EPR与CPR1000核电厂1级部件制造与安装水压试验差异研究

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2017.03.092.04

中国电力 ›› 2017, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 92-95.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2017.03.092.04

EPR与CPR1000核电厂1级部件制造与安装水压试验差异研究

赵伟华, 丰慧星

苏州热工研究院有限公司,江苏苏州 215004

收稿日期:2016-12-13 出版日期:2017-03-20 发布日期:2017-03-17
作者简介:赵伟华（1987—）,男,广东江门人,工程师,从事核电厂在役检查、水压试验工作。E-mail:zhaowh@cgnpc.com.cn

Research on the Differences of Hydrostatic Test for Class 1 Components of EPR and CPR1000 Nuclear Power Plants in the Phases of Manufacturing and Installations

ZHAO Weihua, FENG Huixing

Suzhou Nuclear Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215004, China

Received:2016-12-13 Online:2017-03-20 Published:2017-03-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 1级部件制造与安装阶段的水压试验是核电机组后续调试与安全运行的重要前提。对比分析了不同版本法国《压水堆核岛机械设备设计和建造规则》（RCC-M）关于水压试验要求的差异,并结合CPR1000和EPR 2种机组的系统和结构特点,对1级部件在制造、安装阶段水压试验的试验压力和试验边界等差异进行了论述,并探讨了EPR机组1级部件在制造与安装阶段水压试验的压力选取方法,所得结果可为EPR机组制造与安装阶段的水压试验工作提供重要参考。

关键词: 核电机组, EPR, CPR1000, 水压试验, 试验压力, 试验边界

Abstract: The hydrostatic test for Class 1 components in the phases of manufacturing and installations is a critical pre-requirement for subsequent commissioning and secure operations. The discrepancies of the requirements for hydrostatic testing are compared and analyzed between the different versions of French standard of Design and Construction Rules for Mechanical Components of PWR Nuclear Islands (RCC-M). Taking account of the characteristics of the system and structure of CPR1000 and EPR reactors, the differences of test pressure and test boundaries of hydrostatic test for Class 1 components in the manufacture and the installation phases are presented. The method on how to select test pressure for EPR Class 1 components in the manufacture and the installation phases is also explored and discussed. The conclusions can provide important reference for hydrostatic tests for EPR reactors.

Key words: nuclear power plant, EPR, CPR1000, hydrostatic test, test pressure, test boundary

中图分类号:

赵伟华, 丰慧星. EPR与CPR1000核电厂1级部件制造与安装水压试验差异研究[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(3): 92-95.

ZHAO Weihua, FENG Huixing. Research on the Differences of Hydrostatic Test for Class 1 Components of EPR and CPR1000 Nuclear Power Plants in the Phases of Manufacturing and Installations[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(3): 92-95.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2017.03.092.04

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2017/V50/I3/92

[1]	晁文浩, 袁至, 李骥. 计及电转气-风-火-核-碳捕集的多源联合系统优化调度[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(1): 183-194.
[2]	翟巴菁，闫明晶，白旋. CPR1000机组试验创新及实施[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(2): 10-13.
[3]	王浩，石勇军，高俊，苗雨升，丁洪峰，于毅. AP1000机组蒸汽发生器传热管役前检查[J]. 中国电力, 2015, 48(10): 6-11.
[4]	司恒远. 某EPR核电厂取排水方案跳泵功能分级研究[J]. 中国电力, 2014, 47(9): 56-59.
[5]	李强. AP1000核电站常规岛低加疏水泵配置及选型优化[J]. 中国电力, 2014, 47(9): 46-51.
[6]	裴振坤. 压水堆核电机组RB控制策略的应用与试验[J]. 中国电力, 2014, 47(7): 16-20.
[7]	鲁勤武, 赵淑昱, 李轶, 韩小萍, 柴伟东, 张淑霞. 基于参考电站的核电模块化技术研究[J]. 中国电力, 2014, 47(4): 65-69.
[8]	谭金, 黄岳峰, 徐政. 基于Matlab-Simulink的详细核电机组数学模型研究[J]. 中国电力, 2013, 46(7): 18-23.

EPR与CPR1000核电厂1级部件制造与安装水压试验差异研究

Research on the Differences of Hydrostatic Test for Class 1 Components of EPR and CPR1000 Nuclear Power Plants in the Phases of Manufacturing and Installations

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

模态框（Modal）标题

EPR与CPR1000核电厂1级部件制造与安装水压试验差异研究

Research on the Differences of Hydrostatic Test for Class 1 Components of EPR and CPR1000 Nuclear Power Plants in the Phases of Manufacturing and Installations

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics