Electric Power ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (6): 154-165.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202507070
• New Energy and Energy Storage • Previous Articles
BAI Zhijun1(
), LI Rui2(
), LI Jiankang1, HE Chenglong1, HU Wei1, LIU Yongpan2, YUAN Tiejiang2
Received:2025-07-23
Revised:2026-05-07
Online:2026-06-22
Published:2026-06-28
Supported by:BAI Zhijun, LI Rui, LI Jiankang, HE Chenglong, HU Wei, LIU Yongpan, YUAN Tiejiang. Equivalent modeling of large-scale photovoltaic hydrogen production stations driven by physics-data collaboration[J]. Electric Power, 2026, 59(6): 154-165.
| 类型 | 参数 | 数值 |
| 220 kV线路 | 电阻/(Ω·km–1) | 0.080 |
| 电抗/(Ω·km–1) | 0.417 | |
| 35 kV线路 | 电阻/(Ω·km–1) | 0.270 |
| 电抗/(Ω·km–1) | 0.379 | |
| 主变 | 变比 | 35 kV/220 kV |
| 额定容量/(MV·A) | 150 | |
| 短路电压百分比/% | 12.96 | |
| 箱变 | 变比 | 0.4 kV/0.4 kV/35 kV |
| 额定容量(光伏侧)/(MV·A) | 3.15 | |
| 额定容量(电解槽侧)/(MV·A) | 12.5 | |
| 短路电压百分比(光伏侧)/% | 7 | |
| 短路电压百分比(电解槽侧)/% | 10 | |
| 光伏发电单元 | 额定容量/MW | 3 |
| 额定光照强度/(W·m–2) | ||
| 电解槽单元 | 额定产氢量/(N·m3·h–1) |
Table 1 Main component parameters of photovoltaic hydrogen production station
| 类型 | 参数 | 数值 |
| 220 kV线路 | 电阻/(Ω·km–1) | 0.080 |
| 电抗/(Ω·km–1) | 0.417 | |
| 35 kV线路 | 电阻/(Ω·km–1) | 0.270 |
| 电抗/(Ω·km–1) | 0.379 | |
| 主变 | 变比 | 35 kV/220 kV |
| 额定容量/(MV·A) | 150 | |
| 短路电压百分比/% | 12.96 | |
| 箱变 | 变比 | 0.4 kV/0.4 kV/35 kV |
| 额定容量(光伏侧)/(MV·A) | 3.15 | |
| 额定容量(电解槽侧)/(MV·A) | 12.5 | |
| 短路电压百分比(光伏侧)/% | 7 | |
| 短路电压百分比(电解槽侧)/% | 10 | |
| 光伏发电单元 | 额定容量/MW | 3 |
| 额定光照强度/(W·m–2) | ||
| 电解槽单元 | 额定产氢量/(N·m3·h–1) |
| 单元类型 | 降维维度 | 均方误差 | 信息保留率 |
| 光伏发电单元 | 1 | 0.983 | 0.632 |
| 2 | 0.951 | 0.634 | |
| 3 | 0.738 | 0.922 | |
| 4 | 0.721 | 0.923 | |
| 5 | 0.712 | 0.924 | |
| 电解槽单元 | 1 | 0.979 | 0.603 |
| 2 | 0.961 | 0.613 | |
| 3 | 0.767 | 0.892 | |
| 4 | 0.734 | 0.932 | |
| 5 | 0.714 | 0.947 |
Table 2 Evaluation results of different dimensionality reduction dimensions under single-phase fault
| 单元类型 | 降维维度 | 均方误差 | 信息保留率 |
| 光伏发电单元 | 1 | 0.983 | 0.632 |
| 2 | 0.951 | 0.634 | |
| 3 | 0.738 | 0.922 | |
| 4 | 0.721 | 0.923 | |
| 5 | 0.712 | 0.924 | |
| 电解槽单元 | 1 | 0.979 | 0.603 |
| 2 | 0.961 | 0.613 | |
| 3 | 0.767 | 0.892 | |
| 4 | 0.734 | 0.932 | |
| 5 | 0.714 | 0.947 |
| 分群结果 | 本文等值方法 | 传统等值 方法1 | 传统等值方法2 |
| 光伏子集群1 | PV1-PV3、PV7-PV12、PV19-PV20、PV39-PV42、PV48-PV50 | PV1- PV10 | PV1-PV2、PV8-PV10、PV19-PV20、PV31、PV39-PV43、PV48-PV50 |
| 光伏子集群2 | PV4-PV6、PV13-PV18、PV23-PV28、PV34-PV37 | PV11- PV20 | PV3-PV4、PV6-PV7、PV11-PV13、PV18、PV21-PV22、PV29-PV30、PV32-PV33、PV37-PV38、PV44-PV47 |
| 光伏子集群3 | PV21-PV22、PV29-PV33、PV38、PV43-PV47 | PV21- PV30 | PV5、PV14-PV17、PV23-PV28、PV34-PV36 |
| 光伏子集群4 | — | PV31-PV40 | — |
| 光伏子集群5 | — | PV41-PV50 | — |
| 电解槽子集群1 | EL1-EL8 | EL1-EL8 | EL1-EL8 |
| 电解槽子集群2 | EL9-EL16 | EL9-EL16 | EL9-EL16 |
| 电解槽子集群3 | EL17-EL26 | EL17-EL26 | EL17-EL26 |
Table 3 Station grouping results under single-phase fault
| 分群结果 | 本文等值方法 | 传统等值 方法1 | 传统等值方法2 |
| 光伏子集群1 | PV1-PV3、PV7-PV12、PV19-PV20、PV39-PV42、PV48-PV50 | PV1- PV10 | PV1-PV2、PV8-PV10、PV19-PV20、PV31、PV39-PV43、PV48-PV50 |
| 光伏子集群2 | PV4-PV6、PV13-PV18、PV23-PV28、PV34-PV37 | PV11- PV20 | PV3-PV4、PV6-PV7、PV11-PV13、PV18、PV21-PV22、PV29-PV30、PV32-PV33、PV37-PV38、PV44-PV47 |
| 光伏子集群3 | PV21-PV22、PV29-PV33、PV38、PV43-PV47 | PV21- PV30 | PV5、PV14-PV17、PV23-PV28、PV34-PV36 |
| 光伏子集群4 | — | PV31-PV40 | — |
| 光伏子集群5 | — | PV41-PV50 | — |
| 电解槽子集群1 | EL1-EL8 | EL1-EL8 | EL1-EL8 |
| 电解槽子集群2 | EL9-EL16 | EL9-EL16 | EL9-EL16 |
| 电解槽子集群3 | EL17-EL26 | EL17-EL26 | EL17-EL26 |
| 单元类型 | 降维维度 | 均方误差 | 信息保留率 |
| 光伏发电单元 | 1 | 0.939 | 0.597 |
| 2 | 0.916 | 0.603 | |
| 3 | 0.816 | 0.704 | |
| 4 | 0.697 | 0.893 | |
| 5 | 0.686 | 0.897 | |
| 电解槽单元 | 1 | 0.961 | 0.542 |
| 2 | 0.935 | 0.548 | |
| 3 | 0.762 | 0.892 | |
| 4 | 0.744 | 0.894 | |
| 5 | 0.729 | 0.895 |
Table 4 Evaluation results of different dimensionality reduction dimensions under three-phase fault
| 单元类型 | 降维维度 | 均方误差 | 信息保留率 |
| 光伏发电单元 | 1 | 0.939 | 0.597 |
| 2 | 0.916 | 0.603 | |
| 3 | 0.816 | 0.704 | |
| 4 | 0.697 | 0.893 | |
| 5 | 0.686 | 0.897 | |
| 电解槽单元 | 1 | 0.961 | 0.542 |
| 2 | 0.935 | 0.548 | |
| 3 | 0.762 | 0.892 | |
| 4 | 0.744 | 0.894 | |
| 5 | 0.729 | 0.895 |
| 分群结果 | 等值方法 | ||
| 本文等值方法 | 传统等值 方法1 | 传统等值方法2 | |
| 光伏子集群1 | PV1-PV10 | PV1- PV10 | PV1-PV2、PV8-PV10、PV19-PV20、PV31-PV32、PV39-PV42、PV48-PV50 |
| 光伏子集群2 | PV11-PV13、PV18-PV22、PV29-PV30 | PV11- PV20 | PV3-PV7、PV11-PV14、PV17-PV18、PV21-PV22、PV28-PV30、PV33-PV34、PV37-PV38、PV43-PV47 |
| 光伏子集群3 | PV14-PV17、PV23-PV28 | PV21-PV30 | PV15-PV16、PV23-PV27、PV35-PV36 |
| 光伏子集群4 | PV31-PV40 | PV31-PV40 | — |
| 光伏子集群5 | PV41-PV50 | PV41-PV50 | — |
| 电解槽子集群1 | EL1-EL8 | EL1-EL8 | EL1-EL8 |
| 电解槽子集群2 | EL9-EL16 | EL9-EL16 | EL9-EL16 |
| 电解槽子集群3 | EL17-EL26 | EL17-EL26 | EL17-EL26 |
Table 5 Station grouping results under three-phase fault
| 分群结果 | 等值方法 | ||
| 本文等值方法 | 传统等值 方法1 | 传统等值方法2 | |
| 光伏子集群1 | PV1-PV10 | PV1- PV10 | PV1-PV2、PV8-PV10、PV19-PV20、PV31-PV32、PV39-PV42、PV48-PV50 |
| 光伏子集群2 | PV11-PV13、PV18-PV22、PV29-PV30 | PV11- PV20 | PV3-PV7、PV11-PV14、PV17-PV18、PV21-PV22、PV28-PV30、PV33-PV34、PV37-PV38、PV43-PV47 |
| 光伏子集群3 | PV14-PV17、PV23-PV28 | PV21-PV30 | PV15-PV16、PV23-PV27、PV35-PV36 |
| 光伏子集群4 | PV31-PV40 | PV31-PV40 | — |
| 光伏子集群5 | PV41-PV50 | PV41-PV50 | — |
| 电解槽子集群1 | EL1-EL8 | EL1-EL8 | EL1-EL8 |
| 电解槽子集群2 | EL9-EL16 | EL9-EL16 | EL9-EL16 |
| 电解槽子集群3 | EL17-EL26 | EL17-EL26 | EL17-EL26 |
| 1 | 周孝信, 赵强, 张玉琼, 等. “双碳”目标下我国能源电力系统发展趋势分析: 绿电替代与绿氢替代[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2024, 44 (17): 6707- 6721. |
| ZHOU Xiaoxin, ZHAO Qiang, ZHANG Yuqiong, et al. Analysis of the development trend of China's energy and power system under the dual carbon target: green electricity substitution and green hydrogen substitution[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2024, 44 (17): 6707- 6721. | |
| 2 | 杨胜, 樊艳芳, 侯俊杰, 等. 考虑平抑风光波动的ALK-PEM电解制氢系统容量优化模型[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2024, 52 (1): 85- 96. |
| YANG Sheng, FAN Yanfang, HOU Junjie, et al. Capacity optimization model for an ALK-PEM electrolytic hydrogen production systemconsidering the stabilization of wind and PV fluctuations[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2024, 52 (1): 85- 96. | |
| 3 | 程改红, 陆韶琦, 邵冲, 等. 大规模交直流电力系统电磁暂态仿真高效建模方法[J]. 电网技术, 2017, 41 (6): 1919- 1926. |
| CHENG Gaihong, LU Shaoqi, SHAO Chong, et al. A high efficiency modeling method for electromagnetic transient simulation of large scale AC/DC power system[J]. Power System Technology, 2017, 41 (6): 1919- 1926. | |
| 4 | 李亚楼, 张星, 胡善华, 等. 含高比例电力电子装备电力系统安全稳定分析建模仿真技术[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2022, 46 (10): 33- 42. |
| LI Yalou, ZHANG Xing, HU Shanhua, et al. Modeling and simulation technology for stability analysis of power system with high proportion of power electronics[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2022, 46 (10): 33- 42. | |
| 5 | 吴岳, 朱林, 胡永浩, 等. 基于数据驱动相似度方法的风电场站动态等值建模研究[J]. 电力科学与技术学报, 2024, 39 (5): 118- 128. |
| WU Yue, ZHU Lin, HU Yonghao, et al. Research on dynamic equivalent modeling of a wind farm using a data-drivendegree of similarity method[J]. Journal of Electric Power Science and Technology, 2024, 39 (5): 118- 128. | |
| 6 | 王皓怀, 汤涌, 侯俊贤, 等. 风光储联合发电系统的组合建模与等值[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2011, 31 (34): 1- 9. |
| WANG Haohuai, TANG Yong, HOU Junxian, et al. Composition modeling and equivalence of an integrated power generation system of wind, photovoltaic and energy storage unit[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2011, 31 (34): 1- 9. | |
| 7 | 赵溪洁, 鲍颜红, 吴峰, 等. 基于系统等值参数的新能源多场站有功无功协调控制[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2025, 53 (17): 178- 187. |
| ZHAO Xijie, BAO Yanhong, WU Feng, et al. Coordinated active and reactive power control of multi-new energy stations based on system equivalent parameters[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2025, 53 (17): 178- 187. | |
| 8 | 林子豪. 大型光伏电站等值建模与电压控制研究[D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2020. |
| LIN Zihao. Research on equivalent modeling and voltage control of large photovoltaic power plant[D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2020. | |
| 9 | 潘学萍, 王卫康, 黄桦, 等. 考虑机网动态交互作用的光伏场群等值建模[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2023, 43 (3): 80- 85, 109. |
| PAN Xueping, WANG Weikang, HUANG Hua, et al. Equivalent modeling of PV station groups considering dynamic interaction between PV and power grid[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2023, 43 (3): 80- 85, 109. | |
| 10 |
李健, 贺国伟, 孙光友, 等. 考虑低穿特征的规模化光伏聚类分析方法[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2023, 35 (8): 1- 8.
|
|
LI Jian, HE Guowei, SUN Guangyou, et al. Clustering analysis method for large-scale photovoltaic with LVRT characteristics[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2023, 35 (8): 1- 8.
|
|
| 11 | 张永新, 李飞, 张榴晨, 等. 基于线路阻抗聚类的分布式光伏电站等效建模[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43 (5): 312- 318. |
| ZHANG Yongxin, LI Fei, ZHANG Liuchen, et al. Equivalent modeling of distributed photovoltaic power stations based on line impedance clustering[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2022, 43 (5): 312- 318. | |
| 12 | ROBBINS C, PURELL R, SHEEZ L, et al. Small scale renewable energy power system with hydrogen combustion[C]//Proceedings of the 2008 NHA Annual Hydrogen Conference、Sacramento California 2008: 23. |
| 13 |
周佩朋, 孙华东, 项祖涛, 等. 大规模电力系统仿真用新能源场站模型结构及建模方法研究(三): 电磁暂态模型[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43 (8): 2990- 3000.
|
|
ZHOU Peipeng, SUN Huadong, XIANG Zutao, et al. Research on model structures and modeling methods of renewable energy stations for large-scale power system simulation(Ⅲ): electromagnetic transient models[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43 (8): 2990- 3000.
|
|
| 14 | ULLEBERG O. Case study: the Hawaii hydrogen power park demonstration at Kahua Ranch[R]. US: Hawaii Natural Energy Institute, 2010. |
| 15 |
LITTLE M, THOMSON M, INFIELD D. Electrical integration of renewable energy into stand-alone power supplies incorporating hydrogen storage[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32 (10/11): 1582- 1588.
|
| 16 | 左佳鑫, 杨秀, 赵晓莉, 等. 考虑LVRT功率特性的直驱永磁风电场多机聚合辨识等值建模方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2025, 53 (2): 14- 26. |
| ZUO Jiaxin, YANG Xiu, ZHAO Xiaoli, et al. Equivalence modeling method for multi-machine aggregation identification of direct-drivepermanent magnet wind farm considering LVRT power characteristics[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2025, 53 (2): 14- 26. | |
| 17 |
SEGAWA Y, ENDO N, SHIMODA E, et al. Pilot-scale hydrogen energy utilization system demonstration: a commercial building case study on on-site green hydrogen production and use[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47 (36): 15982- 15991.
|
| 18 |
刘丽萍, 刘德坤, 邓搏, 等. 数据驱动的柔性直流继电保护自适应测试方法[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58 (11): 186- 192, 204.
|
|
LIU Liping, LIU Dekun, DENG Bo, et al. A data-driven adaptive testing method for flexible DC relay protection[J]. Electric Power, 2025, 58 (11): 186- 192, 204.
|
|
| 19 | 王帅, 贾东梨, 刘科研, 等. 适应高比例光伏接入的有源配电网改进型故障保护策略[J]. 中国电力, 2026, 59 (1): 105- 114. |
| WANG Shuai, JIA Dongli, LIU Keyan, et al. Improved fault protection strategy for active distribution networks adapting to high proportion photovoltaic access[J]. Electric Power, 2026, 59 (1): 105- 114. | |
| 20 | 马冰清, 李振兴. 考虑电流限幅的构网型光伏场站送出线路纵联保护新原理[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58 (8): 164- 175. |
| MA Bingqing, LI Zhenxing. A new pilot protection for transmission lines based on overcurrent limiting from grid-forming power sources[J]. Electric Power, 2025, 58 (8): 164- 175. | |
| 21 |
WU H B, ZHANG J J, LUO C, et al. Equivalent modeling of photovoltaic power station based on canopy-FCM clustering algorithm[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 102911- 102920.
|
| 22 | 焦田利, 章坚民, 李熊, 等. 基于空间相关性的大规模分布式用户光伏空间分群方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019, 43 (21): 97- 102, 162. |
| JIAO Tianli, ZHANG Jianmin, LI Xiong, et al. Spatial clustering method for large-scale distributed user photovoltaics based on spatial correlation[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019, 43 (21): 97- 102, 162. | |
| 23 | 胡善华. 含高渗透率分布式光伏的有源配电网动态等值研究及应用[D]. 北京: 中国电力科学研究院, 2024. |
| HU Shanhua. Research and application of dynamic equivalent modeling of active distribution network with high penetration distribution photovoltaic[D]. Beijing: China Electric Power Research Institute, 2024. | |
| 24 | 王荟雅. 基于聚类和深度学习算法的分布式光伏集群动态等效建模研究[D]. 南京: 南京邮电大学, 2023. |
| WANG Huiya. Research on dynamic equivalent modeling of distributed photovoltaic cluster based on clustering and deep learning algorithm[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2023. | |
| 25 |
LI P X, GU W, WANG L F, et al. Dynamic equivalent modeling of two-staged photovoltaic power station clusters based on dynamic affinity propagation clustering algorithm[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2018, 95, 463- 475.
|
| 26 | 王丽朝, 孟子尧, 陈诗明, 等. 基于GRU神经网络的光伏电站数据预处理方法[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43 (11): 78- 84. |
| WANG Lichao, MENG Ziyao, CHEN Shiming, et al. Preprocessing method for photovoltaic power plant data based on GRU neural network[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2022, 43 (11): 78- 84. | |
| 27 | 黄师禹, 朱林, 胡永浩, 等. 基于多时空尺度特性的风电场物理-数据融合动态等值建模[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2025, 49 (1): 150- 160. |
| HUANG Shiyu, ZHU Lin, HU Yonghao, et al. Dynamic equivalent modeling with physics-data fusion for wind farm based on characteristics of multiple spatio-temporal scales[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2025, 49 (1): 150- 160. | |
| 28 | 王诗雯, 刘飞, 刘沁怡, 等. 不对称故障下两级式光伏并网系统低电压穿越控制[J]. 电网技术, 2023, 47 (1): 91- 99. |
| WANG Shiwen, LIU Fei, LIU Qinyi, et al. Low-voltage riding-through control strategy for two-staged grid-connected photovoltaic system under asymmetrical faults[J]. Power System Technology, 2023, 47 (1): 91- 99. | |
| 29 | 孙华东, 李佳豪, 李文锋, 等. 大规模电力系统仿真用新能源场站模型结构及建模方法研究(一): 模型结构[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43 (4): 1378- 1388. |
| SUN Huadong, LI Jiahao, LI Wenfeng, et al. Research on model structures and modeling methods of renewable energy station for large-scale power system simulation (part I): model structure[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43 (4): 1378- 1388. | |
| 30 |
LI H, YAO X L, TACHEGA M A, et al. Technology selection for hydrogen production in China by integrating emergy into life cycle sustainability assessment[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 294, 126303.
|
| 31 | 王诗雯, 刘飞, 庄一展, 等. 基于有功指令共享的两级式光伏并网系统低电压穿越控制策略[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2023, 43 (4): 99- 105. |
| WANG Shiwen, LIU Fei, ZHUANG Yizhan, et al. Active-power-command-sharing low-voltage ride-through control strategy for two-stage PV grid-connected system[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2023, 43 (4): 99- 105. | |
| 32 | 吴亚丽, 冯梦琦, 王君虎, 等. 变分模态分解和自适应稀疏自编码器的故障诊断模型[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2025, 44 (9): 1603- 1611. |
| WU Yali, FENG Mengqi, WANG Junhu, et al. Fault diagnosis method combining variational mode decomposition with adaptive sparse autoencoder[J]. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2025, 44 (9): 1603- 1611. | |
| 33 | 王玲, 朱远哲, 杜婉琳, 等. 基于空间矢量变换与谱聚类的电压暂降事件数据空间聚合方法[J]. 供用电, 2024, 41 (10): 75- 83. |
| WANG Ling, ZHU Yuanzhe, DU Wanlin, et al. Spatial aggregation method for voltage sags event data based on space vector transform and spectral clustering[J]. Distribution & Utilization, 2024, 41 (10): 75- 83. | |
| 34 | 周国梁, 高丽萍, 梁言桥, 等. 柔性直流输电系统多端异构通用化阻抗建模与分析[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58 (3): 73- 85. |
| ZHOU Guoliang, GAO Liping, LIANG Yanqiao, et al. Multi-terminal heterogeneous generalized impedance modeling and analysis of MMC-MTDC transmission systems[J]. Electric Power, 2025, 58 (3): 73- 85. | |
| 35 | 罗茜. 光伏电站的建模及其运行控制技术的研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2023. |
| LUO Qian. Research on modeling and operation control technology of photovoltaic power station[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2023. |
| [1] | Rui WANG, Zhixin FU, Jian WANG, Haoming LIU. A Multi-stage Scenario Tree Generation Method for Wind-Solar Load Based on Complex Feature Extraction and Sinkhorn Distance [J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57(12): 30-40. |
| [2] | Daxing WANG, Yan Ning, Jingpei WANG, Yang XU, Jun BI, Mingbiao ZHOU, Peng WANG. Robust Simplified Modeling of Microgrid in the Context of Constructing New Power Systems [J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57(1): 148-157. |
| [3] | Xiangxiang LIU, Senlin ZHANG, Siqiao ZHU, Rui MA. Multi-form Flexible Resource Aggregation Model for Virtual Power Plant Based on Grey Target Theory and Spectral Clustering [J]. Electric Power, 2023, 56(11): 104-112. |
| [4] | ZHANG Zhonghui, LIU Gushuai, XIE Yimiao, HE Lezhang. Treatment Decision-Making of Partition in Low Voltage Based on Spectral Clustering in Urban Power System [J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(10): 101-105. |
| [5] | LIU Wen-jie, WU Feng, JIN Yu-qing, JU Ping. Clustering Method for DFIG-Based Wind Turbines [J]. Electric Power, 2014, 47(6): 111-116. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
