中国电力 ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (3): 1-13.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202510009
• 电-碳协同下分布式能源系统运营关键技术 • 上一篇 下一篇
魏震波(
), 金文杰(
), 臧天磊, 郑蕉雨, 罗辰昊, 张鑫媛
收稿日期:2025-10-10
修回日期:2026-01-20
发布日期:2026-03-16
出版日期:2026-03-28
作者简介:基金资助:
WEI Zhenbo(
), JIN Wenjie(
), ZANG Tianlei, ZHENG Jiaoyu, LUO Chenhao, ZHANG Xinyuan
Received:2025-10-10
Revised:2026-01-20
Online:2026-03-16
Published:2026-03-28
Supported by:摘要:
针对现有需求响应能力仅局限于电力负荷,其到碳排表征仍存中间变量且一致性效果差,造成用户侧降碳作用未能完全发现,因此提出一种考虑负荷低碳响应能力的多区互联电力系统低碳经济调度。首先,建立用户侧低碳能用引导信号用于量化用户侧低碳调节作用。然后,面向多区互联系统,构建计及负荷低碳响应能力的双层优化模型。其中,上层为基于纳什谈判理论的多区系统合作博弈模型,旨在保障各区主体收益独立基础上实现系统风光消纳整体平衡;下层为以耦合碳排放因子为低碳引导的用户侧低碳需求响应模型,旨在促进区域内源荷间低碳互动能力。最后,通过能碳贡献因子实现不同主体的利益公平分配,进而保障市场环境下的所建模型公平合理性。算例结果表明:较传统基于电力需求响应驱动的多区互联系统低碳经济调度方法,所提模型能进一步挖掘用户侧低碳潜力,有效降低系统碳排放量,同时可一定程度上降低系统运行成本,且保证各主体利益分配的合理性。
魏震波, 金文杰, 臧天磊, 郑蕉雨, 罗辰昊, 张鑫媛. 考虑负荷低碳响应能力的多区互联电力系统低碳经济调度模型[J]. 中国电力, 2026, 59(3): 1-13.
WEI Zhenbo, JIN Wenjie, ZANG Tianlei, ZHENG Jiaoyu, LUO Chenhao, ZHANG Xinyuan. Low-carbon economic dispatch model of multi-region interconnected power system considering load low-carbon response capability[J]. Electric Power, 2026, 59(3): 1-13.
图 2 考虑负荷低碳响应的多区互联系统低碳经济调度求解流程
Fig.2 Solution process for low carbon economic dispatch of multi-region interconnected systems considering low carbon response of load
| 场景 | 总成本/万元 | 弃风弃光量/(MW·h) | 碳排放量/t |
| 1 | 139.46 | 206.34 | 3 161.43 |
| 2 | 135.55 | 95.33 | 3 057.26 |
| 3 | 135.16 | 76.34 | 3 037.65 |
| 4 | 133.96 | 44.66 | 3 009.14 |
表 1 不同场景下的运行结果
Table 1 Operation results in different scenarios
| 场景 | 总成本/万元 | 弃风弃光量/(MW·h) | 碳排放量/t |
| 1 | 139.46 | 206.34 | 3 161.43 |
| 2 | 135.55 | 95.33 | 3 057.26 |
| 3 | 135.16 | 76.34 | 3 037.65 |
| 4 | 133.96 | 44.66 | 3 009.14 |
| 场景 | 各系统 独立运行 | 各系统 合作运行 | 考虑源荷间 低碳互动 | 考虑电碳 贡献因子 |
| 1 | √ | |||
| 2 | √ | |||
| 3 | √ | √ | ||
| 4 | √ | √ | ||
| 5 | √ | √ | √ |
表 2 场景设置
Table 2 Scenario Setting
| 场景 | 各系统 独立运行 | 各系统 合作运行 | 考虑源荷间 低碳互动 | 考虑电碳 贡献因子 |
| 1 | √ | |||
| 2 | √ | |||
| 3 | √ | √ | ||
| 4 | √ | √ | ||
| 5 | √ | √ | √ |
| 场景 | 系统1碳 排放量 | 系统2碳 排放量 | 系统3碳 排放量 | 总碳排 放量 |
| 1 | 3 161.43 | 2 112.26 | 2 491.01 | 7 764.70 |
| 2 | 3 092.41 | 1 909.05 | 2 074.64 | 7 076.10 |
| 3 | 3 009.14 | 1 986.85 | 2 394.69 | 7 390.68 |
| 4 | 2 914.25 | 1 840.69 | 1 993.61 | 6 748.55 |
表 3 不同场景下的系统碳排放量
Table 3 System carbon emissions in different scenarios 单位:t
| 场景 | 系统1碳 排放量 | 系统2碳 排放量 | 系统3碳 排放量 | 总碳排 放量 |
| 1 | 3 161.43 | 2 112.26 | 2 491.01 | 7 764.70 |
| 2 | 3 092.41 | 1 909.05 | 2 074.64 | 7 076.10 |
| 3 | 3 009.14 | 1 986.85 | 2 394.69 | 7 390.68 |
| 4 | 2 914.25 | 1 840.69 | 1 993.61 | 6 748.55 |
| 场景 | 系统1成本 | 系统2成本 | 系统3成本 | 总成本 |
| 1 | 139.46 | 119.07 | 113.46 | 371.99 |
| 2 | 133.37 | 108.58 | 102.15 | 344.10 |
| 3 | 133.96 | 114.22 | 109.64 | 357.82 |
| 4 | 130.97 | 101.56 | 97.47 | 330.00 |
表 4 不同场景下的系统成本
Table 4 System cost in different scenarios 单位:万元
| 场景 | 系统1成本 | 系统2成本 | 系统3成本 | 总成本 |
| 1 | 139.46 | 119.07 | 113.46 | 371.99 |
| 2 | 133.37 | 108.58 | 102.15 | 344.10 |
| 3 | 133.96 | 114.22 | 109.64 | 357.82 |
| 4 | 130.97 | 101.56 | 97.47 | 330.00 |
| 系统 | 独立运行成本 | 合作运行成本 | 最终成本 | 收益提升 |
| 1 | 139.46 | 130.97 | 125.47 | 13.99 |
| 2 | 119.07 | 101.56 | 105.07 | 14.00 |
| 3 | 113.46 | 97.47 | 99.46 | 14.00 |
表 5 标准模型下的利益分配
Table 5 Benefit distribution of standard model 单位:万元
| 系统 | 独立运行成本 | 合作运行成本 | 最终成本 | 收益提升 |
| 1 | 139.46 | 130.97 | 125.47 | 13.99 |
| 2 | 119.07 | 101.56 | 105.07 | 14.00 |
| 3 | 113.46 | 97.47 | 99.46 | 14.00 |
| 系统 | 独立运 行成本 | 合作运 行成本 | 合作后支 付收益 | 最终成本 | 收益提升 |
| 1 | 139.46 | 130.97 | 3.51 | 127.46 | 12.00 |
| 2 | 119.07 | 101.56 | 3.19 | 98.37 | 20.70 |
| 3 | 113.46 | 97.48 | –6.69 | 104.17 | 9.29 |
表 6 基于能碳贡献因子的利益分配
Table 6 Benefit distribution based on energy-carbon contribution factor 单位:万元
| 系统 | 独立运 行成本 | 合作运 行成本 | 合作后支 付收益 | 最终成本 | 收益提升 |
| 1 | 139.46 | 130.97 | 3.51 | 127.46 | 12.00 |
| 2 | 119.07 | 101.56 | 3.19 | 98.37 | 20.70 |
| 3 | 113.46 | 97.48 | –6.69 | 104.17 | 9.29 |
| 系统 | 能量提供 量/(MW·h) | 能量接收 量/(MW·h) | 提供能量度 电碳排强度/ (t·(MW·h)–1) | 接收能量度 电碳排强度/ (t·(MW·h)–1) | 能碳贡 献因子 |
| 1 | 154.61 | 334.93 | 0.059 0 | 0.080 7 | 0.805 |
| 2 | 752.80 | 140.51 | 0.133 0 | 0.464 2 | 1.384 |
| 3 | 116.92 | 548.89 | 0.653 6 | 0.170 2 | 0.624 |
表 7 各系统能碳贡献因子
Table 7 Contribution factor of energy-carbon of each system
| 系统 | 能量提供 量/(MW·h) | 能量接收 量/(MW·h) | 提供能量度 电碳排强度/ (t·(MW·h)–1) | 接收能量度 电碳排强度/ (t·(MW·h)–1) | 能碳贡 献因子 |
| 1 | 154.61 | 334.93 | 0.059 0 | 0.080 7 | 0.805 |
| 2 | 752.80 | 140.51 | 0.133 0 | 0.464 2 | 1.384 |
| 3 | 116.92 | 548.89 | 0.653 6 | 0.170 2 | 0.624 |
| 1 |
张智刚, 康重庆. 碳中和目标下构建新型电力系统的挑战与展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42 (8): 2806- 2818.
|
|
ZHANG Zhigang, KANG Chongqing. Challenges and prospects for constructing the new-type power system towards a carbon neutrality future[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42 (8): 2806- 2818.
|
|
| 2 | 韩肖清, 李廷钧, 张东霞, 等. 双碳目标下的新型电力系统规划新问题及关键技术[J]. 高电压技术, 2021, 47 (9): 3036- 3046. |
| HAN Xiaoqing, LI Tingjun, ZHANG Dongxia, et al. New issues and key technologies of new power system planning under double carbon goals[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2021, 47 (9): 3036- 3046. | |
| 3 |
张运洲, 张宁, 代红才, 等. 中国电力系统低碳发展分析模型构建与转型路径比较[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54 (3): 1- 11.
|
|
ZHANG Yunzhou, ZHANG Ning, DAI Hongcai, et al. Model construction and pathways of low-carbon transition of China's power system[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54 (3): 1- 11.
|
|
| 4 | 卓振宇, 张宁, 谢小荣, 等. 高比例可再生能源电力系统关键技术及发展挑战[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45 (9): 171- 191. |
| ZHUO Zhenyu, ZHANG Ning, XIE Xiaorong, et al. Key technologies and developing challenges of power system with high proportion of renewable energy[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45 (9): 171- 191. | |
| 5 |
肖先勇, 郑子萱. “双碳”目标下新能源为主体的新型电力系统: 贡献、关键技术与挑战[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2022, 54 (1): 47- 59.
|
|
XIAO Xianyong, ZHENG Zixuan. New power systems dominated by renewable energy towards the goal of emission peak & carbon neutrality: contribution, key techniques, and challenges[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2022, 54 (1): 47- 59.
|
|
| 6 | 康重庆, 杜尔顺, 李姚旺, 等. 新型电力系统的“碳视角”: 科学问题与研究框架[J]. 电网技术, 2022, 46 (3): 821- 833. |
| KANG Chongqing, DU Ershun, LI Yaowang, et al. Key scientific problems and research framework for carbon perspective research of new power systems[J]. Power System Technology, 2022, 46 (3): 821- 833. | |
| 7 |
徐潇源, 王晗, 严正, 等. 能源转型背景下电力系统不确定性及应对方法综述[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45 (16): 1- 13.
|
|
XU Xiaoyuan, WANG Han, YAN Zheng, et al. Overview of power system uncertainty and its solutions under energy transition[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45 (16): 1- 13.
|
|
| 8 |
邹宇航, 曾艾东, 郝思鹏, 等. 阶梯式碳交易机制下综合能源系统多时间尺度优化调度[J]. 电网技术, 2023, 47 (6): 2185- 2198.
|
|
ZOU Yuhang, ZENG Aidong, HAO Sipeng, et al. Multi-time-scale optimal dispatch of integrated energy systems under stepped carbon trading mechanism[J]. Power System Technology, 2023, 47 (6): 2185- 2198.
|
|
| 9 |
刘睿捷, 包哲静, 林振智. 考虑双层奖惩型碳交易机制的源网荷分布协同低碳经济调度[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2024, 48 (9): 11- 20.
|
|
LIU Ruijie, BAO Zhejing, LIN Zhenzhi. Distributed collaborative low-carbon economic dispatching of source, grid and load considering dual-layer carbon trading mechanism with reward and punishment[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2024, 48 (9): 11- 20.
|
|
| 10 |
陈俊先, 贾燕冰, 韩肖清, 等. 考虑需求侧碳交易机制的多微能网分布式协同优化调度[J]. 电网技术, 2023, 47 (6): 2196- 2206.
|
|
CHEN Junxian, JIA Yanbing, HAN Xiaoqing, et al. Distributed coordinated optimal scheduling of multi-micro integrated energy systems considering demand-side carbon trading mechanism[J]. Power System Technology, 2023, 47 (6): 2196- 2206.
|
|
| 11 |
伏绍鑫, 张路, 唐翰峰, 等. 考虑柔性电热负荷的区域综合能源系统低碳经济调度[J]. 电力科技与环保, 2023, 39 (5): 417- 428.
|
|
FU Shaoxin, ZHANG Lu, TANG Hanfeng, et al. Low-carbon economic dispatch of community integrated energy system considering flexible electric heating load[J]. Electric Power Technology and Environmental Protection, 2023, 39 (5): 417- 428.
|
|
| 12 |
崔杨, 沈卓, 王铮, 等. 考虑绿证–碳排等价交互机制的区域综合能源系统绿色调度[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43 (12): 4508- 4517.
|
|
CUI Yang, SHEN Zhuo, WANG Zheng, et al. Green dispatch of regional integrated energy system considering green certificate-carbon emission equivalent interaction mechanism[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43 (12): 4508- 4517.
|
|
| 13 | 王婷, 张晶, 高冲, 等. 绿证-碳市场互认抵消下综合能源系统优化调度[J]. 智慧电力, 2025, 53 (2): 104- 110, 118. |
| WANG Ting, ZHANG Jing, GAO Chong, et al. Optimal scheduling of integrated energy system under mutual recognition and offset of green certificate and carbon market[J]. Smart Power, 2025, 53 (2): 104- 110, 118. | |
| 14 | 陈兴龙, 曹喜民, 陈洁, 等. 绿证-碳交易机制下热电灵活响应的园区综合能源系统优化调度[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57 (6): 110- 120. |
| CHEN Xinglong, CAO Ximin, CHEN Jie, et al. Optimized dispatch of park integrated energy system with thermoelectric flexible response under green certificate-carbon trading mechanism[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57 (6): 110- 120. | |
| 15 | 陈浩, 马刚, 钱达, 等. 绿证-碳交易机制下考虑阶梯需求响应的区域综合能源系统优化调度[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2025, 47 (5): 21- 30. |
| CHEN Hao, MA Gang, QIAN Da, et al. Optimization of regional integrated energy systems under green certificate and carbon trading mechanism considering tiered demand response[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2025, 47 (5): 21- 30. | |
| 16 | 周天睿, 康重庆, 徐乾耀, 等. 电力系统碳排放流分析理论初探[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2012, 36 (7): 38- 43, 85. |
| ZHOU Tianrui, KANG (Chong| Zhong)(Qing), XU Qianyao, et al. Preliminary theoretical investigation on power system carbon emission flow[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2012, 36 (7): 38- 43, 85. | |
| 17 |
李姚旺, 张宁, 杜尔顺, 等. 基于碳排放流的电力系统低碳需求响应机制研究及效益分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42 (8): 2830- 2841.
|
|
LI Yaowang, ZHANG Ning, DU Ershun, et al. Mechanism study and benefit analysis on power system low carbon demand response based on carbon emission flow[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42 (8): 2830- 2841.
|
|
| 18 |
张玉敏, 孙鹏凯, 孟祥剑, 等. 基于碳势-能源价格双响应的综合能源系统低碳经济调度[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2024, 48 (9): 21- 33.
|
|
ZHANG Yumin, SUN Pengkai, MENG Xiangjian, et al. Low-carbon economic dispatching of integrated energy system based on dual response of carbon intensity and energy price[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2024, 48 (9): 21- 33.
|
|
| 19 | 孙国强, 刘玥池, 韩海腾, 等. 基于碳势-负荷数据双向反馈机制的配电网调度策略[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2024, 44 (12): 231- 238. |
| SUN Guoqiang, LIU Yuechi, HAN Haiteng, et al. Dispatch strategy for distribution network based on carbon intensity-load data bi-directional feedback mechanism[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2024, 44 (12): 231- 238. | |
| 20 |
孙志媛, 孙艳, 刘默斯, 等. 考虑碳流需求响应的电力系统低碳运行策略[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56 (11): 95- 103.
|
|
SUN Zhiyuan, SUN Yan, LIU Mosi, et al. Low-carbon operation strategy of power system considering carbon flow demand response[J]. Electric Power, 2023, 56 (11): 95- 103.
|
|
| 21 | 赵书琪, 徐建军, 腾新亮, 等. 基于碳排放流理论的配电网低碳经济调度模型[J]. 浙江电力, 2024, 43 (12): 122- 132. |
| ZHAO Shuqi, XU Jianjun, TENG Xinliang, et al. A low-carbon and economically efficient dispatch model for distribution networks based on carbon emission flow theory[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2024, 43 (12): 122- 132. | |
| 22 |
葛晓琳, 余捷, 符杨, 等. 考虑源荷互动的电力系统随机碳流优化[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2024, 44 (24): 9571- 9582.
|
|
GE Xiaolin, YU Jie, FU Yang, et al. Stochastic carbon flow optimization of power system considering source-load interaction[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2024, 44 (24): 9571- 9582.
|
|
| 23 |
马铭辰, 李姚旺, 杜尔顺, 等. 多时段边际碳排放因子及其不确定性分析[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2025, 49 (18): 14- 24.
|
|
MA Mingchen, LI Yaowang, DU Ershun, et al. Marginal carbon emission factors in multiple time periods and analysis of their uncertainties[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2025, 49 (18): 14- 24.
|
|
| 24 |
廖扬, 蔡帜, 邵佳扬, 等. 多区互联综合能源系统分散协调低碳经济调度[J]. 高电压技术, 2023, 49 (1): 138- 146.
|
|
LIAO Yang, CAI Zhi, SHAO Jiayang, et al. Decentralized coordinated low-carbon economic dispatch method for multi-regional interconnected integrated energy system[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2023, 49 (1): 138- 146.
|
|
| 25 |
魏震波, 魏平桉, 郭毅, 等. 考虑跨区能流交互计划的多区域电-气综合能源系统分散调度方法[J]. 电力建设, 2020, 41 (12): 66- 79.
|
|
WEI Zhenbo, WEI Ping'an, GUO Yi, et al. Distributed dispatch method for multi-region electricity-gas integrated energy systems considering cross-region energy flow interaction plan[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2020, 41 (12): 66- 79.
|
|
| 26 |
马成元, 陈皓勇, 肖东亮. 考虑碳约束的新型电力系统跨区域优化调度研究[J]. 智慧电力, 2024, 52 (6): 38- 45.
|
|
MA Chengyuan, CHEN Haoyong, XIAO Dongliang. Cross-region optimal dispatch of new power system considering carbon constraints[J]. Smart Power, 2024, 52 (6): 38- 45.
|
|
| 27 | 马腾飞, 裴玮, 肖浩, 等. 基于纳什谈判理论的风–光–氢多主体能源系统合作运行方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41 (1): 25- 39, 395. |
| MA Tengfei, PEI Wei, XIAO Hao, et al. Cooperative operation method for wind-solar-hydrogen multi-agent energy system based on Nash bargaining theory[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41 (1): 25- 39, 395. | |
| 28 | 杨明, 李明冰, 张玉敏, 等. 基于纳什议价模型的园区综合能源系统低碳优化调度[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2025, 49 (19): 39- 48. |
| YANG Ming, LI Mingbing, ZHANG Yumin, et al. Low-carbon optimal dispatch of park-level integrated energy system based on Nash bargaining model[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2025, 49 (19): 39- 48. | |
| 29 | 吴锦领, 楼平, 管敏渊, 等. 基于非对称纳什谈判的多微网电能共享运行优化策略[J]. 电网技术, 2022, 46 (7): 2711- 2723. |
| WU Jinling, LOU Ping, GUAN Minyuan, et al. Operation optimization strategy of multi-microgrids energy sharing based on asymmetric Nash bargaining[J]. Power System Technology, 2022, 46 (7): 2711- 2723. | |
| 30 | 周天睿, 康重庆, 徐乾耀, 等. 电力系统碳排放流的计算方法初探[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2012, 36 (11): 44- 49. |
| ZHOU Tianrui, KANG Chongqing, XU Qianyao, et al. Preliminary investigation on a method for carbon emission flow calculation of power system[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2012, 36 (11): 44- 49. |
| [1] | 皇甫霄文, 李科, 许长清, 蒋小亮, 于昊正, 王汝靖. 计及多微网灵活性的端对端分散式交易策略[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(9): 194-204, 218. |
| [2] | 王辉, 夏玉琦, 李欣, 董宇成, 周子澜. 基于多主体三层博弈的区域综合能源系统低碳运行策略[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(8): 69-83. |
| [3] | 赵军, 张敏, 张世锋, 杨琦. 计及碳交易和新能源不确定性的多微电网合作运行优化策略[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(5): 62-71. |
| [4] | 陈家兴, 王春玲, 刘春明. 基于改进碳排放流理论的电力系统动态低碳调度方法[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(3): 162-172. |
| [5] | 尚博阳, 许寅, 王颖, 张景平. 参与辅助服务的用户侧储能优化配置及经济分析[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(2): 164-170,178. |
| [6] | 孙伟伟, 寇潇文, 周光, 李满礼. 区分工作日和非工作日负荷的用户侧储能多目标优化策略[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(6): 194-201. |
| [7] | 林振锋, 郑常宝, 芮涛, 胡存刚. 用户侧分布式储能鲁棒博弈优化调度方法[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(2): 35-43,114. |
| [8] | 张燕, 乔松博, 徐奇锋, 俞静. 基于纳什议价理论的分布式绿色电力交易优化分析[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(12): 168-178. |
| [9] | 林日晖, 陈友立. 基于深度Q学习的含用户侧储能微电网频率-电压数字化智能控制策略[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(12): 43-50. |
| [10] | 吴鸣, 寇凌峰, 张进, 胡存刚. 多运营主体微电网日前经济优化调度纳什议价方法[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(11): 19-27,117. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||


AI小编