Evaluation on Time-Domain Simulation Software Applied to Mid-and-Long Term Voltage Stability Study

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2016.10.079.05

Abstract

Abstract: Mid-and-long term voltage collapse of large-scale power system is a slow process. The occurrence and changes are closely related to the dynamic behavior of slow components in system. Therefore, study on mid-and-long term voltage stabilities requires using simulation software that reflects slow dynamic process. Five simulation software packages, namely PSS/E, PSD-FDS, Eurostag, PSASP and DSATools are selected in this study. Practical analysis and evaluations are made to compare functions of these software packages in mid-and-long term time-domain simulations. Through simulation experiments, software parameters investigation and practical application examples, comparisons are performed on several aspects including principle and algorithm, simulation scale, components model and user interface. The results indicate that PSD-FDS provides better models and functions suitable for China power systems and precedes other software packages in mid-and-long term voltage stability research.

Key words: power system, mid-and-long term, voltage stability, time-domain simulation, software evaluation

CLC Number:

TM712

CHEN Gang, FAN Chengwei, WU Wencheng, SUN Jingtao, HU Bowei. Evaluation on Time-Domain Simulation Software Applied to Mid-and-Long Term Voltage Stability Study[J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(10): 79-83.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2016.10.079.05

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/Y2016/V49/I10/79

References

[1] 许晓艳，马烁，黄越辉，等．大规模风电接入对电网静态电压稳定性影响机理研究[J]. 中国电力，2015，48（3）：139-143．
XU Xiaoyan, MA Shuo, HUANG Yuehui, et al． Mechanical study on influence of large scale wind power on static voltage stability[J]. Electric Power, 2015, 48(3): 139-143.
[2] 付正鑫，卢继平，乔梁，等．基于戴维南参数等值的电压稳定性分析[J]. 中国电力，2014，47（5）：44-47．
FU Zhengxin, LU Jiping, QIAO Liang, et al. Voltage stability analysis based on thevenin equivalent parameters[J]. Electric Power, 2014, 47(5): 44-47.
[3] 徐涛，黄慧，张勇军. 电力系统动态电压稳定分析方法及其研究进展[J]. 电气应用，2011，30（1）：37-41．
XU Tao, HUANG Hui, ZHANG Yongjun. Power system dynamic voltage stability analysis method and its research progress[J]. Electrotechnical Application, 2011, 30(1): 37-41.
[4] 徐泰山，鲍颜红，薛禹胜，等. 中期电压稳定的快速仿真算法研究[J]. 电力系统自动化，2000，24（24）：9-11．
XU Taishan, BAO Yanhong, XUE Yusehng, et al. A fast simulation method for mid-term voltage stability countermeasures[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2000, 24(24): 9-11.
[5] 刘益青，陈超英，梁磊，等. 电力系统电压稳定性的动态分析方法综述[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报，2003，15（1）：105-108．
LIU Yiqing, CHEN Chaoying, LIANG Lei, et al. Review of dynamic analysis art of voltage stability in power system[J]. Proceedings of the EPSA, 2003, 15(1): 105-108.
[6] 田鑫，牛新生，曹增功. 考虑电压稳定的主网无功规划方案及仿真计算[J]. 中国电力，2013，46（3）：9-13．
TIAN Xin, NIU Xinsheng, CAO Zenggong. Main grid reactive planning and simulation considering voltage stability[J]. Electric Power, 2013, 46(3): 9-13.
[7] 马世英，印永华，汤涌，等. 短期和中长期电压稳定仿真及评价[J]. 电网技术，2006，30（19）：14-20．
MA Shiying, YIN Yonghua, TANG Yong, et al. Simulation and evaluation for short term and mid/long term voltage stability[J]. Power System Technology, 2006, 30(19): 14-20.
[8] 彭宗华. 影响中长期电压稳定的负荷特性研究[D]. 北京：华北电力大学，2005.
[9] PSD-FDS电力系统全过程动态仿真程序用户手册[R]. 2.11版. 北京：中国电力科学研究院，2012.
[10] Program operation manual of EUROSTAG-4.2[R]. Pari: EDF, 2002.
[11] Program operation manual of PSS/E-33.4[R]． Germany, Munich：PTI Inc, 2013．
[12] 电力系统分析综合程序用户手册[R]. 7.0版. 北京：中国电力科学研究院，2010.
[13] VSAT user manual of DSATools[R]. Canada, British Columbia:Powertech Labs Inc, 2010.
[14] 高崇. 基于EUROSTAG的电网中长期动态稳定仿真研究[D]. 北京：华北电力大学，2008.
[15] 宋新立. PSD-FDS电力系统全过程动态仿真程序[R]. 中国电力科学研究院系统所，2011.
[16] 汤涌. 电力系统全过程动态（机电暂态与中长期动态过程）仿真技术与软件研究[D]. 北京：中国电力科学研究院，2002.
[17] 徐政，徐琼璟，任雷. BPA与PSASP及PSS/E机电暂态仿真的负荷模型比较[J]. 南方电网技术，2008，2（5）：32-35．
XU Zheng, XU Qiongjing, REN Lei. Comparison of load models for electromechanical transient simulation in BPA, PSASP and PSS/E [J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2008, 2(5): 32-35.
[18] 韩松，徐政，吴小辰，等. PSD_BPA与PSS/E暂态稳定数学模型比较[J]. 南方电网技术，2010，4（3）：67-71．
HAN Song, XU Zheng, WU Xiaochen, et al. Comparison of mathematical models for transient stability between PSD-BPA and PSS/E [J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2010, 4(3): 67-71.
[19] 程华. 基于PSS/E的电力系统电压稳定研究[D]. 杭州：浙江大学，2004.
[20] 卢岑岑，王晓茹． BPA与PSS/E直流输电模型仿真比较研究[J]．电网技术，2010，34（Ｓ2）：98-102．
LU Cencen, WANG Xiaoru. Comparison of DC transmission models from BPA and PSS/E[J]. Power System Technology, 2010, 34(S2): 98-102.
[21] 曾雪松. 基于PSD_FDS的电网中长期动态仿真[D]. 成都：西南交通大学，2010.
[22] 王鑫. 基于EUROSTAG的北京电网动态稳定分析[D]. 北京：华北电力大学，2006.
[23] 段建民，张焰，范习辉，等. 基于PSS/E的电力系统电压稳定性分析[J]. 电力自动化设备，2005，25（6）：34-37．
DUAN Jianmin, ZHANG Yan, FAN Xihui, et al. Power system voltage stability analysis based on PSS/E[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2005, 25(6): 34-37.