Analysis of Key Points on Curbing Colored Plume in Coal-Fired Power Plants and Environmental Management

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201812027

Abstract

Abstract: Based on the study of relevant domestic and foreign standards and by taking account of the current development status of flue gas treatment technologies in coal-fired power plants in China, the concepts, interrelations and distinctions between filterable particulate matters, condensable particulate matters (CPM) and dissolved solids in flue gas are analyzed. It is pointed out explicitly that the colored plume environmental management plays the key role in coal-fired power plants in curbing the condensable particulate matters as represented by SO₃. Then, the existing problems in the present environmental management policy regarding colored plume control are sorted out, and finally corresponding policy suggestions for CPM environmental management are put forward.

Key words: coal-fired power plant, colored plume, condensable particulate matter, SO₃, environmental management

CLC Number:

MO Hua, ZHU Jie. Analysis of Key Points on Curbing Colored Plume in Coal-Fired Power Plants and Environmental Management[J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(3): 10-15,35.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201812027

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/Y2019/V52/I3/10

References 21

[1]	燃煤电厂超低排放烟气治理工程技术规范:HJ2053-2018[S]. 北京:中国环境出版社, 2018. Technical specifications for flue gas ultra-low emission engineering of coal-fired power plant:HJ2053-2018[S]. Beijing:China Environment Publishing Press, 2018.
[2]	火电厂污染防治可行技术指南:HJ2301-2017[S]. 北京:中国环境出版社, 2018. Guideline on available technologies of pollution prevention and control for thermal power plant:HJ2301-2017[S]. Beijing:China Environment Publishing Press, 2017.
[3]	固定污染源排气中颗粒物和气态污染物采样方法:GB/T 16157-1996[S]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 1996. The determination of particulates and sampling methods of gaseous pollutants from exhaust gas of stationary source:GB/T 16157-1996[S]. Beijing:China Environment Science Publishing Press, 1996.
[4]	固定污染源废气低浓度颗粒物的测定重量法:HJ 836-2017[S]. 北京:中国环境出版社, 2017. Stationary source emission-Determination of mass concentration of particulate matter at low concentration-Manual gravimetric method:HJ 836-2017[S]. Beijing:China Environment Publishing Press, 2017.
[5]	石爱军, 胡月琪, 白志鹏, 等. 湿法脱硫烟气中多形态颗粒物的测量方法及组分特征[J]. 中国环境监测, 2017, 33(2):101-109 SHI Aijun, HU Yueqi, BAI Zhipeng, et al. Characterization of the inorganic ionic composition of multi-state particulate matter in wet desulfurized flue gas from stationary sources by a new assembled device[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 2017, 33(2):101-109
[6]	CORIO Louis A, SHERWELL John. In-stack condensable particulate matter measurements and issues[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2000, 50(2):207-218.
[7]	US. EPA. Method 202 Best Practices Handbook[EB/OL]. https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/emc/methods/m202-best-practices-handbook.pdf, 2016-03-18.
[8]	Dry impinger method for determining condensable particulate emissions from stationary sources:US. EPA. Method 202[S].
[9]	Determination of particulate emissions from stationary sources:US. EPA. Method 17[S].
[10]	Determination of PM10 and PM2.5 emissions from stationary sources:US. EPA. Method 201A[S].
[11]	Determination of particulate emissions from stationary sources:US. EPA. Method 5[S].
[12]	杨柳, 张斌, 王康慧, 等. 超低排放路线下燃煤烟气可凝结颗粒物在WFGD、WESP中的转化特性[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(1):121-125 YANG Liu, ZHANG Bin, WANG Kanghui, et al. Conversion characteristics of combustible particles from coal-fired flue gas in WFGD and WESP[J]. Environmental Science, 2019, 40(1):121-125
[13]	李军状, 朱法华, 李小龙, 等. 燃煤电厂烟气中可凝结颗粒物测试研究进展与方法构建[J]. 电力科技与环保, 2018, 34(1):37-44 LI Junzhuang, ZHU Fahua, LI Xiaolong, et al. Progress and method construction of condensable particles in flue gas of coal-fired power plants[J]. Electric Power Technology and Environmental Protection, 2018, 34(1):37-44
[14]	莫华, 朱杰, 黄志杰, 等. 超低排放下不同湿法脱硫技术脱除SO3效果测试与分析[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(3):46-50 MO Hua, ZHU Jie, HUANG Zhijie, et al. Test and study on SO3 removal performance of different wet flue gas desulfurization technologies at ultra-low pollutants emission[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(3):46-50
[15]	潘丹萍, 吴昊, 黄荣廷, 等. 石灰石-石膏法烟气脱硫过程中SO3酸雾脱除特性[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 46(2):311-316 PAN Danping, WU Hao, HUANG Rongting, et al. Removal properties of sulfuric acid mist during limestone-gypsum flue gas desulfurization process[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 46(2):311-316
[16]	胡月琪, 冯亚军, 王琛, 等. 燃煤锅炉烟气中CPM与水溶性离子监测方法及应用研究[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2016, 28(1):41-45 HU Yueqi, FENG Yajun, WANG Chen, et al. Studies on monitoring method of condensable particulate and water-soluble ions in fumes from coal fired boilers[J]. The Administration and Technique of Environmental Monitoring, 2016, 28(1):41-45
[17]	朱杰, 许月阳, 姜岸, 等. 超低排放下不同湿法脱硫协同控制颗粒物性能测试与研究[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(1):168-172 ZHU Jie, XU Yueyang, JIANG An, et al. Test and study on performance of wet FGD coordinated particulate matter control for ultra-low pollutants emission[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(1):168-172
[18]	赵瑞, 刘毅, 李延兵, 等. 浅谈燃煤电站SO3检测方法及脱除策略[J]. 神华科技, 2015, 13(5):62-66 ZHAO Rui, LIU Yi, LI Yanbing, et al. Review on the SO3 detection method and removal strategy in coal-fired power plants[J]. Shenhua Science and Technology, 2015, 13(5):62-66
[19]	陈招妹, 王剑波, 姚宇平, 等. 湿式电除尘器在燃煤电厂WFGD后的应用分析[C]//第十五届中国科协年会第9分会场:火电厂烟气净化与节能技术研讨会论文集, 贵阳:2013.
[20]	王思粉, 冯丽娟, 李先国. 浅析我国海水烟气脱硫技术及改进[J]. 热力发电, 2011, 40(1):4-7, 18 WANG Sifen, FENG Lijuan, LI Xianguo, et al. Superficial analysis of seawater flue gas desulphurization technology and improvement thereof[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2011, 40(1):4-7, 18
[21]	黄茹, 马德彭, 莫华, 等. 基于CFB-FGD技术的烟气超低排放工程性能测试评估[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(3):17-21 HUANG Ru, MA Depeng, MO Hua, et al. Testing and assessment on performance of flue gas ultra low emission based on CFB-FGD technology[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(3):17-21