多馈入系统直流间耦合程度量化表征方法

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202006134

中国电力 ›› 2021, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (9): 66-73.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202006134

多馈入系统直流间耦合程度量化表征方法

雷霄, 孙栩, 王薇薇, 刘琳, 李新年, 庞广恒

中国电力科学研究院有限公司，北京 100192

收稿日期:2020-06-09 修回日期:2020-10-09 发布日期:2021-09-14
作者简介:雷霄(1985-),男,通信作者,硕士,高级工程师,从事特高压直流输电技术与大电网仿真分析研究,E-mail:leixiao@epri.sgcc.com.cn;孙栩(1978-),男,博士,高级工程师,从事柔性直流输电技术与大电网仿真分析研究,E-mail:sunxu@epri.sgcc.com.cn;王薇薇(1986-),女,硕士,高级工程师,从事交直流大电网仿真技术研究,E-mail:wangweiwei@epri.sgcc.com.cn
基金资助:
国家电网公司科技项目(VSC/LCC直流并联混合多馈的近区电网动态功率协调控制研究)

A Characterization Method for Coupling Relation in Multi-Infeed HVDC System

LEI Xiao, SUN Xu, WANG Weiwei, LIU Lin, LI Xinnian, PANG Guangheng

China Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing 100192, China

Received:2020-06-09 Revised:2020-10-09 Published:2021-09-14
Supported by:
This work is supported by Science and Technology Project of SGCC (Research on Dynamic Power Coordinated Control of Near Field Power Grid Based on VSC/LCC DC Parallel Hybrid Multi-Feed System)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前多回超/特高压直流馈入华东电网，交直流系统之间交互作用及耦合复杂。为了量化表征多馈入直流间耦合程度，提出了多馈入直流系统的交流电压畸变耦合系数。通过计算一回直流内部故障引起其余直流逆变站换流母线交流电压的畸变程度，得到多直流间耦合系数。该耦合系数包含了直流输送容量对交流系统的影响、不同技术路线直流控制系统内部控制环节响应特性差异以及直流逆变站之间交流电网的阻抗特性等因素的综合评估。利用耦合系数提出耦合区域的概念，可用于评估多回直流同时换相失败的风险。以华东电网多馈入系统为例进行了仿真验证，结果表明所提出的耦合系数以及耦合区域表征形态与实际运行中的情况基本相符，该系数能为直流的规划和运行提供重要的技术参考。

关键词: 特高压直流, 换相失败, 直流间耦合, 多馈入

Abstract: At present, many HVDC/UHVDC projects are feeding into the East China Power Grid, and the interaction and coupling between AC and DC systems are complex. In order to characterize the coupling relation of multiple DC systems, an AC voltage distortion coupling coefficient of multi-infeed HVDC (ACDCC)is proposed. By calculating the bus AC voltage distortion of one inverter station caused by other HVDC system’s internal fault, the coupling coefficient of multiple DC systems is obtained, which covers an integrated assessment of such factors as the influence of DC transmission capacity on the AC system, the different response characteristics of HVDC control and protection system with different technical routes, and the AC system impedance characteristics between inverter stations. The concept of coupling area is put forward using coupling coefficient, which can be used to evaluate the simultaneous commutation failure risk of multi-infeed HVDC systems. A simulation verification is carried out on the multi-infeed system of East China Power Grid, and the results show that the proposed coupling coefficient and the characterization of coupling areas are basically consistent with the actual power system conditions. Therefore, the coupling coefficient can provide an important technical reference for the planning and operation of DC systems.

Key words: UHVDC, commutation failure, DC coupling, multi-infeed

雷霄, 孙栩, 王薇薇, 刘琳, 李新年, 庞广恒. 多馈入系统直流间耦合程度量化表征方法[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(9): 66-73.

LEI Xiao, SUN Xu, WANG Weiwei, LIU Lin, LI Xinnian, PANG Guangheng. A Characterization Method for Coupling Relation in Multi-Infeed HVDC System[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(9): 66-73.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202006134

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2021/V54/I9/66

参考文献

[1] 赵畹君. 高压直流输电工程技术[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2004.
[2] 李兴源. 高压直流输电系统的运行和控制[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998.
[3] 曾南超. 高压直流输电在我国电网发展中的作用[J]. 高电压技术, 2004, 30(11): 11-12
ZENG Nanchao. Role of HVDC transmission in the power system development in China[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2004, 30(11): 11-12
[4] 罗汉武, 乐健, 毛涛, 等. 扎鲁特—青州±800 kV特高压直流输电工程运行特性分析[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2019, 39(1): 53-59
LUO Hanwu, LE Jian, MAO Tao, et al. Analysis of operation characteristics of Zhalute-Qingzhou ±800 kV UHVDC system[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2019, 39(1): 53-59
[5] 沈郁, 熊永新, 姚伟, 等. ±1100 kV特高压直流输电受端接入方式的综合评估[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2018, 38(8): 195-202
SHEN Yu, XIONG Yongxin, YAO Wei, et al. Comprehensive evaluation for receiving end connection scheme of ±1100 kV UHVDC power transmission[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2018, 38(8): 195-202
[6] 王兵, 贾育培, 严剑峰, 等. 特高压交直流混联电网故障反演系统的体系架构与关键技术[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(6): 64-71
WANG Bing, JIA Yupei, YAN Jianfeng, et al. The architecture and key technologies of fault inversion system for hybrid UHV AC/DC power grid[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(6): 64-71
[7] CIGRE Working Group B4.41. Systems with multiple DC infeed[R]. Paris: CIGRE, 2008.
[8] DENIS L H A. Voltage and power interactions in multi-infeed HVDC systems (Draft)[EB/OL]. 2007. Research Report: DL/07/01 Rev.1.4. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.721.5198&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
[9] 林伟芳, 汤涌, 卜广全. 多馈入交直流系统短路比的定义和应用[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2008, 28(31): 1-8
LIN Weifang, TANG Yong, BU Guangquan. Definition and application of short circuit ratio for multi-infeed AC/DC power systems[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2008, 28(31): 1-8
[10] 张啸虎, 陈陈. 系统结构对多馈入直流系统短路比的影响[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38(16): 4777-4783, 4982
ZHANG Xiaohu, CHEN Chen. Influence of system structure on multi-infeed HVDC short circuit ratio[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38(16): 4777-4783, 4982
[11] 邵瑶, 汤涌. 多馈入直流系统交互作用因子的影响因素分析[J]. 电网技术, 2013, 37(3): 794-799
SHAO Yao, TANG Yong. Analysis of influencing factors of multi-infeed HVDC system interaction factor[J]. Power System Technology, 2013, 37(3): 794-799
[12] 郑超, 盛灿辉, 林俊杰, 等. 特高压直流输电系统动态响应对受端交流电网故障恢复特性的影响[J]. 高电压技术, 2013, 39(3): 555-561
ZHENG Chao, SHENG Canhui, LIN Junjie, et al. Influence of UHVDC transmission system dynamic response on AC receiving end's failure recovery characteristics[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2013, 39(3): 555-561
[13] 夏成军, 王真, 杜兆斌. 考虑直流系统控制方式的多馈入交互作用因子实用计算方法[J]. 电网技术, 2017, 41(11): 3532-3540
XIA Chengjun, WANG Zhen, DU Zhaobin. Practical calculation method for multi-infeed interaction factor considering HVDC system control modes[J]. Power System Technology, 2017, 41(11): 3532-3540
[14] 刘席洋, 王增平, 乔鑫, 等. 交直流混联电网换相失败分类及抑制措施研究综述[J]. 智慧电力, 2020, 48(6): 1-7,34
LIU Xiyang, WANG Zengping, QIAO Xin, et al. Review on classification and mitigation measures of commutation failures in AC-DC hybrid power grids[J]. Smart Power, 2020, 48(6): 1-7,34
[15] 袁阳, 卫志农, 雷霄, 等. 直流输电系统换相失败研究综述[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2013, 33(11): 140-147
YUAN Yang, WEI Zhinong, LEI Xiao, et al. Survey of commutation failures in DC transmission systems[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2013, 33(11): 140-147
[16] 张正卫, 陈得治, 卜广全, 等. 多直流馈入的特高压环网安全稳定控制措施研究[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2019, 47(19): 46-53
ZHANG Zhengwei, CHEN Dezhi, BU Guangquan, et al. Research on safety and stability control measures of UHV loop network with multiple DC feeding[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2019, 47(19): 46-53
[17] 张彦涛, 邱丽萍, 施浩波, 等. 考虑不对称故障影响的多馈入直流系统换相失败快速判别方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38(16): 4759-4767, 4980
ZHANG Yantao, QIU Liping, SHI Haobo, et al. Fast detection method of commutation failure in multi infeed DC system considering the effect of unbalanced fault[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38(16): 4759-4767, 4980
[18] 雷霄, 许自强, 王华伟, 等. ±800 kV特高压直流输电工程实际控制保护系统仿真建模方法与应用[J]. 电网技术, 2013, 37(5): 1359-1364
LEI Xiao, XU Ziqiang, WANG Huawei, et al. A modeling method for actual control and protection system of ±800 kV UHVDC transmission project and its application[J]. Power System Technology, 2013, 37(5): 1359-1364
[19] 郑超, 周静敏, 李惠玲, 等. 换相失败预测控制对电压稳定性影响及优化措施[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2016, 40(12): 179-183
ZHENG Chao, ZHOU Jingmin, LI Huiling, et al. Impact of commutation failure prediction control on voltage stability and its optimization measures[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2016, 40(12): 179-183
[20] 王玉, 侯玉强, 刘福锁, 等. 考虑多直流协调恢复的换相失败预测控制启动值优化方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2018, 42(22): 85-90, 158
WANG Yu, HOU Yuqiang, LIU Fusuo, et al. Optimization method for startup threshold of commutation failure prediction control considering coordinated recovery of multi-infeed HVDC systems[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2018, 42(22): 85-90, 158

多馈入系统直流间耦合程度量化表征方法

A Characterization Method for Coupling Relation in Multi-Infeed HVDC System

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	于琳琳, 严格, 晏昕童, 毛玉宾, 陈姝彧, 李甜甜, 文云峰. 考虑电网支撑能力约束的直流落点及定容优化规划[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(8): 175-185.
[2]	梁伟, 吴林林, 赖启平, 李东晟, 徐曼, 沈沉. 风电直流送出系统送端交流故障下风机过电压研究[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(4): 28-37.
[3]	郭小龙, 张江飞, 亢朋朋, 杨桂兴, 孙谊媊, 袁铁江, 刘勇. 含基于PI控制受端二次调频的特高压直流虚拟同步控制策略[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 66-72.
[4]	黄志光, 曹路, 李建华, 张君黎, 王国腾, 徐政. 混合多馈入直流作用下江苏受端电网安全稳定性评估及改善[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(9): 55-65.
[5]	伍凌云, 何笠, 肖雄, 谈超, 陈钢, 周林. 直流系统附加频率控制器对AGC系统控制影响分析[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(8): 68-74.
[6]	袁博, 王颖, 邵华, 张倩茅, 秦梁栋, 刘宁宁, 戴志辉. 抑制特高压直流系统连续换相失败的非线性动态电流偏差控制[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(8): 75-82.
[7]	武建卫, 邵剑峰. 计及波速变化的反行波直流输电线路故障测距方法[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(5): 121-128.
[8]	马江江, 齐磊, 朱毅. ±1100 kV特高压直流换流站PCOV计算及影响因素分析[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(10): 63-71.
[9]	唐耀华, 郭为民, 崔杨. 水-火电机组频率控制策略研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(6): 153-160,178.
[10]	乔丽, 王航, 谢剑, 郭春义. 同步调相机对分层接入特高压直流输电系统的暂态过电压抑制作用研究[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(3): 43-51.
[11]	白帅涛, 陈得治, 马世英, 董清, 汤伟, 吉平, 杨铖, 蒋希凯. 多分层直流馈入的特高压环网开断运行特性及安控措施[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(10): 206-214.
[12]	李慧奇, 任红昕, 郭鑫, 刘承志, 张永奈, 刘大平. ±1 100 kV长距离直流输电线路接地线感应电流分布及拆除方案[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(7): 92-98.
[13]	周路遥, 李特, 王少华, 刘黎, 胡文堂, 周象贤. ±800 kV宾金线浙江段正负地闪多重回击特征分析[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(5): 113-118.
[14]	董存, 梁志峰, 礼晓飞, 王跃峰, 白婕, 王帅. 跨区特高压直流外送优化提升新能源消纳能力研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(4): 41-50.
[15]	雷前, 鲍伟, 瞿海妮, 许唐云. 多馈入直流系统无功补偿选址研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(3): 56-60.

模态框（Modal）标题

多馈入系统直流间耦合程度量化表征方法

A Characterization Method for Coupling Relation in Multi-Infeed HVDC System

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics