CuO-WO3/TiO2催化氧化燃煤烟气中Hg0试验研究

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201904117

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 提高燃煤电厂现有选择性催化还原（SCR）催化剂催化氧化单质汞（Hg⁰）的性能，能够有效增强燃煤电厂利用现有烟气污染物控制装置协同脱汞效率。采用分步浸渍法制备了一系列CuO-WO₃/TiO₂（CuWTi）催化剂，在温度150~350 ℃时模拟燃煤烟气条件，考察了催化氧化Hg⁰性能，并与商用脱硝催化剂进行了比较。探究了烟气中O₂、SO₂和NO等气体对Hg⁰氧化性能的影响规律。发现商用脱硝催化剂和WTi催化剂在不含HCl的模拟烟气中对Hg⁰氧化率均在30%以下，而Cu₂W₈Ti催化剂具有较好的Hg⁰氧化性能。采用X射线光电子能谱分析仪（XPS）对催化剂进行了表征，结果表明，CuO与WO₃的相互作用在催化剂表面生成了丰富的化学吸附氧，促进了Hg⁰的氧化。Hg⁰在Cu₂W₈Ti催化剂表面的氧化过程遵循Mars-Maessen机制。

关键词: 燃煤烟气, 汞排放控制, 零价汞, 催化氧化, CuO-WO₃/TiO₂

Abstract: Improving the Hg⁰ oxidation activity of the commercial selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst can enhance the mercury removal activity in coal fired flue gas. In this paper, a series of CuO-WO₃/TiO₂ (CuWTi) catalysts were synthesized by step impregnation method for oxidize elemental mercury (Hg⁰) using simulated coal-fired flue gas at 150-350 ℃. The effects of O₂, SO₂ and NO on Hg⁰ oxidation were also investigated and compared with commercial catalyst. The results indicated that the commercial SCR catalyst and the WTi exhibited below 30% rate on Hg⁰ oxidation without HCl in simulated flue gas, while the Cu₂W₈Ti catalyst performed good activity of Hg⁰ oxidation and NO removal. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) method was used to characterize the catalysts, and the results suggested that the interaction between CuO and WO₃ created abundant chemisorbed oxygen on the catalyst surface, which was beneficial for Hg⁰ oxidation. The Mars-Maessen mechanism was respected in the process of the Hg⁰ oxidation over Cu₂W₈Ti catalyst.

Key words: coal-fired flue gas, Hg emission control, Hg⁰, catalytic oxidation, CuO-WO₃/TiO₂

中图分类号:

X701
TM621.9

陈传敏, 聂国欣, 贾文波, 刘松涛, 曹悦, 赵毅. CuO-WO₃/TiO₂催化氧化燃煤烟气中Hg⁰试验研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(6): 179-186.

CHEN Chuanmin, NIE Guoxin, JIA Wenbo, LIU Songtao, CAO Yue, ZHAO Yi. Catalytic Oxidation of Elemental Mercury over CuO-WO₃/TiO₂ in Simulated Coal-fired Flue Gas[J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(6): 179-186.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201904117

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2019/V52/I6/179

参考文献

[1] PACYNA E G, PACYNA J M, SUNDSETH K, et al. Global emission of mercury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2010, 44(20):2487-2499.
[2] PARK K S, SEO Y C, LEE S J, et al. Emission and speciation of mercury from various combustion sources[J]. Powder Technology, 2008, 180(1/2):151-156.
[3] KOCMAN D, HORVAT M, PIRRONE N, et al. Contribution of contaminated sites to the global mercury budget[J]. Environmental Research, 2013, 125:160-170.
[4] XU M, YAN R, ZHENG C, et al. Status of trace element emission in a coal combustion process:a review[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2004, 85(2):215-237.
[5] KIM J, PARK J, LEE S, et al. Anthropogenic mercury emission inventory with emission factors and total emission in Korea[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2010, 44(23):2714-2721.
[6] WU Y, WANG S, STREETS D G, et al. Trends in anthropogenic mercury emissions in China from 1995 to 2003[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(17):5312-5318.
[7] ROMANOV A, SLOSS L, JOZEWICZ W. Mercury emissions from the coal-fired energy generation sector of the Russian Federation[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(8):4647-4654.
[8] GAO J, WANG H, CAI W, et al. Pollution characteristics of atmospheric particulate mercury near a coal-fired power plant on the southeast coast of China[J]. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2016, 7(6):1119-1127.
[9] TANG S, WANG L, FENG X, et al. Actual mercury speciation and mercury discharges from coal-fired power plants in Inner Mongolia, northern China[J]. Fuel, 2016, 180:194-204.
[10] GAO Y, ZHANG Z, WU J, et al. A critical review on the heterogeneous catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury in flue gases[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(19):10813-10823.
[11] SRIVASTAVA R K, HUTSON N, MARTIN B, et al. Control of mercury emissions from coal-fired electric utility boilers[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(5):1385-1393.
[12] LAUDAL D L, PAVLISH J H, GALBREATH K C, et al. Pilot-scale evaluation of the impact of selective catalytic reduction for NO_x on mercury speciation[R]. North Dakota:Energy & Environmental Research Center, University of North Dakota, 2000.
[13] FERNÁNDEZ-MIRANDA N, LOPEZ-ANTON M A, DÍAZ-SOMOANO M, et al. Mercury oxidation in catalysts used for selective reduction of NO_x (SCR) in oxy-fuel combustion[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 285:77-82.
[14] HONG H, HAM S, KIM M H, et al. Characteristics of commercial selective catalytic reduction catalyst for the oxidation of gaseous elemental mercury with respect to reaction conditions[J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2010, 27(4):1117-1122.
[15] HSI H, LEE H, HWANG J, et al. Mercury speciation and distribution in a 660-megawatt utility boiler in Taiwan firing bituminous coals[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2010, 60(5):514-522.
[16] WU C, CAO Y, DONG Z, et al. Evaluation of mercury speciation and removal through air pollution control devices of a 190 MW boiler[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China, 2010, 22(2):277-282.
[17] XU W, WANG H, ZHOU X, et al. CuO/TiO₂ catalysts for gas-phase Hg⁰ catalytic oxidation[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2014, 243:380-385.
[18] LI H, ZHU L, WU S, et al. Synergy of CuO and CeO₂ combination for mercury oxidation under low-temperature selective catalytic reduction atmosphere[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2017, 170:69-76.
[19] WANG T, LI C, ZHAO L, et al. The catalytic performance and characterization of ZrO₂ support modification on CuO-CeO₂/TiO₂ catalyst for the simultaneous removal of Hg⁰ and NO[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 400:227-237.
[20] CHI G, SHEN B, YU R, et al. Simultaneous removal of NO and Hg⁰ over Ce-Cu modified V₂O₅/TiO₂ based commercial SCR catalysts[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 330:83-92.
[21] LI H, WU S, WU C, et al. SCR Atmosphere induced reduction of oxidized mercury over CuO-CeO₂/TiO₂ catalyst[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(12):7373-7379.
[22] LI H, WU S, LI L, et al. CuO-CeO₂/TiO₂ catalyst for simultaneous NO reduction and Hg⁰ oxidation at low temperatures[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2015, 5(12):5129-5138.
[23] SHAN W, LIU F, HE H, et al. A superior Ce-W-Ti mixed oxide catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NO_x with NH₃[J]. Applied Catalysis B:Environmental, 2012, 115:100-106.
[24] YANG Y, LIU J, ZHANG B, et al. Experimental and theoretical studies of mercury oxidation over CeO₂-WO₃/TiO₂ catalysts in coal-fired flue gas[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 317:758-765.
[25] LI H, LI Y, WU C, et al. Oxidation and capture of elemental mercury over SiO₂-TiO₂-V₂O₅ catalysts in simulated low-rank coal combustion flue gas[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 169(1/2/3):186-193.
[26] CHEN C, JIA W, LIU S, et al. The enhancement of CuO modified V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ based SCR catalyst for Hg⁰ oxidation in simulated flue gas[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 436:1022-1029.
[27] YAMAGUCHI A, AKIHO H, ITO S. Mercury oxidation by copper oxides in combustion flue gases[J]. Powder Technology, 2008, 180(1/2):222-226.
[28] CHEN C, JIA W, LIU S, et al. Simultaneous NO removal and Hg⁰ oxidation over CuO doped V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalysts in simulated coal-fired flue gas[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2018, 32(6):7025-7034.
[29] ZHANG X, LI C, ZHAO L, et al. Simultaneous removal of elemental mercury and NO from flue gas by V₂O₅-CeO₂/TiO₂ catalysts[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 347:392-400.
[30] CHEN C, JIA W, LIU S, et al. Catalytic performance of CuCl₂-modified V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalyst for Hg⁰ oxidation in simulated flue gas[J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 35(3):637-644.
[31] LEE W, BAE G. Removal of elemental mercury (Hg⁰) by nanosized V₂O₅/TiO₂ catalysts[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(5):1522-1527.
[32] PRESTO A A, GRANITE E J. Survey of catalysts for oxidation of mercury in flue gas[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(18):5601-5609.
[33] LI Y, MURPHY P D, WU C, et al. Development of silica/vanadia/titania catalysts for removal of elemental mercury from coal-combustion flue gas[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(14):5304-5309.
[34] LI H, WU C, LI Y, et al. Impact of SO₂ on elemental mercury oxidation over CeO₂-TiO₂ catalyst[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 219:319-326.
[35] LI H, WU C, LI Y, et al. Role of flue gas components in mercury oxidation over TiO₂ supported MnO_x-CeO₂ mixed-oxide at low temperature[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2012, 243:117-123.
[36] ZHANG X, LI Z, WANG J, et al. Reaction mechanism for the influence of SO₂ on Hg⁰ adsorption and oxidation with Ce_0.1-Zr-MnO₂[J]. Fuel, 2017, 203:308-315.
[37] ZHAO L, LI C, ZHANG J, et al. Promotional effect of CeO₂ modified support on V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalyst for elemental mercury oxidation in simulated coal-fired flue gas[J]. Fuel, 2015, 153:361-369.
[38] CHEN C, JIA W, LIU S, et al. Mechanism of Hg⁰ oxidation in the presence of HCl over a CuCl₂-modified SCR catalyst[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2018, 53(14):10001-10012.
[39] KIM M H, HAM S, LEE J. Oxidation of gaseous elemental mercury by hydrochloric acid over CuCl₂/TiO₂-based catalysts in SCR process[J]. Applied Catalysis B:Environmental, 2010, 99(1/2):272-278.
[40] ZHOU J, HOU W, QI P, et al. CeO₂-TiO₂ sorbents for the removal of elemental mercury from syngas[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(17):10056-10062.
[41] FANG J, BI X, SI D, et al. Spectroscopic studies of interfacial structures of CeO₂-TiO₂ mixed oxides[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2007, 253(22):8952-8961.
[42] HUANG W, XU H, QU Z, et al. Significance of Fe₂O₃ modified SCR catalyst for gas-phase elemental mercury oxidation in coal-fired flue gas[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 149:23-28.
[43] WANG P, SU S, XIANG J, et al. Catalytic oxidation of Hg⁰ by MnO_x-CeO₂/gamma-Al₂O₃ catalyst at low temperatures[J]. Chemosphere, 2014, 101:49-54.
[44] QIAN K, QIAN Z, HUA Q, et al. Structure-activity relationship of CuO/MnO₂ catalysts in CO oxidation[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2013, 273:357-363.
[45] ZHANG Q, XU L, NING P, et al. Surface characterization studies of CuO-CeO₂-ZrO₂ catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH₃[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2014, 317:955-961.
[46] SI Z, WENG D, WU X, et al. Synergistic effects between copper and tungsten on the structural and acidic properties of CuO_x/WO_x-ZrO₂ catalyst[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2011, 1(3):453-461.
[47] BIESINGER M C, LAU L W M, GERSON A R, et al. Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides:Sc, Ti, V, Cu and Zn[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2010, 257(3):887-898.

CuO-WO₃/TiO₂催化氧化燃煤烟气中Hg⁰试验研究

Catalytic Oxidation of Elemental Mercury over CuO-WO₃/TiO₂ in Simulated Coal-fired Flue Gas

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	齐萌, 赵毅. 催化氧化法脱除燃煤烟气中的单质汞[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(3): 147-153,166.
[2]	陶君, 谷小兵, 黄天放, 柳帅, 胡鹏, 董璐, 黄亚继, 段钰锋. 燃煤烟气组分对喷射稻壳活性炭脱汞的影响[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(10): 150-154,184.
[3]	赵莉, 刘宇, 吴洋文, 庄柯, 陆强. 燃煤烟气中零价汞的催化氧化理论研究进展[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(3): 170-176.
[4]	高智溥, 胡冬, 张志刚, 郭婷婷, 王海刚, 陈坤洋. 碱性吸附剂脱除SO₃技术在大型燃煤机组中的应用[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(7): 102-108.
[5]	何石鱼，赵会民，刘长东，胡晨晖. 燃煤汞污染控制研究进展[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(2): 170-175.

模态框（Modal）标题