基于CEMS数据的超低排放燃煤机组大气污染物排放特性分析

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202203075

中国电力 ›› 2023, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (2): 171-178.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202203075

• 节能与环保 • 上一篇

基于CEMS数据的超低排放燃煤机组大气污染物排放特性分析

曲立涛, 齐晓辉, 王德鑫, 于洪海

华电电力科学研究院有限公司，辽宁沈阳　110000

收稿日期:2022-03-08 修回日期:2022-12-20 发布日期:2023-02-23
作者简介:曲立涛（1982—），男，硕士，高级工程师，从事发电企业环境保护技术研究， E-mail：litao-qu@chder.com
基金资助:
华电集团有限公司2021年科技项目（基于大数据分析的北方地区燃煤机组深度调峰策略研究，CHDKJ21-02-179）

Analysis of Air Pollutant Emission Characteristics of Ultra-low Emission Coal-Fired Units Based on CEMS Data

QU Litao, QI Xiaohui, WANG Dexin, YU Honghai

Huadian Power Science Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shenyang 110000, China

Received:2022-03-08 Revised:2022-12-20 Published:2023-02-23
Supported by:
This work is supported by 2021 Science and Technology Project of Huadian Group Co., Ltd. (Research on Deep Peak Shaving Strategy of Coal Fired Units in Northern China Based on Big Data Analysis, No.CHDKJ21-02-179).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以54台超低排放燃煤机组为研究对象，对比分析了主要大气污染物（颗粒物、SO₂、NO_x）的年排放达标率、年排放浓度、排放性能等排放特征。在对环保设施投运和故障进行调查的基础上，分析了排放超标和故障的原因。结果显示：参与调查的燃煤机组中颗粒物、SO₂、NO_x排放年度达标率分别为99.981%、99.962%、99.893%，表明能够稳定实现超低排放；颗粒物、SO₂、NO_x排放绩效均值分别为11.11、68.16、140.26 mg/(kW·h)，满足且优于国家标准要求；启停时段颗粒物、SO₂、NO_x排放超标时长占比分别为54%、64%、57%，说明机组启停过程中颗粒物、SO₂、NO_x排放浓度难以控制，消除启停机期间制约环保设施正常投运的影响因素是后续主要研究方向。

关键词: 超低排放, 大气污染物, 排放浓度, 排放绩效

Abstract: Taking 54 ultra-low emission coal-fired units as the research object, the annual emission compliance rate, annual emission concentration, emission performance and other emission characteristics of major air pollutants (particulate matter, SO₂, NO_x) were compared and analyzed. The causes of excessive emissions and failures were analyzed on the basis of the survey of the commissioning and failures of environmental protection facilities. As shown by the results, the annual up-to-standard emission rates of particulate matter, SO₂, and NO_x in the coal-fired units participating in the survey were 99.981%, 99.962%, and 99.893%; The average emission performance of particulate matter, SO₂, and NO_x were 11.11, 68.16, and 140.26 mg/(kW·h), respectively, which meet and exceed the requirements of national standards; The proportions of the emission of particulate matter, SO₂, and NO_x exceeding the standard during the start-stop period were 54%, 64%, and 57%, respectively, indicating that the emission concentrations of particulate matter, SO₂, and NO_x during the start-stop process of the units were difficult to control. Therefore, eliminating the influencing factors that restrict the normal operation of environmental protection facilities during start-stop period is the research direction of subsequent technical public relations.

Key words: ultra low emission, atmospheric pollutant, emission concentration, emission performance

曲立涛, 齐晓辉, 王德鑫, 于洪海. 基于CEMS数据的超低排放燃煤机组大气污染物排放特性分析[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(2): 171-178.

QU Litao, QI Xiaohui, WANG Dexin, YU Honghai. Analysis of Air Pollutant Emission Characteristics of Ultra-low Emission Coal-Fired Units Based on CEMS Data[J]. Electric Power, 2023, 56(2): 171-178.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202203075

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2023/V56/I2/171

参考文献

[1] 郦建国, 朱法华, 孙雪丽. 中国火电大气污染防治现状及挑战[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(6): 2–10
LI Jianguo, ZHU Fahua, SUN Xueli. Current status and challenges of atmospheric pollution prevention and control of thermal power plants in China[J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(6): 2–10
[2] 刘艳梅, 闫静, 徐文帅, 等. 超低排放改造后燃煤电厂常规大气污染物排放特征[J]. 环境科学学报, 2020, 40(6): 1967–1975
LIU Yanmei, YAN Jing, XU Wenshuai, et al. Emission characteristics of conventional air pollutants in coal-fired power plants after ultra-low emission transformation[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2020, 40(6): 1967–1975
[3] 张金亭, 赵玉丹, 田扬戈, 等. 大气污染物排放量与颗粒物环境空气质量的空间非协同耦合研究: 以武汉市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(4): 612–624
ZHANG Jinting, ZHAO Yudan, TIAN Yangge, et al. Spatial non-coupling of air pollutant emissions and particulate matter-related air quality: a case study in Wuhan City, China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(4): 612–624
[4] 张菊, 苗鸿, 欧阳志云, 等. 近20年北京市城近郊区环境空气质量变化及其影响因素分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2006, 26(11): 1886–1892
ZHANG Ju, MIAO Hong, OUYANG Zhiyun, et al. Ambient air quality trends and driving factor analysis since 1980’s in Beijing[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2006, 26(11): 1886–1892
[5] 国家能源局. 关于印发《煤电节能减排升级与改造行动计划(2014-2020年)》的通知[EB/OL]. (2014-09-12) [2021-10-28]. http://zfxxgk.nea.gov.cn/auto84/201409/ t20140919_1840.htm.
[6] 曲立涛, 于洪海, 李超, 等. 超低排放煤电机组主要大气污染物排放分析[J]. 热力发电, 2022, 51(1): 196–202
QU Litao, YU Honghai, LI Chao, et al. Emission analysis of main air pollutants from ultra-low emission coal-fired power units[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2022, 51(1): 196–202
[7] 全面实施燃煤电厂超低排放和节能改造工作方案[J]. 节能与环保, 2016(1): 32.
[8] 朱法华. 《火电厂污染防治可行技术指南》(HJ 2301—2017)解读[J]. 环境影响评价, 2018, 40(2): 1–4, 16
ZHU Fahua. Interpretation of guideline on available technologies of pollution prevention and control for thermal power plants[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment, 2018, 40(2): 1–4, 16
[9] 中国电力企业联合会. 中国电力行业年度发展报告: 2020[M]. 北京: 中国建材工业出版社, 2020.
[10] 朱法华, 许月阳, 孙尊强, 等. 中国燃煤电厂超低排放和节能改造的实践与启示[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(4): 1–8
ZHU Fahua, XU Yueyang, SUN Zunqiang, et al. Practice and enlightenment of ultra-low emission and energy-saving retrofit of coal-fired power plants in China[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(4): 1–8
[11] 高星, 刘潇, 武新斌, 等. 燃煤电厂典型超低排放除尘技术组合下的尘排放特性[J]. 环境工程学报, 2020, 14(1): 181–188
GAO Xing, LIU Xiao, WU Xinbin, et al. Dust emission characteristics of typical dust ultra-low emission technology configurations in coal-fired plants[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2020, 14(1): 181–188
[12] 李洋, 罗林, 吴建群, 等. 1000 MW燃煤机组负荷变化对颗粒物排放特性影响[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2021, 27(6): 115–120
LI Yang, LUO Lin, WU Jianqun, et al. Effect of load change of an 1000 MW coal-fired unit on particulate matter emission[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2021, 27(6): 115–120
[13] 洪屹磐. pH调控强化湿法烟气SO₂脱除研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2020.
HONG Yipan. Study on wet flue gas desulfurization based on pH control technology [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2020.
[14] 牛拥军, 宦宣州, 李兴华. 燃煤电厂烟气脱硫系统运行优化与经济性分析[J]. 热力发电, 2018, 47(12): 22–28
NIU Yongjun, HUAN Xuanzhou, LI Xinghua. Operation optimization and economic analysis for WFGD system of coal-fired power plants[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2018, 47(12): 22–28
[15] 冯前伟, 张杨, 王丰吉, 等. 燃煤机组SCR脱硝超低排放改造前后性能对比分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40(20): 6644–6653
FENG Qianwei, ZHANG Yang, WANG Fengji, et al. Performance comparison and analysis before and after SCR ultra-low emission transformation of coal-fired units[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020, 40(20): 6644–6653
[16] 赵虹, 何梦漪, 杨建国, 等. SCR脱硝的硫酸铵生成机理及其定量计算模型[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40(10): 3214–3221
ZHAO Hong, HE Mengyi, YANG Jianguo, et al. Formation mechanism and quantification model of ammonium sulfate in SCR denitrification system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020, 40(10): 3214–3221
[17] 姚燕, 马云龙, 杨晓宁, 等. 高砷煤SCR脱硝催化剂中毒失活研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(6): 191–196
YAO Yan, MA Yunlong, YANG Xiaoning, et al. Deactivation of honeycomb SCR catalysts in high-arsenic coal-fired power plant[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(6): 191–196
[18] 陈东景. 我国主要污染物排放强度的区域差异分析[J]. 生态环境, 2008, 17(1): 133–137
CHEN Dongjing. Analysis on the regional differences in main pollutants emission intensity in China[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2008, 17(1): 133–137
[19] 沈海萍, 刘寒梅, 范海燕, 等. 基于总量控制的火电行业主要污染物排放绩效标准研究[J]. 能源工程, 2018(6): 44–50
SHEN Haiping, LIU Hanmei, FAN Haiyan, et al. Research on generating performance standard of thermal power industry based on total amount control[J]. Energy Engineering, 2018(6): 44–50

基于CEMS数据的超低排放燃煤机组大气污染物排放特性分析

Analysis of Air Pollutant Emission Characteristics of Ultra-low Emission Coal-Fired Units Based on CEMS Data

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘含笑, 吴黎明, 赵琳, 于立元, 郦建国, 崔盈. 燃煤电厂湿式电除尘器减排及能效特性研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 196-203.
[2]	张志勇, 莫华, 王猛, 帅伟. 600 MW燃煤机组烟气污染物控制研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 204-210.
[3]	王彦哲, 周胜, 姚子麟, 欧训民. 中国煤电生命周期二氧化碳和大气污染物排放相互影响建模分析[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(8): 128-135.
[4]	朱法华, 许月阳, 孙尊强, 孙雪丽, 王圣. 中国燃煤电厂超低排放和节能改造的实践与启示[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(4): 1-8.
[5]	惠立锋. 燃煤电厂超低排放PM₁₀/PM_2.5实验室采样对比分析[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 190-196.
[6]	刘志坦, 舒喜, 杨爱勇, 李玉刚. 固定式燃气轮机大气污染物排放标准限值的选择[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(8): 117-124.
[7]	吴家玉, 朱杰, 莫华, 张峰, 帅伟, 张晴, 那钦. 典型燃煤电厂浆液冷却烟气消白设施SO₃治理效果测试研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(8): 145-150,172.
[8]	马学礼, 孙希进, 苏燊燊, 张仁锋, 党立晨, 黄显昌, 谢永平. 基于超低排放的燃煤电厂烟囱高度优化研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(5): 179-184.
[9]	徐静馨, 朱法华, 王圣, 张明, 赵秀勇, 孙雪丽, 胡耘, 田文鑫. 超低排放燃煤电厂和燃气电厂综合对比[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(2): 164-172,179.
[10]	刘晓敏, 王乐乐, 黄见勋, 黄荣廷, 许积庄, 孔凡海, 谢建南, 李津津, 杨林军, 张发捷, 何川. 低低温除尘器和海水脱硫可凝结颗粒物有机组分排放特征研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(12): 263-269.
[11]	许剑, 罗志, 周鑫, 李文杰, 黄少波, 常磊, 王晓冰, 牛国平, 张广才. W火焰锅炉SCR分区混合动态调平技术及应用[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(11): 234-242.
[12]	王宏亮, 许月阳, 薛建明, 刘涛, 管一明. 燃煤发电机组超低排放改造前后汞排放规律对比研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(11): 243-251.
[13]	方朝君, 冯炳全, 庞毅, 胡波, 赵伟. 燃煤锅炉掺烧干、湿污泥系统的设计思路[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(10): 224-230.
[14]	赵秀勇, 朱法华, 王圣, 孙雪丽, 徐静馨. 江苏省火电超低排放对环境空气中PM_2.5质量浓度影响模拟研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(9): 167-172.
[15]	曲立涛, 李超, 王德鑫, 于洪海, 杜佳, 齐晓辉. SCR脱硝超低排放NO_x均匀性优化及安全策略分析[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 161-167.

模态框（Modal）标题

基于CEMS数据的超低排放燃煤机组大气污染物排放特性分析

Analysis of Air Pollutant Emission Characteristics of Ultra-low Emission Coal-Fired Units Based on CEMS Data

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics