燃煤电厂超低排放颗粒物在线监测烟气除湿技术

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201907053

中国电力 ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (12): 154-159.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201907053

燃煤电厂超低排放颗粒物在线监测烟气除湿技术

李德文, 焦敏, 郑磊

中煤科工集团重庆研究院有限公司, 重庆 400037

收稿日期:2019-07-05 修回日期:2019-08-19 发布日期:2019-12-05
通讯作者: 焦敏(1987-),男,通信作者,硕士,从事粉尘监测及智能控制系统研究,E-mail:minwzh@163.com
作者简介:李德文(1964-),男,博士,研究员,从事粉尘监测和治理科研工作,E-mail:cqmkyldw@163.com;郑磊(1985-),男,硕士,从事煤矿井下粉尘治理相关工作,E-mail:394716385@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划资助项目（燃煤电厂超低排放监测仪器，2016YFF0102800）

Flue Gas Dehumidification Technology for On-line Monitoring of Ultra-Low Emission Particulate Matter in Coal-Fired Power Plants

LI Dewen, JIAO Min, ZHENG Lei

China Coal Technology and Engineering Group Chongqing Research Institute, Chongqing 400037, China

Received:2019-07-05 Revised:2019-08-19 Published:2019-12-05
Supported by:
This work is supported by National Key R&D Plan of China (Ultra-low Emission Monitoring Instrument for Coal-fired Power Plant, No.2016YFF0102800)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 燃煤电厂超低排放颗粒物浓度在线监测常采用光散射法，但该法受排放烟气的相对湿度、水滴和汽雾等影响。为提高测试结果的准确性，以HJ836—2017《固定污染源废气、低浓度颗粒物的测定重量法》为参照标准，通过实验找出了光散射法测量误差与相对湿度的关系；为降低待测烟气相对温度及水滴和汽雾，对旋流加热器和直管加热器进行了研究。实验结果表明：相对湿度＜55%时，颗粒物浓度的测量误差可忽略不计；在相同功耗条件下，旋流加热器的加热效率比直管加热器的加热效率高30%；为满足燃煤电厂超低排放要求，提高颗粒物在线监测的可靠性，烟气预处理采用旋流加热时的温度不应低于120 ℃。

关键词: 燃煤电厂, 超低排放, 颗粒物检测, 烟气除湿, 旋流加热

Abstract: Light scattering method is often used in the on-line monitoring of ultra-low emission particle concentration in coal-fired power plants, but its accuracy may be affected by the relative humidity, water droplets, vapor mist and so on. In this paper, the relationship between the measurement error of light scattering method and the relative humidity was found out through the experiment with HJ836-2017 "weight method for the determination of waste gas and low concentration particulate matter of fixed pollution source" as the reference standard. In order to reduce the relative temperature, water droplets and vapor mist of the flue gas to be measured, the application of swirl heater and straight tube heater were explored. The experimental results show that: when the relative humidity is less than 55%, the measurement error of particle concentration can be ignored; under the same power consumption, the heating efficiency of swirl heater is 30% higher than that of straight tube heater; in order to meet the ultra-low emission requirements of coal-fired power plant and improve the reliability of on-line monitoring of particles, the temperature of swirl heating used in flue gas pretreatment should be kept no lower than 120 ℃.

Key words: coal fired power plants, ultra low emission, particle detection, flue gas dehumidification, swirling heating

中图分类号:

X513

李德文, 焦敏, 郑磊. 燃煤电厂超低排放颗粒物在线监测烟气除湿技术[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(12): 154-159.

LI Dewen, JIAO Min, ZHENG Lei. Flue Gas Dehumidification Technology for On-line Monitoring of Ultra-Low Emission Particulate Matter in Coal-Fired Power Plants[J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(12): 154-159.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201907053

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2019/V52/I12/154

参考文献

[1] 孟令媛, 朱法华, 易玉萍, 等. 燃煤电厂超低排放颗粒物测试方法研究[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(10):123-126 MENG Lingyuan, ZHU Fahua, YI Yuping, et al. Study on testing methods of particulate matter at ultra-low concentration from coal-fired power plants[J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(10):123-126
[2] 罗毅, 陈威祥. 高湿低温环境下低浓度颗粒物采样滤膜试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(8):180-184 LUO Yi, CHEN Weixiang. Experimental study on sampling filter membrane for low concentration particulate matter under high-humidity low-temperature environment[J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(8):180-184
[3] BOHREN C F, HUFFMAN D R. Absorption and scattering of light by small particles[M]. New York:John Wiley &Sons, 2008.
[4] 李晋惠, 于亚琳, 田军委. 多光路光散射扬尘检测方法研究[J]. 电子测量技术, 2015, 38(10):101-105 LI Jinhui, YU Yalin, TIAN Junwei. Reach on multi-laser scattering dust detection method[J]. Electronic Measurement Technology, 2015, 38(10):101-105
[5] 赵太飞, 康博伦. 日盲紫外光霾粒子光散射测量方法研究[J]. 电子测量与仪器学报, 2016, 30(9):1432-1437 ZHAO Taifei, KANG Bolun. Research on light scattering measurement method of haze particles at blind UV[J]. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrumentation, 2016, 30(9):1432-1437
[6] 李树珉. 烟气排放实时连续监测系统关键技术的研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2009. LI Shumin. Study on the key technologies of continuous emissions monitoring system[D]. Tianjin:Tianjin University, 2009.
[7] 崔术祥.湿度对室内颗粒物分布的影响[D]. 株洲:湖南工业大学, 2013. CUI Shuxiang. The influence of humidity on the distribution of indoor particle[D]. Zhuzhou: Hunan University of Technology, 2013.
[8] 张国城, 赵红达, 赵晓宁. 湿度对光散射粉尘仪测量结果的影响[J]. 计量技术, 2018(5):7-9
[9] 金义忠, 夏黎明. 在线分析样气除湿新技术的应用研究[J]. 分析仪器, 2010(2):65-70 JIN Yizhong, XIA Liming. New techniques of sample dehumidifying for on-line gas analysis[J]. Analytical Instrumentation, 2010(2):65-70
[10] 欧阳应秀, 王剑锋, 刘建强, 等. 空气压缩除湿闭式干燥循环研究[J]. 流体机械, 2000, 28(9):44-47, 4 OUYANG Yingxiu, WANG Jianfeng, LIU Jianqiang, et al. Study on a closed drying cycle employing air as working fluid[J]. Fluid Machinery, 2000, 28(9):44-47, 4
[11] 韩耀明. 半导体制冷微型除湿器与化学干燥剂的对比试验研究[J]. 制冷, 2008, 27(2):12-17 HAN Yaoming. Comparison between semiconductor refrigeration mini dehumidifier and chemical desiccant[J]. Refrigeration, 2008, 27(2):12-17
[12] 罗仲, 张旭, 王胜己, 等. 半导体制冷器除湿实验研究[J]. 制冷学报, 2015, 36(5):101-106 LUO Zhong, ZHANG Xu, WANG Shengji, et al. Experimental research on performance optimization of thermoelectric dehumidifier[J]. Journal of Refrigeration, 2015, 36(5):101-106
[13] 赵媛媛, 何奎, 李斯陶, 等.中空纤维膜除湿组件的热质传递特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(增刊1):96−104. ZHAO Yuanyuan, HE Kui, LI Sitiao, et al. Heat and mass transfer in hollow fiber module for dehumificaton[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(S1):96−104.
[14] 焦敏. 基于Nafion膜的粉尘样气处理技术[J]. 煤炭技术, 2014, 33(10):267-269 JIAO Min. Processing technologies of dust sample gas based on nafion membranes[J]. Coal Technology, 2014, 33(10):267-269
[15] 黄婧, 邓芙蓉, 吴少伟, 等. 相对湿度对光散射法测定大气细颗粒物浓度的影响[J]. 中国预防医学杂志, 2012, 13(5):321-325 HUANG Jing, DENG Furong, WU Shaowei, et al. Effect of relative humidity on concentration of ambient fine particles measured by light-scattering method[J]. China Preventive Medicine, 2012, 13(5):321-325
[16] 苏凌宇. 基于液滴蒸发过程的空气加热器低频不稳定燃烧研究[D]. 长沙:国防科学技术大学, 2009. SU Lingyu. The study of low-frequency combustion instability in air-heater based on droplet evaporation[D]. Changsha:National University of Defense Technology, 2009.
[17] 赵芳.低总温直连式空气加热器数值仿真与试验研究[D]. 长沙:国防科学技术大学, 2012. ZHAO Fang. Numerical simulation and experimental research on direct-connected air heater of low total temperature[D]. Changsha:National University of Defense Technology,2012.
[18] 蒋爱华. 一种旋流除尘式热管空气预热器[J]. 长沙电力学院学报(自然科学版), 1996, 11(2):155-157 JIANG Aihua. A new type of spiral flowing heat pipe air preheater[J]. Journal of Changsha University of Electric Power(Natural Science), 1996, 11(2):155-157
[19] 岳丹婷.工程热力学和传热学[M]. 大连:大连海事学院出版社, 2002.

燃煤电厂超低排放颗粒物在线监测烟气除湿技术

Flue Gas Dehumidification Technology for On-line Monitoring of Ultra-Low Emission Particulate Matter in Coal-Fired Power Plants

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	曲立涛, 齐晓辉, 王德鑫, 于洪海. 基于CEMS数据的超低排放燃煤机组大气污染物排放特性分析[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(2): 171-178.
[2]	刘含笑, 吴黎明, 赵琳, 于立元, 郦建国, 崔盈. 燃煤电厂湿式电除尘器减排及能效特性研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 196-203.
[3]	张志勇, 莫华, 王猛, 帅伟. 600 MW燃煤机组烟气污染物控制研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 204-210.
[4]	孙尊强, 郑成航, 周灿, 王圣, 马修元, 叶毅科. 燃煤电厂典型除尘器运行现状分析及优化[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 194-201.
[5]	王彦哲, 周胜, 姚子麟, 欧训民. 中国煤电生命周期二氧化碳和大气污染物排放相互影响建模分析[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(8): 128-135.
[6]	朱法华, 许月阳, 孙尊强, 孙雪丽, 王圣. 中国燃煤电厂超低排放和节能改造的实践与启示[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(4): 1-8.
[7]	吴家玉, 莫华, 胡耘, 朱杰, 帅伟, 张晴, 姜岸. 京津冀及周边地区燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物不同控制情景下时空变化特征[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 182-189.
[8]	惠立锋. 燃煤电厂超低排放PM₁₀/PM_2.5实验室采样对比分析[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 190-196.
[9]	赵宏, 张发捷, 马云龙, 马宝林, 唐潇, 徐仁博, 罗通达, 李成宝, 任传明, 于洁, 孙路石. 燃煤电厂SCR脱硝氨逃逸迁移规律试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(1): 196-202.
[10]	赵柄, 王海刚, 胡冬, 陈坤洋, 金绪良, 殷爱鸣. 燃煤电厂碱性吸附剂脱汞性能研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(9): 208-213.
[11]	吴家玉, 朱杰, 莫华, 张峰, 帅伟, 张晴, 那钦. 典型燃煤电厂浆液冷却烟气消白设施SO₃治理效果测试研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(8): 145-150,172.
[12]	姚燕, 马云龙, 杨晓宁, 张华东, 王丽朋. 高砷煤SCR脱硝催化剂中毒失活研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(6): 191-196.
[13]	马学礼, 孙希进, 苏燊燊, 张仁锋, 党立晨, 黄显昌, 谢永平. 基于超低排放的燃煤电厂烟囱高度优化研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(5): 179-184.
[14]	徐静馨, 朱法华, 王圣, 张明, 赵秀勇, 孙雪丽, 胡耘, 田文鑫. 超低排放燃煤电厂和燃气电厂综合对比[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(2): 164-172,179.
[15]	刘晓敏, 王乐乐, 黄见勋, 黄荣廷, 许积庄, 孔凡海, 谢建南, 李津津, 杨林军, 张发捷, 何川. 低低温除尘器和海水脱硫可凝结颗粒物有机组分排放特征研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(12): 263-269.

模态框（Modal）标题

燃煤电厂超低排放颗粒物在线监测烟气除湿技术

Flue Gas Dehumidification Technology for On-line Monitoring of Ultra-Low Emission Particulate Matter in Coal-Fired Power Plants

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics