中国电力 ›› 2023, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (11): 121-127.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202306047
韩伟1(), 段文岩1, 杜兴伟2, 姚峰2, 马伟东1, 刘磊1
收稿日期:
2023-06-14
出版日期:
2023-11-28
发布日期:
2023-11-28
作者简介:
韩伟(1975—),男,高级工程师(教授级),从事电力系统继电保护与控制技术研究,E-mail: hanwei1975103@163.com
基金资助:
Wei HAN1(), Wenyan DUAN1, Xingwei DU2, Feng YAO2, Weidong MA1, Lei LIU1
Received:
2023-06-14
Online:
2023-11-28
Published:
2023-11-28
Supported by:
摘要:
数字孪生技术旨在打破虚实界墙,通过虚-实信息链接实现物理实体与虚拟空间的有机融合,模拟出物理实体的实时状态。安全稳定控制系统(简称安控系统)作为保证电网安全稳定运行的第二道防线,一旦发生故障将会给电网的运行造成严重危害。为此,提出一种基于数字孪生的在运安控系统故障诊断方法。首先,通过分析安控系统的一般运行策略和可能存在的故障环节,提出安控系统的数字孪生体系;其次,建立基于海洋捕食者算法优化支持向量机的安控系统故障诊断模型;最后,利用安控系统的运行数据构建样本数据集,验证了所提方法的有效性和正确性。
韩伟, 段文岩, 杜兴伟, 姚峰, 马伟东, 刘磊. 基于数字孪生的在运安控系统故障诊断方法[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(11): 121-127.
Wei HAN, Wenyan DUAN, Xingwei DU, Feng YAO, Weidong MA, Lei LIU. Fault Diagnosis Method for Operational Security Control System Based on Digital Twins[J]. Electric Power, 2023, 56(11): 121-127.
故障类型 | 类型标签 | 训练样本数 | 测试样本数 | |||
正常 | 1 | 32 | 10 | |||
控制策略不匹配 | 2 | 46 | 15 | |||
通信异常 | 3 | 36 | 10 | |||
采样异常 | 4 | 33 | 10 | |||
定值越限 | 5 | 36 | 12 |
表 1 训练及测试样本分布
Table 1 Distribution of training and test samples
故障类型 | 类型标签 | 训练样本数 | 测试样本数 | |||
正常 | 1 | 32 | 10 | |||
控制策略不匹配 | 2 | 46 | 15 | |||
通信异常 | 3 | 36 | 10 | |||
采样异常 | 4 | 33 | 10 | |||
定值越限 | 5 | 36 | 12 |
样本号 | 逻辑值 | 误码率/10–8 | 方差/% | 安全裕度 | 故障类型 | |||||
1 | 0 | 0.173 | 3.23 | 1.012 | 1 | |||||
2 | 0 | 0.325 | 1.52 | 1.006 | 1 | |||||
3 | 1 | 0.216 | 2.18 | 0.992 | 2 | |||||
4 | 1 | 0.154 | 1.75 | 1.027 | 2 | |||||
5 | 0 | 1.523 | 2.61 | 1.135 | 3 | |||||
6 | 0 | 0.245 | 6.94 | 1.037 | 4 | |||||
7 | 0 | 0.312 | 3.17 | 1.722 | 5 |
表 2 样本数据
Table 2 Sample data
样本号 | 逻辑值 | 误码率/10–8 | 方差/% | 安全裕度 | 故障类型 | |||||
1 | 0 | 0.173 | 3.23 | 1.012 | 1 | |||||
2 | 0 | 0.325 | 1.52 | 1.006 | 1 | |||||
3 | 1 | 0.216 | 2.18 | 0.992 | 2 | |||||
4 | 1 | 0.154 | 1.75 | 1.027 | 2 | |||||
5 | 0 | 1.523 | 2.61 | 1.135 | 3 | |||||
6 | 0 | 0.245 | 6.94 | 1.037 | 4 | |||||
7 | 0 | 0.312 | 3.17 | 1.722 | 5 |
故障诊断模型 | 准确率/% | |||||||||||
类型1 | 类型2 | 类型3 | 类型4 | 类型5 | 综合 | |||||||
PSO-SVM | 100 | 100 | 100 | 90 | 88.33 | 94.74 | ||||||
ABC-SVM | 100 | 100 | 100 | 90 | 75.00 | 92.98 | ||||||
SSA-SVM | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 88.33 | 96.49 | ||||||
MPA-SVM | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 91.67 | 98.24 |
表 3 不同模型的分类准确率
Table 3 Classification accuracy of different models
故障诊断模型 | 准确率/% | |||||||||||
类型1 | 类型2 | 类型3 | 类型4 | 类型5 | 综合 | |||||||
PSO-SVM | 100 | 100 | 100 | 90 | 88.33 | 94.74 | ||||||
ABC-SVM | 100 | 100 | 100 | 90 | 75.00 | 92.98 | ||||||
SSA-SVM | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 88.33 | 96.49 | ||||||
MPA-SVM | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 91.67 | 98.24 |
1 | 赖业宁, 封科, 于同伟, 等. 基于DHT和区块链技术的电网安全稳定控制终端分布式认证[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55 (4): 44- 53. |
LAI Yening, FENG Ke, YU Tongwei, et al. Distributed authentication of power grid safety and stability control terminals based on DHT and blockchain[J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55 (4): 44- 53. | |
2 | 朱涛, 谢一工, 钟少军, 等. 模糊层次分析法在电网操作方案选择过程中的应用[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55 (8): 121- 128. |
ZHU Tao, XIE Yigong, ZHONG Shaojun, et al. Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in selection of power grid operation schemes[J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55 (8): 121- 128. | |
3 | 赵丽莉, 李雪明, 倪明, 等. 继电保护与安全稳定控制系统隐性故障研究综述及展望[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2014, 38 (22): 128- 135. |
ZHAO Lili, LI Xueming, NI Ming, et al. Review and prospect of research on hidden failures of protection system and security and stability control system[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2014, 38 (22): 128- 135. | |
4 | 罗剑波, 董希建, 崔晓丹, 等. 关于大型安全稳定控制系统可靠性研究的探讨[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2018, 46 (8): 65- 72. |
LUO Jianbo, DONG Xijian, CUI Xiaodan, et al. Discussion on reliability of large scale security and stability control system[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2018, 46 (8): 65- 72. | |
5 | 李兴建, 夏彦辉, 陈松林, 等. 分布式稳定控制仿真测试系统的研制及应用[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2014, 34 (5): 163- 168. |
LI Xingjian, XIA Yanhui, CHEN Songlin, et al. Development and application of distributed simulation & test system for stability control system[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2014, 34 (5): 163- 168. | |
6 | ZHOU M K, YAN J F, FENG D H. Digital twin framework and its application to power grid online analysis[J]. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 2019, 5 (3): 391- 398. |
7 |
SONG X Y, JIANG T, SCHLEGEL S, et al. Parameter tuning for dynamic digital twins in inverter-dominated distribution grid[J]. IET Renewable Power Generation, 2020, 14 (5): 811- 821.
DOI |
8 |
TAO F, ZHANG H, LIU A, et al. Digital twin in industry: state-of-the-art[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2019, 15 (4): 2405- 2415.
DOI |
9 |
JAIN P, POON J, SINGH J P, et al. A digital twin approach for fault diagnosis in distributed photovoltaic systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2020, 35 (1): 940- 956.
DOI |
10 |
QI Q L, TAO F. Digital twin and big data towards smart manufacturing and industry 4.0: 360 degree comparison[J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6, 3585- 3593.
DOI |
11 | 贺兴, 艾芊, 朱天怡, 等. 数字孪生在电力系统应用中的机遇和挑战[J]. 电网技术, 2020, 44 (6): 2009- 2019. |
HE Xing, AI Qian, ZHU Tianyi, et al. Opportunities and challenges of the digital twin in power system applications[J]. Power System Technology, 2020, 44 (6): 2009- 2019. | |
12 | 刘皓璐, 邵建伟, 王雪, 等. 基于数字孪生的配电自动化终端设备状态评价与故障预判[J]. 电网技术, 2022, 46 (4): 1605- 1613. |
LIU Haolu, SHAO Jianwei, WANG Xue, et al. State evaluation and fault prediction of distribution automation terminal equipment based on digital twins[J]. Power System Technology, 2022, 46 (4): 1605- 1613. | |
13 | 孙荣富, 王隆扬, 王玉林, 等. 基于数字孪生的光伏发电功率超短期预测[J]. 电网技术, 2021, 45 (4): 1258- 1264. |
SUN Rongfu, WANG Longyang, WANG Yulin, et al. Ultra-short-term prediction of photovoltaic power generation based on digital twins[J]. Power System Technology, 2021, 45 (4): 1258- 1264. | |
14 | 李猛, 聂铭, 和敬涵, 等. 基于数字孪生的柔性直流电网纵联保护原理[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42 (5): 1773- 1782. |
LI Meng, NIE Ming, HE Jinghan, et al. Pilot protection of flexible DC grid based on digital twin[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42 (5): 1773- 1782. | |
15 | 张立静, 盛戈皞, 侯慧娟, 等. 基于电热特性融合分析的油浸式变压器匝间短路故障辨识方法[J]. 电网技术, 2021, 45 (7): 2473- 2482. |
ZHANG Lijing, SHENG Gehao, HOU Huijuan, et al. Detection method of interturn short-circuit faults in oil-immersed transformers based on fusion analysis of electrothermal characteristic[J]. Power System Technology, 2021, 45 (7): 2473- 2482. | |
16 | 周毅, 周良才, 沈颖平. 基于数字孪生的华东电网安控系统虚拟建模及实现[J]. 电器与能效管理技术, 2021, (6): 47- 51. |
ZHOU Yi, ZHOU Liangcai, SHEN Yingping. Modeling and implementation of East China power grid security and stability control system based on digital twin[J]. Low Voltage Apparatus, 2021, (6): 47- 51. | |
17 | 刘一民, 颜云松, 许高阳, 等. 基于UML活动图的安全稳定控制装置策略代码自动实现方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50 (5): 154- 161. |
LIU Yimin, YAN Yunsong, XU Gaoyang, et al. A method of automatic realization of security and stability control strategy code based on a UML activity diagram[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50 (5): 154- 161. | |
18 | 贺晓, 李怀强, 任龙飞, 等. 稳控切机回路存在的问题及优化措施研究[J]. 智慧电力, 2022, 50 (9): 104- 109. |
HE Xiao, LI Huaiqiang, REN Longfei, et al. Study on the problems existing in the circuit of stable controlled cutting machine and its optimization measures[J]. Smart Power, 2022, 50 (9): 104- 109. | |
19 | 王子凌, 周金辉, 苏毅方, 等. 电网设备试验数据数模统一化自动采集校验系统设计[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50 (11): 130- 138. |
WANG Ziling, ZHOU Jinhui, SU Yifang, et al. Design of an automatic collection and verification system for digital and analog unified test data of power grid equipment[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50 (11): 130- 138. | |
20 | 蒋航, 熊俊, 陈愚, 等. 基于Markov状态空间法的稳控系统隐性故障建模方法[J]. 电工电能新技术, 2023, 42 (2): 39- 47. |
JIANG Hang, XIONG Jun, CHEN Yu, et al. Modeling method for hidden faults of stability control system based on Markov state space method[J]. Advanced Technology of Electrical Engineering and Energy, 2023, 42 (2): 39- 47. | |
21 | 郭琦, 朱益华, 常东旭, 等. 电网安全稳定控制系统远程试验方法及工程应用[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2020, 44 (1): 152- 159. |
GUO Qi, ZHU Yihua, CHANG Dongxu, et al. Remote test method for security and stability control system of power grid and its engineering application[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2020, 44 (1): 152- 159. | |
22 |
FARAMARZI A, HEIDARINEJAD M, MIRJALILI S, et al. Marine predators algorithm: a nature-inspired metaheuristic[J]. Expert Systems With Applications, 2020, 152, 113377.
DOI |
23 |
CHEN X, QI X L, WANG Z Y, et al. Fault diagnosis of rolling bearing using marine predators algorithm-based support vector machine and topology learning and out-of-sample embedding[J]. Measurement, 2021, 176, 109116- 109133.
DOI |
24 |
TUERXUN W, XU C, GUO H Y, et al. Fault diagnosis of wind turbines based on a support vector machine optimized by the sparrow search algorithm[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9, 69307- 69315.
DOI |
25 |
YUAN X F, LIU Z A, MIAO Z M, et al. Fault diagnosis of analog circuits based on IH-PSO optimized support vector machine[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 137945- 137958.
DOI |
[1] | 陈志永, 韩璟琳, 刘洋, 李光毅, 蒋雨, 蔡瑞天. 基于关键帧提取与图像识别的电网设施数字化重建[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(9): 217-223. |
[2] | 何永胜, 罗丹, 鲁宗相. 特高压阀侧套管数字孪生系统集成设计方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(6): 165-173. |
[3] | 郑鹏, 韩鹏程, 王国栋, 娄颖. 中压配电线路断线高阻接地故障精细化诊断方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(4): 220-228. |
[4] | 胡云鹏, 都成刚, 齐军, 郑日红, 阿敏夫, 张浩, 梁永亮. 基于D-S证据理论的配电网接地故障原因综合辨识模型[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(10): 133-142. |
[5] | 刘贺千, 张健, 张海月, 杨洪达, 陈世玉, 申昱博, 王磊. 基于高频阻抗谱的干式空心电抗器匝间短路故障诊断方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(10): 218-224. |
[6] | 刘曌, 孙庆凯, 许泽凯, 吴潇雨, 王小君, 吕金玲. 能源互联网中的数字孪生技术体系、应用与挑战[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(1): 230-243. |
[7] | 黎燕, 程馨, 黄祖梁, 杨琢. 高可靠性三相多功能并网变换器研究[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(5): 172-181. |
[8] | 李刚, 孟坤, 贺帅, 刘云鹏, 杨宁. 考虑特征耦合的Bi-LSTM变压器故障诊断方法[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(3): 100-108,117. |
[9] | 徐一伦, 张彬桥, 黄婧, 谢枭, 王若昕, 沈丹青, 何丽娜, 杨凯帆. 考虑天气类型和相似日的IWPA-LSSVM光伏发电功率预测[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(2): 143-149. |
[10] | 马海飞, 滕伟, 彭迪康, 柳亦兵, 靳涛. 基于DRS与改进Autogram的风电齿轮箱复合故障特征提取[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(10): 71-79. |
[11] | 王爽, 罗倩, 唐波, 姜岚, 李锦. 考虑样本类内不平衡的CHPOA-DBN变压器故障诊断方法[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(10): 133-144. |
[12] | 张宏杰, 陈贵凤, 闫宏伟, 杨晓龙, 侯天仁, 张伟. 基于SMOTE与Bayes优化的LSTM网络变压器故障诊断[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(10): 164-170. |
[13] | 严亚兵, 褚旭, 肖豪龙, 梁文武, 李辉, 夏振兴. 基于改进支持向量机的数字化变电站安全措施生成技术[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(10): 194-201. |
[14] | 陈铁, 冷昊伟, 李咸善, 陈一夫. 基于油中气体分析与类重叠特征的变压器分层故障诊断模型[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(7): 22-32,41. |
[15] | 李天辉, 庞先海, 范辉, 甄利, 顾朝敏, 董驰. 基于IEMD和GA-WNN的断路器分合闸线圈故障诊断方法[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 111-121. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||