燃煤电厂痕量元素协同脱除及排放

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201805230

中国电力 ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4): 161-166.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201805230

燃煤电厂痕量元素协同脱除及排放

车凯¹, 郑庆宇², 韩忠阁¹, 陈崇明¹, 郁金星¹

1. 国网河北省电力有限公司电力科学研究院, 河北石家庄 050021;
2. 北方工程设计研究院有限公司, 河北石家庄 050011

收稿日期:2018-06-04 修回日期:2018-08-03 出版日期:2019-04-05 发布日期:2019-04-16
作者简介:车凯(1985-),男,硕士,高级工程师,从事大气污染防控研究,E-mail:chekai311@163.com;郑庆宇(1986-),女,硕士,工程师,从事燃煤电站污染防控研究,E-mail:kaoyanqingyu@163.com

Research on Co-removal and Emission of Trace Elements in the Coal-Fired Power Plant

CHE Kai¹, ZHENG Qingyu², HAN Zhongge¹, CHEN Chongming¹, YU Jinxing¹

1. State Grid Hebei Electric Power Research Institute, Shijiazhuang 050021, China;
2. Norendar International Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050011, China

Received:2018-06-04 Revised:2018-08-03 Online:2019-04-05 Published:2019-04-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究痕量元素在电厂排放物中的分布、富集以及常规污染物净化设施（脱硝装置（SCR）、电除尘器（ESP）、湿法烟气脱硫装置（WFGD）、湿式电除尘器（WESP））对痕量元素的协同脱除效果，采用美国环境保护署（USEPA）方法29，对某350 MW典型燃煤机组烟气及各污染物净化设施排放物中11种痕量元素（Be、Cr、Mn、Co、Ni、As、Se、Cd、Sb、Pb、Hg）浓度进行了测试。结果表明，煤粉燃烧后释放的痕量元素主要富集在ESP飞灰和石膏中，而在炉渣和烟囱入口烟气中分布较少；富集在ESP飞灰和石膏中的痕量元素分别占痕量元素排放总量的54.51%~97.58%和1.61%～38.08%；常规污染物净化设施对烟气中痕量元素的综合脱除效率为91.98%~99.98%，烟囱入口排放的痕量元素质量浓度为0.02~9.23 μg/m³，其中Mn、As、Se、Pb等元素质量浓度高于美国EPA颁布的火电厂环保标准中新建燃煤机组排放限值。

关键词: 燃煤电厂, 痕量元素, 污染物净化设施, 协同脱除, 减排控制

Abstract: In order to study the distribution and enrichment of the trace elements in the emissions from power plants and the synergistic removal of the trace elements from conventional pollutant purification facilities(SCR, ESP, WFGD, WESP), the concentration of the trace elements (Be, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, As, Se, Cd, Sb, Pb, Hg) in the emissions of smoke and air pollutant control devices are tested by using US EPA Method 29 in a 350 MW coal-fired power unit. The results show that the trace elements that are mainly distributed in the fly ash and the gypsum takes 54.51%~97.58% and 1.61%~38.08% respectively of the total amount of emitted trace elements, while much less are distributed in the bottom ash and the chimney inlet flue gas. The overall removal rate through air pollutant control devices is 91.98%~99.98%. The concentration of trace elements in the stack is 0.02~9.23 μg/m³, and the concentration values of Mn, As, Se, Pb concentrations are much higher than the ones that are required for the new coal-fired unit trace elements emission quality standards issued by EPA.

Key words: coal-fired power plant, trace elements, air pollutant control devices, co-removal, emission reduction control

中图分类号:

TM621.9
X501

车凯, 郑庆宇, 韩忠阁, 陈崇明, 郁金星. 燃煤电厂痕量元素协同脱除及排放[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(4): 161-166.

CHE Kai, ZHENG Qingyu, HAN Zhongge, CHEN Chongming, YU Jinxing. Research on Co-removal and Emission of Trace Elements in the Coal-Fired Power Plant[J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(4): 161-166.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201805230

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2019/V52/I4/161

参考文献 18

[1]	崔民选, 王军生. 能源蓝皮书:中国能源发展报告(2014)[R]. 北京:中国能源研究会, 2014.
[2]	SWAINE D J. Why trace elements are important[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2000, 65/66:21-23.
[3]	EMEP/EEA. Air pollutant emission inventory guidebook:technical report No. 9/2009[R]. 2009.
[4]	Environmental Protection Agency. National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants from coal-and oil-fired electric utility steam generating units and standards of performance for fossil-fuel-fired electric utility, industrial-commercial-institutional, and small industrial-commercial-institutional steam generating units:EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0044[S]. 2011.
[5]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 环境空气质量标准:GB 3095—2012[S]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2012.
[6]	SWANSON S M, ENGLE M A, RUPPERT L F, et al. Partitioning of selected trace elements in coal combustion products from two coal-burning power plants in the United States[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2013, 113:116-126.
[7]	BHANGARE R C, AJMAL P Y, SAHU S K, et al. Distribution of trace elements in coal and combustion residues from five thermal power plants in India[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2011, 86:349-356.
[8]	TANG Q, LIU G J, YAN Z C, et al. Distribution and fate of environmentally sensitive elements (arsenic, mercury, stibium and selenium) in coal-fired power plants at Huainan, Anhui, China[J]. Fuel, 2012, 95:334-339.
[9]	王春波, 史燕红, 吴华成, 等. 电袋复合除尘器和湿法脱硫装置对电厂燃煤重金属排放协同控制[J]. 煤炭学报, 2016, 41(7):1834-1840 WANG Chunbo, SHI Yanhong, WU Huacheng, et al. Research on collaborative control of heavy metals discharge from coal combustion by hybrid particulate collector and wet flue gas desulphurization[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(7):1834-1840
[10]	MYERS J, ILELLY T, LAWRIE C, et al. Method M29 sampling and analysis:environmental technology verification report[R]. Ohio:United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2002:15-22.
[11]	赵士林, 段钰锋, 周强, 等. 燃煤循环流化床痕量元素排放特性试验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2017, 37(1):193-199 ZHAO Shilin, DUAN Yufeng, ZHOU Qiang, et al. Experimental study on mace elements emission characteristics in coal-fired circulating fluidized bed[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2017, 37(1):193-199
[12]	MEIJ R. Trace element behavior in coal-fired power plants[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 1994, 39(1/2/3):199-217.
[13]	MEIJ R, WINKEL H T. The emissions of heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants from modern coal-fired power stations[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2007, 41(40):9262-9272.
[14]	王运军, 段钰锋, 杨立国, 等. 燃煤电站布袋除尘器和静电除尘器脱汞性能比较[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2008, 36(1):23-29 WANG Yunjun, DUAN Yufeng, YANG Liguo, et al. Comparison of mercury removal characteristic between fabric filter and electrostatic precipitators of coal-fired power plants[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2008, 36(1):23-29
[15]	TANG Q, LIU G J, ZHOU C C, et al. Distribution of trace elements in feed coal and combustion residues from two coal-fired power plants at Huainan, Anhui, China[J]. Fuel, 2013, 107:315-322.
[16]	WU H, GLARBORG P, FRANDSEN F J, et al. Trace elements in co-combustion of solid recovered fuel and coal[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2013, 105:212-221.
[17]	YOSHⅡE R, TAYA Y, ICHIYANAGI T, et al. Emissions of particles and trace elements from coal gasification[J]. Fuel, 2013, 108:67-72.
[18]	ZHAO S L, DUAN Y F, TAN H Z, et al. Migration and emission characteristics of trace elements in a 660 MW coal-fired power plant of China[J]. Energy&Fuels, 2016, 30(7):5937-5944.

燃煤电厂痕量元素协同脱除及排放

Research on Co-removal and Emission of Trace Elements in the Coal-Fired Power Plant

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 18

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘含笑, 吴黎明, 赵琳, 于立元, 郦建国, 崔盈. 燃煤电厂湿式电除尘器减排及能效特性研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 196-203.
[2]	孙尊强, 郑成航, 周灿, 王圣, 马修元, 叶毅科. 燃煤电厂典型除尘器运行现状分析及优化[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 194-201.
[3]	王毅斌, 张思聪, 谭厚章, 林国辉, 王萌, 卢旭超, 杨浩. 440 t/h燃煤锅炉低氮燃烧模式下水冷壁高温腐蚀分析[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(8): 118-127.
[4]	吴家玉, 莫华, 胡耘, 朱杰, 帅伟, 张晴, 姜岸. 京津冀及周边地区燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物不同控制情景下时空变化特征[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 182-189.
[5]	赵宏, 张发捷, 马云龙, 马宝林, 唐潇, 徐仁博, 罗通达, 李成宝, 任传明, 于洁, 孙路石. 燃煤电厂SCR脱硝氨逃逸迁移规律试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(1): 196-202.
[6]	赵柄, 王海刚, 胡冬, 陈坤洋, 金绪良, 殷爱鸣. 燃煤电厂碱性吸附剂脱汞性能研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(9): 208-213.
[7]	姚燕, 马云龙, 杨晓宁, 张华东, 王丽朋. 高砷煤SCR脱硝催化剂中毒失活研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(6): 191-196.
[8]	马学礼, 孙希进, 苏燊燊, 张仁锋, 党立晨, 黄显昌, 谢永平. 基于超低排放的燃煤电厂烟囱高度优化研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(5): 179-184.
[9]	徐静馨, 朱法华, 王圣, 张明, 赵秀勇, 孙雪丽, 胡耘, 田文鑫. 超低排放燃煤电厂和燃气电厂综合对比[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(2): 164-172,179.
[10]	王宏亮, 许月阳, 薛建明, 刘涛, 管一明. 燃煤发电机组超低排放改造前后汞排放规律对比研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(11): 243-251.
[11]	李滨, 杨阳. 烟气SO₃监测控制冷凝法采样方法[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(1): 140-146.
[12]	王文欣, 高毅, 刘春红, 童小忠, 陈彪, 祁志福, 张勤. 燃煤电厂旁路烟气干燥塔控制技术开发[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(1): 147-154.
[13]	雷嗣远, 李海浩, 李乐田, 倪贵东, 孔凡海, 吴国勋, 卞子君. SCR脱硝低负荷投运烟气调温旁路改造设计[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(9): 179-184.
[14]	许剑, 夏小飞, 李凯伦, 郑金, 王星, 马翔. 电站轴流引风机叶片通过频率振动超标问题机理分析及治理[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 117-122.
[15]	陈海杰, 马务, 刘贡祎, 高攀. W火焰锅炉SNCR脱硝及其对SCR入口流场的影响[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 146-153.

模态框（Modal）标题

燃煤电厂痕量元素协同脱除及排放

Research on Co-removal and Emission of Trace Elements in the Coal-Fired Power Plant

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 18

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics