Electric Power ›› 2025, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (12): 1-13.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202509037

• Special Contribution • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Interactions Between Global Energy Transition and Geopolitical Environment

WANG Yaohua1(), LI Xiaochun2,3(), YANG Yu2,3,4(), MIAO Zhongquan1, MAO Jikang1, JIAN Yongfang1   

  1. 1. State Grid Energy Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102209, China
    2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    3. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    4. Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • Received:2025-09-18 Revised:2025-11-28 Online:2025-12-27 Published:2025-12-28
  • Supported by:
    This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.42571208), the Science and Technology Project of SGCC (No.5108-202218280A-2-432-XG), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.72348003).

Abstract:

Global energy transition has become a core issue in the sustainable development strategies of countries worldwide. Focusing on the interactions between global energy transition and the geopolitical, economic, and social dimensions, this study constructs a multidimensional indicator system for global energy transition and the geopolitical environment based on data from 146 countries over the period 2008—2021. It systematically evaluates the evolutionary paths and interaction characteristics of two systems—global energy transition and the global geopolitical environment—from two spatial scales (global and regional). The results show that the global energy transition level has maintained a steady upward trend overall, with significant progress in renewable energy development and energy efficiency, while per capita energy access capacity remains relatively insufficient. The geopolitical environment level has exhibited an overall downward trend since 2018, as the superimposed effects of political unrest, social inequality, and economic vulnerability have become increasingly prominent. At the global scale, the two systems show a significant positive correlation, reflecting a trend of coordinated evolution. At the regional scale, the interaction structure between energy transition and the geopolitical environment demonstrates obvious spatial heterogeneity. North America and South Asia are dominated by trade-off relationships, while Europe boasts the strongest synergistic effect.

Key words: energy transition, geopolitical environment, interaction, spatial scale