中国电力 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 122-127,134.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201811138

• 新能源 • 上一篇    下一篇

面向多主体的园区综合能源系统投资收益量化分析

闫湖1, 黄碧斌1, 洪博文1, 李琼慧1, 孙充勃2   

  1. 1. 国网能源研究院有限公司,北京 102209;
    2. 国网经济技术研究院有限公司,北京 102209
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-03 修回日期:2020-02-19 发布日期:2020-05-05
  • 作者简介:闫湖(1985-),女,通信作者,硕士,高级工程师,从事布式电源政策分析、综合能源服务、综合能源系统经济性分析研究,E-mail:yanhu@sgeri.sgcc.com.cn;黄碧斌(1982-),男,博士,高级工程师,从事分布式电源发展与规划、新能源政策分析、配电网技术经济分析研究,E-mail:huangbibin@sgeri.sgcc.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划资助项目(2016YFB0900100),国家电网有限公司总部科技项目(面向电力综改区的配电网规划技术及发展策略研究,SGTYHT/16-JS-198)

Quantitative Analysis of Return on Investment of Park Integrated Energy System for Multiple Investors

YAN Hu1, HUANG Bibin1, HONG Bowen1, LI Qionghui1, SUN Chongbo2   

  1. 1. State Grid Energy Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102209, China;
    2. State Grid Economic and Technological Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102209, China
  • Received:2018-12-03 Revised:2020-02-19 Published:2020-05-05
  • Supported by:
    This work is supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2016YFB0900100) and Science and Technology Project of SGCC (Research on Distribution Network Planning Technology and Development Strategy for Power Comprehensive Reform District, No.SGTYHT/16-JS-198)

摘要: 新电改下园区成为电力改革重要实验区,在增量配电分开、多元源荷广泛接入情景下,园区综合能源系统投资界面出现了分化,投资主体呈现多元化特点,投资效益分析变得错综复杂。首先分析了新电改对园区综合能源系统运营的影响,基于不同投资分界面提出了4种运营模式,包括分布式电源发配售一体、分布式电源发售一体、配售一体和配网单营;其次构建了面向多主体的园区综合能源系统投资收益量化模型;最后根据实例案证,对比分析了四种运营模式下多主体投资收益计算结果。

关键词: 多主体投资, 综改区, 综合能源系统, 投资收益, 量化模型

Abstract: Industrial parks have become important experimental areas for electricity reform in China. With the liberalization of incremental distribution market and widespread integration of diversified power sources and loads, the investment interface of park integrated energy system (IES) becomes divided, and the investment entities appear diversified. The analysis of investment benefits thus becomes more complex. This paper firstly analyzes the impact of electricity reform on the operation of park integrated energy system, and proposes four operating modes, including generation-distribution-sales integration, generation-sales integration, distribution-sales integration, and distribution network independent operation; Secondly, a quantitative return on investment model of park integrated energy system is presented for multiple investors, and a case study is conducted. Conclusions are given through a comparative analysis of the calculation results of multiple investors’ return on investment for the four operating modes.

Key words: multiple investors, comprehensive reform area, integrated energy system, return on investment, quantitative model