Collaborative Removal of SO3 and Hg by Electrostatic-Fabric Integrated Precipitator

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201812056

Abstract

Abstract: Featured by long-term stable dust emissions, high adaptability to varieties of coal, low investments, less land occupation and low maintenance costs, the electrostatic-fabric integrated precipitator (EFIP) technology has been widely used in coal-fired power plants in China in recent years. The removal efficiency of SO₃ by EFIP exceeds 60%, which can be boosted to more than 80% after spraying a small amount of alkaline adsorbent. The removal efficiency of Hg^P by EFIP exceeds 99%. As for gaseous and total amount of mercury, though affected by the distribution of mercury in flue gas, the removal efficiency of gaseous mercury can still be improved to over 90% after spraying the adsorbents. Compared with other pollutant removal equipment, EFIP has obvious advantages in its high efficiency and low cost for collaborative removal of gaseous pollutants such as SO₃ and Hg.

Key words: coal-fired power plant, electrostatic-fabric integrated precipitator, collaborative removal, SO₃, Hg

CLC Number:

TM621.7+3

CHEN Kuixu. Collaborative Removal of SO₃ and Hg by Electrostatic-Fabric Integrated Precipitator[J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(3): 29-35.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201812056

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/Y2019/V52/I3/29

References 24

[1]	?毛健雄, 毛健全, 赵树民. 煤的清洁燃烧[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1998.
[2]	张军营, 任德贻, 许德伟, 等. 煤中汞及其对环境的影响[J]. 环境科学进展, 1999, 7(3):100-104 ZHANG Junying, REN Deyi, XU Dewei, et al. Mercury in coal and its effect on environment[J]. Advances in Environmental Science, 1999, 7(3):100-104
[3]	MOSER R E. SO3's impacts on plant O & M[J]. Power, 2006, 150(8):10-15.
[4]	高洪亮, 周劲松, 骆仲泱, 等. 氯化氢对燃煤烟气中汞形态分布影响的实验研究[J]. 浙江大学学报, 2004, 38(6):765-769 GAO Hongliang, ZHOU Jinsong, LUO Zhongyang, et al. Effect of hydrogen chloride on speciation distribution of mercury in coal-fired flue gases[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University, 2004, 38(6):765-769
[5]	陈奎续. 超净电袋复合除尘技术的研究应用进展[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(3):22-27 CHEN Kuixu. Research and application progress of ultra-clean electrostatic-fabric integrated precipitator technology[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(3):22-27
[6]	熊桂龙, 李水清, 陈晟, 等. 增强PM2.5脱除的新型电除尘技术的发展[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2015, 35(9):2217-2223 XIONG Guilong, LI Shuiqing, CHEN Sheng, et al. Development of advanced electrostatic precipitation technologies for reducing PM2.5 emissions from coal-fired power plants[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2015, 35(9):2217-2223
[7]	罗汉成, 潘卫国, 丁红蕾, 等. 燃煤锅炉烟气中SO3的产生机理及其控制技术[J]. 锅炉技术, 2015, 46(6):69-72 LUO Hancheng, PAN Weiguo, DING Honglei, et al. The formation mechanism of SO3 from coal-fired boiler flue gas and its control technology[J]. Boiler technology, 2015, 46(6):69-72
[8]	刘含笑, 姚宇平, 郦建国, 等. 燃煤电厂烟气中SO3生成、治理及测试技术研究[J]. 中国电力, 2015, 48(9):152-156 LIU Hanxiao, YAO Yuping, LI Jianguo, et al. Study on SO3 generation, control and testing technology for coal-fired power plants[J]. Electric Power, 2015, 48(9):152-156
[9]	蒋海涛, 蔡兴飞, 付玉玲, 等. 燃煤电厂SO3形成、危害及控制技术[J]. 发电设备, 2013, 27(5):366-368 JIANG Haitao, CAI Xingfei, FU Yuling, et al. Formation, harms and control technology of SO3 from coal-fired power plants[J]. Power Equipment, 2013, 27(5):366-368
[10]	胡冬, 王海刚, 郭婷婷, 等. 燃煤电厂烟气SO3控制技术的研究及进展[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2015, 15(35):92-99, 105 HU Dong, WANG Haigang, GUO Tingting, et al. Research and development of mitigating technology of SO3 in flue gas from coal power plants[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2015, 15(35):92-99, 105
[11]	陈焱, 许月阳, 薛建明. 燃煤烟气中SO3成因、影响及其减排对策[J]. 电力科技与环保, 2011, 27(3):35-37 CHEN Yan, XU Yueyang, XUE Jianming. Discussion on flue gas SO3 forming mechanism, impact and its countermeasures[J]. Electric Power Technology and Environmental Protection, 2011, 27(3):35-37
[12]	魏宏鸽, 程雪山, 马彦斌, 等. 燃煤烟气中SO3的产生与转化及其抑制对策探讨[J]. 发电与空调, 2012, 33(2):1-4 WEI Hongge, CHEN Xueshan, MA Yanbin, et al. Some discussion about SO3's generation, transformation and its inhibiting methods in coal-fired flue gas[J]. Power Generation & Air Condition, 2012, 33(2):1-4
[13]	LEE J Y, JU Y, KEENER T C, et al. Development of cost-effective noncarbon sorbents for Hg0 removal from coal-fired power plants[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(8):2714-2720.
[14]	樊保国, 刘军娥, 乔晓磊, 等. 电厂煤粉锅炉汞排放特性研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2014, 36(7):61-63 FAN Baoguo, LIU Jun'e, QIAO Xiaolei, et al. Mercury emission characteristics of the power plant pulverized coal fired boiler[J]. Environmental Pollution and Prevention, 2014, 36(7):61-63
[15]	LAUDAL D L, BROWN T D, NOTT B R. Effects of flue gas constituents on mercury speciation[J]. Flue Processing Technology, 2000, 65(99):159-165.
[16]	陈进生, 袁东星, 李权龙, 等. 燃煤烟气净化设施对汞排放特性的影响[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2008, 28(2):72-76 CHEN Jinsheng, YUAN Dongxing, LI Quanlong, et al. Effect of flue-gas cleaning devices on mercury emission from coal-fired boiler[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2008, 28(2):72-76
[17]	王智, 贾莹光, 祁宁. 燃煤电站锅炉及SCR脱硝中SO3的生成及危害[J]. 东北电力技术, 2005, 26(9):1-3 WANG Zhi, JIA Yingguang, QI Ning. The creation and harm of SO3 for coal-fired boiler and SCR denitration[J]. Northeast Electric Power Technology, 2005, 26(9):1-3
[18]	任建莉, 周劲松, 骆仲泱, 等. 燃煤电站汞排放分布及控制研究的进展[J]. 电站系统工程, 2006, 22(1):44-46 REN Jianli, ZHOU Jinsong, LUO Zhongyang, et al. A review of mercury speciation and control for coal-fired power plants[J]. Power System Engineering, 2006, 22(1):44-46
[19]	胡长兴, 周劲松, 骆仲泱, 等. 烟气脱汞过程中活性炭喷射量的影响因素[J]. 化工学报, 2005, 56(11):2172-2177 HU Changxing, ZHOU Jinsong, LUO Zhongyang, et al. Factors affecting amount of activated carbon injection for flue gas mercury control[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2005, 56(11):2172-2177
[20]	王泉海, 陈世凯, 吴小君. 溴元素对烟气中汞的形态和分布的影响[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2011, 17(2):160-164 WANG Quanhai, CHEN Shikai, WU Xiaojun. Effect of bromine on speciation and distribution of mercury in flue gases[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2011, 17(2):160-164
[21]	吴江, 潘卫国, 任建兴, 等. 烟气汞形态分布及其受氯化物添加剂影响的研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2009, 29(4):405-408 WU Jiang, PAN Weiguo, REN Jianxing, et al. Mercury speciation distribution in flue gas and the influence of chloride additive on it[J]. Journal of Power Engineering, 2009, 29(4):405-408
[22]	DENNIS J H, PAUL L F. The use of a circulating fluid bed for mercury adsorption and particle agglomeration[C]//Missouri:The Air & Water Management Association Mercury's 92nd Annual Meeting & Exhibition, 1999.
[23]	WANG Ao, SONG Qiang, TU Gongming, et al. Influence of flue gas cleaning system on characteristics of PM2.5 emission from coal-fired power plants[J]. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 2014, 1(1):4-12.
[24]	王雄, 黄志明, 罗贤勇. 美国燃煤电厂汞排放控制研究[J]. 中国城市经济, 2010(9):140-142

Collaborative Removal of SO₃ and Hg by Electrostatic-Fabric Integrated Precipitator

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 24

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	Dongxu LIU, Xiaoyuan ZHANG, Qing MA, Qianwei FENG, Zhen DU. Analysis on SO₃ Generation, Migration and Control Technology of Coal-fired Units [J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57(6): 235-242.
[2]	Chao YI, Da TENG, Shaowei SONG, Ou CHEN. Application Analysis of Flue Gas Condensation Recovery in Coal-fired Power Plants by Spraying Method [J]. Electric Power, 2023, 56(11): 226-235.
[3]	LIU Yi. A Pilot-scale Research on SO₃ Control in Flue Gas of Coal Fired Power Plant [J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55(7): 201-208.
[4]	ZHANG Guozhu, ZHANG Juntai, WEN Yu, YANG Kaixuan, LIU Ming, LIU Jiping. Study on Off-design Condition Characteristics and Control Strategy of Fluegas Waste Heat and Water Recovery System of Coal-Fired Power Plants [J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55(4): 214-220.
[5]	SUN Zunqiang, ZHENG Chenghang, ZHOU Can, WANG Sheng, MA Xiuyuan, YE Yike. Operational Status Analysis and Optimization Suggestions of Typical Dust Collectors in Coal-Fired Power Plants [J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55(11): 194-201.
[6]	WU Jiayu, MO Hua, HU Yun, ZHU Jie, SHUAI Wei, ZHANG Qing, JIANG An. Spatio-Temporal Variation Characteristics of Fugitive Particulate Matter Emissions from the Coal Storage Yard of Coal-Fired Power Plants in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and Surrounding Areas under Different Regulatory Scenarios [J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(2): 182-189.
[7]	CAO Pei, XU Peng, HE Jianming, GAO Kai, TIAN Haoyang, JI Yiping. A Intelligent Method for Insulation Defect Detection of Switchgear Based on Multi-source Sensing [J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(10): 117-124,133.
[8]	ZHAO Hong, ZHANG Fajie, MA Yunlong, MA Baolin, TANG Xiao, XU Renbo, LUO Tongda, LI Chengbao, REN Chuanming, YU Jie, SUN Lushi. Test Study on the Migration Characteristics of Slip Ammonia from the SCR System in the Coal-Fired Power Plant [J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(1): 196-202.
[9]	ZHANG Zhiqiang, ZHU Fahua, ZOU Siyi, SHI Pengfei, WANG Xiaoling, YOU Qin, YAO Li, YAN Shaoshuai, WANG Xing. Study on Environmental Benefits of Wet Plume Treatment Project Based on Actual Measurements [J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(9): 202-207.
[10]	ZHAO Bing, WANG Haigang, HU Dong, CHEN Kunyang, JIN Xuliang, YIN Aiming. Study on Mercury Removal Performance of Alkali Adsorbent in Coal-Fired Power Plant [J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(9): 208-213.
[11]	JIA Xibu. In-depth Analysis on Wastewater Discharge of Wet Limestone-Gypsum FGD [J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(8): 139-144,163.
[12]	WU Jiayu, ZHU Jie, MO Hua, ZHANG Feng, SHUAI Wei, ZHANG Qing, NA Qin. Test Study on SO₃ Control Effect of Slurry Cooling Wet Plume Treatment Project in a Typical Coal-Fired Power Plant [J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(8): 145-150,172.
[13]	MA Xueli, SUN Xijin, SU Shenshen, ZHANG Renfeng, DANG Lichen, HUANG Xianchang, XIE Yongping. Optimization of Chimney Height for Coal-Fired Power Plants for Ultra-Low Emission [J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(5): 179-184.
[14]	LU Junchao, TAO Leixing, YUE Chunmei, CHEN Rui, LIU Zhichao, WANG Yanyan, ZHENG Fangdong, WAN Di. The Present State and Prospect of Water Consumption in Coal-Fired Power Plants [J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(3): 139-146.
[15]	XU Jingxin, ZHU Fahua, WANG Sheng, ZHANG Ming, ZHAO Xiuyong, SUN Xueli, HU Yun, TIAN Wenxin. Comprehensive Comparison of Ultra-low Emission Coal-Fired Power Plants and Gas-Fired Power Plants [J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(2): 164-172,179.