超低排放下不同湿法脱硫技术脱除SO3效果测试与分析

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2017.03.046.05

中国电力 ›› 2017, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 46-50.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2017.03.046.05

• 火电厂超低排放技术专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

超低排放下不同湿法脱硫技术脱除SO₃效果测试与分析

莫华¹, 朱杰^{1, 2}, 黄志杰¹, 朱法华³, 崔立明⁴

1. 环境保护部环境工程评估中心,北京 100012;
2. 中国电力工程顾问集团东北电力设计院,吉林长春 130021;
3. 国电环境保护研究院,江苏南京 210031;
4. 神华集团有限责任公司,北京 100011

收稿日期:2016-12-05 出版日期:2017-03-20 发布日期:2017-03-17
作者简介:莫华（1969—）,女,云南文山人,硕士,研究员,从事电力项目环保技术评估及评价工作。E-mail:hustzj888@163.com
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划项目（2015BAA05B02）

Test and Study on SO₃ Removal Performance of Different Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Technologies at Ultra-Low Pollutants Emission

MO Hua¹, ZHU Jie^{1, 2}, HUANG Zhijie¹, ZHU Fahua³, CUI Liming⁴

1. Appraisal Center for Environment & Engineering, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Beijing 100012, China;
2. Northeast Electric Power Design Institute of CPECC, Changchun 130021, China;
3. China State Power Environmental Protection Research Institute, Nanjing 210031, China;
4. Shenhua Group. Co. Ltd. Beijing 100011, China

Received:2016-12-05 Online:2017-03-20 Published:2017-03-17
Supported by:
This work is supported by National Key Technology R&D Program (No.2015BAA05B02)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对5个实现超低排放电厂的烟气中SO₃实测结果进行了分析,发现超低排放湿法脱硫技术脱除SO₃性能明显不同于国内外有关研究结果,空塔、海水、单托盘、双托盘、旋汇耦合等湿法脱硫技术脱除SO₃效率依次从低到高,存在较大差异,分析认为是气液传质强化等原因形成的,表明超低排放脱硫技术革新也带来了SO₃脱除性能的进步。

关键词: 燃煤电厂, 超低排放, 湿法脱硫, SO3

Abstract: The SO₃ test results of five power plants with ultra-low pollutants emission are analyzed, The analysis shows that the SO₃ removal performance of the wet flue gas desulfurization(WFGD) technologies used in ultra-low pollutants emission is obviously different from that in the domestic and foreign relevant research results. The SO₃ removal efficiency of the WFGD technologies, in the order of empty tower, seawater, single-pallet, double-pallet and rotating coupling, is quite different, which is from low to high. It is considered to be caused by the enhancement of gas-liquid mass transfer. The study indicates that the innovation of WFGD technologies for ultra-low pollutants emission has brought the progress of SO₃ removal performance.

Key words: coal-fired power plant, ultra-low pollutants emission, WFGD, SO3

中图分类号:

TM621
X51

莫华, 朱杰, 黄志杰, 朱法华, 崔立明. 超低排放下不同湿法脱硫技术脱除SO₃效果测试与分析[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(3): 46-50.

MO Hua, ZHU Jie, HUANG Zhijie, ZHU Fahua, CUI Liming. Test and Study on SO₃ Removal Performance of Different Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Technologies at Ultra-Low Pollutants Emission[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(3): 46-50.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2017.03.046.05

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2017/V50/I3/46

参考文献

[1] ERICKSON, CLAYTON A, JAMBHEKAR R. Current work on the impacts and control of SO 3 emissions from selective catalytic reduction systems[C]// 2002 Conference on SCR and SNCR for NO x Control. Pittsburgh, Pa, May 2002.
[2] MOSER R E. SO 3 ’s impacts on plant O&M: Part I[EB/OL]. (2006-10-15) [2016-12-05]. http://www.powermag.com/SO 3 s-impacts-on-plant-om-part-i/,2006-10-15.
[3] 楼清刚.煤燃烧过程中SO 3 的生成试验研究[J]. 能源工程, 2008（6）：46-49.
LOU Qinggang. Study on the formation mechanism of SO 3 during coal burning [J]. Energy Engineering, 2008(6): 46-49.
[4] OFFEN G. Modeling of SO 3 formation process in coal-fired boilers[EB/OL]. (2016-12-10)[2007-03-20]. http://www.epri.com/abstracts/Pages/ProductAb-stract.aspx?ProductId=000000000001012689,2007-03-20.
[5] 王智,贾莹光,祁宁. 燃煤电站锅炉及SCR脱硝中SO 3 的生成及危害[J]. 东北电力技术,2005,26（9）：1-3.
WANG Zhi, JIA Yingguang, QI Ning. The creation and ham of SO 3 for coal-fired boiler and SCR denitration[J]. Northeastern Electric Power Technology, 2005, 26(9): 1-3.
[6] BENSON L B. Use of magnesium hydroxide for reduction of plume visibility in coal-fired power plants[C]//Proceedings of the EPA-DOE-EPRI-A and WMA Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Mega Symposium. 2006: 1002-1020.
[7] MOSER R E. SO 3 ’s impacts on plant O&M: Part Ⅱ[EB/OL].(2007-02-01)[2016-12-05]. http://www.powermag.com/SO 3 s-impacts-on-plant-om-part-ii/, 2007-02-01.
[8] 蒋海涛,蔡兴飞,付玉玲,等燃煤电厂SO 3 形成、危害及控制技术[J]. 发电设备,2013,27（5）：366-368.
JIANG Haitao, CAI Xingfei, FU Yuling, et al . Formation, harms and control technology of SO 3 from coal-fired power plants[J]. Power Equipment, 2013, 27(5): 366-368.
[9] 赵瑞,刘毅,李延兵,等. 浅谈燃煤电站SO 3 检测方法及脱除策略[J]. 神华科技,2015,13（5）：62-65.
ZHAO Rui, LIU Yi, LI Yanbing, et al . Review on the SO 3 detection method and removal strategy in coal-fired power plants[J]. Shenhua Science and Technology, 2015, 13(5): 62-65.
[10] 胡冬,王海刚,郭婷婷,等. 燃煤电厂烟气SO 3 控制技术的研究及进展[J]. 科学技术与工程,2015,15（35）：92-99.
HU Dong, WANG Haigang, GUO Tingting, et al . Research and development of mitigating technology of SO 3 in flue gas from coal power plants[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2015, 15(35): 92-99.
[11] 陈亚非,陈新超,熊建国. 湿法烟气脱硫系统中SO 3 脱除效率等问题的讨论[J]. 工程建设与设计,2004（9）：41-42.
CHEN Yafei, CHEN Xinchao, XIONG Jianguo. Discussion of removal efficiency of SO 3 in wet desulfuration processing[J]. Construction & Design for Project, 2004(9): 41-42.
[12] 詹威全. 干湿法脱硫工艺对SO 3 的脱除性能分析[C]//中国环境科学学会学术年会. 成都,2014：4875-4880.
[13] 潘丹萍,吴昊,黄荣廷,等. 石灰石-石膏法烟气脱硫过程中SO 3 酸雾脱除特性[J]. 东南大学学报（自然科学版）,2016,46（2）： 311-316.
PAN Danping, WU Hao, HUANG Rongting, et al . Removal properties of sulfuric acid mist during limestone-gypsum flue gas desulfurization process [J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 46(2): 311-316.
[14] SRIVASTAVA R K, MILLER C A, ERICKSON C, et al . Emissions of sulfur trioxide from coal-fired power plants[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2004, 54(6): 750-762.
[15] 潘丹萍,吴昊,姜业正,等. 应用水汽相变促进湿法脱硫净烟气中PM 2.5 和SO 3 酸雾脱除的研究[J]. 燃料化学学报,2016,44（1）： 113-119.
PAN Danping, WU Hao, JIANG Yezheng, et al . Improvement in removal of fine particles and SO 3 acid mist from desulfuriaed flue gas with heterogeneous condensation [J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2016, 44(1): 113-119.

超低排放下不同湿法脱硫技术脱除SO₃效果测试与分析

Test and Study on SO₃ Removal Performance of Different Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Technologies at Ultra-Low Pollutants Emission

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘东旭, 张潇元, 马青, 冯前伟, 杜振. 燃煤机组SO₃生成与控制技术路线分析[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(6): 235-242.
[2]	曲立涛, 齐晓辉, 王德鑫, 于洪海. 基于CEMS数据的超低排放燃煤机组大气污染物排放特性分析[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(2): 171-178.
[3]	刘含笑, 吴黎明, 赵琳, 于立元, 郦建国, 崔盈. 燃煤电厂湿式电除尘器减排及能效特性研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 196-203.
[4]	张志勇, 莫华, 王猛, 帅伟. 600 MW燃煤机组烟气污染物控制研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 204-210.
[5]	孙尊强, 郑成航, 周灿, 王圣, 马修元, 叶毅科. 燃煤电厂典型除尘器运行现状分析及优化[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 194-201.
[6]	王彦哲, 周胜, 姚子麟, 欧训民. 中国煤电生命周期二氧化碳和大气污染物排放相互影响建模分析[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(8): 128-135.
[7]	杜振, 王志东, 江建平, 朱跃. 湿法脱硫系统PM_2.5排放特性分析[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(6): 153-158.
[8]	朱法华, 许月阳, 孙尊强, 孙雪丽, 王圣. 中国燃煤电厂超低排放和节能改造的实践与启示[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(4): 1-8.
[9]	吴家玉, 莫华, 胡耘, 朱杰, 帅伟, 张晴, 姜岸. 京津冀及周边地区燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物不同控制情景下时空变化特征[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 182-189.
[10]	惠立锋. 燃煤电厂超低排放PM₁₀/PM_2.5实验室采样对比分析[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 190-196.
[11]	赵宏, 张发捷, 马云龙, 马宝林, 唐潇, 徐仁博, 罗通达, 李成宝, 任传明, 于洁, 孙路石. 燃煤电厂SCR脱硝氨逃逸迁移规律试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(1): 196-202.
[12]	赵柄, 王海刚, 胡冬, 陈坤洋, 金绪良, 殷爱鸣. 燃煤电厂碱性吸附剂脱汞性能研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(9): 208-213.
[13]	贾西部. 石灰石-石膏湿法脱硫废水排放量深度解析[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(8): 139-144,163.
[14]	吴家玉, 朱杰, 莫华, 张峰, 帅伟, 张晴, 那钦. 典型燃煤电厂浆液冷却烟气消白设施SO₃治理效果测试研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(8): 145-150,172.
[15]	姚燕, 马云龙, 杨晓宁, 张华东, 王丽朋. 高砷煤SCR脱硝催化剂中毒失活研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(6): 191-196.

模态框（Modal）标题