TEV与HFCT法测量开关柜局部放电的特性对比

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202108103

中国电力 ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (3): 37-47.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202108103

TEV与HFCT法测量开关柜局部放电的特性对比

谢荣斌¹, 杨超¹, 申强¹, 李诗勇¹, 罗勇¹, 于泊宁²

1. 贵州电网有限责任公司贵阳供电局, 贵州贵阳 550004;
2. 西安交通大学电气工程学院, 陕西西安 710049

收稿日期:2021-08-26 修回日期:2021-09-21 出版日期:2022-03-28 发布日期:2022-03-29
作者简介:谢荣斌(1970—)，男，通信作者，高级工程师，从事高电压技术方向研究，E-mail：xrb123@sina.com
基金资助:
中国南方电网有限责任公司科技项目（面向智能配电网的分布式状态感知应用技术研究，GZKJXM20190127）。

Comparative Study on the Switchgear Partial Discharge Characteristics Based on Transient Earth Voltage and Pulse Current Detection Methods

XIE Rongbin¹, YANG Chao¹, SHEN Qiang¹, LI Shiyong¹, LUO Yong¹, YU Boning²

1. Guiyang Power Supply Bureau of Guizhou Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550004, China;
2. School of Electrical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China

Received:2021-08-26 Revised:2021-09-21 Online:2022-03-28 Published:2022-03-29
Supported by:
This work is supported by China Southern Power Grid Company Limited (Research on Distributed State Awareness Application Technology Oriented to Intelligent Power Distribution Network, No.GZKJXM20190127).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探究了暂态对地电压（transient earth voltage, TEV）法对于开关柜局部放电现象的检测性能，并与脉冲电流检测的效果进行了对比。研究了二者对于不同类型局部放电的检出能力；分析了2种方法测量下4种局部放电PRPD（phase resolved partial discharge）图谱的相似性与差异；通过统计特征参数计算研究了2种检测方法的测量结果随外施电压变化而变化的趋势。结果表明，与传统的高频脉冲电流检测法（high-frequency current transformer，HFCT）相比，暂态对地电压法对于开关柜局部放电的测量信噪比较低，检测效果稍逊，但更适用于微弱尖端放电。从PRPD图谱上来看，2种方法在不同类型局部放电的脉冲幅值特征与相位区间上具有很强的一致性，但在脉冲集中度等方面存在一定区别。随外施电压变化，TEV与HFCT得到的偏斜度、陡峭度变化趋势一致，2种方法均能有效反映局部放电的放电特征。

关键词: 局部放电, 暂态对地电压, 脉冲电流检测, PRPD图谱, 统计特征

Abstract: The transient earth voltage (TEV) method is studied in detection performance for switchgear partial discharge, and compared with the pulse current detection method. In addition, the detection capabilities of the two methods are studied for different types of partial discharge, and the similarities and differences of the PRPD (phase resolved partial discharge) spectra of four partial discharge types measured by two methods are analyzed. The variations of the detection results with the applied voltage are analyzed through calculating the statistical characteristics. The results show that, compared with the conventional high-frequency current transformer (HFCT) method, the TEV method has a lower signal-noise ratio in detecting switchgear partial discharge with a slightly inferior detection performance, but it is more suitable for detecting weak tip discharge; in terms of PRPD spectra, the two methods have strong consistency in pulse amplitude characteristics and phase intervals for different types of partial discharge, but there are some differences in pulse concentration and other aspects. With the change of applied voltage, TEV and HFCT methods have the same variation trend of skewness and steepness, and both methods can effectively reflect the discharge characteristics of partial discharge.

Key words: partial discharge, transient earth voltage, current pulse detection, PRPD spectrum, statistical characteristics

谢荣斌, 杨超, 申强, 李诗勇, 罗勇, 于泊宁. TEV与HFCT法测量开关柜局部放电的特性对比[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(3): 37-47.

XIE Rongbin, YANG Chao, SHEN Qiang, LI Shiyong, LUO Yong, YU Boning. Comparative Study on the Switchgear Partial Discharge Characteristics Based on Transient Earth Voltage and Pulse Current Detection Methods[J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55(3): 37-47.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202108103

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2022/V55/I3/37

参考文献

[1] 李军浩, 韩旭涛, 刘泽辉, 等. 电气设备局部放电检测技术述评[J]. 高电压技术, 2015, 41(8): 2583–2601
LI Junhao, HAN Xutao, LIU Zehui, et al. Review on partial discharge measurement technology of electrical equipment[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2015, 41(8): 2583–2601
[2] FAN W B, GUAN S L, YIN H, et al. PD pattern recognition based on transient earth voltage (TEV) pulse amplitude-frequency of occurrence diagrams for switchgears[C]//2016 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC). Montreal, QC, Canada. IEEE, 2016: 338–341.
[3] 任明, 彭华东, 陈晓清, 等. 采用暂态对地电压法综合检测开关柜局部放电[J]. 高电压技术, 2010, 36(10): 2460–2466
REN Ming, PENG Huadong, CHEN Xiaoqing, et al. Comprehensive detection of partial discharge in switchgear using TEV[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2010, 36(10): 2460–2466
[4] 陈昕. 10 kV开关柜局部放电暂态接地电压测量方法研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2016.
CHEN Xin. Research on partial discharge TEV test method of 10 kV switchgear cabinets[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2016.
[5] 朱涛. 基于地电波的开关柜局放检测校验技术研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2019.
ZHU Tao. Research on detection and verification technology of switchboard based on ground wave[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2019.
[6] 林俊浩. 开关柜局放的超声波及地电波检测技术研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2012.
LIN Junhao. The detection technology of switchgear partial discharge base on ultrasonic and transient earth voltage[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2012.
[7] 于泊宁, 任明, 张志斌, 等. 配电设备分布式局部放电感知技术的实现方法[J]. 高电压技术, 2020, 46(6): 1929–1938
YU Boning, REN Ming, ZHANG Zhibin, et al. Implementation method of distributed partial discharge sensing technology for power distribution equipment[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2020, 46(6): 1929–1938
[8] 赵常威, 丁国成, 杨为, 等. 基于开关柜缺陷模型的局放检测方法对比研究[J]. 高压电器, 2019, 55(3): 220–225
ZHAO Changwei, DING Guocheng, YANG Wei, et al. Comparative study of partial discharge detection methods based on switch cabinet defect models[J]. High Voltage Electrical Apparatus, 2019, 55(3): 220–225
[9] 夏睿, 谭笑, 陈杰, 等. 10 kV XLPE电缆接头典型绝缘缺陷的局部放电特征分析[J]. 绝缘材料, 2020, 53(8): 95–101
XIA Rui, TAN Xiao, CHEN Jie, et al. PD characteristics of typical insulation defects in 10 kV XLPE cable joint[J]. Insulating Materials, 2020, 53(8): 95–101
[10] 杨刚. 典型缺陷局部放电超声信号的特征与模式识别方法研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2020.
YANG Gang. Study on ultrasonic signal characteristics and pattern recognition method of typical defect partial discharge[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020.
[11] 张智辉. GIL局部放电的特高频信号传播特性及传感器布置方式研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2020.
ZHANG Zhihui. The study on UHF signal propagation characteristics and sensor arrangement of GIL partial discharge[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2020.
[12] 张梦成. 高压开关柜局部放电特征提取及其模式识别的研究[D]. 上海: 上海电机学院, 2020.
ZHANG Mengcheng. Study on partial discharge feature extraction and pattern recognition of high voltage switchgear[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Dianji University, 2020.
[13] 覃宇. 高压开关柜局放特性的研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2015.
QIN Yu. Study on partial discharge characteristics of high voltage switchgear[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2015.
[14] 延谦. 高压开关柜局部放电在线监测系统应用与研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2016.
YAN Qian. Application and research of partial discharge online monitoring system for high voltage switchgear[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2016.
[15] 罗思敏, 田妍, 郑服利, 等. 开关柜局部放电检测技术应用[J]. 高压电器, 2020, 56(4): 204–208
LUO Simin, TIAN Yan, ZHENG Fuli, et al. Application of partial discharge detection technology in switchgear[J]. High Voltage Electrical Apparatus, 2020, 56(4): 204–208
[16] IEC60270 Ed. High Voltage Measurements: TEC60270 Ed [S]. 1999.
[17] 王旭. 基于Rogowski线圈脉冲电流检测技术的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2016.
WANG Xu. Research on pulse current detection technology based on Rogowski coil[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016.
[18] 吴吉, 吕鸿, 王流火, 等. 开关柜局部放电暂态地电波(TEV)传播特性的实验研究[J]. 高压电器, 2014, 50(11): 115–121
WU Ji, LV Hong, WANG Liuhuo, et al. Experimental study on the propagation characteristics of partial discharge transient ground waves (TEV) in switchgear[J]. High Voltage Electrical Apparatus, 2014, 50(11): 115–121
[19] 唐志国, 唐铭泽, 李金忠, 等. 电气设备局部放电模式识别研究综述[J]. 高电压技术, 2017, 43(7): 2263–2277
TANG Zhiguo, TANG Mingze, LI Jinzhong, et al. Review on partial discharge pattern recognition of electrical equipment[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2017, 43(7): 2263–2277
[20] AHMED F, DARUS A B, YUSOFF Z, et al. Characterisation of acoustic signal and pattern recognition of free moving metallic particle motion modes in GIS[C]//Proceedings of ICICS, 1997 International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing, Singapore. IEEE, 1997: 750–753.
[21] 律方成, 张波. 基于LLE降维和BP_Adaboost分类器的GIS局部放电模式识别[J]. 电测与仪表, 2014, 51(15): 37–41
LV Fangcheng, ZHANG Bo. Pattern recognition of GIS discharge types based on LLE dimensionality reduction and BP_Adaboost classifier[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2014, 51(15): 37–41
[22] BASHARAN V, MARIA SILUVAIRAJ W I, RAMASAMY VELAYUTHAM M. Recognition of multiple partial discharge patterns by multi-class support vector machine using fractal image processing technique[J]. IET Science, Measurement & Technology, 2018, 12(8): 1031–1038.
[23] 姚锐, 惠萌, 李俊, 等. 基于随机森林的局部放电特征提取和优选研究[J]. 华北电力大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 48(4): 63–72
YAO Rui, HUI Meng, LI Jun, et al. Research on partial discharge feature extraction and optimization based on random forest[J]. Journal of North China Electric Power University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 48(4): 63–72
[24] 范文杰, 张志斌, 夏昌杰, 等. 多手段测量下的油纸绝缘针板电极局部放电的演化规律分析[J/OL]. 高电压技术: 1–11 [2021-09-29]. https: //doi. org/10.13336/j. 1003-6520. hve. 20201151.
FAN Wenjie, ZHANG Zhibin, XIA Changjie, et al. Analysis of the evolution law of partial discharge of oil-paper insulated needle plate electrodes measured by multiple methods[J/OL]. High Voltage Technology: 1–11[2021-09-29]. https://doi.org/10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.20201151.
[25] 张云娟. 绝缘缺陷的局部放电检测与放电类型识别[D]. 西安: 西安工程大学, 2018.
ZHANG Yunjuan. Partial discharge detection and discharge type recognition of insulation defects[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an Polytechnic University, 2018.

TEV与HFCT法测量开关柜局部放电的特性对比

Comparative Study on the Switchgear Partial Discharge Characteristics Based on Transient Earth Voltage and Pulse Current Detection Methods

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	鞠玲, 黄怿. 基于EFPI的数字配电网超声检测传感器[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(6): 194-201.
[2]	冯洋, 周磊, 马全福, 尹松, 王朔. 检测GIS局部放电的小型化多频带复合天线[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(4): 167-174.
[3]	黄辉, 杨智豪, 魏建国, 邓辉, 刘诣. 变压器套管局部放电射频信号在外部空间的分布特征[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(4): 175-183.
[4]	史强, 刘鹍, 李金嵩, 李福超. 基于t-SNE与CFSFDP算法的多源局部放电脉冲分类技术[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 102-110.
[5]	张利, 屈斌, 王永宁, 陈荣, 刘宝稳, 张少杰, 韩斌, 马宏忠. GIS壳体振动机理和局部放电优化诊断与应用[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(3): 80-86.
[6]	郁琦琛, 罗林根, 吴凡, 盛戈皞, 江秀臣. 基于广义回归神经网络的特高频局部放电定位法[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 11-17.
[7]	黄雪莜, 熊俊, 张宇, 刘辉, 陈鹭, 孟祥麟, 江秀臣. 基于残差卷积神经网络的开关柜局部放电模式识别[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 44-51.
[8]	闫帅, 李朋宇, 王高洁, 李强, 吴凡, 罗林根. 基于特高频无线智能传感阵列的敞开式变电站放电定位方法[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 52-57,65.
[9]	李巍巍, 朱轲, 邓元实, 王子康, 黄永禄, 周凯. 温度对电缆附件界面缺陷处局放引发影响机制研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(11): 181-189.
[10]	张成, 王卫东, 杨延滨, 赵洋, 周弋, 张竟成. 新型电缆多参量带电检测装置设计与应用[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(10): 144-151.
[11]	王利, 张伟, 罗定南. 基于随机奇异值分解的局部放电脉冲提取及去噪技术[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(10): 196-203.
[12]	刘东超, 林语, 原辉, 王帅, 姜敏, 俞华, 李海涛. 灰度纹理与油气特征融合的油纸绝缘老化状态评估[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(12): 159-166,197.
[13]	田宇, 罗沙, 李宾宾, 孙文. 采用Fisher线性判别法提取GIS内部局部放电信号最优能量特征[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(9): 93-101.
[14]	栾贻青, 李建祥, 李超英, 黄锐, 吕俊涛. 高压开关柜局部放电检测机器人的开发与应用[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(3): 169-176.
[15]	范敏, 叶会生, 段肖力, 黄海波. 真型开关柜模拟缺陷下的局部放电试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(2): 134-138,143.

模态框（Modal）标题

TEV与HFCT法测量开关柜局部放电的特性对比

Comparative Study on the Switchgear Partial Discharge Characteristics Based on Transient Earth Voltage and Pulse Current Detection Methods

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics