特高压带电作业绝缘工具操作冲击放电特性及试验电极优化

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202203063

中国电力 ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (8): 143-150.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202203063

特高压带电作业绝缘工具操作冲击放电特性及试验电极优化

余光凯¹, 刘庭¹, 朱凯², 聂霖¹, 梁家凯²

1. 中国电力科学研究院有限公司电网环境保护国家重点实验室，湖北武汉 430074;
2. 国网浙江省电力公司金华供电公司，浙江金华 321000

收稿日期:2022-03-22 修回日期:2022-04-20 发布日期:2022-08-18
作者简介:余光凯（1991—），男，通信作者，工程师，从事输配电带电作业技术研究，E-mail：yarchergk@163.com;刘庭（1981—），男，高级工程师（教授级），从事带电作业及电力安全工器具研究，E-mail：cnliuting@qq.com
基金资助:
国家电网有限公司科技项目（特高压专用安全工器具研制和电力安全工器具过程管控及检测试验关键技术研究与应用，SGSDDKOOKJJS1700077）。

Switching Impulse Test of UHV Live Working Insulating Tool and Experimental Electrode Optimization

YU Guangkai¹, LIU Ting¹, ZHU Kai², NIE Lin¹, LIANG Jiakai²

1. China Electric Power Research Institute, State Key Laboratory of Power Grid Environmental Protection, Wuhan 430074, China;
2. State Grid Jinhua Power Supply Company, Jinhua 321000, China

Received:2022-03-22 Revised:2022-04-20 Published:2022-08-18
Supported by:
This work is supported by Science and Technology Project of SGCC (Development of UHV Special Safety Equipment and Research and Application of Key Technologies for Process Control and Testing of Electric Safety Equipment, No.SGSDDKOOKJJS1700077)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前检测机构对特高压带电作业绝缘工具开展操作冲击耐压试验时，电极布置仍沿用低电压等级标准，但试验电压和放电间距大大增加，经常出现绝缘工具间、试验电极对大地或周边构架等非试验通道放电的情况。开展了典型作业工况及试验工况下带电作业用绝缘工具标准波头操作冲击放电特性试验，并对试验工况下放电路径进行统计，提出了采用8分裂U型模拟导线的优化方案，并进行了试验验证，研究结果表明：采用8分裂U型模拟导线可显著降低非试验通道分散放电的概率；对多个试品同时进行试验时，由于存在空气间隙拉弧，试品挂接的水平间距建议不小于5 m；试验电极改进后绝缘杆6.3 m放电电压为2 417 kV，较标准电极增加6.9%，较典型作业工况下最低放电电压增加32.1%，进行绝缘工具耐压试验时建议根据作业工况的耐压要求对试验电压进行修正。

关键词: 特高压, 带电作业, 绝缘工具, 操作冲击, 放电特性试验, 电极优化

Abstract: At present, the electrode arrangement still follows the low voltage level standard when the UHV live-working insulating tools are tested for operation impulse withstand voltage. However, the test voltage and the discharge interval are greatly increased, and discharge often occurs in the non-test channels such as the interval between insulating tools, and the interval between test electrode and the earth or surrounding frames. For this reason, standard wave switching impulse tests are conducted on the insulating tools used for live-working under typical working conditions and test conditions, and the discharge paths under test conditions are counted. An optimization scheme of using 8-bundle U-shaped analog wires is proposed, and corresponding tests are conducted for verification. The results show that using the 8-bundle U-shaped analog wires can significantly reduce the probability of dispersive discharge in non-test channels. The horizontal spacing of the test specimens shall not be less than 5m due to the presence of air gap arcing. After the test electrode is improved, the discharge voltage of the 6.3-m-long insulating rod is 2417 kV, which is 6.9% higher than that of the standard electrode, 32.1% higher than the minimum discharge voltage under typical working conditions. When the insulating tools are tested for withstand voltage, it is recommended to correct the test voltage according to the withstand voltage requirements of the working conditions.

Key words: UHV, live working, insulating tool, switching impulse, discharge characteristics, electrode optimization

余光凯, 刘庭, 朱凯, 聂霖, 梁家凯. 特高压带电作业绝缘工具操作冲击放电特性及试验电极优化[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(8): 143-150.

YU Guangkai, LIU Ting, ZHU Kai, NIE Lin, LIANG Jiakai. Switching Impulse Test of UHV Live Working Insulating Tool and Experimental Electrode Optimization[J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55(8): 143-150.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202203063

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2022/V55/I8/143

参考文献

[1] 刘振亚. 中国特高压交流输电技术创新[J]. 电网技术, 2013, 37(3): 567–574
LIU Zhenya. Innovation of UHVAC transmission technology in China[J]. Power System Technology, 2013, 37(3): 567–574
[2] 刘振亚. 特高压交直流电网[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2013.
[3] 胡毅, 刘凯, 彭勇, 等. 带电作业关键技术研究进展与趋势[J]. 高电压技术, 2014, 40(7): 1921–1931
HU Yi, LIU Kai, PENG Yong, et al. Research status and development trend of live working key technology[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2014, 40(7): 1921–1931
[4] 胡毅, 刘凯, 刘庭, 等. 超/特高压交直流输电线路带电作业[J]. 高电压技术, 2012, 38(8): 1809–1820
HU Yi, LIU Kai, LIU Ting, et al. Live working on EHV/UHV transmission lines[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2012, 38(8): 1809–1820
[5] 王建明, 王震, 苏梓铭, 等. 10 kV与110 kV混压并架线路带电作业人员安全防护研究[J]. 陕西电力, 2013, 41(12): 83–88
WANG Jianming, WANG Zhen, SU Ziming, et al. Security protection of live-working on 10 kV and 110 kV mixedvoltage transmission lines on the same tower[J]. Shaanxi Electric Power, 2013, 41(12): 83–88
[6] 易辉. 我国带电作业用绝缘杆材的现状与前景[J]. 高电压技术, 2001, 27(4): 57–58
YI Hui. Current status and prospects of insulating poles for live working in China[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2001, 27(4): 57–58
[7] GHASSEMI M, FARZANEH M, CHISHOLM W A. Three-dimensional FEM electrical field calculation for FRP hot stick during EHV live-line work[J]. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 2014, 21(6): 2531–2540.
[8] 朱凯, 方玉群, 余光凯. 特高压带电作业绝缘工器具试验电压优化及安全裕度[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(7): 132–140
ZHU Kai, FANG Yuqun, YU Guangkai. Test voltage optimization and safety margin of insulation tools for live working of UHV AC transmission lines[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(7): 132–140
[9] 雷兴列, 程登峰, 操松元, 等. ±1 100 kV接地极线路带电作业绝缘工具最小有效绝缘长度[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(4): 117–122
LEI Xinglie, CHENG Dengfeng, CAO Songyuan, et al. The minimum effective insulation length of insulating tools for live working on ±1 100 kV grounding electrode lines[J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55(4): 117–122
[10] LANINGA J, AMER M, SWATEK D R, et al. HVDC flashover performance of fibreglass reinforced (FRP) hot sticks considering space charges[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomenon. Fort Worth, TX, USA. IEEE, 2017: 609–612.
[11] MCDERMID W, SWATEK D R. Experience with dielectric surfaces of FRP tools used in live line work[J]. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 2014, 21(6): 2415–2427.
[12] 国家能源局. 带电作业用绝缘工具试验导则: DL/T 878—2021[S]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2021.
[13] 林海丹, 刘熊, 梁义明, 等. 绝缘材料沿面闪络发展特性的研究进展[J]. 绝缘材料, 2015, 48(7): 1–8
LIN Haidan, LIU Xiong, LIANG Yiming, et al. Research progress in surface flashover development characteristic of insulating materials[J]. Insulating Materials, 2015, 48(7): 1–8
[14] 司马文霞, 刘春香, 杨鸣, 等. 沿绝缘介质表面的气体放电等离子体模型[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2017, 37(9): 2725–2734
SIMA Wenxia, LIU Chunxiang, YANG Ming, et al. Plasma model of gas discharge along the dielectric surface[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2017, 37(9): 2725–2734
[15] 孟晓波, 梅红伟, 陈昌龙, 等. 气压与湿度对绝缘介质表面流注发展特性影响的试验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2014, 34(12): 1938–1947
MENG Xiaobo, MEI Hongwei, CHEN Changlong, et al. Experimental research on influences of air pressure and humidity on characteristics of streamer propagation along insulation surfaces[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2014, 34(12): 1938–1947
[16] IEEE Power & Energy Society. IEEE guide for maintenance methods on energized power lines: IEEE Std 516—2009 [S]. 2009.
[17] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 高电压试验技术第1部分: 一般定义及试验要求: GB/T 16927.1—2011[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2012.
[18] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 带电作业用绝缘绳索: GB/T 13035—2008[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009.
[19] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 带电作业用空心绝缘管、泡沫填充绝缘管和实心绝缘棒: GB 13398—2008[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010.
[20] Insulation co-ordination Part 2: Application guidelines: IEC 60071-2 [S]. 2018.
[21] Live working – Minimum approach distances for AC systems in the voltage range 72.5 kV to 800 kV – A method of calculation: IEC 61472 [S]. 2013.
[22] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 绝缘配合第2部分: 使用导则: GB/T 311.2—2013[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013.

特高压带电作业绝缘工具操作冲击放电特性及试验电极优化

Switching Impulse Test of UHV Live Working Insulating Tool and Experimental Electrode Optimization

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王硕, 霍慧娟, 徐丹, 郄鑫, 辛诚, 李薇薇, 段婧. 计及特高压交流工程建设的区域碳减排测算及分摊[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(7): 163-172.
[2]	何永胜, 罗丹, 鲁宗相. 特高压阀侧套管数字孪生系统集成设计方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(6): 165-173.
[3]	梁双, 王涉, 徐辉. 中国西电东送40年发展成效与政策建议[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(11): 88-93.
[4]	于琳琳, 严格, 晏昕童, 毛玉宾, 陈姝彧, 李甜甜, 文云峰. 考虑电网支撑能力约束的直流落点及定容优化规划[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(8): 175-185.
[5]	黄书民, 蒋林高, 李志川, 杨光绪, 宋福根. 基于PSO寻优与DBN神经网络的电晕损耗预测[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(6): 95-102,214.
[6]	王胜辉, 王玺铭, 董兴浩, 周军. 特高压直流输电线路极间搭接塑料薄膜的放电模拟试验[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(6): 103-110.
[7]	马爱清, 王洁, 毕永翔. 500 kV交流线路对并行±800 kV直流线路带电作业人员安全防护的影响[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(6): 128-136.
[8]	赵会茹, 赵一航, 王路瑶, 冯凯鑫, 李兵抗, 郭森. 基于贝叶斯最优最劣和改进物元可拓的特高压输电工程综合效益评价[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(6): 161-171.
[9]	杨建华, 肖达强, 张伟, 余明琼, 易本顺. 基于改进RBFNN的1 000 kV特高压线损预测[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 122-127,142.
[10]	雷兴列, 程登峰, 操松元, 彭勇, 夏令志. ±1100 kV接地极线路带电作业绝缘工具最小有效绝缘长度[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(4): 117-122.
[11]	郭小龙, 张江飞, 亢朋朋, 杨桂兴, 孙谊媊, 袁铁江, 刘勇. 含基于PI控制受端二次调频的特高压直流虚拟同步控制策略[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 66-72.
[12]	王容, 史嘉昭, 郭璨, 申巍, 马西奎. 基于CVT的特高压换流站复杂电磁环境下操作过电压测量[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(10): 92-99.
[13]	雷霄, 孙栩, 王薇薇, 刘琳, 李新年, 庞广恒. 多馈入系统直流间耦合程度量化表征方法[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(9): 66-73.
[14]	伍凌云, 何笠, 肖雄, 谈超, 陈钢, 周林. 直流系统附加频率控制器对AGC系统控制影响分析[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(8): 68-74.
[15]	袁博, 王颖, 邵华, 张倩茅, 秦梁栋, 刘宁宁, 戴志辉. 抑制特高压直流系统连续换相失败的非线性动态电流偏差控制[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(8): 75-82.

模态框（Modal）标题

特高压带电作业绝缘工具操作冲击放电特性及试验电极优化

Switching Impulse Test of UHV Live Working Insulating Tool and Experimental Electrode Optimization

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics