Analysis on of the Driving Forces Impacting SO2 Removal in Electric Power Industry

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2014.7.144.5

Abstract

Abstract: In order to investigate what exactly leads to the increase of the SO₂ removal volume and find out the drawbacks in SO₂ emission reduction during the period of the 11th Five-Year, the major driving factors of SO₂ removal in electric power industry are analyzed by using the LMDI method in which the factors are decomposed into terminal treatment effect, structure effect, technological progressing effect, policy effect and investment effect. The research results illustrate that during the period of 2005-2011, the terminal treatment effect contributes the most to the increase of SO₂ removal volume, and the structure effect contributes the second most. In addition, the regression equations of the SO₂ removal volume and its driving factors are set up by adopting partial least squares to provide a reference not only for the governments to make their policies but also for the enterprises to implement energy-saving and emission reduction.

Key words: electric power industry, pollutant emission, LMDI, partial least squares, SO2

CLC Number:

TM611
X701.3

FAN Chang-jian, LI Yuan, HAI Re-ti·tuerxun, WANG Shou-he. Analysis on of the Driving Forces Impacting SO₂ Removal in Electric Power Industry[J]. Electric Power, 2014, 47(7): 144-149.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2014.7.144.5

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/Y2014/V47/I7/144

References

[1] 许月阳,薛建明,管一明,等. 燃煤电厂应对新标准二氧化硫控制对策研究[J]. 中国电力,2012,45（4）：74-77.
XU Yue-yang, XUE Jian-ming, GUAN Yi-ming, et al . Control strategy for sulfur dioxide under new standard in coal-fired power plant [J]. Electric Power, 2012, 45(4): 74-77.
[2] 夏炎,陈锡康,杨翠红. 关于结构分解技术中两种分解方法的比较研究[J]. 运筹与管理,2010,19（5）：27-33.
XIA Yan, CHEN Xi-kang, YANG Gui-hong. Comparative research of two decomposition methods in structural decomposition analysis [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2010, 19(5): 27-33.
[3] 陈雯,王湘萍. 我国工业行业的技术进步、结构变迁与水资源消耗[J]. 湖南大学学报：社会科学版, 2011,25（2）：68-72.
CHEN Wen, WANG Xiang-ping. Technology progress, structure shift and water intensity in Chinese industry: An analysis based on LMDI method [J]. Journal of Hunan University: Social Sciences, 2011, 25(2): 68-72.
[4] 陆文聪,李元龙. 中国工业减排的驱动因素研究[J]. 统计与信息论坛,2012,25（10）：49-54.
LU Wen-cong, LI Yuan-long. Research on driving factors of China’s industrial emissions abatement: A empirical study based on a LMDI method[J]. Statistics & Information Forum, 2012, 25(10): 49-54.
[5] HE J. What is the role of openness for China’s aggregate industrial SO 2 emission: A structural analysis based on the division decomposition method[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69: 868-886.
[6] 高彩玲,高歌,冯爱云. 基于 LMDI 的中国二氧化硫排放区域变化的因素分解[J]. 生态环境学报,2012,21（3）：470-474.
GAO Cai-ling, GAO Ge, Feng Ai-yun. Decomposition analysis of regional SO 2 emissions in China based on LMDI method [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2012, 21(3): 470-474.
[7] 刘睿劼,张智慧. 中国工业二氧化硫排放趋势及影响因素研究[J]. 环境污染与防治,2012,34（10）：100-104.
LIU Rui-jie, ZHANG Zhi-hui. The research of Chinese industrial SO 2 emissions trends and the influence factors [J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2012, 34(10): 100-104.
[8] ANGB W. Decomposition analysis for policy making in energy: Which is the preferred method[J]. Energy Policy, 2004, 32(9) 1131-1139.
[9] ANG B W. The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: A practical guide[J]. Energy Policy, 2005, 33(7): 867-871.
[10] 环境保护部. 中国环境统计年报[R]. 北京,2005—2012.
[11] 王开龙. 电厂常用烟气脱硫技术及其经济行比较[J]. 中国电力教育,2005（S2）：195-197.
WANG Kai-long. The comparison of the commonly used desulfurization technology and its economy in power plant[J]. China Electric Power Education, 2005 (S2): 195-197.
[12] 张平淡,朱松,朱艳春. 环保投资对中国SO 2 减排的影响[J]. 经济理论与经济管理,2012（7）：84-94.
ZHANG Ping-dan, ZHU Song, ZHU Yan-chun. Environmental investment and SO 2 discharge[J]. Economic Theory and Business Management, 2012(7): 84-94.
[13] 赵鹏高. 燃煤电厂烟气脱硫有关问题的思考[J]. 中国电力,2004,37（10）：1-3.
ZHAO Peng-gao. Thought of relevant problems for flue gas desulphurization in coal fired power plant[J]. Electric Power, 2004, 37(10): 1-3.
[14] 王志轩.电力行业节能减排现状问题及对策[J].华电技术, 2008, 30（5）：1-6.
WANG Zhi-xuan. The current problems and countermeasures of energy saving and emissions reducing in power industry [J]. Huadian Technology, 2008, 30(5): 1-6.
[15] 何晓群,刘文卿. 应用回归分析[M]. 北京：中国人民大学出版社,2001.
[16] 曾九孙,刘祥官,罗世华,等. 主成分回归和偏最小二乘法在高炉冶炼中的应用[J]. 浙江大学学报,2009,36（1）：33-36.
ZENG Jiu-sun, LIU Xiang-guan, LUO Shi-hua, et al . Application of principal component regression and partial least square in blast furnace iron-making[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University, 2009, 36(1): 33-36.
[17] 王桂增,叶昊. 主元分析与偏最小二乘法[M]. 北京：清华大学出版社,2012.
[18] JOLLIFFE Ian T. A note on the use of principal components in regression [J]. Applied Statistics, 1982, 31(3): 300-303.

Analysis on of the Driving Forces Impacting SO₂ Removal in Electric Power Industry

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	Xudong LI, Qingbo TAN, Haochen ZHAO, Ning QIAO, Liwei LIU, Caixia TAN, Zhongfu TAN. Carbon Emission Factors and Decoupling Effects of China's Power Industry under the Background of Carbon Peak [J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57(5): 88-98.
[2]	WANG Hailin, WENG Yuyan, ZHANG Chenglong. An Analysis of the Driving Factors of Chinese Electricity Consumption from 1997 to 2017 [J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55(7): 74-80.
[3]	ZHOU Decai, CHEN Jinjin, LIU Bo. Mixed-frequency Asymmetric Measure of China's Electric Power Industry Prosperity Index [J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55(6): 172-185.
[4]	LIU Hanxiao, WU Liming, ZHAO Lin, YU Liyuan, LI Jianguo, CUI Ying. Study on Emission Reduction and Energy Efficiency Characteristics of Wet Electrostatic Precipitator for Coal Fired Power Plants [J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55(5): 196-203.
[5]	WANG Yanzhe, ZHOU Sheng, YAO Zilin, OU Xunmin. Life Cycle Modeling Analysis of the Interaction Between Carbon Dioxide and Air Pollutant Emissions of Coal Power in China [J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(8): 128-135.
[6]	YI Yuping, ZHU Fahua, ZHANG Wenjie, LI Junzhuang, DUAN Jiuxiang, LI Xiaolong. Assessment of Ultra-Low SO₂ Emission Technology for Ultra-High Sulfur Coal [J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(3): 34-40.
[7]	LUO Guoming, MAO Xiaopo, ZHANG Yu, LU Jinpei, ZHOU Junyu, CAO Xiangwei, ZONG Yun. Research on the Impact of 30 mA Leakage Current on the Atmospheric Corrosion of Transmission Lines [J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(12): 125-129.
[8]	YU Yuexi, LIAO Yongjin, SHU Han, SHI Yajuan, ZHANG Yaping, YANG Linjun. Review of SO2 and H2O Poisoning over Commercial Vanadium-Titanium Catalysts in the Selective Catalytic Reduction Denitration [J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(12): 168-173.
[9]	ZHANG Xiang, YANG Li, JIANG Hong, WANG Zhihua, ZHOU Junhu. Simulation Analysis of Desulfurization and Denitration based on the Method of Ozone Combined with Wet Calcium Based Scrubbing [J]. journal1, 2015, 48(7): 129-133.
[10]	WANG Qiwei. Retrofit of Flue Gas Monitoring and Denitration Automatic Control Systems in a Power Plant [J]. journal1, 2015, 48(7): 120-114.
[11]	ZHU Xiaoyan, FANG Quan. Study on Mechanism and Strategy of Cybersecurity in U.S. Electric Power Industry [J]. Electric Power, 2015, 48(5): 81-88.
[12]	LI Xinghua, HE Yudong. Study on Modification of Ultra-Low SO2 Emission in Coal-Fired Power Plants [J]. journal1, 2015, 48(10): 148-151.
[13]	ZHU Kai, YIN Hai-tao. The Decomposition Analysis of Residential Electricity Consumption in China [J]. Electric Power, 2014, 47(3): 130-134.
[14]	MO Hua, ZHU Fa-hua, WANG Sheng. Contribution to PM_2.5 of Atmospheric Pollutant Emission from Thermal Power Sector and Emission Reduction Countermeasures [J]. Electric Power, 2013, 46(8): 1-6.
[15]	WANG Yun-jun, WANG Hong-wei, WEI Ji-ping, GAO Jian-kang, GUO Xiao-min. Removal and Emission of Pollutants from 600-MW Supercritical Units [J]. Electric Power, 2013, 46(12): 113-117.