidation rate of SCR to elemental mercury, and enhanced the capability of WFGD to capture mercury oxide and particulate mercury. Besides, the newly added WESP also displays a synergistic removal capability of both mercury oxide and elemental mercury. Furthermore, by improving the uniformity of SCR flow field, strengthening the maintenance of catalyst and inhibiting the reduction of mercury oxide in WFGD, the synergistic mercury removal capacity can be effectively guaranteed for the present air pollution control devices.

Key words: coal-fired plant, ultra-low emission retrofitting, air pollution control devices (APCDs), mercury synergistic removal, mercury emission factor

王宏亮, 许月阳, 薛建明, 刘涛, 管一明. 燃煤发电机组超低排放改造前后汞排放规律对比研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(11): 243-251.

WANG Hongliang, XU Yueyang, XUE Jianming, LIU Tao, GUAN Yiming. Comparative Study on the Characteristics of Mercury Emission from Coal-Fired Plants before and after Ultra-Low Emission Retrofitting[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(11): 243-251.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202006328

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2020/V53/I11/243

参考文献

[1] ZHANG L, ZHUO Y Q, CHEN L, et al. Mercury emissions from six coal-fired power plants in China[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2008, 89(11): 1033-1040.
[2] 张凡, 邓双, 刘宇, 等. 燃煤电厂大气汞等污染物的排放与控制[M]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2015.
[3] 中国电力企业联合会. 2020年中国电力行业年度发展报告[R]. 北京: 中国建材工业出版社, 2020.
[4] ZHANG Y, YANG J P, YU X H, et al. Migration and emission characteristics of Hg in coal-fired power plant of China with ultra low emission air pollution control devices[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2017, 158: 272-280.
[5] 郭静娟, 刘松涛, 张优, 等. 基于燃煤电厂超低排放的汞分布特性研究[J]. 中国环境监测, 2020, 36(1): 55-59
GUO Jingjuan, LIU Songtao, ZHANG You, et al. Impacts of ultra-low emission in coal-fired power plants on the distribution characteristics of mercury[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 2020, 36(1): 55-59
[6] 华晓宇, 章良利, 宋玉彩, 等. 燃煤机组超低排放改造对汞排放的影响[J]. 热能动力工程, 2016, 31(7): 110-116
HUA Xiaoyu, ZHANG Liangli, SONG Yucai, et al. Influence of the ultra low emission modification of a coal-fired unit on the mercury emissions[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2016, 31(7): 110-116
[7] 宋畅, 张翼, 郝剑, 等. 燃煤电厂超低排放改造前后汞污染排放特征[J]. 环境科学研究, 2017, 30(5): 672-677
SONG Chang, ZHANG Yi, HAO Jian, et al. Mercury emission characteristics from coal-fired power plant before and after ultra-low emission retrofitting[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2017, 30(5): 672-677
[8] 魏绍青, 滕阳, 李晓航, 等. 300 MW等级燃煤机组煤粉炉与循环流化床锅炉汞排放特性比较[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2017, 45(8): 1009-1016
WEI Shaoqing, TENG Yang, LI Xiaohang, et al. Comparison of mercury emission from around 300 MW coal-fired power generation units between pulverized boiler and circulating fluidized-bed boiler[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2017, 45(8): 1009-1016
[9] 王树民, 余学海, 顾永正, 等. 基于燃煤电厂“近零排放”的大气污染物排放限值探讨[J]. 环境科学研究, 2018, 31(6): 975-984
WANG Shumin, YU Xuehai, GU Yongzheng, et al. Discussion of emission limits of air pollutants for ‘near-zero emission’ coal-fired power plants[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31(6): 975-984
[10] 赵毅, 韩立鹏. 660 MW超低排放燃煤电站汞分布特征研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2019, 39(3): 853-858
ZHAO Yi, HAN Lipeng. Distribution characteristics of mercury in 660 MW coal-fired power plant with ultra-low emission[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2019, 39(3): 853-858
[11] 陈磊, 段钰锋, 赵士林, 等. 350 MW超低排放燃煤电厂污染物控制装置对汞的协同脱除[J]. 热能动力工程, 2020, 35(2): 187-193, 200
CHEN Lei, DUAN Yufeng, ZHAO Shilin, et al. Mercury co-removal by the air pollutant control devices in a 350 MW ultra-low emission coal-fired power plant[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2020, 35(2): 187-193, 200
[12] 王建庆. 煤中汞在空气重介质流化床分选过程中的分配规律[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2015.
WANG Jianqing. The distribution rule of mercury in coal during the separation process of air dense medium fluidized bed[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2015.
[13] LUTTRELL G H, KOHMUENCH J N, YOON R H. An evaluation of coal preparation technologies for controlling trace element emissions[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2000, 65/66: 407-422.
[14] 冯立品. 煤中汞的赋存状态和选煤过程中的迁移规律研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学, 2009.
FENG Lipin. The study of mercury occurrence in coal and migration regularity during coal preparation[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology, 2009.
[15] 吴清茹, 赵子鹰, 杨帆, 等. 中国燃煤电厂履行《关于汞的水俣公约》的差距与展望[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(10): 52-60
WU Qingru, ZHAO Ziying, YANG Fan, et al. Gaps and prospects for the implementation of Minamata Convention on Mercury by China's coal-fired power plants[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(10): 52-60
[16] ZHAO S L, DUAN Y F, YAO T, et al. Study on the mercury emission and transformation in an ultra-low emission coal-fired power plant[J]. Fuel, 2017, 199: 653-661.
[17] ZHAO S L, PUDASAINEE D, DUAN Y F, et al. A review on mercury in coal combustion process: content and occurrence forms in coal, transformation, sampling methods, emission and control technologies[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2019, 73: 26-64.
[18] REYNOLDS J. Multi-pollutant control using membrane-based up-flow wet electrostatic precipitation[R]. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), Ohio University, Akron, Ohio, 2004.
[19] 睢辉, 张梦泽, 董勇, 等. 燃煤烟气中单质汞吸附与氧化机理研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2014, 33(6): 1582-1588, 1595
SUI Hui, ZHANG Mengze, DONG Yong, et al. Research progress of adsorption and oxidation mechanism of elemental mercury from coal-fired flue gas[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2014, 33(6): 1582-1588, 1595
[20] 赵毅, 韩立鹏. 超低排放燃煤电厂低低温电除尘器协同脱汞研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2019, 39(4): 319-323, 330
ZHAO Yi, HAN Lipeng. Synergistic removal of mercury by low-low temperature ESP for ultra-low emission coal-fired power plants[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2019, 39(4): 319-323, 330

燃煤发电机组超低排放改造前后汞排放规律对比研究

Comparative Study on the Characteristics of Mercury Emission from Coal-Fired Plants before and after Ultra-Low Emission Retrofitting

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张国柱, 张钧泰, 文钰, 杨凯旋, 刘明, 刘继平. 燃煤机组烟气余热及水回收系统变工况特性和调控策略[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(4): 214-220.
[2]	刘志坦, 姚杰, 庄柯, 喻乐蒙, 周凯. 燃气轮机与燃煤机组SCR脱硝催化剂特性比较[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(6): 145-152.
[3]	贾西部. 石灰石-石膏湿法脱硫废水排放量深度解析[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(8): 139-144,163.
[4]	张顺, 闫培飞, 姚洪宇, 李生鹏, 曹士保, 高亚洲. 亚临界汽包炉深度调峰安全性评估及控制优化技术[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(7): 203-210.
[5]	曲立涛, 李超, 王德鑫, 于洪海, 杜佳, 齐晓辉. SCR脱硝超低排放NO_x均匀性优化及安全策略分析[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 161-167.
[6]	赵永亮, 刁保圣, 韩翔, 刘明, 王珠, 种道彤, 严俊杰. 660 MW超临界燃煤机组变负荷过程动态特性的仿真研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(5): 13-20.
[7]	刘玺璞, 李启永, 李东阳, 郭明, 李建光. 330 MW燃煤发电机组除尘系统节能优化[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(5): 164-169,175.
[8]	杨希刚, 金保昇, 许月阳. SCR超低排放综合诊断及闭环优化[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(3): 153-160.
[9]	刘福国, 张绪辉, 吴举, 崔福兴. 基于数据校正的电厂日常供电煤耗诊断分析[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(11): 118-124.
[10]	赵海宝, 何毓忠, 沈志昂, 蒋华, 姚宇平. 1 350 MW机组电除尘器选型及其钢支架热膨胀影响控制[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(1): 124-128,136.
[11]	宋玉宝, 刘鑫辉, 何川, 王兴俊, 王乐乐, 程世军, 马云龙, 梁俊杰. SCR催化剂低负荷运行硫酸氢铵失活研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(1): 144-150.
[12]	吴智泉, 曹蕃, 袁园, 贾西部. 脱硫废水烟道蒸发工艺对烟气酸露点影响分析[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(1): 151-155,184.
[13]	裴煜坤, 张杨, 徐克涛, 朱跃. SCR烟气脱硝尿素热解和水解技术经济性分析[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(9): 174-178.
[14]	雷鉴琦. 降低燃煤机组SCR脱硝系统催化剂磨损的流场优化[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(7): 152-156,169.
[15]	何军, 马大卫, 王正风, 许勇毅, 查智明, 张其良. 安徽省煤电机组超低排放改造及CEMS验收问题分析[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(7): 170-177.

模态框（Modal）标题

燃煤发电机组超低排放改造前后汞排放规律对比研究

Comparative Study on the Characteristics of Mercury Emission from Coal-Fired Plants before and after Ultra-Low Emission Retrofitting

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics