新型矢量磁滞模型的建模与验证

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202006201

中国电力 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (10): 26-33.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202006201

• 国家“十三五”智能电网重大专项专栏：（一）电工磁性材料及应用技术专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

新型矢量磁滞模型的建模与验证

邓凯¹, 李永建¹, 成昊¹, 巩学海², 杨富尧²

1. 省部共建电工装备可靠性与智能化国家重点实验室(河北工业大学)，天津 300130;
2. 全球能源互联网研究院有限公司，北京 102211

收稿日期:2020-06-19 修回日期:2020-08-10 发布日期:2020-10-05
作者简介:邓凯(1996—)，男，硕士研究生，从事工程电磁场与磁技术研究，E-mail：13920283976@163.com;李永建(1978—)，男，通信作者，教授，从事工程电磁场与磁技术研究，E-mail：liyongjian@hebut.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划资助项目(大功率电力电子装备用中高频磁性元件关键技术，2017YFB0903904) ；国家自然科学基金资助项目(模拟服役条件下电工磁材料磁特性测试及混合矢量磁滞模型研究，51777055)

Modeling and Verification of A Novel Vector Hysteron Model

DENG Kai¹, LI Yongjian¹, CHENG Hao¹, GONG Xuehai², YANG Fuyao²

1. State Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, 300130, China;
2. Global Energy Interconnection Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102211, China

Received:2020-06-19 Revised:2020-08-10 Published:2020-10-05
Supported by:
This work is supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (Key Technologies of Medium and High Frequency Magnetic Components for High Power Electronic Equipment, No.2017YFB0903904), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Magnetic Properties Testing and Hybrid Vector Hysteresis Modeling under Simulated Service Condition, No.51777055)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为描述旋转磁化过程并有效模拟各向异性对于磁化过程的影响，在矢量磁滞算子模型（vector hysteron model，VHM）的框架下改变了基于等势面模拟磁化过程的方法，提出了一种新的磁滞算子实现方法。采用分支曲线作为磁滞算子临界面方程，并利用有向分支曲线的方法对算子的临界面方程进行求解。为了能够进一步研究模型在不同激励条件下的精确模拟，对不同频率下的实验数据进行了参数辨识，并采用Moving函数对辨识参数的分布进行了表征。通过模拟计算结果与实验数据的对比，验证了新型矢量磁滞模型的有效性。

关键词: 矢量磁滞模型, 磁晶各向异性, 磁滞算子, 优化算法, 电工钢片

Abstract: A novel implementation of a hysteresis operator in the framework of Vector Hysteron Model (VHM) is presented to describe rotational magnetization. In order to simulate the effect of anisotropy on the magnetization process more effectively, this paper changes the method of using the equipotential surface to simulate the magnetization process in the VHM model, and discusses a new scheme. This model uses the bifurcation curve as the critical surface equation of the hysteron, and uses the method of the directed bifurcation curve to solve the hysteron's critical surface equation. To further discuss the simulation performance of the model under different excitations, this paper identifies the experimental data at different frequencies, and the Moving functions are used to describe the identified parameters. The comparison between simulation results and the experimental data has been given hereafter and it is shown that the new approach is acceptable and shows good effectiveness.

Key words: vector hysteresis modeling, magneto-crystalline anisotropy, hysteresis operators, optimization algorithm, electrical steels

邓凯, 李永建, 成昊, 巩学海, 杨富尧. 新型矢量磁滞模型的建模与验证[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(10): 26-33.

DENG Kai, LI Yongjian, CHENG Hao, GONG Xuehai, YANG Fuyao. Modeling and Verification of A Novel Vector Hysteron Model[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(10): 26-33.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202006201

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2020/V53/I10/26

参考文献

[1] PLUTA A, MOSES J. Prediction of angular variation of specific total loss of Goss oriented electrical steel[J]. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 2018, 544: 28-33.
[2] ZIRKA S E, MOROZ Y I, STEENTJES S, et al. Dynamic magnetization models for soft ferromagnetic materials with coarse and fine domain structures[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2015, 394: 229-236.
[3] WANG Y, HUANG L, CAO Y, et al. The equivalent model of controller in synchronous frame to stationary frame[J]. Global Energy Interconnection, 2018, 1(2): 122-129.
[4] STONER E, WOHLFARTH E. A mechanism of magnetic hysteresis in heterogeneous alloys[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1948, 240(826): 599-642.
[5] PINZAGLIA E, FABA A. Modelling of vector hysteresis at macromagnetic scale: Open questions and challenges[J]. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 2016, 486: 130-137.
[6] BERNARD L, DANIEL L. Effect of stress on magnetic hysteresis losses in a switched reluctance motor: Application to stator and rotor shrink fitting[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2015, 51(9): 1-13.
[7] BERNARD L, MAILHE B J, SADOWSKI N, et al. Multiscale approaches for magneto-elasticity in device simulation[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2019, 487(165241).
[8] ITO S, MIFUNE T, MATSUO T, et al. Simulation of the stress dependence of hysteresis loss using an energy-based domain model[J]. AIP Advances, 2018, 8(4): 047501.
[9] TEJIMA S, ITO S, MIFUNE T, et al. Partially-implicit method for fast magnetization analysis using assembled domain structure model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2017, 53(6): 1-4.
[10] MAYERGOYZ I D. Generalized scalar preisach models of hysteresis[M]//Mathematical Models of Hysteresis. New York, NY: Springer New York, 1991: 64-140
[11] CARDELLI E, FABA A, LAUDANI A, et al. A moving approach for the Vector Hysteron Model[J]. Physica B Condensed Matter, 2016, 486: 92-96.
[12] CARDELLI E, FABA A, POMPEI M, et al. Pattern search approach to ferromagnetic material modelling[J]. International Journal of Numerical Modelling Electronic Networks Devices and Fields, 2019, 32(4), 2271
[13] CARDELLI E. A general hysteresis operator for the modeling of vector fields[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2011, 47(8): 2056-2067.
[14] CARDELLI E, TORRE E D, FABA A. A general vector hysteresis operator: extension to the 3-D case[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2010, 46(12): 3990-4000.
[15] POSTON T, STEWART I. Catastrophe theory and its applications[M]. New York: Dover Publications, 2014: 80-82.
[16] BERTOTTL G. Hysteresis In magnetism: for physicists, materials scientists, and engineers[M]. San Diego (Calif.): Academic Press, 1998: 53-54.
[17] 刘晨蕾, 潘卓洪, 文习山, 等. 一种基于碳化硅IGBT的可控型直流偏磁抑制方法[J]. 电力科学与技术学报, 2019, 34(1): 67-73
LIU Chenlei, PAN Zhuohong, WEN Xishan, et al. a controllable DC bias suppression device based on the SiC IGBT[J]. Journal of Electric Power Science and Technology, 2019, 34(1): 67-73
[18] 李宗奎. 浅析突变理论及其工程应用[J]. 四川建材, 2018, 44(12): 87-89
LI Zongkui. A Brief Analysis of Mutation Theory and its Engineering Application[J]. Sichuan Building Materials, 2018, 44(12): 87-89
[19] CARDELLI E, FABA A, LAUDANI A, et al. A challenging hysteresis operator for the simulation of Goss-textured magnetic materials[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2017, 432: 14-23.
[20] BURRASCANO P, CARDELLI E, DELLA T D,et al. Numerical identification procedure for a phenomenological vector hysteresis model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2009, 45(3): 1166-1169.
[21] THIAVILLE A. Extensions of the geometric solution of the two dimensional coherent magnetization rotation model[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 1998, 182(1-2): 5-18.
[22] FULGINEI F R SALVINI A, PULCINI G. Metric-topological-evolutionary optimization[J]. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 2012, 20(1): 41-58.
[23] LAUDANI A, FULGINEI F R, SALVINI A. Bouc-Wen hysteresis model identification by the metric-topological evolutionary optimization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2014, 50(2): 621-624.

新型矢量磁滞模型的建模与验证

Modeling and Verification of A Novel Vector Hysteron Model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	周啸, 阳岳希, 寇龙泽, 李云丰, 钱学威, 郝捷, 景卫哲. 模块化多电平柔性直流换流器高频振荡抑制策略与参数优化设计[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(1): 50-60.
[2]	马宏忠, 宣文婧, 朱沐雨, 陈悦林. 基于LWOA-LSTM的大容量锂电池SOC估计[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(6): 37-44.
[3]	徐峰亮, 王克谦, 王文豪, 王鹏, 王文烨, 张帅, 赵凤展. 计及激励型需求响应的低压配电网混合储能优化配置[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(6): 90-101.
[4]	王扬, 路菲, 李骥, 谈竹奎, 孙宗宇, 徐伟, 宋子宏, 刘振鹏. 基于综合优化目标的低碳园区能源系统规划配置[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(4): 14-24.
[5]	李翰章, 冯江涛, 王鹏程, 荣澔洁, 柴宇唤. 基于TDE-SO-AWM-GRU的光伏发电功率预测模型[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(12): 41-49.
[6]	董福贵, 夏美娟, 李婉莹. 基于PSO-GWO的省级能耗强度预测与碳减排潜力估算[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(9): 226-234.
[7]	李大虎, 周泓宇, 周悦, 饶渝泽, 姚伟. 基于多元宇宙优化算法的混合光伏-热电系统MPPT设计[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(11): 197-205.
[8]	陈子含, 滕伟, 胥学峰, 丁显, 柳亦兵. 基于图卷积网络和风速差分拟合的中长期风功率预测[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(10): 96-105.
[9]	胡明月, 张慧芬, 苗淑平, 杨帆, 曲振明. 基于改进鸽群算法的台区三相负荷不平衡相序调整方法[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(9): 121-128.
[10]	陈正雄, 帕孜来·马合木提, 沈玮. 基于改进支持向量回归的IGBT老化预测[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(7): 1-10.
[11]	黄书民, 蒋林高, 李志川, 杨光绪, 宋福根. 基于PSO寻优与DBN神经网络的电晕损耗预测[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(6): 95-102,214.
[12]	张娜, 任强, 刘广忱, 郭力萍, 李静宇. 基于VMD-GWO-ELMAN的光伏功率短期预测方法[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 57-65.
[13]	周鑫, 林镜星, 谢志炜, 张铮, 梁濡铎, 欧祖宏. 基于数据增强及降维方法的配网业扩工程分类模型[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(12): 91-97.
[14]	彭春华, 刘懿, 孙惠娟. 计及条件风险成本的含EH-CSP电站多源发电系统优化运行[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(1): 64-74.
[15]	方彤, 蒋东方, 杨洋, 袁铁江. 基于NSGA-II和熵权法的氢综合能源系统商业运营模式[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(1): 110-118.

模态框（Modal）标题

新型矢量磁滞模型的建模与验证

Modeling and Verification of A Novel Vector Hysteron Model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics