波纹板式SCR催化剂性能检测及其失活原因分析

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2016.01.141.05

中国电力 ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1): 141-145.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2016.01.141.05

波纹板式SCR催化剂性能检测及其失活原因分析

孟小然¹，²，³，王金秀¹，²，陈进生¹，²，于艳科¹，²，³，陈衍婷¹，²

1. 中国科学院城市环境研究所，福建厦门 361021；
2. 中国科学院宁波城市环境观测研究站，浙江宁波 315800；
3. 中国科学院大学，北京 100049

收稿日期:2015-10-21 出版日期:2016-01-18 发布日期:2016-02-04
作者简介:孟小然（1989—），女，河北保定人，硕士研究生，从事大气污染控制技术研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学青年基金资助项目：异质复合材料光热协同催化脱除氮氧化物的性能与机理研究（21403210）；宁波市科技创新团队资助项目（2011B82003）

Performance Determination and Deactivation Analysis of Corrugated SCR Catalysts

MENG Xiaoran¹,²,³, WANG Jinxiu¹,², CHEN Jinsheng¹,², YU Yanke¹,²,³, CHEN Yanting¹,²

1. Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China;
2. Ningbo Urban Environment Observation and Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315800, China;
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2015-10-21 Online:2016-01-18 Published:2016-02-04
Supported by:
This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China-Performance and Mechanism in Photothermocatalytic Synergetic Removal of Nitrogen Oxide on Heterostructured Composite (No. 21403210) and the Program of Innovation Team of the Bureau of Ningbo Science and Technology (No. 2011B82003).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 催化剂性能检测对火电厂烟气脱硝运行和管理有重要意义。选取了某电厂运行23 500 h的波纹板式催化剂（旧催化剂）和同品牌新催化剂，采用XRF，XRD，H2-TPR，DRIFT等手段进行微观性能表征并测试了其活性。结果表明：与新催化剂相比，旧催化剂中Fe、K、Na和Mg等元素的含量明显增多，比表面积和孔容分别下降了38.7%和14.3%，氧化还原性能和Bronsted酸性位数目均有较大程度的下降，脱硝效率由原来的96.2%下降为91.3%，活性系数下降25.3%；烟气飞灰中碱金属和碱土金属的毒害作用是催化剂活性下降的主要原因。指出：波纹板式催化剂易被飞灰堵塞，应保持催化剂吹灰装置良好运行，并利用机组停运机会对催化剂进行清灰，以提高脱硝效率和延长催化剂使用寿命。

关键词: 烟气脱硝, 选择性催化还原（SCR）, 波纹板式催化剂, 性能检测, 失活, 表征

Abstract: Catalyst performance determination is important to the operation and management of flue gas denitrification in power plants. The microcosmic properties and activities are compared between the V2O5-WO3/TiO2 corrugated SCR catalyst which was already used for 23 500 h with the fresh one through XRF, XRD, H2-TPR and DRIFT analysis. The results show that, compared with the fresh catalyst, the Fe, K, Na, Mg contents in the used one are much greater, while its BET surface area and pore volume are decreased by 38.7% and 14.3% respectively. In addition, the redox activity and Br?nsted acid strength decline remarkably; the de-NOx efficiency decreases from 96.2% to 91.3%; and the activity coefficient drops by 25.3%. The deactivation analysis indicates that the blockage and poisoning effects of alkali metal and alkali earth metal elements in the ash deposits are the main reasons of the deactivation. Since the corrugated SCR catalyst is easily clogged by the fly ash, the soot-blower should be maintained in good operation conditions. The dust-cleaning during downtime should be performed to improve the de-NOx efficiency and extend the catalyst lifetime.

Key words: flue gas denitrification, selective catalytic reduction(SCR), corrugated catalysts, performance determination

中图分类号:

X511
TM621

孟小然,，王金秀,陈进生,于艳科,，陈衍婷，. 波纹板式SCR催化剂性能检测及其失活原因分析[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(1): 141-145.

MENG Xiaoran,, WANG Jinxiu, CHEN Jinsheng, YU Yanke,, CHEN Yanting,. Performance Determination and Deactivation Analysis of Corrugated SCR Catalysts[J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(1): 141-145.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2016.01.141.05

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2016/V49/I1/141

参考文献

[1] 朱林，吴碧君，段玖祥，等. SCR烟气脱硝催化剂生产与应用现状[J]. 中国电力，2009，42（8）：61-64.
ZHU Lin, WU Bijun, DUAN Jiuxiang, et al. Situation of production and application on selective catalytic reduction flue gas de-NOx catalysts [J]. Electric Power, 2009, 42(8): 61-64.
[2] 李春雨. SCR脱硝催化剂研究及产业现状分析[J]. 能源工程， 2014（1）：60-64.
LI Chunyu. Investigation of present situation on development of SCR catalyst [J]. Energy Engineering, 2014(1): 60-64.
[3] 孟小然，于艳科，陈进生，等. 平板式SCR催化剂的性能检测[J]. 中国电力，2014，47（12）：144-148，155.
MENG Xiaoran, YU Yanke, CHEN Jinsheng, et al. Performance testing of plate SCR catalysts[J]. Electric Power, 2014, 47(12):144-148, 155.
[4] KAMATA H. The role of K2O in the selective reduction of NO with NH3 over a V2O5(WO3)/TiO2 commercial selective catalytic reduction catalyst[J]. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 1999, 139(2-3): 189-198.
[5] CROCKER C R, VENSON S A, LAUMB J D. SCR catalyst blinding due to sodium and calcium sulfate formation [J]. Preprint Papers-American Chemical Society, Division of Fuel Chemistry, 2004, 49(1):169-170.
[6] BENSON S A, LAUMB J D, CROCKER C R, et al. SCR catalyst performance in flue gases derived from subbituminous and lignite coals [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2005, 86(5): 577-613.
[7] 沈伯雄，熊丽仙，刘亭. 负载型V2O5-WO3/TiO2催化剂的砷中毒研究[J]. 燃料化学学报，2011，39（11）：856-859.
SHEN Boxiong, XIONG Lixian, LIU Ting. Study on arsenic poisoning for loading catalyst of V2O5-WO3/TiO2[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2011, 39(11): 856-859.
[8] 孙克勤，钟秦，于爱华. SCR催化剂的砷中毒研究[J]. 中国环保产业，2008（1）：40-42.
SUN Keqin, ZHONG Qin, YU Aihua. Study on arsenic poisoning of SCR catalyst[J]. China Environmental Protection Industry, 2008(1): 40-42.
[9] KAMATA H, TAKAHASHI K, ODENBRAND C U I. Surface acid property and its relation to SCR activity of phosphorus added to commercial V2O5(WO3)/TiO2 catalyst[J]. Catalysis Letters, 1998, 53(1): 65-71.
[10] Calvin H Bartholomew. Mechanisms of catalyst deactivation [J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2001, 212(1-2): 17-60.
[11] 王义兵，孙叶柱，陈丰，等. 火电厂SCR烟气脱硝催化剂特性及其应用[J]. 电力环境保护，2009，25（4）：13-15.
WANG Yibing, SUN Yezhu, CHEN Feng, et al. Characteristics of SCR catalyst and its application in coal-fired power plants DeNOx system[J]. Electric Power Environmental Protection, 2009, 25(4):13-15.
[12] 云端，宋蔷，姚强. V2O5-WO3/TiO2 SCR催化剂的失活机理及分析[J]. 煤炭转化，2009，32（1）：91-96.
YUN Duan, SONG Qiang, YAO Qiang. Mechanism and analysis of SCR catalyst deactivation [J]. Coal Conversion, 2009, 32(1): 91-96.
[13] LARSSON A C, EINVALL J, ANDERSSON A, et al. Targeting by comparison with laboratory experiments the SCR catalyst deactivation process by potassium and zinc salts in a large-scale biomass combustion boiler [J]. Energy and Fuels, 2006, 20(4): 1398-1405.
[14] 商雪松，陈进生，胡恭任. 不同运行时间烟气脱硝催化剂性能对比分析[J]. 中国电力，2012， 45（1）：45-50，68.
SHANG Xuesong, CHEN Jinsheng, HU Gongren. Comparative analysis of de-NOx catalysts with different opreation-time [J]. Electric Power, 2012, 45(1): 45-50, 68.
[15] PENG Y, LI J, CHEN L, et al. Alkali metal poisoning of a CeO2-WO3 catalyst used in the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3: an experimental and theoretical study [J]. Environental Science& Technology, 2012, 46(5): 2864-2869.
[16] LIU J, ZHAO Z, WANG J, et al. The highly active catalysts of nanometric CeO2-supported cobalt oxides for soot combustion [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2008, 84(1): 185-195.
[17] BOUDALI K L, GHORBEL A,GRANGE P. Characterization and reactivity of WO3-V2O5 supported on sulfated titanium pillared clay catalysts for the SCR-NO reaction[J]. Comptes Rendus Chimie, 2009, 12(6): 779-786.
[18] LIU C, CHEN L, LI J, et al. Enhancement of activity and sulfur resistance of CeO2 supported on TiO2-SiO2 for the selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(11): 6182-6189. deactivation; characteristic

波纹板式SCR催化剂性能检测及其失活原因分析

Performance Determination and Deactivation Analysis of Corrugated SCR Catalysts

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘志坦, 姚杰, 庄柯, 喻乐蒙, 周凯. 燃气轮机与燃煤机组SCR脱硝催化剂特性比较[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(6): 145-152.
[2]	王卫群, 张磊, 黄治军, 傅高健, 李国奇. 基于CFD模拟计算的SCR脱硝系统喷氨优化试验方法[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(6): 185-190.
[3]	高建强, 梁胜莹, 危日光. SCR整流格栅高度与催化剂安装耦合影响分析[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(4): 144-150.
[4]	曲立涛, 李彩亭, 陶莉. 商用SCR催化剂对单质汞（Hg⁰）的氧化作用研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(4): 151-155,160.
[5]	肖育军, 邹毅辉, 李彩亭, 周雪斌. SCR系统结构模型与数值模型的适用性分析[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(3): 146-152,160.
[6]	杨希刚, 金保昇, 许月阳. SCR超低排放综合诊断及闭环优化[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(3): 153-160.
[7]	宋玉宝, 刘鑫辉, 何川, 王兴俊, 王乐乐, 程世军, 马云龙, 梁俊杰. SCR催化剂低负荷运行硫酸氢铵失活研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(1): 144-150.
[8]	裴煜坤, 张杨, 徐克涛, 朱跃. SCR烟气脱硝尿素热解和水解技术经济性分析[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(9): 174-178.
[9]	赵会民, 尹顺利, 刘长东, 朱朝阳, 卢志飞, 戴健, 霍文强, 周文. 失活SCR烟气脱硝催化剂再生工艺工业试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(9): 179-184.
[10]	宋健, 胡章茂, 邓伟力, 陈冬林, 刘良华, 魏绵源, 文聪. 内置式气气换热器在SCR烟气脱硝尿素热解系统中的应用[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(7): 145-151.
[11]	苗永旗, 刘海秋, 周凯, 庄柯, 吴碧君, 金定强. 某330 MW机组烟气脱硝系统超低排放性能诊断与分析[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(4): 124-129.
[12]	傅玉, 陆强, 唐诗洁, 庄柯, 胡笑颖, 董长青. SCR脱硝催化剂寿命管理研究[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(3): 163-169.
[13]	杜振, 王志东, 晏敏, 江建平, 朱跃. SCR脱硝催化剂实际运行性能分析[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(2): 133-136,155.
[14]	方朝君, 卢承政, 白晓龙. SCR脱硝系统超低排放运行优化技术研究[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(2): 143-148.
[15]	金理鹏, 谢新华, 黄飞, 卢承政, 周健, 宋玉宝. SCR脱硝装置大颗粒灰拦截技术试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(2): 156-161,168.

模态框（Modal）标题

波纹板式SCR催化剂性能检测及其失活原因分析

Performance Determination and Deactivation Analysis of Corrugated SCR Catalysts

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics