中国电力 ›› 2015, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 156-160.DOI: 10.11930.2015.3.156

• 节能环保 • 上一篇    

中欧火电厂烟气排放规定对比研究

邓伟妮   

  1. 山东电力工程咨询院有限公司,山东 济南 250013
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-10 出版日期:2015-03-25 发布日期:2015-11-27
  • 作者简介:邓伟妮(1983—),女,广西柳州人,工程师,从事电力环境保护研究。E-mail: dengweini@sdepci.com

Comparative Study on Flue Gas Emission Rules of Thermal Power Plants in EU and China

DENG Weini   

  1. Shandong Electric Power Engineering Consulting Institute Corp., LTD., Jinan 250013, China
  • Received:2014-12-10 Online:2015-03-25 Published:2015-11-27

摘要: 欧盟指令DIRECTIVE 2010/75/EU在国际社会上的认知度较高,文章从适用对象、机组大小划分、燃料类别、标准状态与基准氧含量规定、污染物项目、烟气排放限值、最低脱硫效率等方面,对2010/75/EU指令与中国《火电厂大气污染物排放标准》(GB13223—2011)进行了对比研究,主要结论如下:欧盟污染物控制项目包括SO2、NOx、烟尘和CO,对汞的排放未作要求;燃料及机组类型的划分欧盟较中国细化;欧盟脱硫装置有最低脱硫效率的性能考核;在共有的污染物项目中,中欧排放限值不相上下,某些排放限值中国甚至比欧盟更为严格。

关键词: 2010/75/EU指令, GB13223—2011, 火电厂, 烟气排放

Abstract: DIRECTIVE 2010/75/EU is well recognized worldwide. In this article, the comparative study between DIRECTIVE 2010/75/EU and Emission Standard of Air Pollutants for Thermal Power Plants(GB13223-2011) are conducted from the aspects of appliable objects, unit capacity, fuel types, standard condition and oxygen content benchmark, pollutant items, emission limits and minimum desulfurization efficiency. The study finds that SO2, NOx, dust and CO are included in the EU pollutants control items, whereas mercury emission control is not mentioned; the classification of fuel and unit types in DIRECTIVE 2010/75/EU is more specific than that in GB13223-2011; the minimum desulfurization efficiency is mandatory in EU, but not in China; in regarding the common pollutants control items, the emission limits are comparable between EU and China, and some limits are even more stringent in China.

Key words: DIRECTIVE 2010/75/EU, GB 13223-2011, thermal power plant, flue gas emission

中图分类号: