供用电双方满意的电压暂降治理增值服务策略

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202007161

中国电力 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (11): 50-59.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202007161

• 国家“十三五”智能电网重大专项专栏：（二）电能质量及其治理技术专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

供用电双方满意的电压暂降治理增值服务策略

张博¹, 唐钰政¹, 代双寅¹, 陈韵竹², 王盼盼², 肖先勇²

1. 国网河南省电力公司电力科学研究院，河南郑州 450000;
2. 四川大学电气工程学院，四川成都 610065

收稿日期:2020-07-30 修回日期:2020-09-20 出版日期:2020-11-05 发布日期:2020-11-05
通讯作者: 国家电网公司科技项目(面向多元用户的电能质量智能感知及增值服务关键技术研究与试点应用，202024211A)
作者简介:张博(1986—)，男，硕士，高级工程师，从事电能质量分析技术研究，E-mail：13592602687@126.com;王盼盼(1998—)，女，通信作者，硕士研究生，从事电能质量、优质供电研究，E-mail：panpanscu2020@163.com;肖先勇(1968—)，男，教授，博士生导师，从事电能质量与优质电力研究，E-mail：xiaoxianyong@163.com
基金资助:
This work is supported by Science and Technology Project of SGCC (Research and Application of Power Quality Intellisense and Value-added Services for Multiple Users, No.202024211A)

Value-added Service Strategy of Voltage Sag Governance for Mutual Satisfaction of Power Supply Companies and Power Users

ZHANG Bo¹, TANG Yuzheng¹, DAI Shuangyin¹, CHEN Yunzhu², WANG Panpan², XIAO Xianyong²

1. State Grid Henan Electric Power Company Electric Power Research Institute, Zhengzhou 450000, China;
2. College of Electrical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China

Received:2020-07-30 Revised:2020-09-20 Online:2020-11-05 Published:2020-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 实现电压暂降治理的市场化，需解决降低治理投资成本和合理制定服务费用两大问题。首先提出一种基于过程免疫时间（process immunity time，PIT）的全过程电压暂降风险量化方法；在此基础上，结合暂降治理服务成本，提出一种考虑最大化去风险的电压暂降治理设备优化配置模型，实现满足用户需求的最优治理服务方案决策。引入满意价格策略，定义供、用电双方的满意度，明确其利益诉求，提出一种基于双方满意的电压暂降治理增值服务定价模型。最后，以中国某化工厂为例，通过实例验证所提方法的正确性和合理性，所提方法有助于电压暂降治理增值服务的推行，进而解决用户的电压暂降问题，缓解供用电双方矛盾，具有较大的实用价值。

关键词: 电压暂降, 定价, 风险评估, 治理服务, 双方满意

Abstract: For realizing marketization of voltage sag governance, two major problems need to be solved: lowering the investment cost and reasonably setting the service fee. A method for whole-process voltage sag risk quantification is thus proposed based on the process immunity time (PIT). Combined with the service cost of sag governance, an optimal configuration model of voltage sag governance equipment considering maximum risk removal is proposed to realize the optimal governance service scheme decision-making to meet the needs of users. On the basis of introduction of the satisfactory price strategy, definition of the satisfaction degree of both power supply companies and users, and clarification of their interest demands, a value-added service pricing model of voltage sag governance is proposed based on mutual satisfaction. Finally, taking a chemical plant in China as an example, the feasibility and rationality of the proposed method are verified through case study. The proposed method is helpful to the implementation of value-added service for voltage sag control, thus solving the voltage sag problems of users and alleviating the contradiction between power supply and consumption, which is of great practical value.

Key words: voltage sag, pricing, risk assessment, governance services, mutual satisfaction

张博, 唐钰政, 代双寅, 陈韵竹, 王盼盼, 肖先勇. 供用电双方满意的电压暂降治理增值服务策略[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(11): 50-59.

ZHANG Bo, TANG Yuzheng, DAI Shuangyin, CHEN Yunzhu, WANG Panpan, XIAO Xianyong. Value-added Service Strategy of Voltage Sag Governance for Mutual Satisfaction of Power Supply Companies and Power Users[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(11): 50-59.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202007161

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2020/V53/I11/50

参考文献

[1] 汪颖, 周杨, 肖先勇, 等. 电压暂降问题研究现状及面临的挑战[J]. 供用电, 2018, 35(2): 2-9
WANG Ying, ZHOU Yang, XIAO Xianyong, et al. Research status and challenges of voltage sag issue[J]. Distribution & Utilization, 2018, 35(2): 2-9
[2] 马愿谦, 肖先勇, 黄勇. 考虑敏感设备“以旧换新”增值服务的定价策略[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2019, 39(2): 164-172
MA Yuanqian, XIAO Xianyong, HUANG Yong. Pricing strategy considering "trade-in" value-added service of sensitive equipment[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2019, 39(2): 164-172
[3] 王建勋, 张逸, 张嫣, 等. 面向现代工业园区的电压暂降综合防治方案[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2020, 44(14): 156-163
WANG Jianxun, ZHANG Yi, ZHANG Yan, et al. Comprehensive prevention and control scheme for voltage sag in modern industrial park[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2020, 44(14): 156-163
[4] 林芳, 肖先勇, 张逸, 等. 基于暂降信息的监测装置优化配置与系统电压暂降水平评估[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2016, 36(5): 67-73
LIN Fang, XIAO Xianyong, ZHANG Yi, et al. Optimal monitor allocation and system sag level assessment based on sag information[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2016, 36(5): 67-73
[5] 刘阳, 肖先勇, 张逸, 等. 敏感过程电压暂降响应事件及其风险的区间直觉模糊评估[J]. 电网技术, 2015, 39(5): 1398-1404
LIU Yang, XIAO Xianyong, ZHANG Yi, et al. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessment on response event of voltage-sag-sensitive process and its risk[J]. Power System Technology, 2015, 39(5): 1398-1404
[6] 郑嘉炜. 配电网用户的电压暂降和中断事件概率型经济评估[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学(北京), 2018.
ZHENG Jiawei. Probabilistic economic estimation of distribution network customers with respect to voltage sags and interruptions[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2018.
[7] 甄晓晨. 面向用户的电能质量经济性评估方法研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2013.
ZHEN Xiaochen. Research on economic evaluations for power quality of end-users[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2013.
[8] 丁泽俊, 朱永强. 电能质量的经济损失评估与选择性治理[J]. 现代电力, 2010, 27(5): 91-94
DING zejun, ZHU Yongqiang. Economic loss assessment and selective governance of power quality[J]. Modern Electric Power, 2010, 27(5): 91-94
[9] 何函洋, 肖先勇, 李成鑫, 等. 敏感用户电压暂降损失风险评估的模糊推理模型[J/OL]. 中国电机工程学报: 1-11[2020-07-27]. https://doi.org/10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.191595.
HE Hanyang, XIAO Xianyong, LI Chengxin, et al. Fuzzy reasoning model for risk assessment of voltage sag loss for sensitive users[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE: 1-11[2020-07-27]. https://doi.org/10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.191595.
[10] 李春敏, 肖先勇, 张逸, 等. 工业用户电压暂降损失风险的模糊综合评估[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2018, 30(9): 50-56
LI Chunmin, XIAO Xianyong, ZHANG Yi, et al. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation on loss risk of voltage sag for industry plant[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2018, 30(9): 50-56
[11] 杨进, 李庚银, 周明. 基于差别定价的电能质量服务定价方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2006, 30(8): 41-46
YANG Jin, LI Gengyin, ZHOU Ming. Power quality service pricing method based on differential pricing[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2006, 30(8): 41-46
[12] LI G Y, JIN G H, ZHOU M. Quality insurance based electric energy pricing with multi-quality[C]//18th International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution (CIRED 2005). Turin, Italy. IEE, 2005: 1-5.
[13] 闫海鸥, 叶猛. 计及暂态电压质量服务的统一输电定价模型[J]. 华北电力大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 37(2): 49-53
YAN Hai'ou, YE Meng. Uniform transmission pricing model considering transient voltage quality service[J]. Journal of North China Electric Power University (Natural Science Edition), 2010, 37(2): 49-53
[14] 刘颖英, 冯丹丹, 林才华, 等. 电能质量综合评估研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2020, 48(4): 167-176
LIU Yingying, FENG Dandan, LIN Caihua, et al. Current status and development trend of power quality comprehensive assessment[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2020, 48(4): 167-176
[15] CIGRE/CIRED/UIE Joint Working Group C4.110. Voltage dip immunity of equipment and installations[R]. Paris, France: CIGRE, 2010.
[16] 刘旭娜, 肖先勇, 刘阳, 等. 工业过程电压暂降风险等级层次化多级模糊综合评估[J]. 电网技术, 2014, 38(7): 1984-1988
LIU Xuna, XIAO Xianyong, LIU Yang, et al. Hierarchical multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation on risk level of voltage sag during industrial process[J]. Power System Technology, 2014, 38(7): 1984-1988
[17] 赵宪, 周力行, 邓维. 改进的层次分析法在含分布式电源系统电能质量综合评估中的应用[J]. 中国电力, 2014, 47(12): 72-78
ZHAO Xian, ZHOU Lixing, DENG Wei. Application of improved analytical hierarchy process in comprehensive assessment of the power quality with distributed generators[J]. Electric Power, 2014, 47(12): 72-78
[18] 肖先勇, 马超, 杨洪耕, 等. 用电压暂降严重程度和最大熵评估负荷电压暂降敏感度[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2009, 29(31): 115-121
XIAO Xianyong, MA Chao, YANG Honggeng, et al. Stochastic estimation of equipment sensitivity to voltage sag based on voltage sag severity index and maximum entropy principle[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2009, 29(31): 115-121
[19] 李远, 关彩虹, 李静, 等. 环境污染事故经济损失估算方法分析[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2019, 5(6): 373-375
LI Yuan, GUAN Caihong, LI Jing, et al. Estimation method of economic damage in environmental pollution accidents[J]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue (Electronic Edition), 2019, 5(6): 373-375
[20] 胡安平, 陶以彬, 陈嘉源, 等. 电压暂降治理措施及设备综述[J]. 电力电子技术, 2019, 53(7): 1-5, 10
HU Anping, TAO Yibin, CHEN Jiayuan, et al. Review of voltage sag mitigation measures and equipments[J]. Power Electronics, 2019, 53(7): 1-5, 10
[21] JAFARI M, NADERI S B, HAGH M T, et al. Voltage sag compensation of point of common coupling (PCC) using fault current limiter[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2011, 26(4): 2638-2646.
[22] 黄少华, 刘晓波, 陈雄, 等. 电压暂降传播仿真及治理方案研究[J]. 新型工业化, 2019, 9(7): 1-6, 22
HUANG Shaohua, LIU Xiaobo, CHEN Xiong, et al. Study on simulation of voltage sag propagation and control scheme[J]. The Journal of New Industrialization, 2019, 9(7): 1-6, 22
[23] 刘金鑫, 李鹏, 崔红芬, 等. 微网中电能质量问题及其治理措施研究[J]. 中国电力, 2012, 45(3): 38-42
LIU Jinxin, LI Peng, CUI Hongfen, et al. Research on microgrid power quality and control measures[J]. Electric Power, 2012, 45(3): 38-42
[24] 姚曼. 新产品定价策略的选择[J]. 才智, 2011(4): 19
[25] 金广厚, 李庚银, 周明. 电能质量市场的经济管理方法[J]. 中国电力, 2005, 38(1): 17-22
JIN Guanghou, LI Gengyin, ZHOU Ming. Application of economic managing method in power quality market[J]. Electric Power, 2005, 38(1): 17-22

供用电双方满意的电压暂降治理增值服务策略

Value-added Service Strategy of Voltage Sag Governance for Mutual Satisfaction of Power Supply Companies and Power Users

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	汪林光, 李旭涛, 任勇, 谢小荣. 基于元启发式算法的新能源电力系统振荡稳定性最差工况搜索方法[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(3): 65-72.
[2]	杨珂, 王栋, 李达, 张王俊, 向尕, 李军. 虚拟电厂网络安全风险评估指标体系构建及量化计算[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(8): 130-137.
[3]	齐彩娟, 陈宝生, 韦冬妮, 杨钊. 考虑主从博弈定价模式的共享储能分布鲁棒优化配置方法研究[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(7): 40-53.
[4]	许竞, 赵铁军, 高小刚, 叶鞠, 孙玲玲. 高比例新能源电力系统调节资源灵活性不足风险分析[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(11): 129-138.
[5]	陈曦, 陈万露, 田洪莉, 林健怡, 江天炎, 毕茂强. 售电公司串谋定价行为随机演化博弈分析[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(9): 27-34,133.
[6]	齐彩娟, 车彬, 杨燕, 陈宝生. 考虑新能源消纳与储能参与调频的共享储能主从博弈鲁棒定价方法[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(8): 26-39.
[7]	郁清云, 束云豪, 戴小妹. 激励相容的分段式用户互动补偿电价合同模型[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(1): 49-55.
[8]	吴亚宁, 罗毅, 雷成, 黄豫, 梁宇, 周生存, 聂金峰. 基于改进型PEM和L指标的含风电场电力系统静态电压稳定评估[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(9): 192-203.
[9]	孙启星, 尤培培, 李成仁, 刘思佳, 李炎林, 高效. 适应中国现行电力市场环境下的容量市场机制设计[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(8): 196-201.
[10]	周文, 梁纪峰, 焦亚东, 李铁成, 路艳巧, 刘勇. 电容式电压互感器电压暂降测量误差分析及校正[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(7): 49-58.
[11]	吕金炳, 杨国朝, 范兴管. 基于虚拟上下限曲线的电压暂降防治指标[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(7): 59-66,73.
[12]	刘海涛, 叶筱怡, 吕干云, 袁华骏, 耿宗璞. 基于BAS-SVM的配电网电压暂降源识别[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 128-133.
[13]	杜岩, 谢从珍, 李彦丞, 谢心昊, 栾乐, 罗思敏. 基于加权马氏距离型TOPSIS算法的10 kV配电网雷害风险评估[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(4): 108-116.
[14]	李培, 俞永军, 马智泉, 蔡重凯. 考虑电压暂降治理设备服役年限的优质供电服务模式[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(12): 147-159.
[15]	贺烨丹, 夏向阳, 尹旭, 邓文华, 王灿, 熊富强, 周晗靓. 不对称电压暂降下最大功率输出的MMC协调控制策略[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(12): 160-167.

模态框（Modal）标题

供用电双方满意的电压暂降治理增值服务策略

Value-added Service Strategy of Voltage Sag Governance for Mutual Satisfaction of Power Supply Companies and Power Users

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics