600 MW燃煤机组烟气污染物控制研究

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202105150

中国电力 ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (5): 204-210.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202105150

• 节能与环保 • 上一篇

600 MW燃煤机组烟气污染物控制研究

张志勇¹, 莫华², 王猛^1,2, 帅伟²

1. 内蒙古电力科学研究院，内蒙古呼和浩特 010020;
2. 生态环境部环境工程评估中心，北京 100012

收稿日期:2021-05-20 修回日期:2021-10-20 出版日期:2022-05-28 发布日期:2022-05-18
作者简介:张志勇（1980—），男，博士，高级工程师，从事电力环境保护技术研究工作，E-mail：zyzhang1980@126.com;王猛（1988—），男，通信作者，博士，高级工程师，从事电力环境保护技术研究工作，E-mail：wangmengnmg@163.com
基金资助:
内蒙古自治区自然科学基金资助项目（2019 BS05023）；内蒙古电力科学研究院自筹项目（2019-ZC-01）。

Study of Flue Gas Pollutant Control in a 600 MW Coal-Fired Unit

ZHANG Zhiyong¹, MO Hua², WANG Meng^1,2, SHUAI Wei²

1. Inner Mongolia Electric Power Science & Research Institute, Hohhot 010020, China;
2. Appraisal Center for Environment & Engineering, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of P.R.C, Beijing 100012, China

Received:2021-05-20 Revised:2021-10-20 Online:2022-05-28 Published:2022-05-18
Supported by:
This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (No. 2019BS05023), the Self-funded Project of Inner Mongolia Electric Power Science & Research Institute (No.2019-ZC-01).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以某600 MW超临界燃煤机组为例，研究了燃用高硫、中高灰、特低挥发分煤的W火焰锅炉排放效果。机组采用“选择性非催化还原(selective non-catalytic reduction, SNCR)＋选择性催化还原 (selective catalytic reduction, SCR)脱硝+配高频电源和旋转电极的双室五电场电除尘器+双塔双循环技术的石灰石-石膏湿法脱硫（3+5层喷淋）”的超低排放技术路线，根据机组分散控制系统(distributed control system, DCS) 和连续排放监测系统 (continuous emission monitoring system, CEMS)数据，烟囱出口NO_x、烟尘和SO₂浓度均能稳定达到超低排放水平。SNCR装置运行状态良好，SCR装置氨逃逸较大，最大值为27.51 mg/m³，A、B侧超过设计值2.28 mg/m³的概率分别为51.86%和45.96%，原因为脱硝系统浓度场分布不均。脱硫系统浆液密度控制较好，一级塔浆液pH值控制较好，二级塔浆液pH值控制偏低，未发挥出双塔双循环技术的优势。SO₂、NO_x和烟尘排放强度比2019年全国平均排放强度低48.7%、7.7%和28.9%。

关键词: 超低排放, W火焰炉, 高硫煤, 双塔双循环系统

Abstract: Taking a 600MW supercritical coal-fired unit as an example, the ultra-low emissions effect of W-flame boiler burning high sulfur, medium and high ash and low volatile coal was studied.The unit adopts the ultra-low emissions technology route of " selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)＋selective catalytic reduction (SCR) denitrification, double-chamber five-electric field electrostatic precipitator with high-frequency power supply+rotating electrode, and double-tower double-cycle wet-FGD system (3+5 layer spray)".According to Distributed Control System (DCS) and Continuous Emission Monitoring System (CEMS) data of the unit, NO_x, particulate matter and SO₂ concentrations at chimney outlet can reach ultra-low emission level stably.The SNCR device is in good operating condition. The ammonia escape of SCR device is large, and the maximum ammonia escape reaches 27.51mg/m³. The probability of exceeding the designed value of 2.28mg/m³ on side A and side B is 51.86% and 45.96%, respectively. The reason is that the concentration field of denitration system is unevenly distributed. The slurry density of desulfurization system is well controlled. The pH value of the slurry in the first tower is well controlled, but the pH value in the second tower is relatively low. The emission intensity of SO₂, NO_x and particulate matter is 48.7%, 7.7% and 28.9% lower than the national average emission intensity in 2019.

Key words: ultra-low emissions, W-flame boiler, high-sulfur coal, double-tower double-cycle wet-FGD system

张志勇, 莫华, 王猛, 帅伟. 600 MW燃煤机组烟气污染物控制研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 204-210.

ZHANG Zhiyong, MO Hua, WANG Meng, SHUAI Wei. Study of Flue Gas Pollutant Control in a 600 MW Coal-Fired Unit[J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55(5): 204-210.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202105150

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2022/V55/I5/204

参考文献

[1] TANG L, QU J, MI Z, et al. Substantial emission reductions from Chinese power plants after the introduction of ultra-low emissions standards[J]. Nature Energy, 2019, 4(11): 929–938.
[2] 朱智. 贵州省“W”型火焰锅炉节能及超低排放的调研[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(8): 158–162
ZHU Zhi. Research on the implementation of energy saving and ultra low emission technique in W-flame boilers in Guizhou province[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(8): 158–162
[3] 王建峰, 尤良洲, 胡妲, 等. “W”火焰锅炉脱硝超低排放技术与经济分析[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(3): 38–40,70
WANG Jianfeng, YOU Liangzhou, HU Da, et al. Technical and economical analysis on denitration ultra-low emission of W-flame boilers[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(3): 38–40,70
[4] 张杨, 蒋志强, 孙路长, 等. W火焰锅炉NO_x超低排放技术路线分析与讨论[J]. 电力科技与环保, 2019, 35(1): 4–6
ZHANG Yang, JIANG Zhiqiang, SUN Luchang, et al. Analysis and discussion on ultra-low emission technology route of W-flame boilers[J]. Electric Power Technology and Environmental Protection, 2019, 35(1): 4–6
[5] 时光, 张杨, 裴煜坤, 等. 某2×600 MW机组“W”火焰锅炉氮氧化物超低排放改造方案分析[J]. 发电与空调, 2017, 38(3): 6–9
SHI Guang, ZHANG Yang, PEI Yukun, et al. Model analysis on NO_x ultra low emission retrofit in 2×600 MW “W” type flame boiler[J]. Power Generation and Air Condition, 2017, 38(3): 6–9
[6] 方朝君, 王丽朋, 刘鹏, 等. W型火焰锅炉脱硝NO_x分布优化技术应用[J]. 电力安全技术, 2018, 20(7): 47–50
FANG Chaojun, WANG Lipeng, LIU Peng, et al. Application of NO_x distribution optimization technology for denitrification in W-type flame boiler[J]. Electric Safety Technology, 2018, 20(7): 47–50
[7] 张缠保. 选择性非催化还原脱硝技术在W型锅炉的应用[J]. 中国环保产业, 2019(5): 37–40
ZHANG Chanbao. Application of SNCR denitration technology in W type flame boiler[J]. China Environmental Protection Industry, 2019(5): 37–40
[8] 聂静. SNCR配合SCR在W型锅炉脱硝中的应用[J]. 龙岩学院学报, 2020, 38(2): 69–74
NIE Jing. Application of SNCR and SCR in denitration of W-type boilers[J]. Journal of Longyan University, 2020, 38(2): 69–74
[9] 韦飞, 王春玲, 惠润堂, 等. SCR出口与烟囱入口NO_x浓度“倒挂”因素分析[J]. 环境工程, 2017, 35: 171–173
WEI Fei, WANG Chunling, HUI Runtang, et al. Analyze the factors of different NO_x concentration in SCR reactor outlet and chimney inlet[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2017, 35: 171–173
[10] 魏宏鸽, 徐明华, 柴磊, 等. 双塔双循环脱硫系统的运行现状分析与优化措施探讨[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(10): 132–135
WEI Hongge, XU Minghua, CHAI Lei, et al. Current operation state analysis and optimization method exploration on double-tower double-cycle wet-FGD systems[J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(10): 132–135
[11] 曲立涛. 双塔双循环烟气脱硫系统经济运行控制策略分析[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2016(9): 26–28
QU Litao. Economic operation control strategy analysis of double-tower double-cycle wet-FGD[J]. Resources Economization & Environmental Protection, 2016(9): 26–28
[12] 杨用龙, 苏秋凤, 张杨, 等. 双塔双循环脱硫系统优化与经济性运行研究[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(4): 136–142,179
YANG Yonglong, SU Qiufeng, ZHANG Yang, et al. System optimization and economical operation of the series absorption tower[J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(4): 136–142,179
[13] 郭江源, 姜冉, 张志勇, 等. 基于石灰石-石膏湿法脱硫的超低改造技术分析[J]. 能源环境保护, 2019, 33(6): 36–38,64
GUO Jiangyuan, JIANG Ran, ZHANG Zhiyong, et al. Ultra-low transformation technologies based on limestone-gypsum wet desulfurization[J]. Energy Environmental Protection, 2019, 33(6): 36–38,64
[14] 张晓玲, 廉珂, 祁东东, 等. 双塔串联脱硫系统技术特点分析及优化建议[J]. 能源环境保护, 2019, 33(4): 37–40
ZHANG Xiaoling, LIAN Ke, QI Dongdong, et al. Technical characteristics analysis and optimization suggestion of double-tower series desulfurization system[J]. Energy Environmental Protection, 2019, 33(4): 37–40
[15] 燃煤电厂超低排放烟气治理工程技术规范: HJ 2053—2018 [S].
[16] YANG Z D, ZHENG C H, ZHANG X F, et al. Highly efficient removal of sulfuric acid aerosol by a combined wet electrostatic precipitator[J]. RSC Advances, 2018, 8(1): 59–66.
[17] 莫华, 朱杰, 黄志杰, 等. 超低排放下不同湿法脱硫技术脱除SO₃效果测试与分析[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(3): 46–50
MO Hua, ZHU Jie, HUANG Zhijie, et al. Test and study on SO₃ removal performance of different wet flue gas desulfurization technologies at ultra-low pollutants emission[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(3): 46–50
[18] 朱法华, 孙尊强, 申智勇. 超低排放燃煤电厂有色烟羽成因及治理技术的经济与环境效益研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(8): 1–7,25
ZHU Fahua, SUN Zunqiang, SHEN Zhiyong. Cause analysis of colored smoke plume and related studies on economic and environmental benefits of its treatment technologies for ultra-low emission coal-fired power plants[J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(8): 1–7,25
[19] 莫华, 朱杰. 燃煤电厂有色烟羽治理要点分析与环境管理[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(3): 10–15,35
MO Hua, ZHU Jie. Analysis of key points on curbing colored plume in coal-fired power plants and environmental management[J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(3): 10–15,35
[20] 许剑, 罗志, 周鑫, 等. W火焰锅炉SCR分区混合动态调平技术及应用[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(11): 234–242
XU Jian, LUO Zhi, ZHOU Xin, et al. SCR zone-based hybrid dynamic leveling technology and its application for W-flame boiler[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(11): 234–242

600 MW燃煤机组烟气污染物控制研究

Study of Flue Gas Pollutant Control in a 600 MW Coal-Fired Unit

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	曲立涛, 齐晓辉, 王德鑫, 于洪海. 基于CEMS数据的超低排放燃煤机组大气污染物排放特性分析[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(2): 171-178.
[2]	刘含笑, 吴黎明, 赵琳, 于立元, 郦建国, 崔盈. 燃煤电厂湿式电除尘器减排及能效特性研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 196-203.
[3]	王彦哲, 周胜, 姚子麟, 欧训民. 中国煤电生命周期二氧化碳和大气污染物排放相互影响建模分析[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(8): 128-135.
[4]	朱法华, 许月阳, 孙尊强, 孙雪丽, 王圣. 中国燃煤电厂超低排放和节能改造的实践与启示[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(4): 1-8.
[5]	惠立锋. 燃煤电厂超低排放PM₁₀/PM_2.5实验室采样对比分析[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 190-196.
[6]	吴家玉, 朱杰, 莫华, 张峰, 帅伟, 张晴, 那钦. 典型燃煤电厂浆液冷却烟气消白设施SO₃治理效果测试研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(8): 145-150,172.
[7]	马学礼, 孙希进, 苏燊燊, 张仁锋, 党立晨, 黄显昌, 谢永平. 基于超低排放的燃煤电厂烟囱高度优化研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(5): 179-184.
[8]	徐静馨, 朱法华, 王圣, 张明, 赵秀勇, 孙雪丽, 胡耘, 田文鑫. 超低排放燃煤电厂和燃气电厂综合对比[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(2): 164-172,179.
[9]	刘晓敏, 王乐乐, 黄见勋, 黄荣廷, 许积庄, 孔凡海, 谢建南, 李津津, 杨林军, 张发捷, 何川. 低低温除尘器和海水脱硫可凝结颗粒物有机组分排放特征研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(12): 263-269.
[10]	许剑, 罗志, 周鑫, 李文杰, 黄少波, 常磊, 王晓冰, 牛国平, 张广才. W火焰锅炉SCR分区混合动态调平技术及应用[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(11): 234-242.
[11]	王宏亮, 许月阳, 薛建明, 刘涛, 管一明. 燃煤发电机组超低排放改造前后汞排放规律对比研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(11): 243-251.
[12]	方朝君, 冯炳全, 庞毅, 胡波, 赵伟. 燃煤锅炉掺烧干、湿污泥系统的设计思路[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(10): 224-230.
[13]	赵秀勇, 朱法华, 王圣, 孙雪丽, 徐静馨. 江苏省火电超低排放对环境空气中PM_2.5质量浓度影响模拟研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(9): 167-172.
[14]	曲立涛, 李超, 王德鑫, 于洪海, 杜佳, 齐晓辉. SCR脱硝超低排放NO_x均匀性优化及安全策略分析[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 161-167.
[15]	马大卫, 何军, 张其良, 黄齐顺, 张本耀, 程靖, 朱帅. SCR脱硝系统性能及空气预热器阻力上升分析[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(6): 187-192.

模态框（Modal）标题

600 MW燃煤机组烟气污染物控制研究

Study of Flue Gas Pollutant Control in a 600 MW Coal-Fired Unit

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics