Estimation of Receiving-End Grid Power Peaking Cost and Compensation Mechanism Based on Large-Proportion Renewable Energy Transmission

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2016.08.121.05

Abstract

Abstract: Tianshan-Zhongzhou UHVDC Project is the first UHVDC project in Xinjiang for outbound power transmission. With a designed annual transmission capacity of 44 billion kW·h, it will play an important role in energy resources optimization for a large area. The Tianshan-Zhongzhou UHVDC Transmission Project is built for transmission of both thermal and wind power in Xinjiang. Different proportion of the thermal and wind power has different influences on the operation of Henan power grid. The magnitude of power transmission during Xinjiang power valley will influence the load peaking operation and increase the peaking cost of Henan power grid. By taking this project as an example, a study is made on estimation of receiving-end grid power peaking cost and compensation mechanism based on large-proportion renewable energy transmission, which is expected to provide a reference for formulating relevant electricity price policy.

Key words: Tianshan-Zhongzhou UHVDC Project, themal power mixed with wind power transmission, peaking cost, electric power price;new energy

CLC Number:

TM715

BAI Hongkun, ZHOU Maiyu, YIN Shuo, JIN Liang. Estimation of Receiving-End Grid Power Peaking Cost and Compensation Mechanism Based on Large-Proportion Renewable Energy Transmission[J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(8): 121-125.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2016.08.121.05

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/Y2016/V49/I8/121

References

[1] 刘涛. 风电跨区（省）送出交易及价格机制研究[D]. 北京：中国科学院研究生院，2012.
[2] 国网能源研究院. 跨区（省）输电交易价格机制研究[R]. 北京：国网能源研究院，2014.
[3] 高磊. 南方电网西电东送定价模式研究[D]. 广州：华南理工大学，2009.
[4] 黄怡，王智冬，刘建琴，等. 特高压直流输送风电的经济性分析[J]. 电力建设，2011，32（5）：100－103．
HUANG Yi, WANG Zhidong, LIU Jianqin.Economic analysis on the UHVDC wind power transaction [J]. Electric Power Construction, 2011, 32(5): 100-103.
[5] 华文，徐政，李慧杰，等. 大容量风电远距离送出的经济性研究[J]. 电气技术，2010，8（8）：33－37．
HUA Wen, XU Zheng, LI Huijie, et al. Economic analysis on long distance transportation of large capacity wind power[J]. Electrical Technology, 2010, 8(8): 33-37.
[6] 姚天亮，郑海涛，杨德洲，等. 甘肃河西500万kW光伏就地消纳及调峰分析[J]. 中国电力，2014，47（3）：14－18．
YAO Tianliang, ZHENG Haitao, YANG Dezhou, et al. Analysis on local consumption and peaking issues of 5 000-MW PV in Hexi area of gansu province [J]. Electric Power, 2014, 47(3): 14-18.
[7] 黄天翔.基于风电消纳能力最大化的博弈分析与机制研究[D].北京：华北电力大学，2012.
[8] 关洪浩，张锋，孙谊媊，等. 哈郑直流工程投运初期对新疆电网影响分析[J]. 中国电力，2012，45（12）：48－51．
GUAN Honghao, ZHANGFeng, SUN Yiqian, et al. Analysis on the impact of hami-zhengzhou ultra-high voltage DC project on the power grid [J]. Electric Power, 2012, 45(12): 48-51.
[9] 陈汉雄，郑勇. 大容量核电机组接入川渝电网适应性及参与系统调峰研究[J]. 中国电力，2011，44（3）：1－5．
CHEN Hanxiong, ZHENG Yong. Adaptability of large-capacity nuclear power plants accessing Sichuan and Chongqing grids and ability of participating in system peak-load regulation [J]. Electric Power, 2011, 44(3): 1-5.

[1]	XIAO Shuai, ZHANG Yan, ZHANG De, YU Haifeng, LI Mengjiao. Comprehensive Evaluation Indexes Framework and Evaluation Method for Transmission Planning of Wind Power Cluster [J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(10): 115-122.
[2]	CHENG Linyan, FENG Yanhong, XU Lin. Consumptive Capacity Research Based on Wind-Solar Hybrid Characteristics [J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(7): 63-68.
[3]	HUANG He, GAO Song, ZHU Lei, HAN Jun, LIU Pengxiang, WU Zhi, GU Wei. Active Distribution Network Planning Model and Benders Solution Strategy Considering Multi-energy Complementation [J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(6): 11-18.
[4]	ZHENG Kuan, ZHANG Jinfang, LIU Jun, FENG Junshu, FU Guanjun, LI Jiangtao. Quantitative Analysis of China's Electrification Process Based on the 3E Optimization Model [J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(4): 18-24.
[5]	GUO Yanfei, CHENG Lin, LI Hongtao, RAO Qiang, LIU Manjun. Spatial Load Forecasting Method Based on Support Vector Machine and Internet Information Correction [J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(4): 80-88.
[6]	ZHANG Jinfang, LI Nan, LIU Jun, MI Zhe, YUAN Bo. An Integrated Analysis Method for Wind & Solar Power Accommodation Based on Peak Regulation Balance Principle [J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(3): 68-72.
[7]	ZHANG Ning, DAI Hongcai, HU Zhaoguang, SHEN Bo. A Source-Grid-Load Coordinated Planning Model Considering System Flexibility Constraints and Demand Response [J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(2): 61-69.
[8]	WANG Peng, ZHANG Pengyu, GAO Yajing, XU Jingwen, SUN Huakai. Research on Index System and Algorithm of Customer Classification in Electricity Market from the Regulatory Perspective [J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(12): 139-148.
[9]	YAN Yu, LIN Jikeng, HOU Yanqiu. Construction of the Framework for Adaptability Evaluation of Electricity Market [J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(12): 149-157.
[10]	XU Yiqing, GE Yi, LV Xiang, HUANG Junhui, XIE Zhenjian. Coordination of Wind Power Transmitted Through UHV Transmission Corridors Bundled with Thermal Power and Jiangsu Power Grid [J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(11): 81-87.
[11]	XIE Guohui, LUAN Fengkui, LI Nana, WANG Qingran. Contribution Evaluating Model for the New Energy Accommodation Influencing Factors [J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(11): 125-131.
[12]	LIN Fang, LIN Yan, LV Xianlong, CHENG Xingong, ZHANG Huiyu, CHEN Bojian. Short-term Parallel Power Load Forecasting Based on Balanced KNN [J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(10): 88-94,102.
[13]	ZHANG Quan, DAI Xianzhong, HAN Xinyang, JIN Xiaoling, ZHANG Wen, CHEN Dan. An Accurate Investment Method of Power Grid Based on Full Life Cycle Input-Output Benefit [J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(10): 171-177.
[14]	CHEN Rongjun, HE Yongxiu, CHEN Fenkai, DONG Mingyu, LI Dezhi, GUANG Fengtao. Long-term Daily Load Forecast of Electric Vehicle Based on System Dynamics and Monte Carlo Simulation [J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(9): 126-134.
[15]	DONG Fugui, WU Nannan, YAO Jun, LI Hujun, BAI Hongkun, JIN Chunxu. Study on Evolutionary Game Model of Thermal Power Regulation in Large-scale Wind Power Grid Integration [J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(9): 151-157.