某330 MW机组烟气脱硝系统超低排放性能诊断与分析

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201707184

中国电力 ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (4): 124-129.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201707184

某330 MW机组烟气脱硝系统超低排放性能诊断与分析

苗永旗, 刘海秋, 周凯, 庄柯, 吴碧君, 金定强

国电环境保护研究院, 国家环境保护大气物理模拟与污染控制重点实验室, 江苏南京 210031

收稿日期:2017-07-31 修回日期:2018-01-08 出版日期:2018-04-05 发布日期:2018-04-12
作者简介:苗永旗(1964-),男,山西太原人,高级工程师,主要从事电力安全与环境保护研究,E-mail:miaoyongqi@nepri.com;刘海秋(1989-),男,吉林四平人,硕士,工程师,主要从事电力环境保护研究,E-mail:hlhq20130312@163.com;吴碧君(1963-),女,江苏东台人,博士,高级工程师(研究员),主要从事电力环境保护研究,E-mail:wubijun169@163.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划“大气污染成因与控制技术研究”重点专项资助项目（No.2016YFC0208102）。

Diagnosis and Analysis on Ultra-low Emission Performance of Flue Gas Denitrification System for a 330 MW unit

MIAO Yongqi, LIU Haiqiu, ZHOU Kai, ZHUANG Ke, WU Bijun, JIN Dingqiang

Guodian Environmental Protection Research Institute, State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Physical Modeling and Control of Air Pollution, Nanjing 210031, China

Received:2017-07-31 Revised:2018-01-08 Online:2018-04-05 Published:2018-04-12
Supported by:
This work is supported by The National Key Research and Development Program (Air Pollution Causes and Control Technology Research, No.2016YFC0208102).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 超低排放改造后，一些电厂NO_x排放未达到预期目标。为解决此类问题，以某330MW超低排放机组为例，对运行了15500h的烟气脱硝装置进行现场勘查、运行资料收集，并对运行催化剂进行取样检测，逐一排查NO_x超标排放的原因。研究结果表明：SCR脱硝系统设计裕量低，催化剂主活性成分V₂O₅含量偏低，催化剂微孔数与活性点位数减少导致脱硝效率下降，加之反应器入口NO_x浓度偏高、负荷变化频繁、喷氨响应不及时，造成SCR脱硝装置出口NO_x浓度超过50mg/m³。建议加强锅炉优化运行，尽量避免入口NO_x浓度大幅度波动，提高喷氨响应速度，并应新增1层催化剂，将现有2层催化剂进行再生，以确保NO_x排放浓度稳定达标。

关键词: 燃煤电厂, 烟气脱硝, SCR脱硝装置, 蜂窝催化剂, 运行诊断

Abstract: The anticipated target of NO_x emission control have not been reached in some power plants after the ultra-low emission retrofit project. To solve this problem, taking a 330 MW ultra-low emission unit as an example, onsite investigation was conducted and the operation data of a 15 500 h flue gas denitrification unit was collected. The operating catalyst was also sampled and tested. Besides, the causes of excessive NO_x emission were investigated individually. The research results show that the decline of denitrification efficiency is attributed to low design margin of SCR denitrification, low content of main active component V₂O₅ as well as the decrease of catalyst micropore number and active point number. In addition, the high NO_x concentration at the inlet of the reactor, the frequent load changes, and untimely ammonia spray response cause the NO_x emission at the outlet to exceed 50 mg/m³. In order to ensure that stable emission standards are met, it is suggested that the optimal operation of the boiler should be strengthened to avoid the large fluctuation of NO_x concentration and improve the response speed of ammonia injection. One extra layer of catalysts is also advised and the existing two layers of catalyst should be regenerated.

Key words: thermal power plant, flue gas denitration, SCR deNO_x system, honeycomb catalysts, operation diagnosis

中图分类号:

X51
TM621.9

苗永旗, 刘海秋, 周凯, 庄柯, 吴碧君, 金定强. 某330 MW机组烟气脱硝系统超低排放性能诊断与分析[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(4): 124-129.

MIAO Yongqi, LIU Haiqiu, ZHOU Kai, ZHUANG Ke, WU Bijun, JIN Dingqiang. Diagnosis and Analysis on Ultra-low Emission Performance of Flue Gas Denitrification System for a 330 MW unit[J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(4): 124-129.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201707184

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2018/V51/I4/124

参考文献

[1] 国家能源局. 火电厂烟气脱硝催化剂检测技术规范: DL/T 1286—2013[S]. 2013.
[2] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 蜂窝式烟气脱硝催化剂: GB/T 31587—2015[S]. 2015.
[3] 王康, 朱林, 刘涛, 等. SCR脱硝催化剂检测与性能评价实验平台的设计与建议[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(7): 157-161.WANG Kang, Zhu Lin, Liu Tao, et al. Design and construction of the experimental platform for SCR denitration catalyst testing and performance evaluation[J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(7): 157-161.
[4] 袁宏观, 李小海, 卢立新, 等. 某600 MW燃煤电厂SCR蜂窝式脱硝催化剂性能检测与分析[J]. 能源环境保护, 2017, 31(2): 58-62.YUAN Hongguan, LI Xiaohai, LU Lixin, et al. Properties testing and analysis of honeycomb SCR De-NOx catalyst from a 600 MW coal fired power plant [J]. Energy Environmental Protection, 2017, 31(2): 58-62.
[5] LI Pan, LIU Qingya, LIU Zhenyu. Behaviors of NH₄HSO₄ in SCR of NO by NH₃ over different cokes [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 181-182(1): 169-173. (已核对)
[6] YOU Kunkun, MA Xiaocheng, LIU Jiantao, et al. Characteristic analysis of SCR flue gas denitrification catalyst in power plant[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 518-523: 2423-2426. (已核对)
[7] 武宝会, 崔利. 火电厂SCR烟气脱硝控制方式及其优化[J]. 热力发电, 2013, 42(10): 116-119.WU Baohui, CUI Li. SCR flue gas denitrification control and optimization in thermal power plants[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2013, 42(10): 116-119.
[8] 晏敏, 赵凯, 朱跃. 燃煤电厂运行中脱硝催化剂的性能检测评价与分析[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(7): 168-172.YAN Min, ZHAO Kai, ZHU Yue. Performance assessment and analysis of denitration catalyst in coal-fired power plant [J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(7): 168-172. (已核对)
[9] 商雪松, 陈进生, 赵金平, 等. SCR脱硝催化剂失活及其原因研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2011, 39(6): 465-470.SHANG Xuesong, CHEN Jinsheng, ZHAO Jinping, et al. Discussion on the deactivation of SCR denitrification catalyst and its reasons [J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2011, 39(6): 465-470. (已核对)
[10] 曹林岩, 吴碧君. SCR烟气脱硝催化剂失活原因分析及再生方法探讨[J]. 电力科技与环保, 2012, 28(6): 7-9.CAO Linyan, WU Bijun. The deactivation causes and regeneration procedures for selective catalytic reduction flue gas de-NOx catalysts [J]. Electric Power Technology and Environmental Protection, 2012, 28(6): 7-9. (已核对)
[11] TANG Fushun, XU Bolian, SHI Haihua, et al. The poisoning effect of Na⁺ and Ca²⁺ ions doped on the V₂O₅/TiO₂, catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH₃[J]. Applied Catalysis B Environmental, 2010, 94(1/2): 71-76. (已核对)
[12] SHI Yajuan, SHU Hang, ZHANG Yuhua, et al. Formation and decomposition of NH₄HSO₄ during selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH₃ over V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalysts [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 150: 141-147.
[13] 沈伯雄, 熊丽仙, 刘亭, 等. 纳米负载型V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂催化剂碱中毒及再生研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2010, 38(1): 85-90.SHEN Boxiong, XIONG Lixian, LIU Ting, et al. Alkali deactivation and regeneration of nano V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalyst [J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2010, 38(1): 85-90. (已核对)
[14] 陈进生, 商雪松, 赵金平, 等. 烟气脱硝催化剂的性能检测与评价[J]. 中国电力, 2010, 43(11): 64-69.CHEN Jinsheng, SHANG Xuesong, ZHAO Jinping, et al. Performance determination and evaluation of denitration catalyst in flue gas [J]. Electric Power, 2010, 43(11): 64-69.
[15] LEI Zhigang, LIU Xueyi, JIA Meiru. Modeling of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) for NO removal using monolithic honeycomb catalyst[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(12): 6146-6151. (已核对)
[16] YU Jian, GUO Feng, WANG Yingli. Sulfur poisoning resistant mesoporous Mn-base catalyst for low-temperature SCR of NO with NH₃ [J]. Applied Catalysis B Environmental, 2010, 95(1/2): 160-168. (已核对)
[17] FORZATTI P. Present status and perspectives in de-NOx SCR catalysis [J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2001, 222(1/2): 221-236. (已核对)
[18] ZHENG Yuanjing, JENSEN A D, JOHNSSON J E. Laboratory investigation of selective catalytic reduction catalysts: deactivation by potassium compounds and Catalyst Regeneration [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2004, 43(4): 941-947. (已核对)
[19] 武宝会, 李刚, 薛大禹, 等. SCR Control⁺脱硝控制系统研究及其在660 MW机组的应用[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(11): 175-179, 184.WU Baohui, LI Gang, XUE Dayu, et al. Study on SCR control⁺ denitrification injection control system and its application in a 660 MW unit[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(11): 175-179, 184.
[20] DIAO Chunyan, HE Huazhong. Comparative analysis of performance for SCR De-NOx catalysts in power plant [J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 1004-1005: 711-714. (已核对)

某330 MW机组烟气脱硝系统超低排放性能诊断与分析

Diagnosis and Analysis on Ultra-low Emission Performance of Flue Gas Denitrification System for a 330 MW unit

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘含笑, 吴黎明, 赵琳, 于立元, 郦建国, 崔盈. 燃煤电厂湿式电除尘器减排及能效特性研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 196-203.
[2]	孙尊强, 郑成航, 周灿, 王圣, 马修元, 叶毅科. 燃煤电厂典型除尘器运行现状分析及优化[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 194-201.
[3]	刘志坦, 姚杰, 庄柯, 喻乐蒙, 周凯. 燃气轮机与燃煤机组SCR脱硝催化剂特性比较[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(6): 145-152.
[4]	吴家玉, 莫华, 胡耘, 朱杰, 帅伟, 张晴, 姜岸. 京津冀及周边地区燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物不同控制情景下时空变化特征[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 182-189.
[5]	赵宏, 张发捷, 马云龙, 马宝林, 唐潇, 徐仁博, 罗通达, 李成宝, 任传明, 于洁, 孙路石. 燃煤电厂SCR脱硝氨逃逸迁移规律试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(1): 196-202.
[6]	赵柄, 王海刚, 胡冬, 陈坤洋, 金绪良, 殷爱鸣. 燃煤电厂碱性吸附剂脱汞性能研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(9): 208-213.
[7]	王卫群, 张磊, 黄治军, 傅高健, 李国奇. 基于CFD模拟计算的SCR脱硝系统喷氨优化试验方法[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(6): 185-190.
[8]	姚燕, 马云龙, 杨晓宁, 张华东, 王丽朋. 高砷煤SCR脱硝催化剂中毒失活研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(6): 191-196.
[9]	马学礼, 孙希进, 苏燊燊, 张仁锋, 党立晨, 黄显昌, 谢永平. 基于超低排放的燃煤电厂烟囱高度优化研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(5): 179-184.
[10]	徐静馨, 朱法华, 王圣, 张明, 赵秀勇, 孙雪丽, 胡耘, 田文鑫. 超低排放燃煤电厂和燃气电厂综合对比[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(2): 164-172,179.
[11]	李滨, 杨阳. 烟气SO₃监测控制冷凝法采样方法[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(1): 140-146.
[12]	王文欣, 高毅, 刘春红, 童小忠, 陈彪, 祁志福, 张勤. 燃煤电厂旁路烟气干燥塔控制技术开发[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(1): 147-154.
[13]	雷嗣远, 李海浩, 李乐田, 倪贵东, 孔凡海, 吴国勋, 卞子君. SCR脱硝低负荷投运烟气调温旁路改造设计[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(9): 179-184.
[14]	许剑, 夏小飞, 李凯伦, 郑金, 王星, 马翔. 电站轴流引风机叶片通过频率振动超标问题机理分析及治理[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 117-122.
[15]	陈海杰, 马务, 刘贡祎, 高攀. W火焰锅炉SNCR脱硝及其对SCR入口流场的影响[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 146-153.

模态框（Modal）标题

某330 MW机组烟气脱硝系统超低排放性能诊断与分析

Diagnosis and Analysis on Ultra-low Emission Performance of Flue Gas Denitrification System for a 330 MW unit

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics