A New Method for Fault Line Selection of Photovoltaic Power Station Collection Lines Based on TEO Energy

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202404081

Abstract

Abstract:

Carrying out rapid fault selection of PV power station collection lines is of great significance to ensure the stable operation of the system. A fault method for PV power station collection lines based on the zero-sequence current gradient Teager energy operator (TEO) is proposed. The zero-sequence current sequence model of the collection line for single-phase ground fault is established, and the distribution law of the zero-sequence current and voltage as well as the output characteristics of PV power supply during the fault period are analyzed. The TEO is used to calculate the energy value of the zero-sequence current gradient, and the threshold is based on the difference in energy values between the fault line and the non-fault line measurement points. A fault selection criterion is proposed, and a PV power station line model is built. Simulation verification shows that the proposed method has good selection effect under different fault positions, grounding resistances, unit outputs, and noise interference scenarios.

Key words: power collection lines, fast fourier transform, gradient energy, fault line selection

Ran ZHENG, Jiayi WU, Haoliang DU, Wulue PAN. A New Method for Fault Line Selection of Photovoltaic Power Station Collection Lines Based on TEO Energy[J]. Electric Power, 2025, 58(2): 147-153.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202404081

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/Y2025/V58/I2/147

Figures/Tables 11

References 19

1	王晓卫, 岳阳, 郭亮, 等. 注入电流分布特性辨识的配电网故障选线方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57 (10): 78- 89.
	WANG Xiaowei, YUE Yang, GUO Liang, et al. Injection current distribution characteristics identification based distribution-level fault line selection[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57 (10): 78- 89.
2	胡云鹏, 都成刚, 齐军, 等. 基于D-S证据理论的配电网接地故障原因综合辨识模型[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57 (10): 133- 142.
	HU Yunpeng, DU Chenggang, QI Jun, et al. D-S evidence theory based comprehensive identification model for cause of grounding fault in distribution network[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57 (10): 133- 142.
3	郑雅玲, 韩永霞, 余菲, 等. 基于配电网全架构精确电磁暂态模型的VT一次侧过流机理及影响因素分析[J]. 广东电力, 2023, 36 (1): 48- 58. DOI
	ZHENG Yaling, HAN Yongxia, YU Fei, et al. Analysis of VT primary side overcurrent mechanism and influencing factors based on accurate electromagnetic transient model of distribution network structure[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2023, 36 (1): 48- 58. DOI
4	许守东, 潘馨钰, 李世伟, 等. 基于光伏自适应注入量的配电网单相接地故障保护方法[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2023, 39 (9): 140- 150. DOI
	XU Shoudong, PAN Xinyu, LI Shiwei, et al. A single phase grounding fault protection method for distribution networks based on photovoltaic adaptive injection amount[J]. Power System and Clean Energy, 2023, 39 (9): 140- 150. DOI
5	刘健, 朱青松, 王毅钊, 等. 基于变电站稳态监测信息的小电阻接地系统单相接地检测性能提升方法[J]. 浙江电力, 2023, 42 (4): 1- 8.
	LIU Jian, ZHU Qingsong, WANG Yizhao, et al. Improvement of single-phase grounding fault detection for small resistance grounding systems based on steady-state monitoring information in the substation[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2023, 42 (4): 1- 8.
6	黄博, 李文亮, 徐学帅, 等. 35 kV中压配电网单相接地故障行波定位方法研究[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2023, 39 (1): 58- 63. DOI
	HUANG Bo, LI Wenliang, XU Xueshuai, et al. A study on the traveling wave location method of single-phase grounding fault in 35 kV medium voltage distribution network[J]. Power System and Clean Energy, 2023, 39 (1): 58- 63. DOI
7	徐肃, 张瑞强, 刘轶, 等. 10 kV配电网单相接地故障模拟仿真建模技术研究[J]. 内蒙古电力技术, 2024, 42 (2): 37- 43.
	XU Su, ZHANG Ruiqiang, LIU Yi, et al. Research on simulation and modeling technology for single-phase grounding fault in 10 kV distribution network[J]. Inner Mongolia Electric Power, 2024, 42 (2): 37- 43.
8	黄亚峰, 王浩天, 朱登宝, 等. 基于零序电流特性的中性点灵活接地系统的故障选线方法[J]. 东北电力大学学报, 2023, 43 (3): 16- 22, 71.
	HUANG Yafeng, WANG Haotian, ZHU Dengbao, et al. Fault line selection method for neutral flexible grounding system based on zero sequence current characteristics[J]. Journal of Northeast Electric Power University, 2023, 43 (3): 16- 22, 71.
9	徐鑫森, 徐习东, 陈金玉, 等. 考虑三次谐波调制的柔直系统交流侧单相接地保护研究[J]. 浙江电力, 2024, 43 (10): 114- 123.
	XU Xinsen, XU Xidong, CHEN Jinyu, et al. Research on single-phase grounding fault protection on the AC side of VSC-HVDC systems considering third harmonic modulation[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2024, 43 (10): 114- 123.
10	乔东伟, 宫德锋, 秦苏亚, 等. 电子式消弧线圈对接地故障谐波选线的影响[J]. 山东电力技术, 2024, 51 (12): 10- 18.
	QIAO Dongwei, GONG Defeng, QIN Suya, et al. Influence of power electronic arc suppression coil on harmonic current selection of grounding fault[J]. Shandong Electric Power, 2024, 51 (12): 10- 18.
11	何龙, 朱咏明, 王清彬, 等. 基于优化VMD的小电流接地系统接地故障选线方法[J]. 电工技术, 2024, (2): 48- 51.
	HE Long, ZHU Yongming, WANG Qingbin, et al. Optimized-VMD-based method of determining grounding fault line of small current systems[J]. Electric Engineering, 2024, (2): 48- 51.
12	齐郑, 杨以涵, 林榕. 基于小波变换和维纳滤波技术的小电流接地系统单相接地故障选线研究[J]. 电网技术, 2004, 28 (13): 23- 26. DOI
	QI Zheng, YANG Yihan, LIN Rong. Study on faulty line detection of single phase to ground fault in mall current neutral grounding system based on wavelet transform and Wiener filter technology[J]. Power System Technology, 2004, 28 (13): 23- 26. DOI
13	NIU L, WU G Q, XU Z S. Single-phase fault line selection in distribution network based on signal injection method[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9, 21567- 21578. DOI
14	兰飞, 林立成, 黎静华. 基于改进变分模态分解和信息融合的故障选线[J]. 东北电力大学学报, 2022, 42 (5): 1- 14.
	LAN Fei, LIN Licheng, LI Jinghua. Fault line selection based on ImprovedVariational mode decomposition and information fusion[J]. Journal of Northeast Electric Power University, 2022, 42 (5): 1- 14.
15	杨正理, 黄其新, 王长鹏, 等. 采用差分滤波算法改进最大投影差值故障选线[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2018, 46 (4): 158- 164. DOI
	YANG Zhengli, HUANG Qixin, WANG Changpeng, et al. A new fault line selection method of the maximizing shadow difference optimized by differential filter algorithm[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2018, 46 (4): 158- 164. DOI
16	SHEN Q H. A novel method of fault line selection in low current grounding system using multi-criteria information integrated[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2022, 209, 108010. DOI
17	李秀芬, 李泽昊, 赵建利. 考虑平抑新能源电站功率波动和谐波治理的储能系统控制策略研究[J]. 内蒙古电力技术, 2023, 41 (3): 16- 25.
	LI Xiufen, LI Zehao, ZHAO Jianli. Research on control strategy of energy storage system considering suppression of power fluctuations and harmonic management for new energy power station[J]. Inner Mongolia Electric Power, 2023, 41 (3): 16- 25.
18	李吉峰, 唐克, 王孜航, 等. 计及多源互补特性的新型电力系统分布式电源承载能力评估[J]. 东北电力大学学报, 2023, 43 (1): 62- 68.
	LI Jifeng, TANG Ke, WANG Zihang, et al. Assessment of distributed power generations bearing capacity of modern power systems with multi-sources complementary characteristics[J]. Journal of Northeast Electric Power University, 2023, 43 (1): 62- 68.
19	肖勇, 肖小兵, 金鑫, 等. 含储能和分布式光伏的配电网系统计及静态电压稳定性的多目标优化[J]. 广东电力, 2024, 37 (4): 24- 32. DOI
	XIAO Yong, XIAO Xiaobing, JIN Xin, et al. Multi-objective optimization of distribution network system with energy storage and distributed photovoltaic considering static voltage stability[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2024, 37 (4): 24- 32. DOI

序分量	电阻/(Ω·km^–1)	电抗/(Ω·km^–1)	电纳/(10^–6 S·km^–1)
正序	0.125	0.113	91.000
零序	1.250	0.396	57.000

序分量	电阻/(Ω·km^–1)	电抗/(Ω·km^–1)	电纳/(10^–6 S·km^–1)
正序	0.125	0.113	91.000
零序	1.250	0.396	57.000

序号	故障点到母线距离/km	故障线零序电流梯度能量值	非故障线零序电流梯度能量值	是否识别故障线路
1	0	127.8	9.97	是
2	1	132.2	9.78	是
3	2	139.8	10.03	是
4	3	146.4	11.18	是
5	4	154.8	11.89	是
6	5	161.9	12.64	是

序号	故障点到母线距离/km	故障线零序电流梯度能量值	非故障线零序电流梯度能量值	是否识别故障线路
1	0	127.8	9.97	是
2	1	132.2	9.78	是
3	2	139.8	10.03	是
4	3	146.4	11.18	是
5	4	154.8	11.89	是
6	5	161.9	12.64	是

序号	接地电阻值/Ω	故障线零序电流梯度能量值	非故障线零序电流梯度能量值	是否识别故障线路
1	50	108.90	8.575	是
2	100	96.79	7.632	是
3	150	82.80	6.522	是
4	200	69.46	5.470	是