Lightning Risk Assessment of Distribution Network Line Based on Information Fusion

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202306118

Abstract

Abstract:

Lightning seriously affects the safe operation of distribution network lines. A lightning risk assessment method based on information fusion is thus proposed by introducing sensitive factors and vulnerability indexes. Firstly, a lightning risk assessment index system is constructed from five aspects including ground resistance, population density, tower height, river network density and slope direction. Secondly, by introducing the analytic hierarchy process of information fusion, a correlation matrix of lightning damage is established based on grey, entropy weight and evidence theory to carry out comprehensive evaluation. Finally, a case study of a distribution network line was conducted. The results show that the evaluation results of the proposed method are basically consistent with the actual results for overall trend of lightning risk, which validates the rationality of the index system.

Key words: distribution network line, lightning risk, information fusion, entropy weight theory, degree of certainty

Zixiang PEI, Kai SHU, Xuntian ZHOU, Tiancheng FAN, Yuhe LUO, Yuting LIU. Lightning Risk Assessment of Distribution Network Line Based on Information Fusion[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57(7): 125-131.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202306118

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/Y2024/V57/I7/125

Figures/Tables 12

References 25

1	赵淳, 陈家宏, 王剑, 等. 电网雷害风险评估技术研究[J]. 高电压技术, 2011, 37 (12): 3012- 3021.
	ZHAO Chun, CHEN Jiahong, WANG Jian, et al. Research on technology of lightning disaster risk assessment for power system[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2011, 37 (12): 3012- 3021.
2	周明. 电缆线路对铁路10 kV配电所功率因数的影响[J]. 电力电容器与无功补偿, 2021, 42 (2): 12- 16.
	ZHOU Ming. Influence of cable on power factor of 10 kV railway distribution substation[J]. Power Capacitor & Reactive Power Compensation, 2021, 42 (2): 12- 16.
3	周若琪. 配电变压器雷击建模与雷电防护研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2018.
	ZHOU Ruoqi. Study on lightning stroke modeling and lightning protection of the distribution transformer[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2018.
4	刘乐康, 赵涛, 杨磊, 等. 雷击不同基杆塔下配电变压器雷电防护能力分析[J]. 电瓷避雷器, 2021, (5): 1- 8.
	LIU Lekang, ZHAO Tao, YANG Lei, et al. Lightning protection capability of distribution transformer under different base towers struck by lightning[J]. Insulators and Surge Arresters, 2021, (5): 1- 8.
5	谢从珍, 白剑锋, 王红斌, 等. 基于多维关联信息融合的架空输电线路雷害风险评估方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38 (21): 6233- 6244, 6485.
	XIE Congzhen, BAI Jianfeng, WANG Hongbin, et al. Lightning risk assessment of transmission lines based on multidimensional related information fusion[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38 (21): 6233- 6244, 6485.
6	曾嵘, 刘瀚波, 庄池杰, 等. 基于先导发展模型的输电线路绕击跳闸率计算[J]. 高电压技术, 2017, 43 (5): 1581- 1588.
	ZENG Rong, LIU Hanbo, ZHUANG Chijie, et al. Calculation of shielding failure flashover rate of transmission line using leader progression model[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2017, 43 (5): 1581- 1588.
7	ERIKSSON A J. An improved electrogeometric model for transmission line shielding analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 1987, 2 (3): 871- 886.
8	王喆, 杨旭, 朱迪, 等. 基于灰色模糊评价的光储型电热协同系统日前运营决策方法[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56 (9): 215- 225.
	WANG Zhe, YANG Xu, ZHU Di, et al. Research on the day-ahead operation decision making method for the electric-thermal system based on grey fuzzy evaluation[J]. Electric Power, 2023, 56 (9): 215- 225.
9	朱涛, 谢一工, 钟少军, 等. 模糊层次分析法在电网操作方案选择过程中的应用[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55 (8): 121- 128.
	ZHU Tao, XIE Yigong, ZHONG Shaojun, et al. Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in selection of power grid operation schemes[J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55 (8): 121- 128.
10	张涛, 赵晋泉. 基于IFAHP和TOPSIS的直流弱送端电网调相机配置方案综合评估[J]. 电测与仪表, 2021, 58 (4): 107- 114.
	ZHANG Tao, ZHAO Jinquan. Comprehensive evaluation of synchronous condenser configuration scheme for weak sending-end HVDC power grid based on IFAHP and TOPSIS method[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2021, 58 (4): 107- 114.
11	何璇, 高崇, 曹华珍, 等. 基于改进层次分析法的配电网指标评估[J]. 电测与仪表, 2022, 59 (10): 93- 99.
	HE Xuan, GAO Chong, CAO Huazhen, et al. Index evaluation of distribution network based on improved analytic hierarchy process[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2022, 59 (10): 93- 99.
12	张志劲, 孙才新, 蒋兴良, 等. 层次分析法在输电线路综合防雷措施评估中的应用[J]. 电网技术, 2005, 29 (14): 68- 72.
	ZHANG Zhijin, SUN Caixin, JIANG Xingliang, et al. Application of analytic hierarchy process in estimation of compositive transmission line lightning protection measures[J]. Power System Technology, 2005, 29 (14): 68- 72.
13	刘刚, 马浩禹, 张弦. 改进层次分析法在配网线路防雷评估中的应用[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44 (4): 71- 76, 100.
	LIU Gang, MA Haoyu, ZHANG Xian. Application of improved analytic hierarchy process on evaluation of lightning protection in distribution networks[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 44 (4): 71- 76, 100.
14	赵伟, 李哲, 史海锋, 等. 基于层次分析法的浙江电网雷击跳闸孕灾环境敏感性评估[J]. 高电压技术, 2017, 43 (2): 619- 626.
	ZHAO Wei, LI Zhe, SHI Haifeng, et al. Sensitivity assessment on hazard-pregnant environment of lightning trip-out in Zhejiang power grid based on analytic hierarchy process model[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2017, 43 (2): 619- 626.
15	林巨广, 严军富, 关鹏. 基于熵权法和灰色关联度分析的轴承故障诊断[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 34 (11): 1610- 1614.
	LIN Juguang, YAN Junfu, GUAN Peng. Bearing fault diagnosis based on entropy method and grey relational analysis[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Natural Science), 2011, 34 (11): 1610- 1614.
16	张俊成, 黎敏, 刘志文, 等. 配电网用户侧多类型柔性资源调节能力评估方法[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56 (9): 96- 103, 119.
	ZHANG Juncheng, LI Min, LIU Zhiwen, et al. An evaluation method for multi-type flexible resource regulation capability on the user side of distribution networks[J]. Electric Power, 2023, 56 (9): 96- 103, 119.
17	史恒逸, 王宝华. 考虑配网电压越限风险的光伏接入规划研究[J]. 电测与仪表, 2021, 58 (3): 40- 46.
	SHI Hengyi, WANG Baohua. Research on PV access planning considering the risk of distribution network voltage overrun[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2021, 58 (3): 40- 46.
18	袁文. 基于改进雷击跳闸率计算法的输电线路雷击风险评估方法研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2014.
	YUAN Wen. Study on transmission line lightning risk assessment methods based on improved lightning trip-out rate calculation[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2014.
19	王一枫, 汤伟, 刘路登, 等. 电网运行风险评估与定级体系的构建及应用[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2015, 39 (8): 141- 148.
	WANG Yifeng, TANG Wei, LIU Ludeng, et al. Construction and application of power grid operation risk assessment and rating system[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2015, 39 (8): 141- 148.
20	冯瑞发, 蔡汉生, 廖民传, 等. 基于改进跳闸率计算方法的输电线路雷击风险评估及防雷配置研究[J]. 电瓷避雷器, 2022, (1): 75- 81.
	FENG Ruifa, CAI Hansheng, LIAO Minchuan, et al. Risk assessment and lightning protection measures configuration of transmission line based on the improved calculation method of trip rate[J]. Insulators and Surge Arresters, 2022, (1): 75- 81.
21	邓创, 刘友波, 刘俊勇, 等. 考虑降雨诱发次生地质灾害的电网风险评估方法[J]. 电网技术, 2016, 40 (12): 3825- 3834.
	DENG Chuang, LIU Youbo, LIU Junyong, et al. A risk assessment method of power grid considering secondary geological hazards caused by rainfall weather[J]. Power System Technology, 2016, 40 (12): 3825- 3834.
22	王振国, 李特, 王少华, 等. 浙福特高压交流输电线路避雷器绕击防护性能评估[J]. 电瓷避雷器, 2021, (5): 61- 65.
	WANG Zhenguo, LI Te, WANG Shaohua, et al. Evaluation on the protective performance of the lightning arrester for the lightning shielding failure of Zhefu UHV AC transmission line[J]. Insulators and Surge Arresters, 2021, (5): 61- 65.
23	冯婷婷, 张竣淇, 陈永刚. 基于电网可靠性的输电线路雷击评估方法[J]. 电瓷避雷器, 2021, (1): 160- 164.
	FENG Tingting, ZHANG Junqi, CHEN Yonggang. Lightning strike assessment method for transmission line based on power grid reliability[J]. Insulators and Surge Arresters, 2021, (1): 160- 164.
24	冯楠, 贺晋宏, 魏鑫, 等. 基于KL散度的配电网高阻抗故障检测研究[J]. 智慧电力, 2022, 50 (4): 73- 80.
	FENG Nan, HE Jinhong, WEI Xin, et al. Distribution network high impedance fault detection method based on KL divergence[J]. Smart Power, 2022, 50 (4): 73- 80.
25	姜萌萌, 佟永吉, 陈明丰, 等. 基于灾害条件的主动配电网快速重构策略研究[J]. 智慧电力, 2021, 49 (5): 85- 92.
	JIANG Mengmeng, TONG Yongji, CHEN Mingfeng, et al. Rapid reconfiguration strategy of active distribution network under disaster conditions[J]. Smart Power, 2021, 49 (5): 85- 92.

G₁	风险等级	程度等级
$(1.5{G_{{\text{av}}}},+\infty)$	I	非常高
$({G_{{\text{av}}}} , 1.5{G_{{\text{av}}}}]$	Ⅱ	较高
$(0.75{G_{{\text{av}}}} , {G_{{\text{av}}}}]$	Ⅲ	一般
$(0.5{G_{{\text{av}}}} , 0.75{G_{{\text{av}}}}]$	Ⅳ	较低
$(-\infty, 0.5{G_{{\text{av}}}}]$	Ⅴ	非常低

G₁	风险等级	程度等级
$(1.5{G_{{\text{av}}}},+\infty)$	I	非常高
$({G_{{\text{av}}}} , 1.5{G_{{\text{av}}}}]$	Ⅱ	较高
$(0.75{G_{{\text{av}}}} , {G_{{\text{av}}}}]$	Ⅲ	一般
$(0.5{G_{{\text{av}}}} , 0.75{G_{{\text{av}}}}]$	Ⅳ	较低
$(-\infty, 0.5{G_{{\text{av}}}}]$	Ⅴ	非常低

影响因子	U₁	U₂	U₃	U₄	U₅
U₁	1	2	3	5	9
U₂	1/2	1	2	3	7
U₃	1/3	1/3	1	2	5
U₄	1/5	1/2	1/2	1	3
U₅	1/9	1/7	1/5	1/3	1

影响因子	U₁	U₂	U₃	U₄	U₅
U₁	1	2	3	5	9
U₂	1/2	1	2	3	7
U₃	1/3	1/3	1	2	5
U₄	1/5	1/2	1/2	1	3
U₅	1/9	1/7	1/5	1/3	1

信息层	权重	Z₁	Z₂	Z₃	Z₄	Z₅	$\varTheta $
U₁	0.31	0.06	0.17	0.41	0.31	0.05	0.03
U₂	0.27	0.04	0.18	0.27	0.39	0.12	0.10
U₃	0.21	0.03	0.24	0.51	0.18	0.04	0.05
U₄	0.15	0.07	0.19	0.29	0.44	0.01	0.04
U₅	0.06	0.06	0.47	0.21	0.18	0.08	0.09