中国电力 ›› 2024, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (3): 213-223.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202309108

• 技术经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于经济人假设的负荷侧资源市场化调节作用机理分析

高志远1(), 庄卫金1(), 耿建1(), 李峰1(), 薛必克1, 杨晓雷2, 白柯鞠3   

  1. 1. 中国电力科学研究院有限公司(南京),江苏 南京 210003
    2. 国网浙江省电力有限公司嘉兴供电公司,浙江 嘉兴 314000
    3. 陕西科技大学 机电工程学院,陕西 西安 710016
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-22 接受日期:2023-10-30 出版日期:2024-03-28 发布日期:2024-03-26
  • 作者简介:高志远(1972—),男,通信作者,硕士,高级工程师(教授级),从事智能电网、厂站自动化系统、电力市场研究,E-mail:gaozhiyuan@epri.sgcc.com.cn
    庄卫金( 1978—) ,男,高级工程师,从事电力系统自动化研究,E-mail:zhuangweijin@epri.sgcc.com.cn
    耿建(1971—),男,博士,高级工程师(研究员级),从事电力市场、电力系统优化调度等研究,E-mail:gengjian@epri.sgcc.com.cn
    李峰( 1976—) ,男,高级工程师(研究员级),从事电力系统自动化、人工智能等研究,E-mail:lifeng2@epri.sgcc.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家电网有限公司科技项目(规模化可调节负荷参与调峰和现货市场交易机制及验证技术研究,5108-202255035A-1-1-ZN)。

The Regulation Mechanism of Electricity Market on Load Side Resources Based on the Economic Person Hypothesis

Zhiyuan GAO1(), Weijin ZHUANG1(), Jian GENG1(), Feng LI1(), Bike XUE1, Xiaolei YANG2, Keju BAI3   

  1. 1. China Electric Power Research Institute (Nanjing), Nanjing 210003, China
    2. State Grid Jiaxing Power Supply Company, Jiaxing 314000, China
    3. College of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi'an 710016, China
  • Received:2023-09-22 Accepted:2023-10-30 Online:2024-03-28 Published:2024-03-26
  • Supported by:
    This work is supported by Science and Technology Project of SGCC (Research on Trading Mechanism and Verification Technology of Large-Scale Adjustable Load Participating in Peak Shaving and Spot Market, No.5108-202255035A-1-1-ZN).

摘要:

为充分利用负荷侧调节能力,需要对市场化机制对负荷侧的调节作用机理进行深入研究。基于市场对不同类型负荷的调节目的、信号来源差异,把市场化调节作用总体分为电价调节和互动调节2类。基于古典经济学中经济人假设,从成本、收益等因素考量对不同类型负荷的电价调节和互动调节作用机理进行了研究,进而对电价调节和互动调节的区别和联系进行了定性分析和定量比较,通过案例的验证表明:电价调节作用是通过负荷侧追求盈余最大化而发生的常态化市场作用,互动调节是市场运营机构为追求社会福利最大化而按需使用的市场化调节手段,两者的作用机理有较大区别,同时又相互关联。

关键词: 电力市场, 经济人假设, 可调节负荷, 需求响应, 电价调节, 互动调节

Abstract:

In order to make full use of the load-side regulation capacity, it is necessary to conduct an in-depth research on the regulation mechanism of the market-oriented mechanism on the load side. Based on the different regulatory purposes and signal sources for different types of loads in the market, the market-oriented regulatory role is generally divided into two categories: electricity price regulation and interactive regulation. Based on the assumption of economic man in classical economics, the mechanisms of electricity price regulation and interactive regulation for different types of loads are studied in terms of cost, benefits, and other factors. Furthermore, the differences and connections between electricity price regulation and interactive regulation are qualitatively analyzed and quantitatively compared. Case study results show that the electricity price regulation always works as ordinary market through pursuit of surplus maximization on the load side, and the interactive regulation is a kind of market-oriented tool that market operators use on demand to pursue social welfare maximization, and the action mechanism of the two is quite different, but also interrelated.

Key words: electricity market, economic person hypothesis, adjustable loads, demands response, electricity price regulation, interactive regulation