中国电力 ›› 2025, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (9): 88-96.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202504051
冯轩1(
), 孔祥平2(
), 杜晓舟1, 费骏韬2, 张献蒙3, 蒋秋雨4(
), 李振兴5
收稿日期:2025-04-18
发布日期:2025-09-26
出版日期:2025-09-28
作者简介:基金资助:
FENG Xuan1(
), KONG Xiangping2(
), DU Xiaozhou1, FEI Juntao2, ZHANG Xianmeng3, JIANG Qiuyu4(
), LI Zhenxing5
Received:2025-04-18
Online:2025-09-26
Published:2025-09-28
Supported by:摘要:
“交改直”直流输电工程能够有效提升输电效率并解决新增线路空间限制等难题,但在实际运行中,交流滤波器的投切操作会引发谐波畸变,影响电能质量。针对这一问题,通过分析现场录波数据,提取了交流滤波器投切过程中的关键特征,并提出了工程优化措施。同时,考虑到工程实际运行方式的局限性和实验条件的限制,基于实际系统参数建立了精细化仿真模型,利用强化学习算法提出了一种交流滤波器投切组合优化策略。仿真结果表明,该策略能够有效降低总谐波畸变率(total harmonic distortion,THD),显著提升系统电能质量,为“交改直”工程的稳定运行提供重要技术支撑。
冯轩, 孔祥平, 杜晓舟, 费骏韬, 张献蒙, 蒋秋雨, 李振兴. “交改直”系统交流滤波器投切组合优化策略[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(9): 88-96.
FENG Xuan, KONG Xiangping, DU Xiaozhou, FEI Juntao, ZHANG Xianmeng, JIANG Qiuyu, LI Zhenxing. AC Filter Switching Combination Optimization Strategy for "AC-to-DC" System[J]. Electric Power, 2025, 58(9): 88-96.
| 参数 | 滤波器分组类型 | |||||
| BP11/BP13 | HP24/36 | HP3 | ||||
| C1/μF | 2.745 | |||||
| C2/mH | 33/ | |||||
| L1/mH | 228.785 | |||||
| L2/mH | ||||||
| R1、R2/Ω | 80 | 575 | ||||
表 1 各滤波器参数
Table 1 Parameters of each filter
| 参数 | 滤波器分组类型 | |||||
| BP11/BP13 | HP24/36 | HP3 | ||||
| C1/μF | 2.745 | |||||
| C2/mH | 33/ | |||||
| L1/mH | 228.785 | |||||
| L2/mH | ||||||
| R1、R2/Ω | 80 | 575 | ||||
| 功率 (p.u.) | 功率/MW | 不同滤波器连接组数 | ||||||
| BP11/BP13 | HP24/36 | HP3 | ||||||
| 0.1 | 120 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| 0.2 | 240 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| 0.3 | 360 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| 0.4 | 480 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| 0.5 | 600 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| 0.6 | 720 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 0.7 | 840 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 0.8 | 960 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||
| 0.9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||
| 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||||
表 2 绝对最小滤波器配置
Table 2 Absolute minimum filter configuration
| 功率 (p.u.) | 功率/MW | 不同滤波器连接组数 | ||||||
| BP11/BP13 | HP24/36 | HP3 | ||||||
| 0.1 | 120 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| 0.2 | 240 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| 0.3 | 360 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| 0.4 | 480 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| 0.5 | 600 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| 0.6 | 720 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 0.7 | 840 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 0.8 | 960 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||
| 0.9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||
| 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||||
| 日期 | 时刻 | 滤波器操作 | 类型 | BP11/13 | HP24/36 | HP3 | ||||||
| 4月27日 | 19:57 | 投入 | BP11/13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 19:57 | 投入 | HP24/36 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||||||
| 22:47 | 投入 | HP3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 4月28日 | 13:52 | 投入 | BP11/13 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 13:53 | 投入 | HP24/36 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||||
| 13:56 | 投入 | BP11/13 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||||||
| 20:37 | 投入 | HP24/36 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||
| 20:38 | 切除 | HP24/36 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
表 3 滤波器操作
Table 3 Filter operation
| 日期 | 时刻 | 滤波器操作 | 类型 | BP11/13 | HP24/36 | HP3 | ||||||
| 4月27日 | 19:57 | 投入 | BP11/13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 19:57 | 投入 | HP24/36 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||||||
| 22:47 | 投入 | HP3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 4月28日 | 13:52 | 投入 | BP11/13 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 13:53 | 投入 | HP24/36 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||||
| 13:56 | 投入 | BP11/13 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||||||
| 20:37 | 投入 | HP24/36 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||
| 20:38 | 切除 | HP24/36 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 日期 | 时刻 | 滤波器操作 | 类型 | BP11/13 | HP24/36 | HP3 | ||||||
| 4月28日 | 21:12 | 投入 | HP3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| 21:13 | 切除 | BP11/13 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||
| 23:06 | 切除 | HP3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||||
| 23:08 | 切除 | HP24/36 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 23:09 | 切除 | BP11/13 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 4月29日 | 01:08 | 投入 | BP11/13 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 01:10 | 投入 | HP24/36 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||||
| 01:11 | 投入 | HP24/36 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||
| 03:01 | 切除 | HP24/36 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||||
| 03:02 | 切除 | HP24/36 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 03:04 | 切除 | BP11/13 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 11:59 | 切除 | HP3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||||||
| 14:22 | 投入 | HP3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 15:38 | 投入 | BP11/13 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 15:39 | 投入 | HP24/36 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||||
| 15:41 | 投入 | HP24/36 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||
| 15:42 | 投入 | HP3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |||||||
| 17:53 | 切除 | HP3 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
表 4 滤波器操作
Table 4 Filter operation
| 日期 | 时刻 | 滤波器操作 | 类型 | BP11/13 | HP24/36 | HP3 | ||||||
| 4月28日 | 21:12 | 投入 | HP3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| 21:13 | 切除 | BP11/13 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||
| 23:06 | 切除 | HP3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||||
| 23:08 | 切除 | HP24/36 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 23:09 | 切除 | BP11/13 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 4月29日 | 01:08 | 投入 | BP11/13 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 01:10 | 投入 | HP24/36 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||||
| 01:11 | 投入 | HP24/36 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||
| 03:01 | 切除 | HP24/36 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||||
| 03:02 | 切除 | HP24/36 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 03:04 | 切除 | BP11/13 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 11:59 | 切除 | HP3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||||||
| 14:22 | 投入 | HP3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 15:38 | 投入 | BP11/13 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 15:39 | 投入 | HP24/36 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||||
| 15:41 | 投入 | HP24/36 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||
| 15:42 | 投入 | HP3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |||||||
| 17:53 | 切除 | HP3 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| 功率标 幺值 (p.u.) | 投切顺序 | |||||||||||||||
| BP11/ BP13 | HP24/ 36 | HP3 | BP11/ BP13 | HP24/ 36 | BP11/ BP13 | HP24/ 36 | HP3 | |||||||||
| 0.1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 0.2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 0.3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 0.4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 0.6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 0.7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 0.8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 | ||||||||
| 0.9 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 6 | ||||||||
表 5 强化学习优化后滤波器投切顺序
Table 5 Reinforcement learning optimized filter switching sequence
| 功率标 幺值 (p.u.) | 投切顺序 | |||||||||||||||
| BP11/ BP13 | HP24/ 36 | HP3 | BP11/ BP13 | HP24/ 36 | BP11/ BP13 | HP24/ 36 | HP3 | |||||||||
| 0.1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 0.2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 0.3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 0.4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 0.6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 0.7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 0.8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 | ||||||||
| 0.9 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 6 | ||||||||
| 1 | 陈晋, 娄悦, 张献蒙, 等. “交改直”输电工程送端换流站设计特点[J]. 电力勘测设计, 2024, (S2): 1- 7. |
| 2 | 陈松涛, 陈兵, 吴巍, 等. “交改直”±200 kV同塔三回直流线路过电压研究[J]. 浙江电力, 2025, 44 (3): 108- 115. |
| CHEN Songtao, CHEN Bing, WU Wei, et al. Study on overvoltage in ±200 kV triple-circuit DC transmission lines on the same tower for an AC-to-DC transmission project[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2025, 44 (3): 108- 115. | |
| 3 |
MEHMOOD R S, HUSSAIN A, ALI U, et al. Novel double-damped tuned AC filters in HVDC systems[J]. Computers, Materials and Continua, 2023, 75 (1): 1467- 1482.
DOI |
| 4 |
LIN S, MU D L, XU L J, et al. Parameter optimization method for AC filters in HVDC considering reactive power compensation effectiveness[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2025, 40 (1): 365- 375.
DOI |
| 5 | 谭天健. 基于人工神经网络的滤波器设计方法研究[D]. 桂林: 桂林理工大学, 2024. |
| TAN Tianjian. Research on filter design method based on artificial neural network[D]. Guilin: Guilin University of Technology, 2024. | |
| 6 | LIU Z X, SHAO W, DING X, et al. GA-optimized ANN for modeling of UWB filters[C]//2020 International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology (ICMMT). Shanghai, China. IEEE, 2021: 1–2. |
| 7 | 李辉, 徐浩, 郭思源, 等. ±800 kV湘潭换流站交流滤波器投切策略及优化[J]. 电力电容器与无功补偿, 2017, 38 (3): 36- 42. |
| LI Hui, XU Hao, GUO Siyuan, et al. Switching strategy and optimization of AC filter for ±800 kV Xiangtan converter station[J]. Power Capacitor & Reactive Power Compensation, 2017, 38 (3): 36- 42. | |
| 8 | 段雄英, 陈一豪, 张帆, 等. 选相抑制交流滤波器合闸涌流及过电压研究[J]. 高压电器, 2021, 57 (5): 14- 20, 28. |
| DUAN Xiongying, CHEN Yihao, ZHANG Fan, et al. Study on closing inrush current and overvoltage by phase selective suppression of AC filter[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 2021, 57 (5): 14- 20, 28. | |
| 9 | 廖雨. 考虑不同工况下投切交流滤波器产生的涌流及过电压分析[J]. 电工技术, 2024, (23): 253- 257. |
| LIAO Yu. Analysis of inrush current and overvoltage generated by switching AC filter under different working conditions[J]. Electric Engineering, 2024, (23): 253- 257. | |
| 10 | 古智鹏, 胡蕴斌, 翁洪志, 等. 基于PSCAD/EMTDC的换流站交流滤波器电容器不平衡电流异常分析[J]. 电力电容器与无功补偿, 2021, 42 (1): 12- 17. |
| GU Zhipeng, HU Yunbing, WENG Hongzhi, et al. Analysis on abnormal unbalanced current of AC filter capacitor of converter station based on PSCAD/EMTDC[J]. Power Capacitor & Reactive Power Compensation, 2021, 42 (1): 12- 17. | |
| 11 | 董武, 张健, 周勤勇, 等. 中国电力系统安全稳定性演化综述[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58 (1): 115- 127. |
| DONG Wu, ZHANG Jian, ZHOU Qinyong, et al. An overview of the evolution of security and stability of China’s power system[J]. Electric Power, 2025, 58 (1): 115- 127. | |
| 12 |
闫新, 王黎, 彭寅, 等. 混合多端高压直流输电线路的行波传播过程分析[J]. 山东电力技术, 2023, 50 (3): 57- 62.
DOI |
|
YAN Xin, WANG Li, PENG Yin, et al. Analysis of travelling wave propagation process in hybrid multi-terminal HVDC transmission system[J]. Shandong Electric Power, 2023, 50 (3): 57- 62.
DOI |
|
| 13 |
时圣尧, 姜明磊, 张贺一, 等. 高比例风电接入的送端混合级联直流输电系统无功协调控制策略[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2024, 46 (11): 83- 91.
DOI |
|
SHI Shengyao, JIANG Minglei, ZHANG Heyi, et al. Reactive power coordination control strategy for sending-end hybrid cascaded HVDC transmission system with high proportion of wind power integration[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2024, 46 (11): 83- 91.
DOI |
|
| 14 | 张冬清, 张国华, 徐玲铃, 等. 调相机在电力系统中的发展应用与动态特性[J]. 南方能源建设, 2024, 11 (4): 31- 41. |
| ZHANG Dongqing, ZHANG Guohua, XU Lingling, et al. Development application and dynamic characteristics of synchronous condenser in electric power system[J]. Southern Energy Construction, 2024, 11 (4): 31- 41. | |
| 15 | 贺日星, 杨宝峰, 陈瀚栋, 等. 抑制直流输电换相失败方法研究[J]. 内蒙古电力技术, 2023, 41 (6): 75- 83. |
| HE Rixing, YANG Baofeng, CHEN Handong, et al. Research of methods for suppressing commutation failure in HVDC transmission[J]. Inner Mongolia Electric Power, 2023, 41 (6): 75- 83. | |
| 16 | 贾跟卯, 赵启承, 骆福权, 等. 直流换流站高通HP3型交流滤波器电抗器匝间故障监测及保护[J]. 高压电器, 2024, 60 (1): 136- 143, 162. |
| JIA Genmao, ZHAO Qicheng, LUO Fuquan, et al. Monitoring and protection on inter-turn short circuit fault for reactor of high Pass3rd-order AC filter in DC convert station[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 2024, 60 (1): 136- 143, 162. | |
| 17 | 卢东斌, 薛海平, 沈全荣, 等. 基于滤波规则的HVDC交流过电压快切滤波器控制策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2018, 42 (15): 192- 199. |
| LU Dongbin, XUE Haiping, SHEN Quanrong, et al. Filtering-rule-based control strategy of switching-off AC filters for overvoltage in HVDC transmission[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2018, 42 (15): 192- 199. | |
| 18 | 刘亮, 吴明凯, 陆洪建, 等. 银川东换流站直流功率回降原因分析及改进措施[J]. 宁夏电力, 2022, (4): 24- 29. |
| LIU Liang, WU Mingkai, LU Hongjian, et al. Cause analysis and improvement measures of DC power back-drop at Yinchuan Eastern Converter Substation[J]. Ningxia Electric Power, 2022, (4): 24- 29. | |
| 19 | 孔玮琦, 李凯协, 蔡斌, 等. 牛从直流无功控制优先级与绝对最小滤波器限制直流功率策略研究[J]. 电工技术, 2024, (17): 192- 195. |
| KONG Weiqi, LI Kaixie, CAI Bin, et al. Research on the priority and absolute minimum filter restriction DC power strategy for bull’s DC reactive power control[J]. Electric Engineering, 2024, (17): 192- 195. | |
| 20 | 王秋楠, 晋宏杨, 刘东, 等. LCC-HVDC换流站无功电压控制问题综述[J]. 电力电容器与无功补偿, 2023, 44 (2): 10- 17. |
| WANG Qiunan, JIN Hongyang, LIU Dong, et al. Review on reactive voltage control of LCC-HVDC converter station[J]. Power Capacitor & Reactive Power Compensation, 2023, 44 (2): 10- 17. | |
| 21 | 孙冬川, 孙亮, 孔令乾, 等. 基于深度强化学习的多能虚拟电厂优化调度[J]. 东北电力大学学报, 2024, 44 (3): 102- 111. |
| SUN Dongchuan, SUN Liang, KONG Lingqian, et al. Deep reinforcement learning-based optimal scheduling for multi-energy virtual power plant[J]. Journal of Northeast Electric Power University, 2024, 44 (3): 102- 111. | |
| 22 | 周良才, 周毅, 沈维健, 等. 基于深度强化学习的新型电力系统无功电压优化控制[J]. 电测与仪表, 2024, 61 (9): 182- 189. |
| ZHOU Liangcai, ZHOU Yi, SHEN Weijian, et al. Reactive voltage optimization control of novel power system based on deep reinforcement learning[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2024, 61 (9): 182- 189. | |
| 23 | 王扬, 陈智斌, 吴兆蕊, 等. 强化学习求解组合最优化问题的研究综述[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2022, 16 (2): 261- 279. |
| WANG Yang, CHEN Zhibin, WU Zhaorui, et al. Review of reinforcement learning for combinatorial optimization problem[J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2022, 16 (2): 261- 279. | |
| 24 |
杜婉琳, 王玲, 罗威, 等. 基于深度强化学习的有源配电网电压分层控制策略[J]. 发电技术, 2024, 45 (4): 734- 743.
DOI |
|
DU Wanlin, WANG Ling, LUO Wei, et al. Voltage hierarchical control strategy of active distribution network based on deep reinforcement learning[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45 (4): 734- 743.
DOI |
|
| 25 | 梁星星, 冯旸赫, 马扬, 等. 多Agent深度强化学习综述[J]. 自动化学报, 2020, 46 (12): 2537- 2557. |
| LIANG Xingxing, FENG Yanghe, MA Yang, et al. Deep multi-agent reinforcement learning: a survey[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2020, 46 (12): 2537- 2557. |
| [1] | 王勇, 王辉, 胡雅涵, 赵鹏, 李雪男. 基于风光互补混合储能系统的微电网优化及电能质量提升[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(7): 162-167. |
| [2] | 陈仕龙, 吴涛, 郭成, 毕贵红, 钱永亮. 基于相关性分析的电网非同步监测数据场景谐波责任划分[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(1): 15-25. |
| [3] | 杨帆, 卫水平, 任意, 陈秭龙, 乐健. 变权-混合决策评估的复合功能并网逆变器多目标协同优化控制方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(3): 113-125. |
| [4] | 张博智, 张茹, 焦东翔, 王龙宇, 周一凡, 周丽霞. 基于VMD-SAST的电能质量扰动分类识别方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(2): 34-40. |
| [5] | 陈仕龙, 吴涛, 郭成, 张梓睿, 孙竟豪. 基于DBSCAN聚类和区间回归的多谐波责任划分[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(2): 138-148. |
| [6] | 李天楚, 容斌, 伍智鹏, 黄珏, 黄开来, 杨刚, 易杨. 基于边缘计算的风电群非故意发射超高次谐波抑制策略[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(8): 200-206,215. |
| [7] | 杨嘉伟, 易杨, 姜浩, 朱林, 姚志伟. 基于随机载波脉冲宽度调制的变换器群超高次谐波抑制机理[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(11): 160-167. |
| [8] | 于永军, 许立国, 林子杰, 孙冰涵, 刘秋降, 吴振升, 任之杰. 基于级联H桥变流器的风电网宽频带谐波阻抗测量装置[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 73-83. |
| [9] | 张健, 于浩, 梁建权, 王悦, 刘贺千. 基于数据驱动的多污染模式电能质量耦合性评估[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 84-90. |
| [10] | 黄学民, 邓俊文, 邓京, 罗新, 韩永霞. 交流滤波器避雷器电气特性分析中不同仿真模型的影响[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(7): 141-148. |
| [11] | 温才权, 全杰雄, 周凯, 潘龙斌, 李成. 大容量SVC相控电抗器对站用低压直流电源的影响分析及防范措施[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(12): 45-53. |
| [12] | 钟庆, 姚蔚琳, 许中, 周凯, 王钢. 基于平均点线距的电压暂降系统级评估方法[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(11): 9-14. |
| [13] | 卓放, 杨泽斌, 易皓, 杨光宇, 王蒙, 阴晓晴, 朱承治. 综合配网谐波及三相不平衡评价指标的治理设备优化配置策略[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(11): 40-49. |
| [14] | 王延召, 周兵, 张业茂, 谢辉春, 刘震寰. ±1 100 kV换流站交流滤波器场的工频电场仿真[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(6): 121-127. |
| [15] | 赵健, 王奕凡, 谢桦, 周宁, 孙芊. 高渗透率可再生能源接入系统中储能应用综述[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(4): 167-177. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||


AI小编