Comprehensive Evaluation of User Energy Storage System Configuration Schemes Based on the Improved Triangular Fuzzy VIKOR Method

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202107106

Electric Power ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (4): 185-191.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202107106

• Eenewable Energy and Energy Storage Technology • Previous Articles Next Articles

Comprehensive Evaluation of User Energy Storage System Configuration Schemes Based on the Improved Triangular Fuzzy VIKOR Method

MA Zhao¹, ZHAO Huiru¹, HUO Huijuan², LU Hao³

1. School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China;
2. State Grid Economic and Technological Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102209, China;
3. Department of Economic Management, North China Electric Power University, Baoding, 071003, China

Received:2021-07-22 Revised:2022-02-14 Online:2022-04-28 Published:2022-04-24
Supported by:
This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Comprehensive Value Measurement and Incentive Mechanism of Electrochemical Energy Storage System Considering Bilateral Uncertainty of Power Supply and Demand，No.71973043)

Abstract

Abstract: A comprehensive evaluation model based on improved triangular fuzzy VIKOR method is proposed, which is applied to the evaluation of energy storage system configuration schemes in uncertain decision-making environment. Firstly, the evaluation criteria set of user energy storage system configuration scheme is constructed by the grounded theory, and then some key criteria were select based on the grey relation-rough set method to form the evaluation index system. Then a combination weighting method based on the integration of subjective and objective is put forward to improve the weight accuracy. The subjective weight is obtained by the FAHP method, and the objective weight is obtained by the improved CRITIC method. Finally, considering the conflict and fuzziness between different criteria, an improved triangle fuzzy VIKOR method is constructed to evaluate the energy storage configuration schemes. The validity and feasibility of the model are proved by simulation analysis.

Key words: user energy storage system, multiple criteria decisions making, VIKOR method, fuzzy set theory

MA Zhao, ZHAO Huiru, HUO Huijuan, LU Hao. Comprehensive Evaluation of User Energy Storage System Configuration Schemes Based on the Improved Triangular Fuzzy VIKOR Method[J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55(4): 185-191.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202107106

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/EN/Y2022/V55/I4/185

References

[1] 史林军, 杨帆, 刘英, 等. 计及社会发展的多场景用户侧储能容量优化配置[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2021, 49(22): 59–66
SHI Linjun, YANG Fan, LIU Ying, et al. Multi-scenario user-side energy storage capacity optimization configuration considering social development[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2021, 49(22): 59–66
[2] 任大伟, 侯金鸣, 肖晋宇, 等. 能源电力清洁化转型中的储能关键技术探讨[J]. 高电压技术, 2021, 47(8): 2751–2759
REN Dawei, HOU Jinming, XIAO Jinyu, et al. Exploration of key technologies for energy storage in the cleansing transformation of energy and power[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2021, 47(8): 2751–2759
[3] DING Y X, XU Q S, HUANG Y. Optimal sizing of user-side energy storage considering demand management and scheduling cycle[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2020, 184: 106284.
[4] LOMBARDI P, SCHWABE F. Sharing economy as a new business model for energy storage systems[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 188: 485–496.
[5] GIBB D, JOHNSON M, ROMANÍ J, et al. Process integration of thermal energy storage systems - evaluation methodology and case studies[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 230: 750–760.
[6] 郭久亿, 刘洋, 郭焱林, 等. 不同典型用户侧储能配置评估与运行优化模型[J]. 电网技术, 2020, 44(11): 4245–4254
GUO Jiuyi, LIU Yang, GUO Yanlin, et al. Configuration evaluation and operation optimization model of energy storage in different typical user-side[J]. Power System Technology, 2020, 44(11): 4245–4254
[7] 洪博文, 胡静, 王建国, 等. 面向能源互联网的用户侧分布式储能价值评估[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(3): 113–120,130
HONG Bowen, HU Jing, WANG Jianguo, et al. Energy internet oriented evaluation of distributed energy storage utility in user-side[J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(3): 113–120,130
[8] 黄碧斌, 胡静, 蒋莉萍, 等. 中国电网侧储能在典型场景下的应用价值评估[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(7): 158–165
HUANG Bibin, HU Jing, JIANG Liping, et al. Application value assessment of grid side energy storage under typical scenarios in China[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(7): 158–165
[9] 饶宇飞, 高泽, 杨水丽, 等. 大规模电池储能调频应用运行效益评估[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2020, 9(6): 1828–1836
RAO Yufei, GAO Ze, YANG Shuili, et al. Operational benefit evaluation for frequency regulation application of large-scale battery energy storage[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2020, 9(6): 1828–1836
[10] BAUMANN M, WEIL M, PETERS J F, et al. A review of multi-criteria decision making approaches for evaluating energy storage systems for grid applications[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 107: 516–534.
[11] 刘永前, 梁超, 阎洁, 等. 风-光电站中储能系统混合最优配置及其经济性研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(12): 143–150
LIU Yongqian, LIANG Chao, YAN Jie, et al. Optimal configuration and economic study of hybrid energy storage system in wind and solar power plants[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(12): 143–150
[12] GONG Q W, WANG Y B, FANG J T, et al. Optimal configuration of the energy storage system in ADN considering energy storage operation strategy and dynamic characteristic[J]. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 2020, 14(6): 1005–1011.
[13] 郭森, 赵浩然, 赵名锐, 等. 多类异质电储能系统优选模型研究[J]. 智慧电力, 2018, 46(10): 11–17,48
GUO Sen, ZHAO Haoran, ZHAO Mingrui, et al. Optimal selection model for multi-class heterogeneous electrical energy storage systems[J]. Smart Power, 2018, 46(10): 11–17,48
[14] 周立立, 向月, 陈凌天. 基于风险-收益分析的用户侧储能容量经济配置研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(9): 187–197
ZHOU Lili, XIANG Yue, CHEN Lingtian. Research on economic allocation of user-side energy storage capacity based on risk-benefit analysis[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(9): 187–197
[15] ÇOLAK M, KAYA İ. Multi-criteria evaluation of energy storage technologies based on hesitant fuzzy information: a case study for Turkey[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2020, 28: 101211.
[16] REN J Z. Sustainability prioritization of energy storage technologies for promoting the development of renewable energy: a novel intuitionistic fuzzy combinative distance-based assessment approach[J]. Renewable Energy, 2018, 121: 666–676.
[17] RILEY R W. Handbook of qualitative research[J]. Journal of Leisure Research, 1996, 28(2): 132.
[18] RAJESH R. Sustainability performance predictions in supply chains: grey and rough set theoretical approaches[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2020: 1–30.
[19] 薛锋, 胡萍, 李青青. 基于灰色-粗糙集的高速铁路运营统计指标体系构建[J]. 系统工程, 2021, 39(4): 115–125
XUE Feng, HU Ping, LI Qingqing. Construction of high-speed railway operation statistical index system based on grey rough set[J]. Systems Engineering, 2021, 39(4): 115–125
[20] SAATY T L. Decision making—the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP)[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2004, 13(1): 1–35.
[21] ZHAO H R, GUO S. Selecting green supplier of thermal power equipment by using a hybrid MCDM method for sustainability[J]. Sustainability, 2014, 6(1): 217–235.
[22] DIAKOULAKI D, MAVROTAS G, PAPAYANNAKIS L. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the critic method[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 1995, 22(7): 763–770.
[23] WANG Y M, LUO Y. Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2010, 51(1): 1–12.
[24] OPRICOVIC S. Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems [D]. Belgrade: University of Belgrde, 1998.
[25] VAISHNAVI V, SURESH M. Applications of fuzzy logic approach for assessment[M].Singapore:Springer,2021: 1191–1198.

Comprehensive Evaluation of User Energy Storage System Configuration Schemes Based on the Improved Triangular Fuzzy VIKOR Method

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics