超低排放改造后燃煤烟气净化设备协同脱汞潜力分析

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201707018

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 燃煤机组完成超低排放改造后，原有的烟气净化设备在设备容量、装备水平上有较大提升。为了给汞排放治理提供决策依据，分析了超低排放改造后烟气净化设备的汞脱除潜力。研究结果表明：SCR烟气脱硝系统改造能够增大Hg⁰的氧化效率，因而能促进后续烟气净化设备的脱汞效率；低低温电除尘和电袋复合除尘技术的协同脱汞效率显著，可达40%；安装高效除尘除雾器的脱硫塔对汞的协同脱除效率可达96%。然而，由于超低排放改造后除尘器出口Hg²⁺含量低，且粉尘浓度低、粒径小，脱硫系统单塔提效增容改造及湿式电除尘器对烟气中汞的脱除效率影响有限；还有可能出现单塔提效增容改造后脱硫系统出口汞的排放浓度较入口略有增加的情况。

关键词: 燃煤机组, 烟气, 汞, 超低排放, 净化设备, SCR脱硝装置, 低低温电除尘, 电袋复合除尘, 高效除尘除雾器, 湿式电除尘器

Abstract: The ultra-low emissions retrofitting improves the flue gas purification equipment in the coal-fired power plant greatly in terms of the equipment capacity and quality. In order to provide the basis for decision-making on the control of mercury emission, the synergistic mercury removal efficiency of the purification equipment is analyzed. The results show that the SCR system retrofitting can increase the oxidation efficiency of Hg⁰ and promote the mercury removal efficiency of the dust removal equipment and the desulfurization equipment. The mercury removal effect of the low-temperature electrostatic precipitator and the electrical fabric filter can reach up to 40%. The desulfurization equipment with a high efficient demister can remove mercury in a synergistic manner with an efficiency of 96%. However, due to the low Hg²⁺ concentration at the outlet of the dust collector as well as the low dust concentration and the small particle size, the influence on mercury removal efficiency in flue gas is limited from the single tower retrofitting and the wet electrostatic precipitator in the desulphurization system. It is also possible that the mercury emission concentration at the outlet of the desulphurization system is slightly higher than that at the inlet after the single tower retrofitting.

Key words: coal-fired power plant, flue gas, mercury, ultra-low emissions, purification equipment, SCR, low-temperature electrostatic precipitator, electrical fabric filter, high efficient demister, WESP

中图分类号:

陈坤洋, 郭婷婷, 王海刚, 胡冬. 超低排放改造后燃煤烟气净化设备协同脱汞潜力分析[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(6): 160-165.

CHEN Kunyang, GUO Tingting, WANG Haigang, HU Dong. Potential Analysis of Synergetic Mercury Removal from Coal-Fired Flue Gas on Purification Equipment after Retrofitting of Ultra-low Emission[J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(6): 160-165.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201707018

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2018/V51/I6/160

参考文献

[1] 王起超, 马如龙. 煤及其灰渣中的汞[J]. 中国环境科学, 1997, 17(1):76-79.WANG Qichao, MA Rulong. The mercury in coal and its cinder[J]. China Environmental Science, 1997, (1):76-79.
[2] 任建莉, 周劲松, 骆仲泱, 等. 煤中汞燃烧过程析出规律试验研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2002, 22(3):289-293.REN Jianli, ZHOU Jinsong, LUO Zhongyang, et al. Study of mercury emission during coal combustion[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2002, 22(3):289-293.
[3] USEPA. National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants from coal- and oil-fired electric utility steam generating units and standards of performance for fossil-fuel-fired electric utility, industrial-commercial-institutional, and small industrial-commercial-institutional steam generating units; Technical correction; Final rule:40 CFR Parts 60 and 63[S]. 2016.
[4] 李辉, 王强, 朱法华, 等.燃煤电厂汞的排放控制要求与监测方法[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2011, 1(3):226-231.LI Hui, WANG Qiang, ZHU Fahua, et al. The control requirements and monitoring methods for mercury emission in coal-fired power plants[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2011, 1(3):226-231.
[5] 徐玮. 燃煤烟气中汞的形态分布特征及净化设备的除汞效果[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2010.
[6] USEPA. Mercury study report to congress, Volume Ⅱ:An inventory of anthropogenic mercury emissions in the United States[R]. Washington, 1997.
[7] 王铮, 薛建明, 许月阳, 等. 选择性催化还原协同控制燃煤烟气中汞排放效果影响因素研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2013, 33(14):32-37.WANG Zheng, XUE Jianming, XU Yueyang, et al. Research on influencing factors of SCR's cooperative control in mercury emissions from coal-fired flue[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33(14):32-37.
[8] RICHARDSON C, MACHALEK T, MILLER S, et al. Effect of NO_x control processes on mercury speciation in utility flue gas[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2002, 52(8):941-947.
[9] 杨立国. 燃煤烟气汞形态转化及脱除机理研究[D]. 南京:东南大学, 2008.
[10] MEIJ R, VREDENBREGT L, WINKEL H T. The fate and behavior of mercury in coal-fired power plants[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 2002, 52(8):912-917.
[11] 何胜. 燃煤烟气汞催化氧化的试验和机理研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2009.
[12] HONG H J, HAM S W, KIM M H, et al. Characteristics of commercial selective catalytic reduction catalyst for the oxidation of gaseous elemental mercury with respect to reaction conditions[J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2010, 27(4):1117-1122.
[13] SVACHULA J, ALEMANY L J, FERLAZZO N, et al. Oxidation of SO₂ to SO₃ over honeycomb DeNOXing catalysts[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1993, 32(5), 826-834.
[14] ZHUANG Y, LAUMB J, LIGGETT R, et al. Impacts of acid gases on mercury oxidation across SCR catalyst[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2007, 88(10):929-934.
[15] CAO Y, CHEN B, WU J, et al. Study of mercury oxidation by a selective catalytic reduction catalyst in a pilot-scale slipstream reactor at a utility boiler burning bituminous coal[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2007, 21(1):145-156.
[16] 华晓宇, 章良利, 宋玉彩, 等. 燃煤机组超低排放改造对汞排放的影响[J]. 热能动力工程, 2016, 31(7):110-116.HUA Xiaoyu, ZHANG Liangli, SONG Yucai, et al. Influence of the ultra-low emission modification of a coal-fired unit on the mercury emissions[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2016, 31(7):110-116.
[17] CAO Y, CHENG C M, CHEN C W, et al. Abatement of mercury emissions in the coal combustion process equipped with a fabric filter baghouse[J]. Fuel, 2008, 87(15/16):3322-3330.
[18] 刘迎晖, 郑楚光, 程俊峰, 等. 燃煤烟气中汞的形态及其分析方法[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2000, 28(5):463-467.LIU Yinghui, ZHENG Chuguang, CHENG Junfeng, et al. Speciation and analysis of mercury in coal combustion flue gas[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2000, 28(5):463-467.
[19] PUDASAINEE D, KIM J H, YOON Y S, et al. Oxidation, reemission and mass distribution of mercury in bituminous coal-fired power plants with SCR, CS-ESP and wet FGD[J]. Fuel, 2012, 93(1):312-318.
[20] KOLKER A, SENIOR C L, QUICK J C. Mercury in coal and the impact of coal quality on mercury emissions from combustion systems[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2006, 21(11):1821-1836.
[21] 张乐. 燃煤过程汞排放测试及汞排放量估算研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2007.
[22] 许月阳, 薛建明, 王宏亮, 等. 燃煤烟气常规污染物净化设施协同控制汞的研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2014, 34(23):3924-3931.XU Yueyang, XUE Jianming, WANG Hongliang, et al. Research on mercury collaborative control by conventional pollutants purification facilities of coal-fired power plants[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2014, 34(23):3924-3931.
[23] 张静怡. 燃煤电站烟气中汞脱除与减排技术[J]. 中国电力, 2012, 45(9):76-79.ZHANG Jingyi. Technology of mercury removal and reduction for flue gas of coal-fired power plants[J]. Electric Power, 2012, 45(9):76-79.
[24] 殷立宝, 禚玉群, 徐齐胜, 等. 中国燃煤电厂汞排放规律[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2013, 63(29):1-9.YIN Libao, ZHUO Yuqun, XU Qisheng, et al. Mercury emission from coal-fired power plants in China[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 63(29):1-9.
[25] 熊桂龙, 李水清, 陈晟, 等. 增强PM_2.5脱除的新型电除尘技术的发展[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2015, 35(9):2217-2223.XIONG Guilong, LI Shuiqing, CHEN Sheng, et al. Development of advanced electrostatic precipitation technologies for reducing PM_2.5 emissions from coal-fired power plants[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2015, 35(9):2217-2223.
[26] 胡斌, 刘勇, 任飞, 等. 低低温电除尘协同脱除细颗粒与SO₃实验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(16):4319-4325.HU Bin, LIU Yong, REN Fei, et al. Experimental study on simultaneous control of fine particle and SO₃ by low-low temperature electrostatic precipitator[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(16):4319-4325.
[27] 林翔. 低低温电除尘器提效及多污染物协同治理探讨[C]//第十六届中国电除尘学术会议, 武汉, 2015.
[28] 莫华, 朱法华, 王圣, 等. 湿式电除尘器在燃煤电厂的应用及其对PM_2.5的减排作用[J]. 中国电力, 2013, 46(11):62-65.MO Hua, ZHU Fahua, WANG Sheng, et al. Application of WESP in coal-fired power plants and its effect on emission reduction of PM_2.5[J]. Electric Power, 2013, 46(11):62-65.
[29] 田贺忠. 利用湿式静电除尘器(ESP)脱除汞[J]. 国际电力, 2005, 9(6):62-64.TIAN Hezhong. Mercury control by using wet electrostatic precipitators[J]. International Electric Power for China, 2005, 9(6):62-64.
[30] 宋畅, 张翼, 郝剑, 等. 燃煤电厂超低排放改造前后汞污染排放特征[J]. 环境科学研究, 2017. 30(5):672-677.SONG Chang, ZHANG Yi, HAO Jian, et al. Mercury emission characteristics from coal-fired power plant before and after ultra-low emission retrofitting[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2017. 30(5):672-677.
[31] 中国大唐集团科学技术研究院有限公司火力发电技术研究院. 燃煤机组烟尘一体化脱除关键技术研究及应用技术报告[R]. 北京. 2017.
[32] 史文峥, 杨萌萌, 张绪辉, 等. 燃煤电厂超低排放技术路线与协同脱除[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36()16:4308-4318.SHI Wenzheng, YANG Mengmeng, ZHANG Xuhui, et al. Ultra-low emission technical route of coal-fired power plants and the cooperative removal[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(16):4308-4318.
[33] 张晖栋. 燃煤电站电袋复合除尘器协同脱汞的研究[J]. 中国环保产业, 2017(2):54-57.ZHANG Huidong. Study on de-mercury of electrical bag compound precipitator in coal-fired power station[J]. China Environmental Protection Industry, 2017(2):54-57.
[34] 刘玉坤, 禚玉群, 陈昌和, 等. 燃煤电站脱硫系统的脱汞性能[J]. 中国电力, 2011, 44(12):68-72.LIU Yukun, ZHUO Yuqun, CHEN Changhe, et al. Mercury removal performance of desulfurization systems in coal-fired power plants[J]. Electric Power, 2011, 44(12):68-72.
[35] 李少华, 徐英健, 王虎, 等. WFGD系统脱硫及脱汞特性模拟研究[J]. 锅炉技术, 2014, 45(6):72-76.LI Shaohua, XU Yingjian, WANG Hu, et al. Simulation study on the take off mercury and sulfur performance in the wet flue gas desulfurization system[J]. Boiler Technology, 2014, 45(6):72-76.
[36] 莫华, 朱杰, 黄志杰, 等. 超低排放下不同湿法脱硫技术脱除SO₃效果测试与分析[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(3):46-50.MO Hua, ZHU Jie, HUANG Zhijie, et al. Test and study on SO₃ removal performance of different wet flue gas desulfurization technologies at ultra-low pollutants emission[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(3):46-50.
[37] 魏宏鸽, 徐明华, 柴磊, 等. 双塔双循环脱硫系统的运行现状分析与优化措施探讨[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(10):132-135.WEI Hongge, XU Minghua, CHAI Lei, et al. Current operation state analysis and optimization method exploration on double-tower double-cycle wet-FGD systems[J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(10):132-135.