石灰-石膏法烟气脱硫系统塔内浆液pH值及密度测量改进

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2012.9.80.4

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 火电厂石灰-石膏法烟气脱硫系统所用pH计及密度计的取样探头易结垢、磨损,测量管路堵塞频繁,导致脱硫塔浆液pH值和密度的测量出现偏差甚至数据失真。为此,设计了改进型pH计取样装置,并采用隔膜压力变送器代替传统密度计。结合山西大土河焦化有限责任公司热电一分厂3×75 t/h循环流化床锅炉烟气脱硫工程,介绍二者的使用原理及应用情况。实践结果表明,改进型pH计取样装置可有效保护取样探头,具有较好的实用性和经济性;隔膜压力变送器具有监测脱硫塔内浆液密度和液位的双重功能,且维护工作量小,更符合工程应用的需求。

关键词: 烟气脱硫, 石灰-石膏法, pH计, 密度计, 隔膜压力变送器

Abstract: Scaling and wearing tend to happen on the sampling probe of pH meters and density meters used in lime-gypsum FGD system of thermal power plants, which leads to frequent clogging in the measuring pipeline and deviation, even distortion in pH value and density measurement for the desulfurization tower slurry. Therefore, an improved pH sampling device is designed, adopting the diaphragm pressure transmitter instead of the traditional densimeter. Combined with the FGD project for three 75-t/h circulating fluidized bed boilers in the No.1 combined heat and power plant for Shanxi Datuhe Coking and Chemical Co., Ltd., the principle and application of the design is introduced. The experimental results show that the improved pH sampling device can effectively protect the sampling probe with better practicability and economics. The diaphragm pressure transmitter also has dual functions, i.e., monitoring the density and liquid level of the slurry in the desulfurization tower, which requires less maintenance work and is more suitable for engineering application.

Key words: FGD, pH meter, density meter, diaphragm pressure transmitter

中图分类号:

梁磊, 马洪玉, 丁华, 梁咏. 石灰-石膏法烟气脱硫系统塔内浆液pH值及密度测量改进[J]. 中国电力, 2012, 45(9): 80-84.

LIANG Lei, MA Hong-yu, DING Hua, LIANG Yong. Improvement in pH Value and Density Measurement for Slurry in Tower of Lime-Gypsum FGD Systems[J]. Electric Power, 2012, 45(9): 80-84.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2012.9.80.4

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2012/V45/I9/80

参考文献

[1] 肖家荣.对湿法脱硫系统中pH计安装测量方式的探讨[J]. 江西电力,2007(4):30-31.
XIAO Jia-rong. Discussion about meter′s installation and pH measurement in wet flue gas desulphurization system[J]. Jiangxi Electric Power,2007(4):30-31.
[2] 孙长春.压力密度计的设计与应用[J]. 热力发电, 2009, 38(6):95-97.
SUN Chang-chun. Design and application of pressure densimeter[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2009, 38(6):95-97.
[3] 朱治利.石灰石-石膏湿法脱硫技术中的问题[J]. 四川电力技术,2002(4):39-43.
ZHU Zhi-li. Wet limestone gypsum flue gas desulfurization technique problems[J]. Sichuan Electric Power Technology, 2002(4):39-43.
[4] 曾庭华.湿法烟气脱硫吸收塔系统的设计和运行分析[J]. 电力环境保护,2002,18(4):5-9.
ZENG Ting-hua. Analysis on design and operation of the absorber system in wet FGD plant[J]. Electric Power Environmental Protection, 2002,18(4):5-9.
[5] 钟秦.燃煤烟气脱硫脱硝技术及工程实例[M].北京：化学工业出版社.2002.
[6] 颜俭.湿法脱硫工艺的控制氧化[J].电力环境保护,1997,13(2)：41-44.
YAN Jian. The wet desulfurization process control of oxidative[J]. Electric Power Environmental Protection,1997,13(2):41-44.
[7] 谭学谦.浅谈600 MW机组湿法脱硫吸收塔的设计[J].电力环境保护,2007,23(3):32-35.
TNA Xue-qian. Discuss on the WFGD absorber process design of a 600 MW units[J]. Electric Power Environmental Protection, 2007, 23(3):32-35.
[8] 颜俭,惠润堂,杨爱勇.湿法烟气脱硫系统的吸收塔设备[J].电力环境保护,2006,22(5):13-17.
YAN Jian, HUI Run-tang, YANG Ai-yong. WFGD absorption tower equipment[J]. Electric Power Environmental Protection,2006,22(5):13-17.
[9] 沈建军,武丽英,祁利明.火电厂湿法烟气脱硫石膏脱水问题分析及处理措施[J]. 工业安全与环保,2009,11(10):26-28.
SHEN Jian-jun, WU Li-ying, QI Li-ming. Analysis on gypsum dehyd-ration in wet flue gas desulfurization of power plant[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2009,11(10): 26-28.
[10] 贾建忠.2×300 MW机组石灰石-石膏湿法烟气脱硫(FGD)系统的运行维护[J]. 内蒙古科技与经济,2008,6(3):242-243.
JIA Jian-zhong. 2×300 MW unit of wet limestone gypsum flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system operation and maintenance[J]. Inner Mongolia Science Technology and Economy,2008,6(3):242-243.
[11] 崔可,柴明,徐康富.回收法氧化镁湿法烟气脱硫机理和工艺基础研究[J]. 环境科学, 2006, 27(5)846-849.
CUI Ke, CHAI Ming, XU Kang-fu. Mechanism and technology of recovery flue gas desulphurization with magnesium oxide[J]. Environmental Science, 2006, 2(5): 846-849.
[12] 郭毅,李荫堂,李军.烟气脱硫喷淋塔本体设计与分析[J]. 热力发电, 2004, 33(1):30-31.
GUO Yi, LI Yin-tang, LI Jun. Flue gas desulfurization spray tower body design and analysis[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2004, 33(1): 30-31.
[13] 田明明,杨红刚,刘继奎.600 MW机组湿法烟气脱硫吸收塔系统设计[J]. 山西电力,2008(4):40-42.
TIAN Ming-ming, YANG Hong-gang, LIU Ji-kui. 600 MW unit wet FGD absorber system design[J]. Shanxi Electric Power, 2008(4):40-42.
[14] 孙琦明.湿法脱硫工艺吸收塔及塔内件的设计选型[J]. 中国环保产业,2007(4):18-22.
SUN Qi-ming.Model selection of design for absorbing tower and it's inside fittings in wet process of FGD technology[J]. China Environmental Protection Industry, 2007(4):18-22.

[1]	姜龙, 程亮, 李金晶, 李庆. 燃煤电厂湿法脱硫浆液品质及喷淋层运行状况定量评价[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(11): 217-225, 235.
[2]	徐遵义, 刘文慧, 张旭冉, 张海燕. 基于数据驱动的浆液循环泵运行优化研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(3): 197-204.
[3]	刘文慧, 徐遵义, 张旭冉, 张海燕. 基于互信息和PCA理论的湿法烟气脱硫工况特征提取方法[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(8): 158-163.
[4]	薛明华, 夏多兵, 胡子健, 田昌, 苏明旭. 基于超声波衰减谱的石膏浆液粒度测量方法[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(9): 173-178.
[5]	李壮, 胡妲, 朱跃. 双塔双循环脱硫除雾器故障分析及对策研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(2): 172-177.
[6]	翁卫国, 孙建国, 李钦武, 周灿, 蒋善行. 脱硫废水零排放系统关键参数数值模拟研究[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(6): 42-47.
[7]	邱桂芝, 张志刚, 宋寅, 郭婷婷, 王海刚, 贾嘉, 王鹤麒. 管束式除雾器结构优化数值模拟及高效除雾器研制[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(5): 134-140.
[8]	王丰吉, 尤良洲, 朱跃, 胡妲. 冷凝式除雾器在脱硫系统中的应用及性能评价[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(4): 143-148.
[9]	孙立娇, 叶治安, 胡特立, 李荣轩, 曹瑞雪, 王宏宾. 电厂工业废水处理后回用于脱硫工艺水的试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(9): 135-137.
[10]	沈健, 董强强, 黄剑文. 脱硫石膏脱水困难原因分析及对策[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(6): 125-129.
[11]	张世山, 陈振宇, 郑鹏, 陈鸥, 杨建辉. 国电泰州电厂2×1 000 MW二次再热机组NOx、SO₂超低排放技术应用[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(6): 32-37.
[12]	李兴华，牛拥军，张利清. 湿法烟气脱硫系统采用电石渣为脱硫剂的试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(8): 140-143.
[13]	刘毅, 仲兆平, 赵凯, 史晓宏, 陈创社, 王文宝. 富氧燃烧模拟烟气石灰石-石膏湿法脱硫试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(11): 159-164.
[14]	魏宏鸽，徐明华，柴磊，朱跃. 双塔双循环脱硫系统的运行现状分析与优化措施探讨[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(10): 132-135.
[15]	何仰朋，陶明，石振晶，郭浩然，何育东. 喷淋脱硫塔内除雾器运行特性[J]. 中国电力, 2015, 48(7): 124-128.