清洁燃煤发电技术的多属性综合评估方法研究

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201703016

中国电力 ›› 2017, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (10): 166-170.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201703016

清洁燃煤发电技术的多属性综合评估方法研究

刘彤, 张慧聪

华北电力大学,北京 102206

收稿日期:2017-03-19 出版日期:2017-10-25 发布日期:2017-10-30
作者简介:刘彤（1963—）,女,四川仪陇人,教授,从事火电厂锅炉技术研究。E-mail: liut@ncepu.edu.cn

Study on Multi-attribute Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Clean Coal Power Generation Technology

LIU Tong, ZHANG Huicong

North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China

Received:2017-03-19 Online:2017-10-25 Published:2017-10-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了客观地对电力行业清洁燃煤技术进行评估,以及为淘汰小容量机组提供参考,采用多属性综合评估方法构建清洁燃煤发电技术评估体系,从技术、资源消耗、污染物排放以及成本效益4个方面进行综合评估。评估结果表明,整体煤气化联合循环发电技术的环境性能最好,但其成本效益最差。超临界/超超临界煤粉炉机组各方面性能较为均衡。超临界循环流化床机组与超临界煤粉炉机组性能不相上下,前者环境性能较优,后者成本效益较好。

关键词: 电力行业, 清洁利用技术, 评估体系, 能源消耗

Abstract: In order to objectively evaluate the clean coal utilization technologies in the power industry and provide references for the elimination of small capacity units, the multi-attribute comprehensive evaluation method is used to construct an evaluation system of clean coal power generation technology for comprehensive assessment from the four aspects of technologies, resources consumption, pollutant emissions and cost-effectiveness. The evaluation results show that the integrated coal gasification combined cycle power generation technology has the best environmental performance, but its cost-effectiveness is the worst. The supercritical/ultra-supercritical pulverized coal furnace unit has even performance in all aspects. Compared with the supercritical pulverized coal furnace unit, the supercritical circulating fluidized bed unit is competitive in general performance, especially in environmental performance, while the former one performs better in cost effectiveness.

Key words: assessment system, clean unitlization technology, power industry, energy consumption

中图分类号:

TM621

刘彤, 张慧聪. 清洁燃煤发电技术的多属性综合评估方法研究[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(10): 166-170.

LIU Tong, ZHANG Huicong. Study on Multi-attribute Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Clean Coal Power Generation Technology[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(10): 166-170.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201703016

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2017/V50/I10/166

参考文献

[1] 唐学军,薛年华,何加坤,等. 一种新的综合评价方法在电力系统中的应用[J]. 水电能源工程,1999,17(3)：53-56.
TANG Xuejun, XUE Nianhua, HE Jiakun, et al . The application of a new comprehensive evaluation method in power systems [J]. Hydroelectric Energy, 1999, 17(3): 53-56.
[2] 贺永冰. 节能减排评价方法在火电厂凝结水泵变频改造中的应用[J]. 电力技术,2010. 19(7)：27-29.
HE Yongbing. Application of evaluation method of energy-saving and emission reduction in the variable frequency reformation of condensate pumps [J]. Electric Power Technology, 2010, 19(7): 27-29.
[3] 郭家宝. 热电联产机组燃料成本分摊和节能效益评价方法探讨[J]. 中国电力,2003,36(3)：78-80.
GUO Jiabao. Discussion on the fuel cost apportionment and energy-saving benefit evaluation methods for cogeneration units [J]. Electric Power, 2003, 36(3): 78-80.
[4] 清华大学. 环境保护最佳可行技术评估指标体系[R]. 北京：清华大学,2009.
[5] 国家发展和改革委员会,环境保护部,工业和信息化部. 电力(燃煤发电企业)行业清洁生产评价指标体系[EB/OL]. (2015-04-20)[2016-12-01]. http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbgg/201504/W020150420524648567766.pdf.
[6] 许乃中,曾维华. 火电行业节能减排技术综合评价方法研究[J]. 环境科学与技术,2014. 37(5)：187-192,198.
XU Naizhong, ZENG Weihua. A comprehensive method based on interval-value for evaluation of energy-saving and emission- reducing technology of thermal power industry [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 37(5): 187-192, 198.
[7] 屈伟平. 清洁煤发电的CCS和IGCC联产技术[J]. 国内外机电一体化技术,2010(1)：58-63,65.
[8] 龙如银. 洁净煤技术体系综合评价研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(11)：140-144.
LONG Ruyin. Study on the comprehensive assessment of the clean coal technology system[J]. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2004, 24(11): 140-144.
[9] 钟智辉,刘豫龙,叶永松. 常规火电与IGCC经济性比较[J]. 华中电力,2002,15(4)：47-48.
ZHONG Zhihui, LIU Yulong, YE Yongsong. Economy comparison of traditional thermal power plant and IGCC [J]. Central China Electric Power, 2002, 15(4): 47-48.
[10] 赵洁,赵敏,谢秋野. 国内外整体煤气化联合循环电厂发展概况及我国建设条件分析[J]. 中国电力,2006,39(4)：43-46.
ZHAO Jie, ZHAO Min, XIE Qiuye. Domestic and abroad development situation and conditions analysis for the IGCC power plants construction in China [J]. Electric Power, 2006, 39(4): 43-46.
[11] 徐强,曹江,周一工,等. 整体煤气化联合循环(IGCC)特点综述及产业化前景分析[J]. 锅炉技术,2006,37(6)：1-9.
XU Qiang, CAO Jiang, ZHOU Yigong. Features summarization and industrialization analysis of integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) [J], Boiler Technology, 2006, 37(6): 1-9.
[12] 邹阳军,何胜,郑文广. 超临界循环流化床锅炉的发展[J]. 能源工程,2016(4)：19-24.
ZOU Yangjun, HE Sheng, ZHENG WenGuang. Development of supercritical circulating fluidized bed boiler[J]. Energy Engineering, 2016(4): 19-24.

清洁燃煤发电技术的多属性综合评估方法研究

Study on Multi-attribute Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Clean Coal Power Generation Technology

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	周原冰, 张士宁, 侯方心, 任宏涛, 徐鹏飞. 电力行业碳达峰及促进全社会碳减排影响分析[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(9): 1-9.
[2]	李旭东, 谭青博, 赵浩辰, 乔宁, 刘力纬, 谭彩霞, 谭忠富. 碳达峰背景下中国电力行业碳排放因素和脱钩效应[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(5): 88-98.
[3]	王一蓉, 陈浩林, 林立身, 唐进. 考虑电力行业碳排放的全国碳价预测[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(5): 79-87.
[4]	康俊杰, 赵春阳, 周国鹏, 赵良. 基于熵权-德尔菲法的源网荷储多能互补项目布局评估方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(12): 120-131.
[5]	于宗超, 文明, 李湘华, 谢欣涛, 杨洪明. 融合群体智慧的分布式智能电网高效发展管理策略[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(10): 57-68.
[6]	周德才, 陈金金, 刘波. 中国电力景气指数的混频非对称测度[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(6): 172-185.
[7]	石庆松, 秦蕊, 肖鹏, 欧阳丽炜, 熊刚, 张宏鑫, 王飞跃. 基于联盟链的电力物资采购数据共享激励机制[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(3): 87-96.
[8]	朱晓燕，方泉. 美国电力行业信息安全运作机制和策略分析[J]. 中国电力, 2015, 48(5): 81-88.
[9]	范长健, 李媛, 海热提·吐尔逊, 王寿鹤. 电力行业SO₂去除量驱动因素分析[J]. 中国电力, 2014, 47(7): 144-149.
[10]	王敬敏, 薛雨田. 基于数据包络模型的电力行业碳排放权配额初始分配效率研究[J]. 中国电力, 2013, 46(10): 146-150.
[11]	吴姜，王奕，王仁民. 电气二次设备风险量化评估体系设计[J]. 中国电力, 2013, 46(1): 75-80.

模态框（Modal）标题

清洁燃煤发电技术的多属性综合评估方法研究

Study on Multi-attribute Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Clean Coal Power Generation Technology

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics