中国电力 ›› 2024, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (10): 172-178, 207.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202311027
陈奇芳1(), 李若凡1(
), 夏明超2(
), 吴迪3, 邵尹池4
收稿日期:
2023-11-07
出版日期:
2024-10-28
发布日期:
2024-10-25
作者简介:
陈奇芳(1986—),男,博士,副教授,从事电动汽车汽车V2G应用、综合能源系统、电力-交通融合等研究,E-mail:chenqf@bjtu.edu.cn基金资助:
Qifang CHEN1(), Ruofan LI1(
), Mingchao XIA2(
), Di WU3, Yinchi SHAO4
Received:
2023-11-07
Online:
2024-10-28
Published:
2024-10-25
Supported by:
摘要:
提出了一种计及多维性能评估的新型配电网光伏选址定容方法,首先,形成了涵盖电能质量、供电能力、光伏接入效果的多维度评价体系,构建了基于主客观组合赋权-模糊评价的接入方案综合评价方法;其次,将综合评价与优化选址定容过程有机结合,形成了评价-选取一体化的光伏选址定容优化模型,采用非支配排序遗传算法(non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II,NSGA-II)实现了全年光伏差异化出力条件下的最优接入位置、容量获取;最后,算例验证表明:所提方法不仅显著降低了节点电压偏差和线路传输压力,而且在更全面技术性能评价范围内具有更优的光伏接入特性和多指标综合性能,并提升了光伏配置合理性和资源效率,可有效支撑新型配电网的发展需求。
陈奇芳, 李若凡, 夏明超, 吴迪, 邵尹池. 计及多维性能评估的新型配电网光伏选址定容方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(10): 172-178, 207.
Qifang CHEN, Ruofan LI, Mingchao XIA, Di WU, Yinchi SHAO. Photovoltaic Site Selection and Capacity Determination Method for New Distribution Network Considering Multidimensional Performance Evaluation[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57(10): 172-178, 207.
图 2 基于综合性能评价的评价-选取一体化分布式光伏选址定容模型
Fig.2 Evaluation-selected integrated distributed PV locating and sizing model based on comprehensive performance evaluation
方案类型 | 接入参数 | 接入点情况 | 评价结果 | |||||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||||||||||
3点接入 | 位置 | 9 | 13 | 17 | — | — | 76.02 | |||||||
容量/kW | 698 | — | — | |||||||||||
5点接入 | 位置 | 8 | 13 | 14 | 17 | 19 | 75.74 | |||||||
容量/kW | 640 | 971 | 400 | 710 | 400 |
表 1 不同接入方案的最佳参数
Table 1 Optimal parameters for different access solutions
方案类型 | 接入参数 | 接入点情况 | 评价结果 | |||||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||||||||||
3点接入 | 位置 | 9 | 13 | 17 | — | — | 76.02 | |||||||
容量/kW | 698 | — | — | |||||||||||
5点接入 | 位置 | 8 | 13 | 14 | 17 | 19 | 75.74 | |||||||
容量/kW | 640 | 971 | 400 | 710 | 400 |
指标级别 | 指标 | 评价体系指标赋权情况 | ||||||||||
主观赋权 | 客观赋权 | 组合赋权 | 归一化组合赋权 | |||||||||
一级指标 | A1 | 0.252 | 0.413 | 0.325 | — | |||||||
A2 | 0.327 | 0.306 | 0.324 | — | ||||||||
A3 | 0.421 | 0.281 | 0.351 | — | ||||||||
二级指标 | A1 | B1 | 0.409 | 0.465 | 0.438 | 0.143 | ||||||
B2 | 0.281 | 0.243 | 0.258 | 0.084 | ||||||||
B3 | 0.310 | 0.292 | 0.304 | 0.099 | ||||||||
A2 | B4 | 0.193 | 0.121 | 0.154 | 0.050 | |||||||
B5 | 0.406 | 0.467 | 0.440 | 0.143 | ||||||||
B6 | 0.401 | 0.412 | 0.406 | 0.132 | ||||||||
A3 | B7 | 0.272 | 0.321 | 0.307 | 0.107 | |||||||
B8 | 0.222 | 0.292 | 0.268 | 0.094 | ||||||||
B9 | 0.190 | 0.021 | 0.065 | 0.023 | ||||||||
B10 | 0.316 | 0.366 | 0.360 | 0.125 |
表 2 主客观赋权权重
Table 2 Subjective and objective weighting
指标级别 | 指标 | 评价体系指标赋权情况 | ||||||||||
主观赋权 | 客观赋权 | 组合赋权 | 归一化组合赋权 | |||||||||
一级指标 | A1 | 0.252 | 0.413 | 0.325 | — | |||||||
A2 | 0.327 | 0.306 | 0.324 | — | ||||||||
A3 | 0.421 | 0.281 | 0.351 | — | ||||||||
二级指标 | A1 | B1 | 0.409 | 0.465 | 0.438 | 0.143 | ||||||
B2 | 0.281 | 0.243 | 0.258 | 0.084 | ||||||||
B3 | 0.310 | 0.292 | 0.304 | 0.099 | ||||||||
A2 | B4 | 0.193 | 0.121 | 0.154 | 0.050 | |||||||
B5 | 0.406 | 0.467 | 0.440 | 0.143 | ||||||||
B6 | 0.401 | 0.412 | 0.406 | 0.132 | ||||||||
A3 | B7 | 0.272 | 0.321 | 0.307 | 0.107 | |||||||
B8 | 0.222 | 0.292 | 0.268 | 0.094 | ||||||||
B9 | 0.190 | 0.021 | 0.065 | 0.023 | ||||||||
B10 | 0.316 | 0.366 | 0.360 | 0.125 |
评价 指标 | 3点接入 | 5点接入 | ||||||||||
固定权 重法 | 单一模糊 综合评价 | 本文 方法 | 固定权 重法 | 单一模糊 综合评价 | 本文 方法 | |||||||
B1 | 2.53 | 2.48 | 2.58 | 2.49 | 2.46 | 2.60 | ||||||
B2 | 2.30 | 2.38 | 2.21 | 2.37 | 2.41 | 2.19 | ||||||
B3 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | ||||||
B4 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | ||||||
B5 | 3.07 | 3.07 | 3.07 | 3.07 | 3.07 | 3.07 | ||||||
B6 | 2.29 | 2.37 | 2.29 | 2.30 | 2.33 | 2.29 | ||||||
B7 | 103.52 | 98.52 | 96.40 | 109.59 | 106.64 | 92.35 | ||||||
B8 | 76.90 | 76.90 | 76.90 | 74.88 | 75.67 | 76.90 | ||||||
B9 | 12.59 | 7.61 | 5.50 | 13.87 | 13.23 | 1.48 | ||||||
B10 | 5.85 | 3.27 | 2.17 | 9.13 | 7.58 | 0.41 |
表 3 不同方法的评价指标
Table 3 Evaluation indicators of different methods 单位:%
评价 指标 | 3点接入 | 5点接入 | ||||||||||
固定权 重法 | 单一模糊 综合评价 | 本文 方法 | 固定权 重法 | 单一模糊 综合评价 | 本文 方法 | |||||||
B1 | 2.53 | 2.48 | 2.58 | 2.49 | 2.46 | 2.60 | ||||||
B2 | 2.30 | 2.38 | 2.21 | 2.37 | 2.41 | 2.19 | ||||||
B3 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | ||||||
B4 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | ||||||
B5 | 3.07 | 3.07 | 3.07 | 3.07 | 3.07 | 3.07 | ||||||
B6 | 2.29 | 2.37 | 2.29 | 2.30 | 2.33 | 2.29 | ||||||
B7 | 103.52 | 98.52 | 96.40 | 109.59 | 106.64 | 92.35 | ||||||
B8 | 76.90 | 76.90 | 76.90 | 74.88 | 75.67 | 76.90 | ||||||
B9 | 12.59 | 7.61 | 5.50 | 13.87 | 13.23 | 1.48 | ||||||
B10 | 5.85 | 3.27 | 2.17 | 9.13 | 7.58 | 0.41 |
1 | 杨亘烨, 孙荣富, 丁然, 等. 计及光伏多状态调节能力的配电网多时间尺度电压优化[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55 (3): 105- 114. |
YANG Henghua, SUN Rongfu, DING RAN, et al. Multi time scale reactive power and voltage optimization of distribution network considering photovoltaic multi state regulation capability[J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55 (3): 105- 114. | |
2 | 丁琦欣, 覃洪培, 万灿, 等. 基于机会约束规划的配电网分布式光伏承载能力评估[J]. 东北电力大学学报, 2022, 42 (6): 28- 38. |
DING Qixin, TAN Hongpei, WAN Can, et al. Chance-constrained Optimization-based Distributed Photovoltaic Hosting Capacity Assessment of Distribution Networks[J]. Journal of Northeast Electric Power University, 2022, 42 (6): 28- 38. | |
3 |
张旭, 李阳, 刘晓, 等. 含高渗透率新能源的新型交直流储能系统的配电网规划[J]. 南方电网技术, 2022, 16 (4): 60- 67.
DOI |
ZHANG Xu, LI Yang, LIU Xiao, et al. Distribution network planning of new AC/DC energy storage system with high penetration new energy[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2022, 16 (4): 60- 67.
DOI |
|
4 |
杨军, 何金波, 陈晨辉, 等. 基于数据驱动的低压配电网故障检测方法[J]. 内蒙古电力技术, 2023, 41 (5): 28- 34.
DOI |
YANG Jun, HE Jinbo, CHEN Chenhui, et al. Data-driven fault detection method for low voltage distribution network[J]. Inner Mongolia Electric Power, 2023, 41 (5): 28- 34.
DOI |
|
5 | 杨彪, 颜伟, 莫静山. 考虑源荷功率随机性和相关性的主导节点选择与无功分区方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45 (11): 61- 67. |
YANG Biao, YAN Wei, MO Jingshan. Pilot-bus selection and network partitioning method considering randomness and correlation of source-load power[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45 (11): 61- 67. | |
6 | 陈德炜, 施永明, 徐威, 等. 基于改进FPA算法的含分布式光伏配电网选址定容多目标优化方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50 (7): 120- 125. |
CHEN Dewei, SHI Yongming, XU Wei, et al. Multi-objective optimization method for location and capacity of a distribution network with distributed photovoltaic energy based on an improved FPA algorithm[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50 (7): 120- 125. | |
7 | 王涛, 刘雪飞, 郑重, 等. 基于潮流线性化的分布式发电选址定容新算法[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2020, 40 (8): 117- 128. |
WANG Tao, LIU Xuefei, ZHENG Zhong, et al. Novel locating and sizing algorithm for distributed generation based on power flow linearization[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2020, 40 (8): 117- 128. | |
8 | 赵丽萍, 张书伟, 张雪岩, 等. 基于随机机会约束规划的面向能源互联的主动配电网选址定容方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2020, 48 (14): 121- 129. |
ZHAO Liping, ZHANG Shuwei, ZHANG Xueyan, et al. Locating and sizing method for energy interconnection oriented active distribution networks based on stochastic chance constrained programming[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2020, 48 (14): 121- 129. | |
9 | 李鹏华, 宋卓然, 吴文传. 部分可观测条件下的配电网数据驱动最优潮流模型[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56 (12): 51- 57. |
LI Penghua, SONG Zhuoran, WU Wenchuan. A data-driven optimal power flow model under partial observability[J]. Electric Power, 2023, 56 (12): 51- 57. | |
10 | 刘柳, 赵俊勇, 马亮. 基于改进蝴蝶算法的分布式光伏选址定容[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2021, 33 (8): 15- 23. |
LIU Liu, ZHAO Junyong, MA Liang. Locating and sizing of distributed photovoltaic generation based on improved butterfly optimization algorithm[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2021, 33 (8): 15- 23. | |
11 | 朱训君, 王宾, 李海雨, 等. 基于改进粒子群算法的农村配电网分布式光伏选址定容研究[J]. 电力电容器与无功补偿, 2020, 41 (4): 206- 214. |
ZHU Xunjun, WANG Bin, LI Haiyu, et al. Study on distributed photovoltaic location and capacity selection of rural distribution network based on improved particle swarm optimization[J]. Power Capacitor & Reactive Power Compensation, 2020, 41 (4): 206- 214. | |
12 |
王斌, 张裕, 罗晨. 高比例光伏接入的配电网分布式运行优化技术[J]. 南方电网技术, 2024, 18 (6): 121- 130.
DOI |
WANG Bin, ZHANG Yu, LUO Chen. Distributed operation optimization technology for distribution network with high penetration of photovoltaics[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2024, 18 (6): 121- 130.
DOI |
|
13 |
钱乙卫, 田浩, 刘财华, 等. 考虑概率分布的分布式光伏无功下垂控制策略[J]. 发电技术, 2024, 45 (2): 273- 281.
DOI |
QIAN Yiwei, TIAN Hao, LIU Caihua, et al. Droop control strategy of distributed photovoltaic reactive power considering probability distribution[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45 (2): 273- 281.
DOI |
|
14 | 王鹤, 余中枢, 李筱婧, 等. 基于主成分分析方法的多类型电动汽车接入配电网的综合风险评估[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2021, 41 (11): 57- 65. |
WANG He, YU Zhongshu, LI Youjing, et al. Comprehensive risk assessment of multiple types of electric vehicles connected to distribution network based on principal component analysis method[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2021, 41 (11): 57- 65. | |
15 | 黄彦璐, 林跃欢, 于力, 等. 基于大数据的配电网电压时空特性研究[J]. 电测与仪表, 2022, 59 (2): 24- 29. |
HUANG Yanlu, LIN Yuehuan, YU Li, et al. Research on spatiotemporal characteristics of voltage in distribution network based on big data[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2022, 59 (2): 24- 29. | |
16 |
葛诗涵, 李立生, 姜仁卓, 等. 基于层次动态灰色关联分析的配电网运行状态评价指标体系的构建与应用[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20 (23): 9393- 9399.
DOI |
GE Shihan, LI Lisheng, JIANG Renzhuo, et al. Construction and application of distribution network operational status evaluation index system based on hierarchical dynamic grey correlation analysis[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2020, 20 (23): 9393- 9399.
DOI |
|
17 | 吴鸣, 赵婷婷, 赵凤展, 等. 微电网运行效果评价指标体系及评价方法[J]. 电网技术, 2018, 42 (3): 690- 697. |
WU Ming, ZHAO Tingting, ZHAO Fengzhan, et al. Evaluation index system of microgrid operation effect and corresponding evaluation method[J]. Power System Technology, 2018, 42 (3): 690- 697. | |
18 | 朱辉, 闫腾飞, 丁一, 等. 基于改进的AHP-CRITIC综合权重计算法的多元用户用能行为特性刻画及评价方法[J]. 东北电力大学学报, 2023, 43 (5): 70- 77. |
ZHU Hui, YAN Tengfei, DING Yi, et al. Characterization Andevaluation Method for Multi-user Energy Consumption Behavior Based on the Improved AHP-CRITIC Composite Weighting Approach[J]. Journal of Northeast Electric Power University, 2023, 43 (5): 70- 77. | |
19 | 李进友, 李媛, 冯冰, 等. 基于随机组合赋权模糊评价的风电机组健康状态评估[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43 (8): 340- 351. |
LI Jinyou, LI Yuan, MA Bing, et al. Wind turbine health state assessment based on stochastic combination weighting fuzzy evaluation[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2022, 43 (8): 340- 351. | |
20 |
郭杉, 田苗, 田智, 等. 基于改进TOPSIS模型的配电台区电压质量评估方法[J]. 内蒙古电力技术, 2023, 41 (1): 45- 51.
DOI |
GUO Shan, TIAN Miao, TIAN Zhi, et al. Evaluation method of voltage quality in distribution station area based on improved TOPSIS model[J]. Inner Mongolia Electric Power, 2023, 41 (1): 45- 51.
DOI |
|
21 | 李聪, 鲁一霏, 陈辰, 等. 城镇燃气管网事故应急救援特征分析及救援能力评估[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63 (10): 1537- 1547. |
LI Cong, LU Yifei, CHEN Chen, et al. Analysis of emergency rescue characteristics and evaluation of rescue capability for accidents associated with urban gas pipeline networks[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2023, 63 (10): 1537- 1547. | |
22 | 陈晨, 闫向阳, 齐桓若, 等. 基于FAHP-改进CRITIC组合赋权的屋顶光伏接入配网评价方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2023, 51 (15): 97- 108. |
CHEN Chen, YAN Xiangyang, QI Huanruo, et al. An evaluation method of a roof photovoltaic access distribution network based on the weight of FAHP-improvement CRITIC combination[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2023, 51 (15): 97- 108. | |
23 | 谷卫星, 王婷婷, 张鹏, 等. 基于组合赋权和TOPSIS的配电网CPS系统脆弱性评估[J]. 华北电力大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 50 (1): 56- 66,131. |
GU Weixing, WANG Tingting, ZHANG Peng, et al. Vulnerability assessment of distribution network CPS system based on combination weighting and TOPSIS[J]. Journal of North China Electric Power University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 50 (1): 56- 66,131. | |
24 | 王源, 姜懿郎, 王长江, 等. 基于改进G1-CRITIC的直流多馈入受端系统故障筛选与排序[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2021, 33 (12): 43- 52. |
WANG Yuan, JIANG Yilang, WANG Changjiang, et al. Fault screening and sorting of DC multi-infeed receiving end system based on improved G1-CRITIC method[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2021, 33 (12): 43- 52. | |
25 | 朱晓荣, 刘亚维. 基于模糊综合评判的光伏阵列状态评估[J]. 太阳能学报, 2020, 41 (11): 103- 111. |
ZHU Xiaorong, LIU Yawei. State estimation of photovoitaic array based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2020, 41 (11): 103- 111. |
[1] | 孙通, 张沈习, 曹毅, 曹佳晨, 程浩忠. 计及5G基站可调特性的配电网分布式光伏准入容量鲁棒优化[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(2): 140-146. |
[2] | 邱洁, 梁财豪, 朱永强, 夏瑞华. 考虑氢能储运特性的配电网集群划分与氢能系统选址定容策略[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(8): 12-22. |
[3] | 周才期, 刘静利, 孙鹏凯, 张玉敏. 分布式光伏波动事件多级区间滚动预警方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(8): 96-107. |
[4] | 王海军, 居蓉蓉, 董颖华. 基于时空关联特征与B-LSTM模型的分布式光伏功率区间预测[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(7): 74-80. |
[5] | 刘韵艺, 汤渊, 苏盛, 吴裕宙, 王晓倩. 基于STL-Bayesian时空模型的分布式光伏系统异常检测[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(5): 222-231. |
[6] | 张宇, 魏新迟, 冯凯辉, 时珊珊, 孟子涵, 梁媛. 计及分布式光伏承载力的配电网侧独立储能充放电策略[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(4): 111-117. |
[7] | 陈璨, 苏紫诺, 马原, 刘佳林, 王玉庆, 王飞. 基于分层关联性建模的分布式光伏功率超短期概率预测[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(12): 50-59. |
[8] | 杨鹏伟, 赵丽萍, 陈军法, 甄钊, 王飞, 李利明. 基于相似时段匹配与Transformer网络建模的分布式光伏超短期功率预测方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(12): 60-70. |
[9] | 白晶, 金广厚, 孙鹤林, 胡楚樊, 赵晋泉, 陈天华. 高渗透光伏配电网第三方主体调压辅助服务补偿与获取[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(4): 95-103,111. |
[10] | 李娟, 汪家铭, 许苏迪, 姜云龙, 杨雄. 基于量子萤火虫算法的配电网故障恢复策略[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(12): 191-198. |
[11] | 段瑶, 高崇, 程苒, 吴亚雄, 黄烨, 刘志文. 考虑5G基站可调度潜力的配电网分布式光伏最大准入容量评估[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(12): 80-85, 99. |
[12] | 王晶, 袁懿, 邵尹池, 张晋奇, 丁然, 巩彦江. 考虑资源储备度的主动配电网多目标集群划分与电压控制方法[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(12): 69-79. |
[13] | 李世辉, 王琪, 贾晓卜, 吴文传, 梁华洋, 朱琳. 考虑热泵负荷和分布式光伏的配微网协调调度[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(9): 29-37. |
[14] | 陈璨, 白明辉, 张婉明, 席海阔, 尹兆磊, 邵尹池, 王枭枭, 马原. 分布式光伏边界渗透率快速定位及消纳方案择优[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(8): 40-50. |
[15] | 李丰君, 王磊, 赵健, 张建宾, 张世尧, 田杨阳. 基于天气融合和LSTM网络的分布式光伏短期功率预测方法[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 149-154. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||