燃煤电厂WESP颗粒物脱除机制及排放特征研究

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201706180

中国电力 ›› 2017, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (12): 178-184.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201706180

• 节能与环保 • 上一篇

燃煤电厂WESP颗粒物脱除机制及排放特征研究

刘含笑, 姚宇平, 郦建国, 陈招妹, 方小伟

浙江菲达环保科技股份有限公司,浙江诸暨 311800

收稿日期:2017-09-10 出版日期:2017-12-20 发布日期:2018-01-30
作者简介:刘含笑（1987—）,男,山东潍坊人,硕士,工程师,从事电除尘器除尘特性研究。E-mail:gutounan@163.com
基金资助:
国家国际科技合作专项（2014DFA90620）; 国家重点研发计划（2016YFC0203704; 2016YFC0209107; 2017YFB0603202）

Research of PM Removal Mechanism and Emission Characteristics for WESP in a Coal-Fired Power Plant

LIU Hanxiao, YAO Yuping, LI Jianguo, CHEN Zhaomei, FANG Xiaowei

Feida Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd., Zhuji 311800, China

Received:2017-09-10 Online:2017-12-20 Published:2018-01-30
Supported by:
This work is supported by International Cooperation Ministry of Science and Major Project(No. 2014DFA90620), National Key R&D Plan (No. 2016YFC0203704, No. 2016YFC0209107, No. 2017YFB0603202).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从强化荷电和促进细颗粒团聚两方面对湿式电除尘器（WESP）细颗粒强化脱除机制进行了分析。并基于调研和现场实测方式,对国内投运的WESP颗粒物排放特征进行了系统研究。采用ELPI测定WESP进出口粉尘粒径分布,采用滤筒方法测定总尘,采用ELPI、PM-10或DGI测定PM₁₀、PM_2.5浓度,采用冷凝法测定SO₃。对调研及实测数据进行统计分析：ELPI将PM₁₀从0.03~10 μm被分为12等级,WESP对PM₁₀各级粒径均有明显的去除效率,数浓度、质量浓度去除效率均在40%以上,最高可达90%以上;WESP出口颗粒物浓度0.43~12.5 mg/m³,绝大部分在5 mg/m³以下,除尘效率均在70%以上,最高可达90%以上;WESP出口PM_2.5浓度0.35~1.59 mg/m³,大部分数据低于1 mg/m³,且脱除效率大部分在60%以上,最高可达90%以上;WESP出口SO₃浓度0.10~3.21 mg/m³,脱除效率均大于60%,最高可达90%以上。调研某350 MW机组WESP出口连续3个月CEMS数据,颗粒物小时浓度达标率为100%,系统实现了长期稳定运行。

关键词: 燃煤电厂, 湿式电除尘器, 总尘, PM2.5, SO3

Abstract: In this paper, the WESP fine particle strengthening removal mechanism is analyzed for the first time from the aspects of strengthened charging and promoted fine particle coalescence. Then through further investigation and on-site measurement, the PM emission characteristics of WESP are studied comprehensively. The inlet and outlet particle size distribution, total dust concentration, PM₁₀/PM_2.5 concentration and SO₃ concentration of WESP were measured by virtue of ELPI, filter cartridge, ELPI/PM-10 or DGI and condensation method, respectively. Based on the statistical analysis of the research and measured data, it is shown that PM₁₀ is divided into 12 levels ranged from 0.03 μm to 10 μm by using ELPI and dust particles in each level are removed significantly using WESP with the removal efficiency of both number concentration and mass concentration exceeding 40%, and the maximum even reaching more than 90%. The outlet dust concentration of WESP is between 0.43 mg/m³ and 12.5 mg/m³, most of which is lower than 5 mg/m³. Moreover, dust removal efficiency is above 70%, with the maximum over 90%. The outlet PM_2.5 concentrations of WESP are limited in the range between 0.35 mg/m³ and 1.59 mg/m³ while most of them are lower than 1 mg/m³ and PM_2.5 removal efficiency is above 60%, with the maximum more than 90%. The outlet SO₃ concentration of WESP is within the range between 0.10 mg/m³ and 3.21 mg/m³. SO₃ removal efficiency is achieved above 60% with the maximum more than 90%. The outlet CEMS data for three months of continuous operation of WESP of a 350 MW unit was studied and the result showed that hourly concentration control rate reached 100%. Therefore long term stable operation of the system is realized.

Key words: coal-fired power, WESP, TSP, PM2.5, SO3

中图分类号:

TM621

刘含笑, 姚宇平, 郦建国, 陈招妹, 方小伟. 燃煤电厂WESP颗粒物脱除机制及排放特征研究[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(12): 178-184.

LIU Hanxiao, YAO Yuping, LI Jianguo, CHEN Zhaomei, FANG Xiaowei. Research of PM Removal Mechanism and Emission Characteristics for WESP in a Coal-Fired Power Plant[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(12): 178-184.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201706180

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2017/V50/I12/178

参考文献

[1] DEY L, VENKATARAMAN C, A wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) for soft nanoparticle collection[J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2012, 46(7): 750-759.
[2] LIN G Y, TSAI C J, CHEN S C, et al , An efficient single-stage wet electrostatic precipitator for fine and nanosized particle control [J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2010, 44(1): 38-45.
[3] KIM H J, HAN B, KIM Y J, et al . Characteristics of an electrostatic precipitator for submicron particles using non- metallic electrodes and collection plates[J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2010, 41(11): 987-997.
[4] KIM H J, HAN B, KIM Y J, et al . Fine particle removal performance of a two-stage wet electrostatic precipitator using a nonmetallic pre-charger[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2011, 61(12): 1334-1343.
[5] TSAI C J, LIN G Y. Wet electrostatic precipitator with pulse jet for cleaning discharge wires: U.S. Patent 8, 211, 217[P]. 2012-07-03.
[6] BELTRAN M R. Wet ESP for the collection of submicron particles, mist and air toxics[M]. Electrostatic Precipitation, 2009: 499-506.
[7] CHANG J, DONG Y, WANG Z, et al . Removal of sulfuric acid aerosol in a wet electrostatic precipitator with single terylene or polypropylene collection electrodes [J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2011, 42(8): 544-554.
[8] 刘媛,闫骏,井鹏,等. 湿式静电除尘技术研究及应用[J]. 环境科学与技术,2014,37（6）：83-88.
LlU Yuan, YAN Jun, JING Peng, et al . Research and application of wet electrostatic precipitator[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 37(6): 83-88.
[9] 熊贵龙,李水清,陈晟,等. 增强PM 2.5 脱除的新型电除尘技术的发展[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2015,35（9）：2217-2223.
XIONG Guilong, LI Shuiqing, CHEN Sheng, et al . Development of advanced electrostatic precipitation technologies for reducing PM 2.5 emissions from coal-fired power plants[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2015, 35(9): 2217-2223.
[10] WANG X H, YOU C F. Effects ofthermophoresis, vapor, and water film on particle removal of electrostatic precipitator[J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2013, 63: 1-9.
[11] 时超林,潘卫国,郭瑞堂,等. 火电厂湿式静电除尘器的发展现状综述[J]. 电力与能源,2013,34（5）：439-499.
SHI Chaolin, PAN Weiguo, GUO Ruitang, et al . Development situation of the WESP in thermal power plant[J]. Power and Energy, 2013, 34(5): 439-499.
[12] 刘忠,刘含笑,冯新新,等. 湍流聚并器流场和颗粒运动轨迹模拟[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2012,32（14）：71-75.
LIU Zhong, LIU Hanxiao, FENG Xinxin, et al . Simulation for the flow field of the turbulence coalescence device and the trajectory of particles [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2012, 32(14): 71-75.
[13] TSAI R, CHANG Y P, LIN T Y. Combined effects of thermophoresis and electrophoresis on particle depositiononto a wafer [J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 1998, 29(7): 811-825.
[14] FAN Y, QIN F H, LUO X S, et al . Heterogeneous condensation on insoluble spherical particles: modeling and parametric study[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2013, (102): 387-396.
[15] 刘含笑,姚宇平,郦建国. 凝聚器二维单扰流柱流场中颗粒凝并模拟[J]. 动力工程学报,2015,35（4）：292-297.
LIU Hanxiao, YAO Yuping, LI Jianguo. Coagulating simulation of particles in flow field of coagulator 2D single turbulence column[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2015, 35(4): 292-297.

燃煤电厂WESP颗粒物脱除机制及排放特征研究

Research of PM Removal Mechanism and Emission Characteristics for WESP in a Coal-Fired Power Plant

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘含笑, 吴黎明, 赵琳, 于立元, 郦建国, 崔盈. 燃煤电厂湿式电除尘器减排及能效特性研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 196-203.
[2]	孙尊强, 郑成航, 周灿, 王圣, 马修元, 叶毅科. 燃煤电厂典型除尘器运行现状分析及优化[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 194-201.
[3]	吴家玉, 莫华, 胡耘, 朱杰, 帅伟, 张晴, 姜岸. 京津冀及周边地区燃煤电厂煤场无组织颗粒物不同控制情景下时空变化特征[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 182-189.
[4]	刘玺璞, 李东阳, 张超. 多种负荷工况下湿式电除尘器的PM_2.5脱除效率及排放特征[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(1): 182-187.
[5]	赵宏, 张发捷, 马云龙, 马宝林, 唐潇, 徐仁博, 罗通达, 李成宝, 任传明, 于洁, 孙路石. 燃煤电厂SCR脱硝氨逃逸迁移规律试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(1): 196-202.
[6]	赵柄, 王海刚, 胡冬, 陈坤洋, 金绪良, 殷爱鸣. 燃煤电厂碱性吸附剂脱汞性能研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(9): 208-213.
[7]	姚燕, 马云龙, 杨晓宁, 张华东, 王丽朋. 高砷煤SCR脱硝催化剂中毒失活研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(6): 191-196.
[8]	马学礼, 孙希进, 苏燊燊, 张仁锋, 党立晨, 黄显昌, 谢永平. 基于超低排放的燃煤电厂烟囱高度优化研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(5): 179-184.
[9]	徐静馨, 朱法华, 王圣, 张明, 赵秀勇, 孙雪丽, 胡耘, 田文鑫. 超低排放燃煤电厂和燃气电厂综合对比[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(2): 164-172,179.
[10]	李滨, 杨阳. 烟气SO₃监测控制冷凝法采样方法[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(1): 140-146.
[11]	王文欣, 高毅, 刘春红, 童小忠, 陈彪, 祁志福, 张勤. 燃煤电厂旁路烟气干燥塔控制技术开发[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(1): 147-154.
[12]	雷嗣远, 李海浩, 李乐田, 倪贵东, 孔凡海, 吴国勋, 卞子君. SCR脱硝低负荷投运烟气调温旁路改造设计[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(9): 179-184.
[13]	许剑, 夏小飞, 李凯伦, 郑金, 王星, 马翔. 电站轴流引风机叶片通过频率振动超标问题机理分析及治理[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 117-122.
[14]	陈海杰, 马务, 刘贡祎, 高攀. W火焰锅炉SNCR脱硝及其对SCR入口流场的影响[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 146-153.
[15]	晋银佳, 刘泽宇, 尤良洲, 夏守庆, 唐国瑞. RESALT技术在燃煤电厂脱硫废水浓缩处理中的应用[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 154-160.

模态框（Modal）标题

燃煤电厂WESP颗粒物脱除机制及排放特征研究

Research of PM Removal Mechanism and Emission Characteristics for WESP in a Coal-Fired Power Plant

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics