Electric Power ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (6): 60-75.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202601038
• Innovation and Key Technologies of Coupled Operating Mechanisms for a Unified National Electricity Market • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Siyu1(
), ZHANG Cheng1, JIANG Tao1, XIAO Ya1, YI Yawen2, ZHANG Yuxin2, CHEN Xinyu2(
)
Received:2026-01-15
Revised:2026-03-31
Online:2026-06-22
Published:2026-06-28
Supported by:LIU Siyu, ZHANG Cheng, JIANG Tao, XIAO Ya, YI Yawen, ZHANG Yuxin, CHEN Xinyu. A dual-attention TCN-BiGRU short-term electricity-carbon price coupling prediction method incorporating time-series fluctuation information mining[J]. Electric Power, 2026, 59(6): 60-75.
| 数据类型 | 参数 | 数值 |
| 电价 | 模态数量 B | 9 |
| 惩罚因子 α | 500.36 | |
| 更新步长 τ | 0 | |
| 直流分量处理 | 0 | |
| 初始化方法 | 1 | |
| 收敛容差 | 1×10–7 | |
| 碳价 | 模态数量 B | 7 |
| 惩罚因子 α | 500 | |
| 更新步长 τ | 0 | |
| 直流分量处理 | 0 | |
| 初始化方法 | 1 | |
| 收敛容差 | 1×10–7 | |
| CCO算法参数 | 优化器种群大小 | 30 |
| 最大迭代次数 | 50 | |
| 模态数量B范围 | [3, 10] | |
| 惩罚因子α范围 | [500, |
Table 1 OVMD parameters
| 数据类型 | 参数 | 数值 |
| 电价 | 模态数量 B | 9 |
| 惩罚因子 α | 500.36 | |
| 更新步长 τ | 0 | |
| 直流分量处理 | 0 | |
| 初始化方法 | 1 | |
| 收敛容差 | 1×10–7 | |
| 碳价 | 模态数量 B | 7 |
| 惩罚因子 α | 500 | |
| 更新步长 τ | 0 | |
| 直流分量处理 | 0 | |
| 初始化方法 | 1 | |
| 收敛容差 | 1×10–7 | |
| CCO算法参数 | 优化器种群大小 | 30 |
| 最大迭代次数 | 50 | |
| 模态数量B范围 | [3, 10] | |
| 惩罚因子α范围 | [500, |
| 分类 | 特征 |
| 电价数据集 | 实时现货电价/(元·(MW·h)–1) |
| 短波辐射/(MW·m–2) | |
| 风速/(km·h–1) | |
| 温度/℃ | |
| 降水量/mm | |
| 系统负荷/MW | |
| 光伏出力/MW | |
| 风电出力/MW | |
| 水电计划功率/MW | |
| 联络线计划功率/MW | |
| 总开机容量/MW | |
| 碳价数据集 | USD/CNY汇率 |
| EUR/CNT汇率 | |
| 美原油价格/(美元·桶–1) | |
| 沪深300指数 | |
| 中证500指数 | |
| 温度/℃ |
Table 2 Dataset features
| 分类 | 特征 |
| 电价数据集 | 实时现货电价/(元·(MW·h)–1) |
| 短波辐射/(MW·m–2) | |
| 风速/(km·h–1) | |
| 温度/℃ | |
| 降水量/mm | |
| 系统负荷/MW | |
| 光伏出力/MW | |
| 风电出力/MW | |
| 水电计划功率/MW | |
| 联络线计划功率/MW | |
| 总开机容量/MW | |
| 碳价数据集 | USD/CNY汇率 |
| EUR/CNT汇率 | |
| 美原油价格/(美元·桶–1) | |
| 沪深300指数 | |
| 中证500指数 | |
| 温度/℃ |
| 模块 | 参数 | 数值 |
| TCN | 每层通道数 | 512 |
| 卷积核大小 | 3 | |
| 卷积步长 | 1 | |
| 第0层膨胀率 | 1 | |
| 第1层膨胀率 | 2 | |
| 第2层膨胀率 | 4 | |
| 第0层填充大小 | 2 | |
| 第1层填充大小 | 4 | |
| 第2层填充大小 | 8 | |
| Dropout比率 | 0.2 | |
| 权重归一化 | 是 | |
| 时间维度裁剪 | 是 | |
| BiGRU | 输入特征维度 | 512 |
| 隐藏层维度 | 512 | |
| 层数 | 3 | |
| 批次维度在前 | 是 | |
| 双向GRU | 是 | |
| 偏置项 | 是 | |
| 特征注意力 | 输入特征维度 | 12 |
| 隐藏层维度 | 512 | |
| 第一层线性变换 | ||
| 激活函数 | Tanh | |
| 第二层线性变换 | 512 | |
| 归一化函数 | Softmax | |
| 时间注意力 | 隐藏层维度 | |
| 注意力权重计算层 | ||
| 训练参数 | 批次大小 | 64 |
| 训练轮数 | 170 | |
| 初始学习率 | 0.001 | |
| 早停耐心值 | 12 | |
| 早停最小改善阈值 | ||
| 梯度裁剪最大范数 | 1 | |
| Dropout比率 | 0.2 | |
| 学习率衰减因子 | 0.5 | |
| 学习率调度器耐心值 | 5 | |
| 学习率最小值 |
Table 3 Model parameters
| 模块 | 参数 | 数值 |
| TCN | 每层通道数 | 512 |
| 卷积核大小 | 3 | |
| 卷积步长 | 1 | |
| 第0层膨胀率 | 1 | |
| 第1层膨胀率 | 2 | |
| 第2层膨胀率 | 4 | |
| 第0层填充大小 | 2 | |
| 第1层填充大小 | 4 | |
| 第2层填充大小 | 8 | |
| Dropout比率 | 0.2 | |
| 权重归一化 | 是 | |
| 时间维度裁剪 | 是 | |
| BiGRU | 输入特征维度 | 512 |
| 隐藏层维度 | 512 | |
| 层数 | 3 | |
| 批次维度在前 | 是 | |
| 双向GRU | 是 | |
| 偏置项 | 是 | |
| 特征注意力 | 输入特征维度 | 12 |
| 隐藏层维度 | 512 | |
| 第一层线性变换 | ||
| 激活函数 | Tanh | |
| 第二层线性变换 | 512 | |
| 归一化函数 | Softmax | |
| 时间注意力 | 隐藏层维度 | |
| 注意力权重计算层 | ||
| 训练参数 | 批次大小 | 64 |
| 训练轮数 | 170 | |
| 初始学习率 | 0.001 | |
| 早停耐心值 | 12 | |
| 早停最小改善阈值 | ||
| 梯度裁剪最大范数 | 1 | |
| Dropout比率 | 0.2 | |
| 学习率衰减因子 | 0.5 | |
| 学习率调度器耐心值 | 5 | |
| 学习率最小值 |
| 模型 | 方法 | 电价 | 碳价 | |||||||
| EMA/(元·(MW·h)–1) | ERMS/(元·(MW·h)–1) | EWMAP/% | R2 | EMA/(元·t–1) | ERMS/(元·t–1) | EWMAP/% | R2 | |||
| M1 | EMD | 61.75 | 84.74 | 20.17 | 0.75 | 1.48 | 1.99 | 3.80 | 0.52 | |
| M2 | EEMD | 56.49 | 81.84 | 18.45 | 0.76 | 1.43 | 1.91 | 3.69 | 0.56 | |
| M3 | CEEMDAN | 69.06 | 93.29 | 22.55 | 0.69 | 1.60 | 2.08 | 4.12 | 0.47 | |
| M4 | VMD | 55.04 | 80.77 | 17.97 | 0.77 | 1.48 | 1.97 | 3.81 | 0.53 | |
| 本文模型 | OVMD | 49.87 | 76.36 | 16.28 | 0.80 | 1.28 | 1.70 | 3.30 | 0.65 | |
Table 4 Prediction error evaluation of different decomposition methods
| 模型 | 方法 | 电价 | 碳价 | |||||||
| EMA/(元·(MW·h)–1) | ERMS/(元·(MW·h)–1) | EWMAP/% | R2 | EMA/(元·t–1) | ERMS/(元·t–1) | EWMAP/% | R2 | |||
| M1 | EMD | 61.75 | 84.74 | 20.17 | 0.75 | 1.48 | 1.99 | 3.80 | 0.52 | |
| M2 | EEMD | 56.49 | 81.84 | 18.45 | 0.76 | 1.43 | 1.91 | 3.69 | 0.56 | |
| M3 | CEEMDAN | 69.06 | 93.29 | 22.55 | 0.69 | 1.60 | 2.08 | 4.12 | 0.47 | |
| M4 | VMD | 55.04 | 80.77 | 17.97 | 0.77 | 1.48 | 1.97 | 3.81 | 0.53 | |
| 本文模型 | OVMD | 49.87 | 76.36 | 16.28 | 0.80 | 1.28 | 1.70 | 3.30 | 0.65 | |
| 模型 | 方法 | 电价特征 | 碳价特征 |
| M5 | PCC | 净负荷、前1日电价、前1日IMF1 | 美原油价格、前1日电价、前2日电价、前3日电价、前4日电价、前5日电价、前1日IMF1、前2日IMF1、前3日IMF1、前4日IMF1、前5日IMF1 |
| M6 | EN | 系统负荷、水电机组计划出力、净负荷、总开机容量、前1日净负荷、前1日IMF1、前1日IMF2、前1日IMF3 | 前1日电价、前1日IMF1、前1日IMF2、前1日IMF3、前1日IMF4、前2日IMF1、前2日IMF2、前2日IMF3、前2日IMF4 |
| M7 | RF | 温度、净负荷、总开机容量、前1日电价、前1日净负荷、前1日IMF1 | 沪深300、前1日电价、前2日电价、前3日电价、前4日电价、前1日IMF1、前2日IMF1、前3日IMF1、前4日IMF1、前5日IMF1、前1日IMF7 |
| M8 | XGBoost | 光伏出力、净负荷、前1日电价、前2日电价、前1日净负荷、前4日净负荷 | 沪深300、前1日电价、前2日电价、前3日电价、前1日IMF1、前2日IMF1、前3日IMF1 |
| 本文 模型 | MIC | 温度、净负荷、总开机容量、前1日电价、前1日IMF1、碳价 | 中证500、沪深300、美原油价格、USD/CNY汇率、前1日电价、前2日电价、前3日电价、前4日电价、前1日IMF1、前2日IMF1、前3日IMF1、前4日IMF1 |
Table 5 Selected features of different feature selection methods
| 模型 | 方法 | 电价特征 | 碳价特征 |
| M5 | PCC | 净负荷、前1日电价、前1日IMF1 | 美原油价格、前1日电价、前2日电价、前3日电价、前4日电价、前5日电价、前1日IMF1、前2日IMF1、前3日IMF1、前4日IMF1、前5日IMF1 |
| M6 | EN | 系统负荷、水电机组计划出力、净负荷、总开机容量、前1日净负荷、前1日IMF1、前1日IMF2、前1日IMF3 | 前1日电价、前1日IMF1、前1日IMF2、前1日IMF3、前1日IMF4、前2日IMF1、前2日IMF2、前2日IMF3、前2日IMF4 |
| M7 | RF | 温度、净负荷、总开机容量、前1日电价、前1日净负荷、前1日IMF1 | 沪深300、前1日电价、前2日电价、前3日电价、前4日电价、前1日IMF1、前2日IMF1、前3日IMF1、前4日IMF1、前5日IMF1、前1日IMF7 |
| M8 | XGBoost | 光伏出力、净负荷、前1日电价、前2日电价、前1日净负荷、前4日净负荷 | 沪深300、前1日电价、前2日电价、前3日电价、前1日IMF1、前2日IMF1、前3日IMF1 |
| 本文 模型 | MIC | 温度、净负荷、总开机容量、前1日电价、前1日IMF1、碳价 | 中证500、沪深300、美原油价格、USD/CNY汇率、前1日电价、前2日电价、前3日电价、前4日电价、前1日IMF1、前2日IMF1、前3日IMF1、前4日IMF1 |
| 模型 | 方法 | 电价 | 碳价 | |||||||
| EMA/(元·(MW·h)–1) | ERMS/(元·(MW·h)–1) | EWMAP/% | R2 | EMA/(元·t–1) | ERMS/(元·t–1) | EWMAP/% | R2 | |||
| M5 | PCC | 54.45 | 77.04 | 17.78 | 0.79 | 1.39 | 1.85 | 3.57 | 0.58 | |
| M6 | EN | 61.55 | 85.52 | 20.10 | 0.74 | 1.44 | 1.93 | 3.70 | 0.54 | |
| M7 | RF | 55.67 | 81.64 | 18.18 | 0.77 | 1.51 | 1.94 | 3.89 | 0.54 | |
| M8 | XGBoost | 58.56 | 81.19 | 19.12 | 0.77 | 1.43 | 1.87 | 3.69 | 0.57 | |
| 本文模型 | MIC | 49.87 | 76.36 | 16.28 | 0.80 | 1.28 | 1.70 | 3.30 | 0.65 | |
Table 6 Prediction error evaluation of different feature selection methods
| 模型 | 方法 | 电价 | 碳价 | |||||||
| EMA/(元·(MW·h)–1) | ERMS/(元·(MW·h)–1) | EWMAP/% | R2 | EMA/(元·t–1) | ERMS/(元·t–1) | EWMAP/% | R2 | |||
| M5 | PCC | 54.45 | 77.04 | 17.78 | 0.79 | 1.39 | 1.85 | 3.57 | 0.58 | |
| M6 | EN | 61.55 | 85.52 | 20.10 | 0.74 | 1.44 | 1.93 | 3.70 | 0.54 | |
| M7 | RF | 55.67 | 81.64 | 18.18 | 0.77 | 1.51 | 1.94 | 3.89 | 0.54 | |
| M8 | XGBoost | 58.56 | 81.19 | 19.12 | 0.77 | 1.43 | 1.87 | 3.69 | 0.57 | |
| 本文模型 | MIC | 49.87 | 76.36 | 16.28 | 0.80 | 1.28 | 1.70 | 3.30 | 0.65 | |
| 模型 | 方法 | 电价 | 碳价 | |||||||
| EMA/(元·(MW·h)–1) | ERMS/(元·(MW·h)–1) | EWMAP/% | R2 | EMA/(元·t–1) | ERMS/(元·t–1) | EWMAP/% | R2 | |||
| M9 | CNN | 56.45 | 81.20 | 18.44 | 0.77 | 1.50 | 1.99 | 3.87 | 0.51 | |
| M10 | TCN | 67.87 | 97.08 | 22.17 | 0.67 | 1.54 | 2.09 | 3.96 | 0.47 | |
| M11 | BiGRU | 58.45 | 82.05 | 19.09 | 0.76 | 1.36 | 1.78 | 3.49 | 0.61 | |
| M12 | BiLSTM | 62.71 | 87.87 | 20.48 | 0.73 | 1.56 | 2.09 | 4.02 | 0.47 | |
| M13 | Transformer | 66.31 | 92.03 | 21.65 | 0.70 | 2.15 | 3.06 | 5.54 | −0.14 | |
| M14 | Informer | 70.25 | 117.68 | 22.94 | 0.51 | 1.78 | 2.21 | 4.58 | 0.40 | |
| M15 | N-BEATS | 76.93 | 122.74 | 25.13 | 0.47 | 1.82 | 2.32 | 4.69 | 0.34 | |
| M16 | N-HITS | 66.51 | 104.04 | 21.72 | 0.62 | 1.61 | 2.09 | 4.16 | 0.47 | |
| M17 | TCN-BiGRU | 57.33 | 81.13 | 18.72 | 0.77 | 1.42 | 1.87 | 3.66 | 0.57 | |
| M18 | CNN-BiGRU | 60.05 | 87.08 | 19.61 | 0.73 | 1.49 | 1.98 | 3.83 | 0.52 | |
| M19 | TCN-Attention | 64.37 | 92.81 | 21.02 | 0.70 | 1.54 | 2.07 | 3.97 | 0.48 | |
| M20 | BiGRU-Attention | 63.98 | 90.19 | 20.90 | 0.71 | 1.44 | 1.90 | 3.70 | 0.56 | |
| 本文模型 | DA-TCN-BiGRU | 49.87 | 76.36 | 16.28 | 0.80 | 1.28 | 1.70 | 3.30 | 0.65 | |
Table 7 Prediction error evaluation of different deep learning models
| 模型 | 方法 | 电价 | 碳价 | |||||||
| EMA/(元·(MW·h)–1) | ERMS/(元·(MW·h)–1) | EWMAP/% | R2 | EMA/(元·t–1) | ERMS/(元·t–1) | EWMAP/% | R2 | |||
| M9 | CNN | 56.45 | 81.20 | 18.44 | 0.77 | 1.50 | 1.99 | 3.87 | 0.51 | |
| M10 | TCN | 67.87 | 97.08 | 22.17 | 0.67 | 1.54 | 2.09 | 3.96 | 0.47 | |
| M11 | BiGRU | 58.45 | 82.05 | 19.09 | 0.76 | 1.36 | 1.78 | 3.49 | 0.61 | |
| M12 | BiLSTM | 62.71 | 87.87 | 20.48 | 0.73 | 1.56 | 2.09 | 4.02 | 0.47 | |
| M13 | Transformer | 66.31 | 92.03 | 21.65 | 0.70 | 2.15 | 3.06 | 5.54 | −0.14 | |
| M14 | Informer | 70.25 | 117.68 | 22.94 | 0.51 | 1.78 | 2.21 | 4.58 | 0.40 | |
| M15 | N-BEATS | 76.93 | 122.74 | 25.13 | 0.47 | 1.82 | 2.32 | 4.69 | 0.34 | |
| M16 | N-HITS | 66.51 | 104.04 | 21.72 | 0.62 | 1.61 | 2.09 | 4.16 | 0.47 | |
| M17 | TCN-BiGRU | 57.33 | 81.13 | 18.72 | 0.77 | 1.42 | 1.87 | 3.66 | 0.57 | |
| M18 | CNN-BiGRU | 60.05 | 87.08 | 19.61 | 0.73 | 1.49 | 1.98 | 3.83 | 0.52 | |
| M19 | TCN-Attention | 64.37 | 92.81 | 21.02 | 0.70 | 1.54 | 2.07 | 3.97 | 0.48 | |
| M20 | BiGRU-Attention | 63.98 | 90.19 | 20.90 | 0.71 | 1.44 | 1.90 | 3.70 | 0.56 | |
| 本文模型 | DA-TCN-BiGRU | 49.87 | 76.36 | 16.28 | 0.80 | 1.28 | 1.70 | 3.30 | 0.65 | |
| 1 | 中共中央, 国务院. 关于完整准确全面贯彻新发展理念 做好碳达峰碳中和工作的意见[EB/OL]. (2021-10-24)[2025-10-01]. http://www.news.cn/politics/zywj/2021/10/24/c_1127990632.htm. |
| 2 |
崔勇, 郑建, 时瑞廷, 等. 电-碳-绿证市场交易环境下多能联盟低碳优化运营机制研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2025, 46 (12): 385- 395.
|
|
CUI Yong, ZHENG Jian, SHI Ruiting, et al. Research on low-carbon optimal operation mechanism of multi-energy alliance in electricity-carbon-green certificate market trading environment[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2025, 46 (12): 385- 395.
|
|
| 3 |
陈操操, 于凤菊, 张悦, 等. 碳交易试点政策减排效应实证评估及机制分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2025, 45 (3): 1674- 1685.
|
|
CHEN Caocao, YU Fengju, ZHANG Yue, et al. Empirical evaluation and mechanism analysis of domestic carbon trading pilot policies on emission reduction[J]. China Environmental Science, 2025, 45 (3): 1674- 1685.
|
|
| 4 |
蔡子龙, 李嘉棋, 沈赋, 等. 基于SDAE-EEMD降噪分解与改进Informer-BiLSTM模型的电力短期负荷预测方法[J]. 电网技术, 2025, 49 (12): 5009- 5018.
|
|
CAI Zilong, LI Jiaqi, SHEN Fu, et al. A Short-term power load forecasting method based on SDAE-EEMD denoising decomposition and an improved informer-BiLSTM model[J]. Power System Technology, 2025, 49 (12): 5009- 5018.
|
|
| 5 | 王雨珊. 京津冀区域电力行业碳排放结构演化路径研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学(北京), 2024. |
| WANG Yushan. Research on the evolution path of carbon emission structure of electric power sector in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University (Beijing), 2024 . | |
| 6 | 张卓拉. 碳市场-用能权市场-电力市场价格传导模型研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学(北京), 2024. |
| ZHANG Zhuola. Research on the price transmission model of carbon market-energy consumption rights market-electricity market[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University (Beijing), 2024 . | |
| 7 |
OLMSTEAD D E H, YATCHEW A. Carbon pricing and Alberta's energy-only electricity market[J]. The Electricity Journal, 2022, 35 (4): 107- 112.
|
| 8 |
周明, 严正, 倪以信, 等. 含误差预测校正的 ARIMA 电价预测新方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2004, 24 (12): 63- 68.
|
|
ZHOU Ming, YAN Zheng, NI Yixing, et al. A novel ARIMA approach on electricity price forecasting with the improvement of predicted error[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2004, 24 (12): 63- 68.
|
|
| 9 |
TAN Z F, ZHANG J L, WANG J L, et al. Day-ahead electricity price forecasting using wavelet transform combined with ARIMA and GARCH models[J]. Applied Energy, 2010, 87 (11): 3606- 3610.
|
| 10 | 刘丽燕. 基于非参数GARCH模型的电力市场日前电价预测研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆师范大学, 2016. |
| LIU Liyan. Day-ahead of electricity price forecasting using nonparametric GARCH model [D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Normal University, 2016 . | |
| 11 | QIAO G X, WANG J H, ZHANG F P, et al. Structural changes and volatility forecasting in China's carbon markets: a hybrid approach integrating GARCH-SVR with LASSO-weighted windows method[J]. Journal of Climate Finance, 2025, 12: 100072. |
| 12 |
贾嵘, 蔡振华, 康睿. 基于最小二乘支持向量机的系统边际电价预测[J]. 高电压技术, 2006 (11): 145- 148.
|
|
JIA Rong, CAI Zhenhua, KANG Rui. Forecasting system marginal price based on similarity search and least square support vector machine[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2006 (11): 145- 148.
|
|
| 13 |
LUO R, LIU J P, CHEN P P, et al. Enhancing carbon price robust forecasting: A text-driven method utilizing weighted interval-joint quadratic support vector regression[J]. Energy Economics, 2025, 148, 108585.
|
| 14 |
魏勤, 陈仕军, 黄炜斌, 等. 利用随机森林回归的现货市场出清价格预测方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41 (4): 1360- 1367, 1542.
|
|
WEI Qin, CHEN Shijun, HUANG Weibin, et al. Forecasting method of clearing price in spot market by random forest regression[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41 (4): 1360- 1367, 1542.
|
|
| 15 |
ZHAO S Y, WANG Y L, DENG J W, et al. An adaptive multi-factor integrated forecasting model based on periodic reconstruction and random forest for carbon price[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2025, 177, 113274.
|
| 16 | 艾雨, 贾燕冰, 韩肖清. 基于相似日筛选与组合深度学习模型的日前电价预测方法[J]. 电网技术, 2025, 49 (1): 242- 251. |
| AI Yu, JIA Yanbin, HAN Xiaoqing. Day-ahead electricity price prediction method based on similar day screening and combined deep learning modeling[J]. Power System Technology, 2025, 49 (1): 242- 251. | |
| 17 |
SHI H X, WEI A L, XU X Z, et al. A CNN-LSTM based deep learning model with high accuracy and robustness for carbon price forecasting: a case of Shenzhen's carbon market in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 352, 120131.
|
| 18 | 朱晋, 程启明, 程尹曼. 基于CNN-GRU深度学习的模块化多电平矩阵变换器故障诊断[J]. 南方电网技术, 2024, 18 (11): 13- 22. |
| ZHU Jin, CHENG Qiming, CHENG Yinman. Fault Diagnosis of modular multilevel matrix converter based on CNNGRU deep learning[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2024, 18 (11): 13- 22. | |
| 19 |
PALANIYAPPAN B, RAMU S K. Optimized LSTM-based electric power consumption forecasting for dynamic electricity pricing in demand response scheme of smart grid[J]. Results in Engineering, 2025, 25, 104356.
|
| 20 |
乔松博, 孙瑜, 胡海, 等. 基于REMD-CNN-Transformer-LSTM组合模型的碳排放交易价格预测[J]. 西安理工大学学报, 2025, 41 (2): 186- 196.
|
|
QIAO Songbo, SUN Yu, HU Hai, et al. Carbon emission trading price prediction based on REMD CNN-Transformer-LSTM combined model[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Technology, 2025, 41 (2): 186- 196.
|
|
| 21 |
LI H Z, SHAO T M, GAO X, et al. Forecasting carbon price using a hybrid framework based on Bayesian optimization algorithm[J]. Petroleum Science, 2025, 22 (12): 5314- 5328.
|
| 22 | AKTER K, RAHMAN M A, ISLAM M R, et al. Data reconstruction-enabled robust hybrid models for intraday electricity price forecasting against data contamination attacks[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2026, 174: 111526. |
| 23 | LI M, WANG X. Short-term electricity price forecasting via CPO-enhanced dual decomposition and NRBO-optimized deep learning[J]. Digital Signal Processing, 2026, 168(Part B): 105520. |
| 24 |
李子凯, 杨波, 周忠堂, 等. 考虑高比例风电波动的多注意力TCN电价预测方法[J]. 电测与仪表, 2025, 62 (3): 138- 146.
|
|
LI Zikai, YANG Bo, ZHOU Zhongtang, et al. A Multi-attention TCN based electricity price forecasting method considering high proportion of wind power fluctuation[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2025, 62 (3): 138- 146.
|
|
| 25 |
CAI X T, YUAN B, WU C. An integrated CEEMDAN and TCN-LSTM deep learning framework for forecasting[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2025, 98, 103879.
|
| 26 |
吉兴全, 曾若梅, 张玉敏, 等. 基于注意力机制的CNN-LSTM短期电价预测[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50 (17): 125- 132.
|
|
JI Xingquan, ZENG Ruomei, ZHANG Yumin, et al. CNN-LSTM short-term electricity price prediction based on an attention mechanism[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50 (17): 125- 132.
|
|
| 27 |
杨超, 冉启武, 罗德虎, 等. 基于注意力机制的CNN-BIGRU短期电价预测[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2024, 36 (3): 22- 29.
|
|
YANG Chao, RAN Qiwu, LUO Dehu, et al. Short-term electricity price prediction based on attention mechanism with CNN-BIGRU[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2024, 36 (3): 22- 29.
|
|
| 28 | XU Y Z, HUANG X, GAO Z, et al. A novel electricity price forecasting approach based on multi-attention feature fusion model optimized by variational mode decomposition[J]. Measurement, 2025, 253(Part B): 117596. |
| 29 | HUANG J Y, YU E, LI C J, et al. A hybrid attention-enabled multivariate information fusion for carbon price forecasting[J]. Renewable Energy, 2026, 256(Part E): 124246. |
| 30 |
刘达, 牛东晓, 李媛媛, 等. 基于周期波动及其影响分析的电力市场中长期电价预测[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2009, 29 (13): 80- 85.
|
|
LIU Da, NIU Dongxiao, LI Yuanyuan, et al. Medium and long term electricity price forecasting in electricity market based on periodic fluctuation and its influence analysis[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2009, 29 (13): 80- 85.
|
|
| 31 |
许越, 李强, 崔晖. 基于MIC-EEMD-改进Informer的含高比例清洁能源与储能的电力市场短期电价多步预测[J]. 电网技术, 2024, 48 (3): 949- 958.
|
|
XU Yue, LI Qiang, CUI Hui. Short-term multi-step price prediction for the electricity market with a high proportion of clean energy and energy storage based on MIC-EEMD-improved informer[J]. Power System Technology, 2024, 48 (3): 949- 958.
|
|
| 32 | 王长春, 王果, 赵倩宇, 等. 考虑分时电价和充电利用率特征的大型电动汽车充电站负荷短期预测方法[J]. 南方电网技术, 2024, 18 (5): 75- 84. |
| WANG Changchun, WANG Guo, ZHAO Qianyu, et al. A short-term load forecasting method for large scale electric vehicle charging stations considering characteristics of charging utilization rate and time-of-use electricity price[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2024, 18 (5): 75- 84. | |
| 33 |
TIAN Z R, SUN W P, WU C Y. MLP-Carbon: a new paradigm integrating multi-frequency and multi-scale techniques for accurate carbon price forecasting[J]. Applied Energy, 2025, 383, 125330.
|
| 34 | SHEN W J, WANG C, HUANG M M, et al. Multiple complex construction noise signal decomposition and prediction methods: based on WOA-VMD and stacked LSTM[J]. Measurement, 2025, 256(Part B): 118201. |
| 35 | 薛阳, 李金星, 杨江天, 等. 基于相似日分析和改进鲸鱼算法优化LSTM网络模型的光伏功率短期预测[J]. 南方电网技术, 2024, 18 (11): 97- 105. |
| XUE Yang, LI Jinxing, YANG Jiangtian, et al. Short-term prediction of photovoltaic power based on similar day analysis and improved whale algorithm to optimize LSTM network model[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2024, 18 (11): 97- 105. | |
| 36 | KOHÚT R, KLAUČO M, KVASNICA M. Unified carbon emissions and market prices forecasts of the power grid[J]. Applied Energy, 2025, 377: 124527. |
| 37 |
YAN K, ZHANG D. Feature selection and analysis on correlated gas sensor data with recursive feature elimination[J]. Sensors Actuators B Chem, 2015, 212, 353- 63.
|
| 38 |
JIANG Z Y, CHE J X, HE M J, et al. A CGRU multi-step wind speed forecasting model based on multi-label specific XGBoost feature selection and secondary decomposition[J]. Renewable Energy, 2023, 203, 802- 827.
|
| 39 | LANG Y F, GAO Y L, CHEN T T, et al. Centered Collision Optimizer: A novel and efficient physics-based metaheuristic optimization algorithm for solving complex real-world engineering optimization problems[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2026, 448(Part B): 118491. |
| 40 |
WANG J Y, XU P C, JI X B, et al. MIC-SHAP: An ensemble feature selection method for materials machine learning[J]. Materials Today Communications, 2023, 37, 106910.
|
| [1] | ZENG Ruijiang, LI Zhiyong, HUANG Shu, WANG Weiguang. Abnormal data detection method for distribution networks in data scarcity scenarios [J]. Electric Power, 2026, 59(5): 67-75. |
| [2] | Yan GAO, Hanbin WU, Jixin ZHANG, Huaming ZHANG, Pei ZHANG. Day-Ahead Probabilistic Prediction Model for Photovoltaic Power Based on Combined Deep Learning [J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57(4): 100-110. |
| [3] | Nian ZOU, Meifang WEI, Sheng SU, Yingjun ZHENG, Wenqing ZHOU. Detection of Electricity Theft by Low Voltage Users with Zero Power Consumption Based on Water-Electricity Correlation Information [J]. Electric Power, 2023, 56(12): 206-216. |
| [4] | FENG Yuqi, LI Hui, LI Lijuan, ZHOU Yanbo, TAN Mao, PENG Hanmei. Voltage Trajectory Prediction of Photovoltaic Power Station Based on CNN-GRU [J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55(7): 163-171. |
| [5] | ZHENG Haofeng, YANG Guohua, KANG Wenjun, LIU Zhiyuan, LIU Shitao, WU Hong, ZHANG Honghao. Load Forecasting Based on Multiple Load Features and TCN-GRU Neural Network [J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55(11): 142-148. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
