中国电力 ›› 2024, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (7): 132-142.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202306087
郭亮1(), 屈新宇2(
), 王晓卫2(
), 王毅钊3, 田影2, 张帆2
收稿日期:
2023-06-25
接受日期:
2023-12-26
出版日期:
2024-07-28
发布日期:
2024-07-23
作者简介:
郭亮(1986—),男,硕士,高级工程师,从事配电网继电保护研究,E-mail:guoliangxinyu@126.com基金资助:
Liang GUO1(), Xinyu QU2(
), Xiaowei WANG2(
), Yizhao WANG3, Ying TIAN2, Fan ZHANG2
Received:
2023-06-25
Accepted:
2023-12-26
Online:
2024-07-28
Published:
2024-07-23
Supported by:
摘要:
针对配电网在电压过零点和高阻故障时刻选线不准确的问题,提出一种适用于谐振接地系统单相接地故障的选线新方法,利用优化后的变分模态分解对各馈线零序功率进行处理,遴选出与原始零序功率相关强度最高的本征模态函数IMF(k),将IMF(k)转换为JPG格式的二维图像,再利用Hough变换检测技术,得到故障起始阶段IMF(k)的拟合直线及夹角;对各支路模态量拟合直线夹角进行比对处理,将最小综合相关系数值对应的馈线确定为故障馈线;仿真结果表明:该方法不受接地电阻、故障相角、噪声干扰、数据缺失等因素的影响,验证了所提方法的有效性。
郭亮, 屈新宇, 王晓卫, 王毅钊, 田影, 张帆. 基于改进Hough变换的消弧线圈接地配电网故障选线新方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(7): 132-142.
Liang GUO, Xinyu QU, Xiaowei WANG, Yizhao WANG, Ying TIAN, Fan ZHANG. A Novel Fault Feeder Selection Method for Resonant Grounding Distribution Networks Based on Improved Hough Transform[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57(7): 132-142.
馈线类型 | 相序 | R/(Ω·km–1) | C/(μF·km–1) | L/(mH·km–1) | ||||
架空线 | 正序 | 0.170 0 | 0.009 7 | 1.210 0 | ||||
零序 | 0.230 0 | 0.008 0 | 5.478 0 | |||||
电缆 | 正序 | 0.270 0 | 0.339 0 | 0.255 0 | ||||
零序 | 2.700 0 | 0.280 0 | 1.019 0 | |||||
DG变 | 正序漏抗为0.025 00 p.u. | 额定功率为2 MV·A |
表 1 配电网模型馈线参数
Table 1 Distribution network model feeder parameters
馈线类型 | 相序 | R/(Ω·km–1) | C/(μF·km–1) | L/(mH·km–1) | ||||
架空线 | 正序 | 0.170 0 | 0.009 7 | 1.210 0 | ||||
零序 | 0.230 0 | 0.008 0 | 5.478 0 | |||||
电缆 | 正序 | 0.270 0 | 0.339 0 | 0.255 0 | ||||
零序 | 2.700 0 | 0.280 0 | 1.019 0 | |||||
DG变 | 正序漏抗为0.025 00 p.u. | 额定功率为2 MV·A |
故障馈线 | 故障位置D/km | 选线判据 | 最小值 | 结果 | ||||
L1 | 10 | [–0.10 0.60 0.63 0.66] | –0.10 | L1 | ||||
L3 | 6 | [0.92 0.89 0.72 0.89] | 0.72 | L3 | ||||
L4 | 5 | [0.50 0.20 0.43 –0.29] | –0.29 | L4 |
表 2 弧光高阻故障时的选线结果
Table 2 Feeder selection results in case of arc high impedance fault
故障馈线 | 故障位置D/km | 选线判据 | 最小值 | 结果 | ||||
L1 | 10 | [–0.10 0.60 0.63 0.66] | –0.10 | L1 | ||||
L3 | 6 | [0.92 0.89 0.72 0.89] | 0.72 | L3 | ||||
L4 | 5 | [0.50 0.20 0.43 –0.29] | –0.29 | L4 |
故障 馈线 | 故障 位置 D/km | 初相 角β/(°) | SNR/ dB | Rg/Ω | 故障发生 时间点 t/s | 选线判据 | 最小值 | 结果 | ||||||||
L1 | 10 | 90 | — | 10 | 0.1 | [0.89 0.96 0.96 0.97] | 0.89 | L1 | ||||||||
500 | [0.22 0.75 0.74 0.74] | 0.22 | L1 | |||||||||||||
1000 | [–0.02 0.66 0.66 0.66] | –0.02 | L1 | |||||||||||||
L3 | 6 | 0 | — | 10 | 0.1 | [0.49 0.38 –0.48 0.35] | –0.48 | L3 | ||||||||
500 | [0.34 0.34 –0.98 0.34] | –0.98 | L3 | |||||||||||||
90 | — | 10 | 0.1 | [0.90 0.87 0.71 0.81] | 0.71 | L3 | ||||||||||
500 | [0.47 0.60 0.09 0.93] | 0.09 | L3 | |||||||||||||
60 | 10 | 10 | 0.1 | [0.90 0.86 0.65 0.87] | 0.65 | L3 | ||||||||||
1000 | [0.53 0.62 –0.20 0.44] | –0.20 | L3 | |||||||||||||
2000 | [0.39 0.43 –0.60 0.49] | –0.60 | L3 | |||||||||||||
L4 | 5 | 60 | — | 10 | 电压过 零点 | [0.38 0.38 0.39 –0.84] | –0.84 | L4 | ||||||||
1000 | [0.83 0.83 0.83 0.49] | 0.49 | L4 | |||||||||||||
2000 | [0.88 0.87 0.88 0.62] | 0.62 | L4 |
表 3 工况变化时的选线结果
Table 3 Feeder selection results in case of different conditions
故障 馈线 | 故障 位置 D/km | 初相 角β/(°) | SNR/ dB | Rg/Ω | 故障发生 时间点 t/s | 选线判据 | 最小值 | 结果 | ||||||||
L1 | 10 | 90 | — | 10 | 0.1 | [0.89 0.96 0.96 0.97] | 0.89 | L1 | ||||||||
500 | [0.22 0.75 0.74 0.74] | 0.22 | L1 | |||||||||||||
1000 | [–0.02 0.66 0.66 0.66] | –0.02 | L1 | |||||||||||||
L3 | 6 | 0 | — | 10 | 0.1 | [0.49 0.38 –0.48 0.35] | –0.48 | L3 | ||||||||
500 | [0.34 0.34 –0.98 0.34] | –0.98 | L3 | |||||||||||||
90 | — | 10 | 0.1 | [0.90 0.87 0.71 0.81] | 0.71 | L3 | ||||||||||
500 | [0.47 0.60 0.09 0.93] | 0.09 | L3 | |||||||||||||
60 | 10 | 10 | 0.1 | [0.90 0.86 0.65 0.87] | 0.65 | L3 | ||||||||||
1000 | [0.53 0.62 –0.20 0.44] | –0.20 | L3 | |||||||||||||
2000 | [0.39 0.43 –0.60 0.49] | –0.60 | L3 | |||||||||||||
L4 | 5 | 60 | — | 10 | 电压过 零点 | [0.38 0.38 0.39 –0.84] | –0.84 | L4 | ||||||||
1000 | [0.83 0.83 0.83 0.49] | 0.49 | L4 | |||||||||||||
2000 | [0.88 0.87 0.88 0.62] | 0.62 | L4 |
故障 馈线 | 故障位置 D/km | 数据缺失 | Rg/Ω | 选线判据 | ||||
L1 | 10 | L1、L2缺失20% L3、L4缺失20% | 1000 | [0.39 0.55 0.58 0.66] | ||||
L1、L2缺失30% L3、L4缺失20% | 5000 | [0.24 0.61 0.73 0.58] | ||||||
L3 | 6 | L1、L2缺失20% L3、L4缺失30% | 1000 | [0.39 0.55 0.08 0.66] | ||||
L1、L2缺失10% L3、L4缺失5% | 5000 | [0.50 0.51 0.07 0.94] | ||||||
L4 | 5 | L1、L3缺失10% L2、L4缺失5% | 1000 | [0.69 0.67 0.72 0.08] | ||||
L1、L3缺失20% L2、L4缺失20% | 5000 | [0.49 0.51 0.44 –0.53] |
表 4 数据缺失变化时的选线结果
Table 4 Feeder selection results in case of different missing data
故障 馈线 | 故障位置 D/km | 数据缺失 | Rg/Ω | 选线判据 | ||||
L1 | 10 | L1、L2缺失20% L3、L4缺失20% | 1000 | [0.39 0.55 0.58 0.66] | ||||
L1、L2缺失30% L3、L4缺失20% | 5000 | [0.24 0.61 0.73 0.58] | ||||||
L3 | 6 | L1、L2缺失20% L3、L4缺失30% | 1000 | [0.39 0.55 0.08 0.66] | ||||
L1、L2缺失10% L3、L4缺失5% | 5000 | [0.50 0.51 0.07 0.94] | ||||||
L4 | 5 | L1、L3缺失10% L2、L4缺失5% | 1000 | [0.69 0.67 0.72 0.08] | ||||
L1、L3缺失20% L2、L4缺失20% | 5000 | [0.49 0.51 0.44 –0.53] |
选线方法 | 数据缺失 | Rg/Ω | 选线判据 | 结果 | ||||
本文 | — | 10 | [1.22 1.23 1.24 1.03] | 正确 | ||||
1000 | [0.93 0.93 0.99 0.20] | 正确 | ||||||
各馈线缺失20% | 5000 | [0.63 0.59 0.62 0.21] | 正确 | |||||
文献[ | — | 10 | [–1 –1 –1 1] | 正确 | ||||
1000 | [–1 –1 –1 1] | 正确 | ||||||
各馈线缺失20% | 5000 | [–1 –1 –1 –1] | 错误 |
表 5 不同方法选线结果
Table 5 Feeder selection results of different methods
选线方法 | 数据缺失 | Rg/Ω | 选线判据 | 结果 | ||||
本文 | — | 10 | [1.22 1.23 1.24 1.03] | 正确 | ||||
1000 | [0.93 0.93 0.99 0.20] | 正确 | ||||||
各馈线缺失20% | 5000 | [0.63 0.59 0.62 0.21] | 正确 | |||||
文献[ | — | 10 | [–1 –1 –1 1] | 正确 | ||||
1000 | [–1 –1 –1 1] | 正确 | ||||||
各馈线缺失20% | 5000 | [–1 –1 –1 –1] | 错误 |
1 | 张国军, 张文周, 葛群, 等. 基于补偿参数的多零序电流互感器的小电流接地系统单相接地故障选线方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2021, 49 (2): 1- 9. |
ZHANG Guojun, ZHANG Wenzhou, GE Qun, et al. Single-phase ground fault line selection method of small current grounding system of multiple zero-sequence current transformer based on compensation parameters[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2021, 49 (2): 1- 9. | |
2 | 董俊, 李一凡, 束洪春, 等. 配电网馈出线路单相永久性接地故障性质辨识方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35 (21): 4576- 4585. |
DONG Jun, LI Yifan, SHU Hongchun, et al. Study on identification method of single phase permanent ground fault in distribution network feedout line[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35 (21): 4576- 4585. | |
3 | 王雪菲, 李京, 陈平, 等. 基于行波波形综合相似度比较的电缆故障选线[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50 (1): 51- 59. |
WANG Xuefei, LI Jing, CHEN Ping, et al. Cable fault line selection based on comprehensive similarity comparison of traveling wave waveforms[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50 (1): 51- 59. | |
4 |
YUAN J W, JIAO Z B. Faulty feeder detection based on image recognition of current waveform superposition in distribution networks[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2022, 130, 109663.
DOI |
5 | 高杰, 程启明, 程尹曼, 等. 基于量子遗传双稳态系统的配电网故障选线方法[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2018, 38 (5): 164- 170, 203. |
GAO Jie, CHENG Qiming, CHENG Yinman, et al. Faulty line selection method based on quantum genetic bistable system for distribution network[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2018, 38 (5): 164- 170, 203. | |
6 | 周宇, 汤涛, 曾祥君, 等. 基于零序电流幅值比倍增系数的灵活接地系统故障选线方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50 (23): 112- 120. |
ZHOU Yu, TANG Tao, ZENG Xiangjun, et al. Fault line detection method for a flexible grounding system based on a zero-sequence current amplitude ratio multiplication coefficient[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50 (23): 112- 120. | |
7 | 喻锟, 胥鹏博, 曾祥君, 等. 基于模糊测度融合诊断的配电网接地故障选线[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37 (3): 623- 633. |
YU Kun, XU Pengbo, ZENG Xiangjun, et al. Grounding fault line selection of distribution networks based on fuzzy measures integrated diagnosis[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37 (3): 623- 633. | |
8 |
WANG B, GENG J Z, DONG X Z. High-impedance fault detection based on nonlinear voltage–current characteristic profile identification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2018, 9 (4): 3783- 3791.
DOI |
9 | 刘映彤, 黄纯, 袁静泊, 等. 谐振接地系统两点同相接地故障暂态特征及选线[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55 (10): 62- 70. |
LIU Yingtong, HUANG Chun, YUAN Jingbo, et al. Transient characteristics and line selection of two-point grounding faults on same phase in resonant grounding system[J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55 (10): 62- 70. | |
10 | 朱乔木, 党杰, 陈金富, 等. 基于深度置信网络的电力系统暂态稳定评估方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38 (3): 735- 743. |
ZHU Qiaomu, DANG Jie, CHEN Jinfu, et al. A method for power system transient stability assessment based on deep belief networks[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38 (3): 735- 743. | |
11 |
刘谋海, 王媛媛, 曾祥君, 等. 基于暂态相电流特征分析的故障选线新方法[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2017, 29 (1): 30- 36.
DOI |
LIU Mouhai, WANG Yuanyuan, ZENG Xiangjun, et al. Novel method of fault line selection based on characteristic analysis of transient phase-current[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2017, 29 (1): 30- 36.
DOI |
|
12 | 魏科文, 张靖, 何宇, 等. 基于VMD和相关性聚类的谐振接地系统单相接地故障选线[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2021, 49 (22): 105- 113. |
WEI Kewen, ZHANG Jing, HE Yu, et al. Single-phase grounding fault line selection in a resonant grounding system based on VMD and correlation clustering[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2021, 49 (22): 105- 113. | |
13 | 汤涛, 周宇, 曾祥君, 等. 基于过渡电阻评估的灵活接地系统暂态故障选线方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2023, 47 (5): 171- 179. |
TANG Tao, ZHOU Yu, ZENG Xiangjun, et al. Transient fault line selection method for flexible grounded system based on transition resistance evaluation[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2023, 47 (5): 171- 179. | |
14 | 唐佳林, 王镇波, 张鑫鑫. 基于霍夫变换的直线检测技术[J]. 科技信息, 2011(14): 33, 35. |
15 |
滕今朝, 邱杰. 利用Hough变换实现直线的快速精确检测[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2008, 13 (2): 234- 237.
DOI |
TENG Jinzhao, QIU Jie. Fast and precise detection of straight line with Hough transform[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2008, 13 (2): 234- 237.
DOI |
|
16 |
束洪春, 高利, 段锐敏, 等. 利用零序电流全量Hough变换的配电网故障选线方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2013, 37 (9): 110- 116.
DOI |
SHU Hongchun, GAO Li, DUAN Ruimin, et al. A novel Hough transform approach of fault line selection in distribution networks using total zero-sequence current[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2013, 37 (9): 110- 116.
DOI |
|
17 | 李建蕊, 李永丽, 王伟康, 等. 基于零序电流与电压相位差变化的灵活接地系统故障选线方法[J]. 电网技术, 2021, 45 (12): 4847- 4855. |
LI Jianrui, LI Yongli, WANG Weikang, et al. Fault line detection method for flexible grounding system based on changes of phase difference between zero sequence current and voltage[J]. Power System Technology, 2021, 45 (12): 4847- 4855. | |
18 | 王晓卫, 刘伟博, 郭亮, 等. 基于不同时段内积投影的灵活接地系统高阻故障选线方法[J/OL]. 电工技术学报: 1–14[2023-06-19].https://doi.org/ 10.19595/ j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.221878. |
WANG Xiaowei, LIU Weibo, GUO Liang, et al. High impedance fault line selection method based on inner product projection of different time periods for flexible grounding systems[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 1–14[2023-06-19]. https: //doi.org/ 10.19595/ j.cnki.1000-6753. tces.221878. | |
19 | GUO M F, GAO J H, SHAO X, et al. Location of single-line-to-ground fault using 1-D convolutional neural network and waveform concatenation in resonant grounding distribution systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2020, 70, 3501009. |
20 | 邹豪, 曾祥君, 喻锟, 等. 基于零序电压调控的故障选线选相新方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2020, 48 (15): 69- 76. |
ZOU Hao, ZENG Xiangjun, YU Kun, et al. A new method of fault line selection and phase selection based on zero sequence voltage regulation[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2020, 48 (15): 69- 76. | |
21 | 薛永端, 刘珊, 王艳松, 等. 基于零序电压比率制动的小电阻接地系统接地保护[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2016, 40 (16): 112- 117. |
XUE Yongduan, LIU Shan, WANG Yansong, et al. Grounding fault protection in low resistance grounding system based on zero-sequence voltage ratio restraint[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2016, 40 (16): 112- 117. | |
22 | 徐丙垠, 李天友, 薛永端. 配电网触电保护与中性点接地方式[J]. 供用电, 2017, 34 (5): 21- 26. |
XU Bingyin, LI Tianyou, XUE Yongduan. Electric shock protection and earthing methods of distribution networks[J]. Distribution & Utilization, 2017, 34 (5): 21- 26. | |
23 | 邵文权, 程畅, 卫晓辉, 等. 利用暂态电流Hausdorff距离的谐振配电网故障选线方案[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50 (8): 33- 42. |
SHAO Wenquan, CHENG Chang, WEI Xiaohui, et al. Fault line selection scheme using the Hausdorff distance of transient current in resonant distribution networks[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50 (8): 33- 42. | |
24 | 王宾, 崔鑫, 董新洲. 配电线路弧光高阻故障检测技术综述[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40 (1): 96- 107, 377. |
WANG Bin, CUI Xin, DONG Xinzhou. Overview of arc high impedance grounding fault detection technologies in distribution system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020, 40 (1): 96- 107, 377. | |
25 | 秦苏亚, 薛永端, 刘砾钲, 等. 有源配电网小电流接地故障暂态特征及其影响分析[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37 (3): 655- 666. |
QIN Suya, XUE Yongduan, LIU Lizheng, et al. Transient characteristics and influence of small current grounding faults in active distribution network[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37 (3): 655- 666. |
[1] | 郑燃, 吴佳毅, 杜浩良, 潘武略. 基于零序电流TEO梯度能量的光伏场站集电线路故障选线方法[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(2): 147-153. |
[2] | 胡云鹏, 都成刚, 齐军, 郑日红, 阿敏夫, 张浩, 梁永亮. 基于D-S证据理论的配电网接地故障原因综合辨识模型[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(10): 133-142. |
[3] | 王晓卫, 岳阳, 郭亮, 王雪, 王毅钊, 张志华, 杨峰峰. 注入电流分布特性辨识的配电网故障选线方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(10): 78-89. |
[4] | 刘映彤, 黄纯, 袁静泊, 闫森. 谐振接地系统两点同相接地故障暂态特征及选线[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(10): 62-70. |
[5] | 贾思棋, 李军辉, 杜冬梅, 刘彬, 何青. 基于随机Hough变换的线路覆冰厚度图像识别技术[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(12): 39-45,53. |
[6] | 张琦雪, 王祥珩, 陈佳胜, 徐天乐, 李华忠, 王光, 陈俊. 组合型接地方式对注入式定子接地保护的影响[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(11): 96-103. |
[7] | 兀鹏越, 焦尚彬, 赵峰, 寇水潮, 师延金. 统调动力源系统单相接地故障选线研究[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(5): 39-45. |
[8] | 戴栩生,黄纯,叶倩,汪沨,董旭柱,冷崇富. 基于暂态相关性分析的小电流接地故障选线方法[J]. 中国电力, 2015, 48(1): 81-86. |
[9] | 陈昊, 王玉荣, 周永荣. 考虑线路参数非线性特征的零序电流增益分析[J]. 中国电力, 2014, 47(1): 35-38. |
[10] | 张志霞, 张欣雨. 配电网间歇性电弧接地故障选线方法[J]. 中国电力, 2013, 46(8): 108-111. |
[11] | 张杰, 毕贵红, 陈仕龙, 谢佳伟. 基于压缩感知理论的小电流接地故障选线法[J]. 中国电力, 2013, 46(12): 6-6. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||