平板式抗砷中毒SCR脱硝催化剂在高砷烟气中活性变化研究

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202112007

中国电力 ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (11): 202-208.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202112007

• 节能与环保 • 上一篇

平板式抗砷中毒SCR脱硝催化剂在高砷烟气中活性变化研究

陈晨¹, 贾舒雅², 刘丁嘉¹, 贾海威¹, 张颖³, 曲艳超^1,3

1. 浙江科卓环保科技有限公司，浙江绍兴 312300;
2. 思克莱德大学化学工程学院，格拉斯哥 G11XXQ;
3. 中国科学技术大学化学与材料科学学院，安徽合肥 230026

收稿日期:2021-12-03 修回日期:2022-09-20 发布日期:2022-11-29
作者简介:陈晨（1989—），男，硕士，工程师，从事工业烟气治理研究，E-mail：hbdlcc@163.com;曲艳超（1988—），男，通信作者，硕士，高级工程师，从事工业烟气治理研究，E-mail：qyanchao@126.com
基金资助:
安徽省科技重大专项项目（202203a07020018）

Research on the Activation Change of Plate-Type Anti-arsenic-poisoning SCR De-NO_x Catalyst in High-Arsenic Flue Gas

CHEN Chen¹, JIA Shuya², LIU Dingjia¹, JIA Haiwei¹, ZHANG Ying³, QU Yanchao^1,3

1. Zhejiang Kezhuo Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd., Shaoxing 312300, China;
2. Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G11XXQ, Scotland;
3. School of Chemistry and Materials Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Received:2021-12-03 Revised:2022-09-20 Published:2022-11-29
Supported by:
This work is supported by the Science and Technology Major Projects in Anhui Province (No.202203a07020018)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究某高砷煤燃煤电厂在役板式抗砷中毒SCR脱硝催化剂的活性变化和脱硝塔不同部位催化剂受烟气的影响，分别对新鲜催化剂和运行1年催化剂进行脱硝活性测试，并通过X射线原子荧光（XRF）、N₂吸附/脱附、X射线光电子能谱（XPS）和粒径分析等表征手段进行分析。结果表明，在350 ℃烟气条件下，运行1年后催化剂的脱硝活性相对于新鲜催化剂有所下降，由94.52%降到最低77.12%，仍表现出较好的抗砷中毒性能；同时，催化剂中累积了大量砷元素，上下层催化剂中砷的平均含量分别达到了10.47%和9.28%；通过表征分析发现，2层催化剂同时发生了砷的物理和化学中毒，上层催化剂主要发生砷的物理中毒，而下层催化剂主要发生砷的化学中毒。

关键词: SCR催化剂, 抗砷中毒, 脱硝性能, 高砷煤, 中毒

Abstract: To research the activity change and the influence of flue gas for different parts catalysts in high-arsenic coal-fired power plant, fresh catalyst and one-year-used catalysts from different parts were selected for denitrification activity tests, and characterizations including X-ray fluorescence (XRF), N₂ adsorption/desorption, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and particle size analysis were conducted. The results showed that under 350°C, the activity of the one-year-used catalysts (at least 77.12%) was lower than that of the fresh catalyst (94.52%), indicating that the plate-type catalyst showed good resistance to arsenic. A large amount of arsenic had been accumulated in the one-year-used catalysts, and the average arsenic content of the upper and lower catalysts had reached 10.47% and 9.28% respectively. Through characterization and analysis, it was found that the upper and lower catalysts were both physically and chemically poisoned by arsenic. The major deactivation factor for the upper catalysts was physical blockage, while the chemical deactivation was dominant for the catalysts in the lower layer.

Key words: SCR catalyst, anti-arsenic-poisoning, denitrification performance, high arsenic coal, poisoning

陈晨, 贾舒雅, 刘丁嘉, 贾海威, 张颖, 曲艳超. 平板式抗砷中毒SCR脱硝催化剂在高砷烟气中活性变化研究[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 202-208.

CHEN Chen, JIA Shuya, LIU Dingjia, JIA Haiwei, ZHANG Ying, QU Yanchao. Research on the Activation Change of Plate-Type Anti-arsenic-poisoning SCR De-NO_x Catalyst in High-Arsenic Flue Gas[J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55(11): 202-208.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202112007

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2022/V55/I11/202

参考文献

[1] 晏敏, 张杨, 郭博闻, 等. 基于全寿命周期成本的SCR脱硝系统优化分析[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(3): 191–196
YAN Min, ZHANG Yang, GUO Bowen, et al. Analysis on the optimization of SCR denitrification system based on life cycle cost[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(3): 191–196
[2] 华晨飞, 朱林, 姚杰, 等. 废烟气脱硝催化剂资源回用载体的品质及特性研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(2): 197–204
HUA Chenfei, ZHU Lin, YAO Jie, et a1. Research on the quality and characteristics of carriers for resource reuse of waste flue gas denitration catalyst[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(2): 197–204
[3] 赵宏, 张发捷, 马云龙, 等. 燃煤电厂SCR脱硝氨逃逸迁移规律试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(1): 196–202
ZHAO Hong, ZHANG Fajie, MA Yunlong, et a1. Test study on the migration characteristics of slip ammonia from the SCR system in the coal-fired power plant[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(1): 196–202
[4] 刘志坦, 姚杰, 庄柯, 等. 燃气轮机与燃煤机组SCR脱硝催化剂特性比较[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(6): 145–152
LIU Zhitan, YAO Jie, ZHUANG Ke, et a1. Comparison of characteristics of SCR-DeNO_x catalyst for gas-turbine units and coal-fired units[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(6): 145–152
[5] STREGE J R, ZYGARLICKE C J, FOLKEDAHL B C, et al. SCR deactivation in a full-scale cofired utility boiler[J]. Fuel, 2008, 87(7): 1341–1347.
[6] LISI L, LASORELLA G, MALLOGGI S, et a1. Single and combined deactivating effect of alkali metals and HCl on commercial SCR catalysts[J]. Applied Catalysis B:Environmental, 2004, 50(4): 251–258.
[7] 王宝冬, 汪国高, 刘斌, 等. 选择性催化还原脱硝催化剂的失活、失效预防、再生和回收利用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2013, 32(增刊1): 133–139
WANG Baodong, WANG Guogao, LIU Bin, et al. Development of SCR catalyst deactivation, regeneration and recycling[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2013, 32(S1): 133–139
[8] PRITCHARD S, DIFRANCESCO C, KANEKO S, et a1. Optimizing SCR catalyst design and performance for coal-fired boilers[C]//Proceedings of the EPA/EPRI Symposium on Stationary Combination NO_x Control, 1995: 16-19.
[9] CHEN J P, BUZANOWSKI M A, YANG R T, et al. Deactivation of the vanadia catalyst in the selective catalytic reduction process[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 1990, 40(10): 1403–1409.
[10] 余岳溪, 廖永进, 束航, 等. SO₂与H₂O对商用钒钨钛脱硝催化剂毒化作用综述[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(12): 168–173
YU Yuexi, LIAO Yongjin, SHU Hang, et al. Review of SO₂ and H₂O poisoning over commercial vanadium-titanium catalysts in the selective catalytic reduction denitration[J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(12): 168–173
[11] PENG Y, LI J H, SI W Z, et al. Deactivation and regeneration of a commercial SCR catalyst: comparison with alkali metals and arsenic[J]. Applied Catalysis B:Environmental, 2015, 168-169: 195–202.
[12] 沈伯雄, 熊丽仙, 刘亭. 负载型V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂催化剂的砷中毒研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2011, 39(11): 856–859
SHEN Boxiong, XIONG Lixian, LIU Ting. Study on arsenic poisoning for loading catalyst of V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2011, 39(11): 856–859
[13] HILBRIG F, GOBEL H E, KNOZINGER H, et al. Interaction of arsenious oxide with DeNO_x-catalysts: an X-Ray absorption and diffuse reflectance infrared spectroscopy study[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1991, 129(1): 168–176.
[14] KONG M, LIU Q C, WANG X Q, et al. Performance impact and poisoning mechanism of arsenic over commercial V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ SCR catalyst[J]. Catalysis Communications, 2015, 72: 121–126.
[15] 朱春华, 陆强, 庄柯, 等. 燃煤电厂砷中毒SCR脱硝催化剂的失活特性研究[J]. 应用化工, 2018, 47(6): 1145–1149,1161
ZHU Chunhua, LU Qiang, ZHUANG Ke, et al. Research on the deactivation of arsenic poisoned SCR De-NO catalyst in coal-fired power plants[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2018, 47(6): 1145–1149,1161
[16] LI X, LI J H, PENG Y, et al. Regeneration of commercial SCR catalysts: probing the existing forms of arsenic oxide[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(16): 9971–9978.
[17] 姚燕, 马云龙, 杨晓宁, 等. 高砷煤SCR脱硝催化剂中毒失活研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(6): 191–196
YAO Yan, MA Yunlong, YANG Xiaoning, et al. Deactivation of honeycomb SCR catalysts in high-arsenic coal-fired power plant[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(6): 191–196
[18] KWON D W, PARK K H, HONG S C. The influence on SCR activity of the atomic structure of V₂O₅/TiO₂ catalysts prepared by a mechanochemical method[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2013, 451: 227–235.
[19] CHEN L, LI J H, GE M F. The poisoning effect of alkali metals doping over nano V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalysts on selective catalytic reduction of NO_x by NH₃[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 170(2-3): 531–537.
[20] PARVULESCU V I, GRANGE P, DELMON B. Catalytic removal of NO[J]. Catalysis Today, 1998, 46(4): 233–316.

平板式抗砷中毒SCR脱硝催化剂在高砷烟气中活性变化研究

Research on the Activation Change of Plate-Type Anti-arsenic-poisoning SCR De-NO_x Catalyst in High-Arsenic Flue Gas

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	姚燕, 马云龙, 杨晓宁, 张华东, 王丽朋. 高砷煤SCR脱硝催化剂中毒失活研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(6): 191-196.
[2]	宋玉宝, 赵鹏, 姚燕, 谢新华, 韦振祖, 张发捷. SCR脱硝不均匀反应宏观模型研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(5): 176-184.
[3]	曲立涛, 李彩亭, 陶莉. 商用SCR催化剂对单质汞（Hg⁰）的氧化作用研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(4): 151-155,160.
[4]	宋玉宝, 刘鑫辉, 何川, 王兴俊, 王乐乐, 程世军, 马云龙, 梁俊杰. SCR催化剂低负荷运行硫酸氢铵失活研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(1): 144-150.
[5]	傅玉, 陆强, 唐诗洁, 庄柯, 胡笑颖, 董长青. SCR脱硝催化剂寿命管理研究[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(3): 163-169.
[6]	李倩. 平板式烟气脱硝催化剂国家标准解读[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(7): 143-146.
[7]	余岳溪，廖永进，束航，史雅娟，张亚平，杨林军. SO2与H2 O对商用钒钨钛脱硝催化剂毒化作用综述[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(12): 168-173.
[8]	刘红辉, 刘伟, 黄锐, 袁鹏, 席文昌, 黄新竹, 王刚. 燃煤电厂SCR脱硝催化剂失活及其再生性能研究[J]. 中国电力, 2014, 47(4): 139-143.

模态框（Modal）标题

平板式抗砷中毒SCR脱硝催化剂在高砷烟气中活性变化研究

Research on the Activation Change of Plate-Type Anti-arsenic-poisoning SCR De-NOx Catalyst in High-Arsenic Flue Gas

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

Research on the Activation Change of Plate-Type Anti-arsenic-poisoning SCR De-NO_x Catalyst in High-Arsenic Flue Gas