湿式相变凝聚器协同多污染物脱除研究

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2017.02.128.07

中国电力 ›› 2017, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2): 128-136.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2017.02.128.07

湿式相变凝聚器协同多污染物脱除研究

谭厚章¹, 熊英莹¹, 王毅斌¹, 曹瑞杰¹, 杨祖旺², 郑海国²

1. 西安交通大学能源与动力工程学院,陕西西安 710049;
2. 西安格瑞电力科技有限公司,陕西西安 710043

收稿日期:2016-11-01 出版日期:2017-02-20 发布日期:2017-02-22
作者简介:谭厚章（1965—）,男,江西吉安人,教授,博士生导师,从事火电厂煤高效低氮燃烧、系统节能节水以及烟气多污染物脱除与控制等方面研究工作。E-mail:tanhz@mail.xjtu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（No. 91544108;No. 51376147）; 国家重点研发计划资助项目（No. 2016YFB0601500;No.2016YFB0600605）

Study on Synergistic Removal of Multi-Pollutants by WPTA

TAN Houzhang¹, XIONG Yingying¹, WANG Yibin¹, CAO Ruijie¹, YANG Zuwang², ZHENG Haiguo²

1. School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China;
2. Xi’an GeRui Power Science and Technology Limited Company, Xi’an 710043, China;

Received:2016-11-01 Online:2017-02-20 Published:2017-02-22
Supported by:
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No. 91544108;No. 51376147), the National Key Research Program of China (No. 2016YFB0601500;No. 2016YFB0600605).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 燃煤发电机组多污染物协同脱除技术将是未来火电领域的研究热点,为此研发并设计了一种高湿烟气环境中实现细颗粒凝聚和多污染物协同脱除的新型装置——湿式相变凝聚器（Wet Phase Transition Agglomerator,WPTA）。该装置经过实验室实验、中试实验和某660 MW燃煤机组全烟气工况工程实验研究,发现其具有优良的细颗粒物凝聚能力和多种污染物协同脱除性能。中试实验结果表明,经过WPTA后,烟气中颗粒物的粒度分布曲线由单峰分布演变为双峰分布,且粒径在2 μm左右颗粒的峰值明显降低,粒径大于10 μm颗粒的峰值呈增加趋势。660 MW机组全烟气试验结果显示,满负荷下WPTA投运,PM_2.5、PM_1.0脱除效率分别比不投运提高约5个百分点、15个百分点;同时实现了烟气中Hg、As、Ba、Ga、Li、Mn、Sr和Ti元素的高效脱除, 其中Hg与As的脱除能力分别提高了4.18倍和2.82倍。研究结果表明,该湿式相变凝聚协同多污染物脱除技术能很好地实现燃煤机组污染物超低排放。

关键词: 湿式相变凝聚器, 燃煤电厂, 粉尘, 细颗粒物, 多污染物, 协同脱除

Abstract: The technology of multi-pollutants synergistic removal in coal-fired power plants will become the research hotspots in the future. In this paper, a new device named wet phase transition agglomerator (WPTA) is designed and developed to achieve the goal of removing fine particles and multi-pollutants collaboratively from high temperature wet flue gas. Verified through lab-scale testing, pilot-scale testing and a full-scale onsite test under working conditions in a 660-MW lignite-fired power plant, this device has exhibited excellent performance in fine particle and multi-pollutant removal. The pilot-scale test indicates that after the flue gas flow passed through the WPTA, the volume fraction of particles changes from unimodal distribution into bimodal distribution. The peak value of the particle volume fraction is decreased substantially for the particle around 2μm while that of the particles over 10μm tends to increase. The full-scale test shows that the removal efficiency of PM_2.5 and PM_1.0 is improved by 5 and 15 percentage points respectively at full generation loading. The efficient removal of trace elements of Hg, Ba, Ga, As, Li, Mn, Sr and Ti is also achieved simultaneously, of which the removal efficiencies of Hg and As are improved by 4.18 and 2.82 times, respectively. The study result indicates that the new configuration of WPTA+WESP can meet the requirements for ultra-low emission standards on fine particulate matters and other pollutants for coal-fired power plants of China.

Key words: WPTA, coal-fired power plant, dust, fine particulate matter, synergistic removal, multi-pollutants

中图分类号:

谭厚章, 熊英莹, 王毅斌, 曹瑞杰, 杨祖旺, 郑海国. 湿式相变凝聚器协同多污染物脱除研究[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(2): 128-136.

TAN Houzhang, XIONG Yingying, WANG Yibin, CAO Ruijie, YANG Zuwang, ZHENG Haiguo. Study on Synergistic Removal of Multi-Pollutants by WPTA[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(2): 128-136.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2017.02.128.07

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2017/V50/I2/128

参考文献

[1] QUANN R, SAROFIM A. Vaporization of refractory oxides during pulverized coal combustion[C]//Symposium (international) on Combustion, Elsevier, 1982.
[2] 史文峥,杨萌萌,张绪辉,等. 燃煤电厂超低排放技术路线与协同脱除[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2016,36（16）：4308-4318,4513.
SHI Wenzheng, YANG Mengmeng, ZHANG Xuhui, et al . Ultra- low emission technical route of coal-fired power plants and the cooperative removal[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(16): 4308-4318, 4513.
[3] 赵磊,周洪光. 超低排放燃煤火电机组湿式电除尘器细颗粒物脱除分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2016,36（2）：468-473.
ZHAO Lei, ZHOU Hongguang. Particle removal efficiency analysis of WESP in an ultra low emission coal-fired power plant[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(2): 468-473.
[4] 胡斌,刘勇,杨春敏,等. 化学团聚促进电除尘脱除烟气中PM 2.5 和SO 3 [J]. 化工学报,2016,63（9）：3902-3909.
HU Bin, LIU Yong, YANG Chunmin, et al . Simultaneous control of PM 2.5 and SO 3 by chemical agglomeration collaborative electrostatic precipitation [J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 63(9): 3902-3909.
[5] 魏凤,张军营,王春梅,等. 煤燃烧超细颗粒物团聚促进技术的研究进展[J]. 煤炭转化,2003,26（3）：27-31.
WEI Feng, ZHANG Junying, WANG Chunmei, et al . Review of submicron particles agglomeration in coal combustion process[J]. Coal Conversion, 2003, 26(3): 27-31.
[6] 熊英莹,谭厚章. 湿式相变冷凝除尘技术对微细颗粒物的脱除研究[J]. 洁净煤技术,2015,21（2）：20-24.
XIONG Yingying, TAN Houzhang. Influence of wet phase transition condensate dust removal technology on fine particle removal [J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2015, 21(2): 20-24.
[7] 颜金培,杨林军,张霞,等. 应用蒸汽相变机理脱除燃煤可吸入颗粒物实验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2007,27（35）：12-16.
YAN Jinpei, YANG Linjun, ZHANG Xia, et al . Experimental study on separation of inhalable particles from coal combustion by heterogeneous condensation enlargement[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2007, 27(35): 12-16.
[8] TRUCE R, WILKINS J, CRYNACK R, et al . The indigo agglomerator a proven technology for reducing visible emission from electrostatic precipitators [J]. Energetyka, 2005, 11: 751-757.
[9] SLINN W G N. Precipitation scavenging [J]. Atmospheric Sciences and Power Production, 1984: 466-532.
[10] HE C, AHMADI G. Particle deposition with thermophoresis in laminar and turbulent duct flows[J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 1998, 29(6): 525-546.
[11] YAN R, GAUTHIER D, FLAMANT G. Volatility and chemistry of trace elements in a coal combustor[J]. Fuel, 2001, 80(15): 2217-2226.

[1]	刘含笑, 吴黎明, 赵琳, 于立元, 郦建国, 崔盈. 燃煤电厂湿式电除尘器减排及能效特性研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 196-203.
[2]	孙尊强, 郑成航, 周灿, 王圣, 马修元, 叶毅科. 燃煤电厂典型除尘器运行现状分析及优化[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 194-201.
[3]	吴家玉, 莫华, 胡耘, 朱杰, 帅伟, 张晴, 姜岸. 京津冀及周边地区燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物不同控制情景下时空变化特征[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 182-189.
[4]	赵宏, 张发捷, 马云龙, 马宝林, 唐潇, 徐仁博, 罗通达, 李成宝, 任传明, 于洁, 孙路石. 燃煤电厂SCR脱硝氨逃逸迁移规律试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(1): 196-202.
[5]	赵柄, 王海刚, 胡冬, 陈坤洋, 金绪良, 殷爱鸣. 燃煤电厂碱性吸附剂脱汞性能研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(9): 208-213.
[6]	姚燕, 马云龙, 杨晓宁, 张华东, 王丽朋. 高砷煤SCR脱硝催化剂中毒失活研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(6): 191-196.
[7]	马学礼, 孙希进, 苏燊燊, 张仁锋, 党立晨, 黄显昌, 谢永平. 基于超低排放的燃煤电厂烟囱高度优化研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(5): 179-184.
[8]	徐静馨, 朱法华, 王圣, 张明, 赵秀勇, 孙雪丽, 胡耘, 田文鑫. 超低排放燃煤电厂和燃气电厂综合对比[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(2): 164-172,179.
[9]	王宏亮, 许月阳, 薛建明, 刘涛, 管一明. 燃煤发电机组超低排放改造前后汞排放规律对比研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(11): 243-251.
[10]	李滨, 杨阳. 烟气SO₃监测控制冷凝法采样方法[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(1): 140-146.
[11]	王文欣, 高毅, 刘春红, 童小忠, 陈彪, 祁志福, 张勤. 燃煤电厂旁路烟气干燥塔控制技术开发[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(1): 147-154.
[12]	雷嗣远, 李海浩, 李乐田, 倪贵东, 孔凡海, 吴国勋, 卞子君. SCR脱硝低负荷投运烟气调温旁路改造设计[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(9): 179-184.
[13]	许剑, 夏小飞, 李凯伦, 郑金, 王星, 马翔. 电站轴流引风机叶片通过频率振动超标问题机理分析及治理[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 117-122.
[14]	陈海杰, 马务, 刘贡祎, 高攀. W火焰锅炉SNCR脱硝及其对SCR入口流场的影响[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 146-153.
[15]	晋银佳, 刘泽宇, 尤良洲, 夏守庆, 唐国瑞. RESALT技术在燃煤电厂脱硫废水浓缩处理中的应用[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 154-160.

湿式相变凝聚器协同多污染物脱除研究

Study on Synergistic Removal of Multi-Pollutants by WPTA

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

模态框（Modal）标题

湿式相变凝聚器协同多污染物脱除研究

Study on Synergistic Removal of Multi-Pollutants by WPTA

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics